Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Early Access

Inheritance of flowering time in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under cold stress conditions

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.10156
Submitted
20 June 2025
Published
31-03-2026

Abstract

Flowering is the primary characteristic of spermatophytes, which includes key crop plants like chickpea. The duration of flowering in plants with indeterminate growth is directly related to the yield. Early flowering in chickpea extends the reproductive phase, resulting in increased productivity. The experiment was carried out at the Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur, during the rabi season. The current investigation involved the crossing of the ICC-16349 (donor and cold-tolerant parent) with the GPF-2 (recipient and cold-susceptible parent) to produce a total of 80 potential hybrids. Screening of parents was conducted using 51 Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR) markers, of which marker TA-180 showed polymorphism. An evaluation was performed under field conditions to investigate the genetics of time to flowering of F2 progeny plants resulting from the cross of chickpea genotypes GPF-2 (which flowers late under cold stress) and ICC-16349 (which flowers early under cold stress). In order to analyse the F2 data and to assess the goodness of fit, the chi-square test (χ2) was applied. During the experiment, TA-180 was used to screen 80 potential hybrids. The results showed that 34 of these hybrids (42.5 %) were confirmed to be actual hybrids. The F2 generation of plants exposed to cold stress exhibited a segregation pattern, with a ratio of 3:1 between late and early flowering plants. This indicates that the trait of late flowering is under monogenic control that suppresses the trait of early flowering. The current work has the potential to aid in the creation of effective breeding strategies for the production of chickpea cultivars that exhibit early flowering under cold conditions. This would result in improved yields for chickpea crops grown in winter in Northern India.

