Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. 2 (2025)

Multi-trait selection indices for identifying elite rice genotypes in rice breeding programs

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.6215
Submitted
21 November 2024
Published
08-03-2025 — Updated on 11-04-2025
Versions

Abstract

Rice (Oryza sativa L.) serves as a staple food for nearly half of the global population, with rising demand necessitating significant advancements in productivity. Traditional selection methods that focus solely on yield often fail to account for the complex interplay of agronomic and grain quality traits. The integration of multiple selection indices in breeding enhances efficiency by simultaneously evaluating important traits, aiding in informed decision-making, balancing desirable traits, and accelerating the development of high-performing varieties. This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of various multi-trait selection indices, namely the Multi-Trait GenotypeIdeotype Distance Index (MGIDI), Genotype by Yield and Trait biplot (GYT), Linear Phenotypic Selection Index (LPSI), and the Elston Index, in identifying elite rice genotypes for breeding programs. A total of 110 genetically diverse rice germplasm lines were evaluated using a randomized block design during the Rabi season of 2023–24. Key agronomic and grain quality traits were assessed, with statistical analyses, including ANOVA and correlation studies, conducted to interpret the result. Among the indices, MGIDI demonstrated the highest selection gains (16.9%) for yield, while other indices demonstrated variable efficiencies across different traits. Traits such as the number of grains per panicle and productive tillers exhibited positively correlations with yield, whereas negative selection for plant height and days to maturity posed challenges. Notably, genotypes BMDK-2-2-8-2, JR 13, A 67, and CR 4376-1-1-1-2-2-1 were consistently selected across indices, reflecting their superior trait performance across multiple traits. Combining several indices improves the breeding process by enabling the selection of genotypes with traits such as nutrient-use efficiency and drought tolerance, thereby improving rice yield under challenging conditions, such as lowfertility soils or drought stress. These findings highlight the importance of multi-trait indices in optimizing genetic gains and improving breeding efficiency. Notably, MGIDI emerged as the most effective tool, providing a comprehensive approach to integrating traits, making it indispensable for rice breeding programs.

