This is an outdated version published on 05-02-2025. Read the
most recent version.
Research Articles
Early Access
Impact of nitrogen and sulphur fertilizer rates on nitrogen uptake dynamics and nutrient use efficiency in wheat
Department of Agronomy, School of Agriculture, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara 144 411, India
Department of Agronomy, School of Agriculture, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara 144 411, India
Department of Entomology, School of Agriculture, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara 144 411, India
Department of Agronomy, School of Agriculture, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara 144 411, India
Department of Agronomy, School of Agriculture, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara 144 411, India
Department of Agronomy, School of Agriculture, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara 144 411, India
College of Agriculture Food and Wine, The University of Adelaide, Urbrrae, South Australia, Australia
Abstract
A field experiment was performed to assess the impact of nitrogen (N) and sulphur (S) fertilizer rates, along with their interactions, on nutrient uptake, content and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) in wheat at various growth stages. The study examined the effects of administering 40 kg N, 80 kg N, and 120 kg N alongside 0 kg S, 15 kg S, and 30 kg S on N and S uptake, as well as grain and shoot nutrient content during wheat ontogeny. Nitrogen uptake and concentration in wheat grain and shoots were significantly increased by 120 kg of N and 30 kg of S. At 120 kg N + 30 kg S, shoots (13.91, 34.80, 41.50 and 39.89 kg/ha) and grains (152.36 kg/ha) showed the highest uptake, with the lowest recorded in the control. Sulphur uptake followed a similar pattern, peaking at 120 kg N + 30 kg S (3.17, 6.91, and 8.36 kg/ha) in the shoots. This treatment had the highest S levels in shoots (0.67%, 0.44%, and 0.34%) and grain (0.288%) compared to the control group. The 120 kg N + 30 kg S treatment had the highest NUE and sulphur use efficiency (SUE) (91.31% and 84.10%, respectively), while the 40 kg N + 0 kg S and 40 kg N + 15 kg S treatments recorded the lowest values (53.14% and 11.03%). Nitrogen production efficiency peaked at 21.187 kg yield/kg N at 120 kg N and 0 kg S, but S production efficiency decreased with higher S levels. Balancing N and S improved nutrient absorption, content, and utilization efficiency in the wheat production system.
References
- Ishfaq M, Wang Y, Xu J, Hassan MU, Yuan H, Liu L, et al. Improvement of nutritional quality of food crops with fertilizer: A global meta-analysis. Agron Sustain Dev. 2023;43(6):74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-023-00923-7
- Noulas C, Torabian S, Qin R. Crop nutrient requirements and advanced fertilizer management strategies. Agron J. 2023;13(8):2017. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13082017
- Schulte-Uebbing LF, Beusen AH, Bouwman AF, De Vries W. From planetary to regional boundaries for agricultural nitrogen pollution. Nature. 2022;610(7932):507-12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05158-2
- Liu Z, Liu D, Fu X, Du X, Zhang Y, Zhen W, et al. Integrated transcriptomic and metabolomic analyses revealed the regulatory mechanism of sulfur application in grain yield and protein content in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:935516. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.935516
- Haider G, Farooq MA, Shah T, Malghani S, Awan MI, Habib-ur-Rahman M, et al. Cereal responses to nutrients and avenues for improving nutrient use efficiency in Cereal Crops. CRC Press; 2023. p.79-106. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003250845-5
- Ibn RA, Ghosh UK, Hossain MS, Mahmud A, Saha AK, Rahman MM, et al. Enhancing nitrogen use efficiency in cereal crops: From agronomy to genomic perspectives. Cereal Res Commun. 2024;17:1-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42976-024-00515-5
- De Oliveira Silva A, Jaenisch BR, Ciampitti IA, Lollato RP. Wheat nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and sulfur uptake dynamics under different management practices. Agron J. 2021;113(3):2752-69. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20637
- Piper CS. Soils and plant analysis. Hans Publishers Bombay; 1966.
