Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. sp4 (2025): Recent Advances in Agriculture by Young Minds - III

Bio-mulches on moisture and biological properties of soils under maize-legume sequence

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.10166
Submitted
20 June 2025
Published
15-12-2025

Abstract

To find out the best combination of cropping sequence and level of mulching for growing of Rabi legumes in maize-legume sequence. The present field experiment was conducted during 2017-18 and 2018-19 at the Agricultural Farm of Institute of Agriculture, Visva Bharati, located in Sriniketan, West Bengal using split plot design (SPD) with three main plots as cropping system (CS1: maize-chickpea; CS2: maizelentil; CS3: maize-lathyrus) and five sub-plot as mulching (M0: No mulch (residue removal); M1: In-situ maize stalk mulch (MSM); M2: MSM + water hyacinth (5 t ha-1); M3: MSM + paddy straw (5 t ha-1); M4: MSM + paddy straw (2.5 t ha-1) + water hyacinth (2.5 t ha-1)) and the experiments were replicated four times. In the present study, we have formulated locally available bio-mulches for the efficient moisture conservation and improving soil microbial conditions for growing Rabi pulses (chickpea, lentil, lathyrus) after Kharif maize under zero tillage. Among the bio-mulches, highest soil microbial biomass carbon (SMBC) (196.87 and 200.59 μg g-1 soil) and dehydrogenase activity (DHA) (25.32 and 26.70 μg TPF hr-1 g-1 ) were recorded at 0-15 cm soil under MSM + paddy straw (5 t ha-1) mulch (M3) and in cropping sequence, highest water use efficiency was showed by maize-lathyrus (CS3) (1.33 and 1.37 kg ha-1 mm-1) for 2017-18 and 2018-19 respectively under MSM + paddy straw (5 t ha-1) mulch (M3). Bio-mulches conserve soil moisture and improved the soil biological properties and gave higher water productivity and water use efficiency.