References

  1. Yu Y, Xu X, Hu Y, Ding Y, Chen L. Indole-3-Acetic Acid (IAA) and sugar mediate endosperm development in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Rice. 2024;17(1):66. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12284-024-00745-5
  2. Hunter MC, Smith RG, Schipanski ME, Atwood LW, Mortensen DA. Agriculture in 2050: recalibrating targets for sustainable intensification. Bioscience. 2017;67(4):386–91. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix010
  3. Singh A, Sengar RS, Rajput VD, Minkina T, Singh RK. Zinc oxide nanoparticles improve salt tolerance in rice seedlings by improving physiological and biochemical indices. Agriculture. 2022;12(7):1014. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12071014
  4. Yadav GP, Kumar D, Dalbhagat CG, Mishra HN. A comprehensive review on instant rice: Preparation methodology, characterization and quality attributes. Food Chemistry Advances. 2023:100581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.focha.2023.100581
  5. Wei S, Li X, Lu Z, Zhang H, Ye X, Zhou Y, et al. A transcriptional regulator that boosts grain yields and shortens the growth duration of rice. Science. 2022;377(6604):eabi8455. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abi845
  6. Yang J, Zhang X, Wang D, Wu J, Xu H, Xiao Y, et al. The deterioration of starch physiochemical and minerals in highquality indica rice under low-temperature stress during grain filling. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2024;14:1295003. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1295003
  7. Sasaki T, Burr B. International rice genome sequencing project: the effort to completely sequence the rice genome. Curr Opini Plant Biol. 2000;3(2):138–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-5266(99)00047-3
  8. Gross BL, Zhao Z. Archaeological and genetic insights into the origins of domesticated rice. Pro Nat Acad Sci. 2014;111(17):6190–97. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1308942110
  9. Alam Z, Akter S, Khan MA, Hossain MI, Amin MN, Biswas A, et al. Sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.) genotype selection using advanced indices and statistical models: A multi-year approach. Heliyon. 2024;10(10). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon. 2024.e31569
  10. Chatterjee S. A new coefficient of correlation. J Ameri Stat Assoc.2021;116(536):2009–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2020.1758115
  11. Nogueira S, Sechidis K, Brown G. On the stability of feature selection algorithms. J Mach Learn Res. 2018;18(174):1–54.
  12. Happ MM, Graef GL, Wang H, Howard R, Posadas L, Hyten DL. Comparing a mixed model approach to traditional stability estimators for mapping genotype by environment interactions and yield stability in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:630175. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.630175
  13. Van Oijen M, Höglind M. Toward a Bayesian procedure for using process-based models in plant breeding, with application to ideotype design. Euphytica. 2016;207(3):627–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-015-1562-5
  14. Smith HF. A discriminant function for plant selection. Annals of Eugenics. 1936;7(3):240–50. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1809.1936.tb02143.x
  15. Hazel LN. The genetic basis for constructing selection indexes. Genetics. 1943;28(6):476–90.
  16. Hazel LN, Dickerson GE, Freeman AE. The selection index—then, now and for the future. J Dairy Sci. 1994;77(10):3236–51. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(94)77265-9
  17. Cerón?Rojas JJ, Crossa J, Sahagún?Castellanos J, Castillo? González F, Santacruz?Varela A. A selection index method based on eigen analysis. Crop Science. 2006;46(4):1711–21. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2005.11-0420
  18. Stephens MJ, Alspach PA, Beatson RA, Winefield C, Buck EJ. Genetic parameters and development of a selection index for breeding red raspberries for processing. J Ameri Soc Hort Sci. 2012;137(4):236–42. https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.137.4.236
  19. Bhering LL, Laviola BG, Salgado CC, Sanchez CF, Rosado TB, Alves AA. Genetic gains in physic nut using selection indexes. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira. 2012;47:402–08. https://doi.org/10.1590/ S0100-204X2012000300012
  20. Zhang W, Xu H, Zhu J. Index selection on seed traits under direct, cytoplasmic and maternal effects in multiple environments. J Genet Geno. 2009;36(1):41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1673-8527(09)60005-9
  21. Prunier JG, Colyn M, Legendre X, Nimon KF, Flamand MC. Multicollinearity in spatial genetics: separating the wheat from the chaff using commonality analyses. Molecular Ecology. 2015;24(2):263–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13029
  22. Olivoto T, Lúcio AD. metan: An R package for multi?environment trial analysis. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2020;11(6):783–89.
  23. Yan W, Frégeau-Reid J. Genotype by Yield*Trait (GYT) biplot: a novel approach for genotype selection based on multiple traits. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26688-8
  24. Kendal E. Comparing durum wheat cultivars by genotype× yield× trait and genotype× trait biplot method. Chilean J Agri Res. 2019;79(4):512–22. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-58392019000400512
  25. Elston RC. A weight-free index for the purpose of ranking or selection with respect to several traits at a time. Biometrics. 1963:85–97. https://doi.org/10.2307/2527573
  26. Sayd RM, Amabile RF, Faleiro FG, Montalvão AP, Coelho MC. Comparison of selection indices in the selection of malting barley genotypes irrigated. Acta Sci Agri. 2019;3(9):80–89. https://doi.org/10.31080/ASAG.2019.03.0611
  27. Magnussen S. Selection index: economic weights for maximum simultaneous genetic gain. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 1990;79:289–93.
  28. Team RC. RA language and environment for statistical computing, R Foundation for Statistical. Computing; 2021. https://www.R-project.org/
  29. Perez-Elizalde S, Cerón-Rojas JJ, Crossa J, Fleury D, Alvarado G. Rindsel: An R package for phenotypic and molecular selection indices used in plant breeding. Crop Breeding: Methods and Protocols. 2014:87–96.
  30. Diaz F, Eyzaguirre R, Marulanda J, Blas R, Longin CF, Utz HF, et al. Variability of high dry matter orange?fleshed sweetpotato [Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.] in later breeding stages and allocation of breeding resources in the humid tropics of Peru. Crop Science. 2024;64(3):1219–35.
  31. Cerón?Rojas JJ, Crossa J, Toledo FH, Sahagún?Castellanos J. A predetermined proportional gains eigen selection index method. Crop Science. 2016;56(5):2436–47. .https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2015.11.0718
  32. Rocha JR, Machado JC, Carneiro PC. Multitrait index based on factor analysis and ideotype?design: Proposal and application on elephant grass breeding for bioenergy. Gcb Bioenergy. 2018;10(1):52–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12443