References

  1. 1. Shilenge SK. Agronomic evaluation of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes in contrasting agro-ecological regions of Limpopo and Mpumalanga Provinces. PhD [dissertation]. Turfloop: University of Limpopo; 2012.
  2. 2. Van der Maesen LJG. Origin, history and taxonomy of chickpea. In: Saxena MC, Singh KB, editors. The chickpea. Wallingford: CAB International; 1987. p. 11–34.
  3. 3. Muehlbauer FJ, Singh KB. Genetics of chickpea. In: Saxena MC, Singh KB, editors. The chickpea. Wallingford: CAB International; 1987. p. 99–125.
  4. 4. Varshney RK, Mir RR, Bhatia S, Thudi M, Hu Y, Azam S, et al. Integrated physical, genetic and genome map of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Funct Integr Genomics. 2014;14:59–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10142-014-0363-6
  5. 5. Thakur P, Kumar S, Malik JA, Berger JD, Nayyar H. Cold stress effects on reproductive development in grain crops: an overview. Environ Exp Bot. 2010;67:429–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2009.09.004
  6. 6. Awasthi R, Bhandari K, Nayyar H. Temperature stress and redox homeostasis in agricultural crops. Front Environ Sci. 2015;3:11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2015.00011
  7. 7. Atalay E, Babaoğlu M. Determination of genetic relationship in Turkish chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes using SSR molecular markers and capillary electrophoresis. Pak J Agric Sci. 2012;22:369–75.
  8. 8. Tautz D, Renz M. Simple sequences are ubiquitous repetitive components of eukaryotic genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1984;12:4127–38. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/12.10.4127
  9. 9. Beckmann JS, Soller M. Toward a unified approach to genetic mapping of eukaryotes based on sequence tagged microsatellite sites. Biotechnology (N Y). 1990;8:930–2. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1090-930
  10. 10. Khanna-Chopra R, Sinha SK. Chickpea: physiological aspects of growth and yield. In: Saxena MC, Singh KB, editors. The chickpea. Wallingford: CAB International; 1987. p. 163–89.
  11. 11. Kumar J, Abbo S. Genetics of flowering time in chickpea and its bearing on productivity in semiarid environments. Adv Agron. 2001;72:107–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(01)72012-3
  12. 12. Summerfield RJ, Roberts EH. Photo-thermal regulation of flowering in pea, lentil, faba bean and chickpea. In: Summerfield RJ, editor. World crops: cool-season food legumes. Dordrecht: Springer; 1988. p. 911–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2764-3_72
  13. 13. Roberts EH, Hadley P, Summerfield RJ. Effects of temperature and photoperiod on flowering in chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.). Ann Bot. 1985;55:881–92. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a086969
  14. 14. Ellis RH, Lawn RJ, Summerfield RJ, Qi A, Roberts EH, Chay PM, et al. Towards the reliable prediction of time to flowering in six annual crops. V. Chickpea (Cicer arietinum). Exp Agric. 1994;30:271–82. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479700024376
  15. 15. Gumber RK, Singh S. Genetics of flowering time in chickpea-a preliminary report. Int Chickpea Pigeonpea Newsl. 1996;23:295–6.
  16. 16. Kumar J, Van Rheenen HA. A major gene for time of flowering in chickpea. J Hered. 2000;91:67–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/91.1.67
  17. 17. Or E, Hovav R, Abbo S. A major gene for flowering time in chickpea. Crop Sci. 1999;39:315–22. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1999.0011183X003900020002xa
  18. 18. Cho S, Kumar J, Shultz JL, Anupama K, Tefera F, Muehlbauer FJ. Mapping genes for double podding and other morphological traits in chickpea. Euphytica. 2002;128:285–92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020872009306
  19. 19. Knott SA, Haley CS, Thompson R. Methods of segregation analysis for animal breeding data: a comparison of power. Heredity. 1992;68:299-311. https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1992.44
  20. 20. Murray MG, Thompson WF. Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1980;8:4321–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/8.19.4321
  21. 21. Winter P, Pfaff T, Udupa SM, Hüttel B, Sharma PC, Sahi S, et al. Characterization and mapping of sequence-tagged microsatellite sites in the chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genome. Mol Gen Genet. 1999;262:90–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004380051063
  22. 22. Gaur R, Sethy NK, Choudhary S, Shokeen B, Gupta V, Bhatia S. Advancing the STMS genomic resources for defining new locations on the intraspecific genetic linkage map of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). BMC Genomics. 2011;12:117. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-12-117
  23. 23. Smitha S, Katageri IS. Hybridity confirmation in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) through SSR molecular markers. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2019;8:44–8.
  24. 24. Pearson K. Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution. VIII. On the correlation of characters not quantitatively measurable. Proc R Soc Lond. 1900;66:241–4. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspl.1899.0096
  25. 25. Morais SR, Vieira AF, Almeida LC, Rodrigues LA, Melo PG, Faria LC, et al. Application of microsatellite markers to confirm controlled crosses and assess genetic identity in common bean. Crop Breed Appl Biotechnol. 2016;16:234–9. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-70332016v16n3n35
  26. 26. Johnson PL, Sharma RN, Nanda HC. Hybridity testing and heterosis in relation to genetic divergence in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under rice based cropping system. Indian J Genet Plant Breed. 2019;79:622–5. https://doi.org/10.31742/IJGPB.79.3.13
  27. 27. Tembo B, Sibiya J, Tongoona P, Tembo L. Validation of microsatellite molecular markers linked with resistance to Bipolaris sorokiniana in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J Agric Sci. 2017;155:1061–8. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859617000144
  28. 28. Wang J, Zhong GY, Chin EC, Register JC, Riley RD, Niebur WS, et al. Identification of parents of F1 hybrids through SSR profiling of maternal and hybrid tissue. Euphytica. 2002;124:29–34. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015629600268
  29. 29. Nandakumar N, Singh AK, Sharma RK, Mohapatra T, Prabhu KV, Zaman FU. Molecular fingerprinting of hybrids and assessment of genetic purity of hybrid seeds in rice using microsatellite markers. Euphytica. 2004;136:257–64. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EUPH.0000032706.92360.c6
  30. 30. Lucchese C, Dinelli G, Miggiano A, Lovato A. Identification of pepper (Capsicum spp.) cultivars by field and electrophoresis tests. Seed Sci Technol. 1999;27:37–47.
  31. 31. Sharma KD, Nayyar H. Cold stress alters transcription in meiotic anthers of cold tolerant chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). BMC Res Notes. 2014;7:717. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-717
  32. 32. Sharma KD, Nayyar H. Regulatory networks in pollen development under cold stress. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:402. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00402
  33. 33. Kiran A, Kumar S, Nayyar H, Sharma KD. Low temperature-induced aberrations in male and female reproductive organ development cause flower abortion in chickpea. Plant Cell Environ. 2019;42:2075–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.13536
  34. 34. Berger JD, Turner NC, Siddique KH, Knights EJ, Brinsmead RB, Mock I, et al. Genotype by environment studies across Australia reveal the importance of phenology for chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) improvement. Aust J Agric Res. 2004;55:1071–84. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR04104
  35. 35. Srinivasan A, Johansen C, Saxena NP. Cold tolerance during early reproductive growth of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): characterization of stress and genetic variation in pod set. Field Crops Res. 1998;57:181–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(97)00118-4
  36. 36. Croser JS, Clarke HJ, Siddique KH, Khan TN. Low-temperature stress: implications for chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) improvement. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 2003;22:185–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/713610855
  37. 37. Nayyar H, Bains T, Kumar S. Low temperature induced floral abortion in chickpea: relationship to abscisic acid and cryoprotectants in reproductive organs. Environ Exp Bot. 2005;53:39–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2004.02.011
  38. 38. Anbessa Y, Warkentin T, Vandenberg A, Ball R. Inheritance of time to flowering in chickpea in a short-season temperate environment. J Hered. 2006;97:55–61. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esj009
  39. 39. Hegde VS. Genetics of flowering time in chickpea in a semi-arid environment. Plant Breed. 2010;129:683–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.2009.01748.x

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.