- Jackson ML. Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall of Indica, New Delhi. 1967; p.144-97.
- Keeney DR, Nelson DW. Nitrogen—inorganic forms. Methods of soil analysis: Part 2 chemical and microbiological properties;1982.9:643-98. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.2ed.c33
- Bremner JM, Banwart WL. Sorption of sulfur gases by soils. Soil Biol Biochem. 1976;8(2):79-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(76)90068-7
- Barton MJ, Hanson RG, Simms PM, Smith JK. Sulphur fertilizer effect on cotton: II. Growth characteristics, nutrient status and yield. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 1982;13(10):835-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103628209367314
- Grzebisz W, Zielewicz W, Przygocka-Cyna K. Deficiencies of secondary nutrients in crop plants—A real challenge to improve nitrogen management. Agron J. 2022;13(1):66. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13010066
- Melash AA, Bogale AA, Bytyqi B, Nyandi MS, Ábrahám ÉB. Nutrient management: As a panacea to improve the caryopsis quality and yield potential of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L.) under the changing climatic conditions. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1232675. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1232675
- Rawal N, Pande KR, Shrestha R, Vista SP. Nutrient concentration and its uptake in various stages of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) as influenced by nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilization. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 2023;54(8):1151-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2022.2138904
- Kulczycki G. The effect of elemental sulfur fertilization on plant yields and soil properties. Agronomy. 2021;167:105-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2020.12.003
- Meselhy GA, Sharma S, Guo Z, Singh G, Yuan H, Tripathi RD, et al. Nanoscale sulfur improves plant growth and reduces arsenic toxicity and accumulation in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Environ Sci Technol. 2021;55(20):13490-503. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c05495
- Saquee FS, Diakite S, Kavhiza NJ, Pakina E, Zargar M. The efficacy of micronutrient fertilizers on the yield formulation and quality of wheat grains. Agron. 2023;13(2):566. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13020566
- Albahri G, Alyamani AA, Badran A, Hijazi A, Nasser M, Maresca M, et al. Enhancing essential grains yield for sustainable food security and bio-safe agriculture through latest innovative approaches. Agron. 2023;13(7):1709. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13071709
- Lyu X, Liu Y, Li N, Ku L, Hou Y, Wen X. Foliar applications of various nitrogen (N) forms to winter wheat affect grain protein accumulation and quality via N metabolism and remobilization. Crop J. 2022;10(4):1165-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2021.10.009
- Liu Q, Li M, Ji X, Liu J, Wang F, Wei Y. Characteristics of grain yield, dry matter production and nitrogen uptake and transport of rice varieties with different grain protein content. Agron. 2022;12(11):2866. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12112866
- Ma Q, Qian Y, Yu Q, Cao Y, Tao R, Zhu M, et al. Controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer application mitigated N losses and modified microbial community while improving wheat yield and N use efficiency. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2023;349:108445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2023.108445
- Hu Y, Chen Y, Yang X, Deng L, Lu X. Enhancing soybean yield: The synergy of sulfur and rhizobia inoculation. Plants. 2023;12(22):3911. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12223911
- Yon H, Parihar CM, Mohammadi N, Jat SL, Meena BR, Patra K, et al. Impact of irrigation and nitrogen management on crop performance, yield and economics of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) in Kandahar region of Afghanistan. Indian J Agric Sci. 2024;94(1):100-03. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v94i1.123726
- Baber BM, Hashemi T, Durani A, Aryan S, Zahid T, Gulab G, et al. Effect of different nitrogen fertilizer rates on wheat yield under the arid and semi-arid climatic conditions of Nangarhar province. Nangarhar University Int J Biosci. 2024;3(02):9-14. https://doi.org/10.70436/nuijb.v3i02.315
- Mawlong I, Kumar MS, Premi OP, Kandpal BK, Gurung B, Mog B, et al. Understanding nitrogen allocation dynamics in Indian mustard: Insights from enzyme activity and ideotype analysis. Sci Hortic. 2024;338:113659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2024.113659
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.