References

  1. 1. Bargali SS, Bargali K, Singh L, Ghosh L, Lakhera ML. Acacia nilotica based traditional agroforestry system: effect on paddy crop and management. Curr Sci. 2009;25:581-7.
  2. 2. Bargali SS, Shahi C, Bargali K, Negi B, Khatri K. Energy and monetary efficiencies at different altitudinal agroecosystems in central Himalaya, India. Heliyon. 2022;8(11):e11500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11500
  3. 3. Shahi C, Bargali SS, Bargali K, Vibhuti. Dry matter dynamics and CO₂ mitigation in the herb layer of Central Himalayan agroecosystems along an altitudinal gradient, India. Trop Ecol. 2023;64(1):180-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42965-022-00258-6
  4. 4. Negi B, Khatri K, Bargali SS, Bargali K. Invasive Ageratina adenophora (Asteraceae) in agroecosystems of Kumaun Himalaya, India: a threat to plant diversity and sustainable crop yield. Sustain. 2023;8(14):10748. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151410748
  5. 5. Negi B, Khatri K, Bargali SS, Bargali K, Fartyal A. Phenological behaviour of Ageratina adenophora compared with native herb species across varied habitats in the Kumaun Himalaya. Plant Ecol. 2025;226(3):237-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258CFF024-01487-6
  6. 6. Gulati A, Juneja R. Indian agriculture towards 2030. Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of India; 2020. p. 1-27.
  7. 7. Chand R, Prasanna PL, Singh A. Farm size and productivity: understanding the strengths of smallholders and improving their livelihoods. Eco Pol Weekly. 2011;25:5-11.
  8. 8. Balkrishna A, Sharma G, Sharma N, Rawat N, Kumar A, Arya V. Transition of Indian agriculture from glorious past to challenging future: a serious concern. Indian J Ecol. 2022;49(3):977-86. https://doi.org/10.55362/IJE/2022/3625
  9. 9. Rahman S. Green revolution in India: environmental degradation and impact on livestock. Asian J Water Environ Pollut. 2015;12(1):75-80. https://doi.org/10.3233/AJW-2015-12_1_11
  10. 10. Kannan E. Trends in India’s agricultural growth and its determinants. Asian J Agric Dev. 2011;8(2):79-99. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.199328
  11. 11. Kumar A, Tripathi HP, Yadav RA. Intensification and diversification in rice (Oryza sativa)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system for sustainability. Indian J Agro. 2012;57(4):319-22.
  12. 12. Prakash KN, Venkataramana MN. Growth of maize ecosystem in India and Karnataka vis-à-vis associated risk in production: an economic insight. Mysore J Agric Sci. 2023;57(2):264-72.
  13. 13. Imran A, Hakim S, Tariq M, Nawaz MS, Laraib I, Gulzar U, et al. Diazotrophs for lowering nitrogen pollution crises: looking deep into the roots. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:637815. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.637815
  14. 14. Das A, Devi TM, Babu S, Ansari M, Layek J, Bhowmick SN, et al. Cereal-legume cropping system in Indian Himalayan region for food and environmental sustainability. In: Meena R, Das A, Yadav G, Lal R, editors. Legumes for soil health and sustainable management. Singapore: Springer; 2018. p. 33-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0253-4_2
  15. 15. Roy S, Hazra S. Monthly drought assessment and early warning for droughts in Purulia district of West Bengal. Indian Ground Water. 2020;XV:7-19.
  16. 16. Saha R, Ghosh PK, Das AD. Soil water dynamics and yield as influenced by residue and tillage management in maize (Zea mays)-mustard (Brassica campestris) cropping system. Indian J Agric Sci. 2009;79(5):340-5.
  17. 17. Dey JK, Saren BK, Debnath A, Gudade BA, Singh S, Kumar A, et al. Productivity and nutrient dynamics of legume in a maize-legume cropping system are influenced by biomulches under no-tillage system. Int J Plant Prod. 2022;16(3):531-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42106-022-00204-5
  18. 18. Bekele D. The effect of tillage on soil moisture conservation: a review. Int J Res Stud Agric Sci. 2020;6:30-41. https://doi.org/10.20431/2454-6224.0610004
  19. 19. Meena BP, Shirale AO, Dotaniya ML, Jha P, Meena AL, Biswas AK, et al. Conservation agriculture: a new paradigm for improving input use efficiency and crop productivity. In: Bisht J, Meena V, Mishra P, Pattanayak A, editors. Conservation agriculture. Singapore: Springer; 2016. p. 39-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2558-7_2
  20. 20. Jalota SK, Khera R, Ghuman BS, editors. Method in soil physics. 1st ed. New Delhi: Narosa Publishing House; 1998.
  21. 21. Ghosh PK, Das A, Saha R, Kharkrang E, Tripathi AK, Munda GC, et al. Conservation agriculture towards achieving food security in Northeast India. Curr Sci. 2010;10:915-21.
