Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. sp3 (2025): Advances in Plant Health Improvement for Sustainable Agriculture

Impact of neem-coated urea and nano urea on rice under Tamirabarani river basin

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.10239
Submitted
25 June 2025
Published
10-12-2025

Abstract

This study examined to evaluate the nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) of neem-coated urea (NCU), nano urea (NU) and productivity of two widely grown rice varieties, ASD16 and ADT46 around Tamirabarani River basin. Treatments included varying foliar dosages of NCU, NU, the recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) and control. Results showed RDF significantly outperformed all treatments in quantitative parameters (plant height, tiller density, grain yield, straw yield) and qualitative parameters (chlorophyll content, leaf area index), followed by NCU, NU and the control. The balanced nutrient profile of RDF and soil-based application maximized uptake and plant growth, unlike the nitrogen-limited and foliar-dependent NCU and NU. Notably, NCU’s higher nitrogen content (46 %) and slow-release properties via neem coating enhanced absorption compared to NU’s lower nitrogen (4 %) and reliance on foliar uptake, which likely faced inefficiencies due to leaf surface limitations and environmental factors like humidity. These findings position RDF as the most effective option for optimizing rice productivity in this region, highlighting the critical role of comprehensive nutrient delivery and efficient absorption mechanisms.

References

  1. 1. Gutaker RM, Groen SC, Bellis ES, Choi JY, Pires IS, Bocinsky RK, et al. Genomic history and ecology of the geographic spread of rice. Nature plants. 2020;6(5):492–502. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-020-0659-6
  2. 2. (USDA) USDoA. China rice area, yield and production. 2024.
  3. 3. Directorate of Economics and Statistics (DES) DoA, India. Area, production & yield - reports. 2024.
  4. 4. Arthur James R, Purvaja R, Ramesh R. Environmental integrity of the tamiraparani river basin, South India. Environ Manage River Basin Ecosyst. 2015:507–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13425-3_24
  5. 5. Kumarasamy P, Dahms H-U, Jeon H-J, Rajendran A, Arthur James R. Irrigation water quality assessment-an example from the Tamiraparani river, Southern India. Arab J Geosci. 2014;7:5209–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-013-1146-4
  6. 6. Magesh N, Chandrasekar N. Driving forces behind land transformations in the Tamiraparani sub-basin, South India. Remote Sensing Applications: Appl Soc Environ. 2017;8:12–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2017.07.003
  7. 7. Mohana P, Nagamani K, Muthusamy S, Velmurugan P. Environmental impact assessment of Thamirabarani River Basin, Tamil Nadu using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Indian J Sci Technol. 2018;11(22):17. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2018/v11i20/106246
  8. 8. Kirthiga S, Narasimhan B, Balaji C. Enhancing irrigation water productivity using short-range ensemble weather forecasts at basin scale: A novel framework for regions with high hydro-climatic variability. J Hydrol. 2024;639:131610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131610
  9. 9. Paul A, Bhatia A. Exploring the Effects of Contemporary Agricultural Techniques on Soil and Water Pollution in Rice Fields. Navigating the Nexus: Hydrology, Agriculture, Pollution and Climate Change, Volume 1: Springer; 2025. p. 197–238.
  10. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-76532-2_9
  11. 10. Atapattu SS, Kodituwakku DC. Agriculture in South Asia and its implications on downstream health and sustainability: A review. Agric Water Manag. 2009;96(3):361–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2008.09.028
  12. 11. Benavides-Mendoza A. Use of nanomaterials in plant nutrition. Plant Nutrition and Food Security in the Era of Climate Change: Elsevier; 2022. p. 453–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822916-3.00016-0
  13. 12. Suman J, Rakshit A, Patra A, Dutta A, Tripathi VK, Mohapatra KK, et al. Enhanced efficiency N fertilizers: an effective strategy to improve use efficiency and ecological sustainability. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2023;23(2):1472–88.