  33. Kaiser HF. The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika. 1958;23(3):187–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289233
  34. Cruz CD, Regazzi AJ, Carneiro PCS. Modelos biométricos aplicados ao melhoramento genético. 4. ed. Viçosa, MG: UFV; 2012. p. 514
  35. Hamblin J, Zimmermann MJ. Breeding common bean for yield in mixtures. Plant breeding reviews. 1986;4:245–72.
  36. Spearman C. The abilities of man;1961.
  37. Ouattara F, Agre PA, Adejumobi II, Akoroda MO, Sorho F, Ayolié K, Bhattacharjee R. Multi-trait selection index for simultaneous selection of water yam (Dioscorea alata L.) genotypes. Agronomy. 2024;14(1):128. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14010128
  38. Pour-Aboughadareh A, Poczai P. Dataset on the use of MGIDI index in screening drought-tolerant wild wheat accessions at the early growth stage. Data in Brief. 2021;36:107096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2021.107096
  39. Olivoto T, Nardino M. MGIDI: A novel multi-trait index for genotype selection in plant breeding. BioRxiv. 2020:2020–07. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.23.217778
  40. Tewachew A, Mohammed W, Assefa A. Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance analysis in upland rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes for yield and yield related traits in Benishangul Gumuz, Ethiopia. Int J Plant Breed Crop Sci. 2018;5(3):437–43.
  41. Demeke B, Dejene T, Abebe D. Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance of morphological, yield related and quality traits in upland rice (Oryza Sativa L.) genotypes at pawe, Northwestern Ethiopia. Cogent Food Agri. 2023;9(1):2157099. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2022.2157099
  42. Chijioke ND, Osekita OS. Multi-variate analysis for yield evaluation in rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes. GSC Advanced Research and Reviews. 2021;6(3):067–75. https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2021.6.3.0042
  43. Shavrukov Y, Kurishbayev A, Jatayev S, Shvidchenko V, Zotova L, Koekemoer F, et al. Early flowering as a drought escape mechanism in plants: how can it aid wheat production?. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2017;8:1950. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01950
  44. Swamy BM, Shamsudin NA, Rahman SN, Mauleon R, Ratnam W, Cruz MT, Kumar A. Association mapping of yield and yieldrelated traits under reproductive stage drought stress in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Rice. 2017;10:1–3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12284-017-0161-6
  45. Fentie DB, Abera BB, Ali HM. Association of agronomic traits with grain yield of lowland rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes. Int J Agric Sci. 2021;8(3):2348–3997.
  46. Thuy NP, Trai NN, Khoa BD, Thao NH, Phong VT, Thi QV. Correlation and path analysis of association among yield, micronutrients and protein content in rice accessions grown under aerobic condition from Karnataka, India. Plant Breed Biotech. 2023;11(2):117–29. https://doi.org/10.9787/PBB.2023.11.2.117
  47. Badshah MA, Naimei T, Zou Y, Ibrahim M, Wang K. Yield and tillering response of super hybrid rice Liangyoupeijiu to tillage and establishment methods. The Crop Journal. 2014;2(1):79–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2013.11.004
  48. Barhate KK, Jadhav MS, Bhavsar VV. Correlation and path analysis in aromatic lines of rice (Oryza sativa L.). J Pharma Phytochem. 2021;10(3):363–66.
  49. Li R, Li M, Ashraf U, Liu S, Zhang J. Exploring the relationships between yield and yield-related traits for rice varieties released in China from 1978 to 2017. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2019;10:543. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00543
  50. Saketh T, Shankar VG, Srinivas B, Hari Y. Correlation and path coefficient studies for grain yield and yield components in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Int J Plant Soil Sci. 2023;35(19):1549–58. https://doi.org/10.9734/IJPSS/2023/v35i193700
  51. Ogunbayo SA, Sie M, Ojo DK, Sanni KA, Akinwale MG, Toulou B, et al. Genetic variation and heritability of yield and related traits in promising rice genotypes (Oryza sativa L.). J Plant Breed Crop Sci. 2014;6(11):153–59. https://doi.org/10.5897/JPBCS2014.0457
  52. Nithya N, Beena R, Stephen R, Abida PS, Jayalekshmi VG, Viji MM, Manju RV. Genetic variability, heritability, correlation coefficient and path analysis of morphophysiological and yield related traits of rice under drought stress. Chemical Science Review and Letters. 2020;9(33):48–54. https://doi.org/10.37273/chesci.cs142050122
  53. Sary DN, Badriyah L, Sihombing RD, Syauqy TA, Mustikarini ED, Prayoga GI, et al. Estimation of heritability and association analysis of agronomic Traits contributing to yield on upland rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Breed Biotech. 2022;10(4):232–43. https://doi.org/10.9787/PBB.2022.10.4.232
  54. Shrestha J, Subedi S, Subedi NR, Subedi S, Kushwaha UK, Maharjan B, Subedi M. Assessment of variability, heritability and correlation in rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes. https://doi.org/10.31924/nrsd.v11i2.077
  55. Roy SC, Shil P. Assessment of genetic heritability in rice breeding lines based on morphological traits and caryopsis ultrastructure. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):7830. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63976-8
  56. Ambrósio M, Daher RF, Santos RM, Santana JG, Vidal AK, Nascimento MR, et al. Multi-trait index: selection and recommendation of superior black bean genotypes as new improved varieties. BMC Plant Biology. 2024;24(1):525. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-024-05248-5
  57. Olivoto T, Nardino M, Meira D, Meier C, Follmann DN, de Souza VQ, et al. Multi?trait selection for mean performance and stability in maize. Agro J. 2021;113(5):3968–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20741
  58. Woyann LG, Meira D, Matei G, Zdziarski AD, Dallacorte LV, Madella LA, Benin G. Selection indexes based on linear?bilinear models applied to soybean breeding. Agronomy Journal. 2020;112(1):175–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20044
  59. Olivoto T, Nardino M. MGIDI: Toward an effective multivariate selection in biological experiments. Bioinformatics. 2021;37(10):1383–89. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa981
  60. Pallavi M, Prasad BM, Shanthi P, Reddy VL, Kumar AN. Multi trait genotype-ideotype distance index (MGIDI) for early seedling vigour and yield related traits to identify elite lines in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Electr J Plant Breed. 2024;15(1):120–31.
  61. Ceron-Rojas JJ, Castillo-González F, Sahagun-Castellanos J, Santacruz-Varela A, Benítez-Riquelme I, Crossa J. A molecular selection index method based on eigenanalysis. Genetics. 2008;180(1):547–57. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.108.087387

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.