  22. 22. Sarkar S, Paramanick M, Goswami SB. Soil temperature, water use and yield of yellow sarson (Brassica napus L. var. glauca) in relation to tillage intensity and mulch management under rainfed lowland ecosystem in eastern India. Soil Tillage Res. 2007;93(1):94-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2006.03.015
  23. 23. Kumar R, Saurabh K, Mishra JS, Mondal S, Hans H, Sundaram PK, et al. Impact of conservation agriculture on soil properties and crop productivity under rice-fallow ecology in Eastern India. In: Jayaraman S, Dalal RC, Patra AK, Chaudhari SK, editors. Conservation agriculture: a sustainable approach for soil health and food security. Singapore: Springer; 2021. p. 165-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0827-8_8
  24. 24. Dey JK, Saren BK, Duary B, Pramanik K. Performance of zero-till bio-mulching on different pulses under maize-legume sequence. Legume Res. 2023;46(2):176-80. https://doi.org/10.18805/LR-4395
  25. 25. Midya A, Saren BK, Dey JK, Maitra S, Praharaj S, Gaikwad DJ, et al. Crop establishment methods and integrated nutrient management improve: Part I. Crop performance, water productivity and profitability of rice (Oryza sativa L.) in the lower Indo-Gangetic plain, India. Agronomy. 2021;11(9):1860. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11091860
  26. 26. Jalota SK, Singh KB, Chahal GB, Gupta RK, Chakraborty S, Sood A, et al. Integrated effect of transplanting date, cultivar and irrigation on yield, water saving and water productivity of rice (Oryza sativa L.) in Indian Punjab: field and simulation study. Agric Water Manag. 2009;96(7):1096-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2009.02.005
  27. 27. Brookes PC, Joergensen RG. Microbial biomass measurements by fumigation-extraction. In: Bloem J, Hopkins DW, Benedetti A, editors. Methods for assessing soil quality. Cambridge: CABI Publishing; 2006. p. 77-83. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851990989.0000
  28. 28. Li X, Chen Z. Soil microbial biomass C and N along a climatic transect in the Mongolian steppe. Biol Fertil Soils. 2004;39:344-51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-004-0720-z
  29. 29. Vance ED, Brookes PC, Jenkinson DS. An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biol Biochem. 1987;19(6):703-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(87)90052-6
  30. 30. Casida Jr LE, Klein DA, Santoro T. Soil dehydrogenase activity. Soil Sci. 1964;98(6):371-6.
  31. 31. Gomez KA, Gomez AA, editors. Statistical procedures for Agricultural research. 2nd ed. Philippines: John Wiley & Sons; 1984.
  32. 32. Shi L, Dai C, Maruthaveeran S. Application of perennial sweet pea in soil and water conservation. Appl Sci. 2023;13(19):11075. https://doi.org/10.3390/app131911075
  33. 33. Blight G. Solar heating of the soil and evaporation from a soil surface. Geotechnique. 2009;59(4):355-63. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2009.59.4.355
  34. 34. Yusefi A, Firouzi FA, Aminzadeh M. The effects of shallow saline groundwater on evaporation, soil moisture and temperature distribution in the presence of straw mulch. Hydro Res. 2020;51(4):720-38. https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2020.010
  35. 35. De Vita P, Di Paolo E, Fecondo G, Di Fonzo N, Pisante M. No-tillage and conventional tillage effects on durum wheat yield, grain quality and soil moisture content in southern Italy. Soil Tillage Res. 2007;92(1-2):69-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2006.01.012
  36. 36. Liu Y, Gao M, Wu W, Tanveer SK, Wen X, Liao Y. The effects of conservation tillage practices on the soil water-holding capacity of a non-irrigated apple orchard in the Loess Plateau, China. Soil Tillage Res. 2013;130:7-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2013.01.012
  37. 37. El-Beltagi HS, Basit A, Mohamed HI, Ali I, Ullah S, Kamel EA, et al. Mulching as a sustainable water and soil saving practice in agriculture: a review. Agronomy. 2022;12(8):1881. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12081881
  38. 38. Duchene O, Vian JF, Celette F. Intercropping with legume for agroecological cropping systems: complementarity and facilitation processes and the importance of soil microorganisms: a review. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2017;240:148-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.02.019
  39. 39. Pandey R, Bargali SS, Bargali K, Karki H, Chaturvedi RK. Dynamics of nitrogen mineralization and fine root decomposition in subtropical Shorea robusta Gaertner f. forests of Central Himalaya, India. Sci Total Environ. 2024;921:170896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170896
  40. 40. Prem M, Ranjan P, Seth N, Patle GT. Mulching techniques to conserve the soil water and advance the crop production– a review. Curr World Environ. 2020;15:10-30. https://doi.org/10.12944/CWE.15.Special-Issue1.02

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.