  14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-023-01237-z
  15. 13. Sowmya P, Madhavi A, Jayasree G, Sreelatha D, Triveni S. Enhancing Paddy Yields with Advanced Nitrogen Fertilizers: A Study of Neem-coated Urea, Agrotain Urea and Nano Nitrogen. J Sci Res Rep. 2025;31(1):175–84. https://doi.org/10.9734/jsrr/2025/v31i12756
  16. 14. Ihuoma SO, Madramootoo CA. Recent advances in crop water stress detection. Comput Electron Agric. 2017;141:267–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2017.07.026
  17. 15. Meena SO, Vashishtha M. Neem (Azadirachta indica) oil coated urea as a novel controlled release fertilizer: Physical and chemical analysis of structure and its nutrient release behaviour. J Serb Chem Soc. 2024;89(7-8):1077–92. https://doi.org/10.2298/JSC230228033M
  18. 16. Surekha K, Pragnya M, Manasa V, Gobinath R, Brajendra P. Potential agronomic and environmental benefits of neem coated urea (NCU) application in rice (Oryza sativa L.)-A systematic review. ORYZA-An International Journal of Rice. 61(4):408–19. https://doi.org/10.35709/ory.2024.61.4.15
  19. 17. Dimkpa CO, Fugice J, Singh U, Lewis TD. Development of fertilizers for enhanced nitrogen use efficiency-Trends and perspectives. Sci Total Environ. 2020;731:139113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139113
  20. 18. Thomas B. Encyclopedia of applied plant sciences: Academic Press; 2016.
  21. 19. Markwell J, Osterman JC, Mitchell JL. Calibration of the Minolta SPAD-502 leaf chlorophyll meter. Photosynth Res. 1995;46:467–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00032301
  22. 20. Welles JM, Norman J. Instrument for indirect measurement of canopy architecture. Agron J. 1991;83(5):818–25. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1991.00021962008300050009x
  23. 21. Bonham CD. Measurements for terrestrial vegetation: John Wiley & Sons; 2013. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118534540
  24. 22. Zhang H, Xue Y, Wang Z, Yang J, Zhang J. Morphological and physiological traits of roots and their relationships with shoot growth in “super” rice. Field Crops Res. 2009;113(1):31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2009.04.004
  25. 23. Fageria NK, Baligar VC. Enhancing nitrogen use efficiency in crop plants. Advanc agron. 2005;88:97–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(05)88004-6
  26. 24. Team RC. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. 4.3.1 ed. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2023.
  27. 25. Hala Y, Jumadi O, Muis A, Hartati H, Inubushi K. Development of urea coated with neem (Azadirachta indica) to increase fertilizer efficiency and reduce greenhouse gases emission. Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering). 2014;69(5). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v69.3195
  28. 26. Azeem B, KuShaari K, Man ZB, Basit A, Thanh TH. Review on materials & methods to produce controlled release coated urea fertilizer. J Control Release. 2014;181:11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.02.020
  29. 27. Ahmed S, Fahmy A. Environmental Impact for applications of neem cake coated urea and nano iron foliar on rationalization of chemical nitrogen fertilizers and wheat yield. J Soil Sci Agric Eng. 2017;8(11):613–20. https://doi.org/10.21608/jssae.2017.38088
  30. 28. Arunkumar M, Fathima P, Yogananda S, Shekara B. Influence of foliar application of nano urea and urea on productivity and nutrient status of fodder maize during kharif season. J Exp Agric Int. 2024;46(5):428–34. https://doi.org/10.9734/jeai/2024/v46i52394
  31. 29. Singh A, Jaswal A, Singh M. Impact of neem coated urea on rice yield and nutrient use efficiency (NUE). Agricultural Reviews. 2019;40(1):70–4. https://doi.org/10.18805/ag.R-1817
  32. 30. Pudhuvai B, Koul B, Das R, Shah MP. Nano-Fertilizers (NFs) for resurgence in nutrient use efficiency (NUE): A sustainable agricultural strategy. Current Pollution Reports. 2024;11(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-024-00331-9
  33. 31. An H, Owens J, Beres B, Li Y, Hao X. Nitrous oxide emissions with enhanced efficiency and conventional urea fertilizers in winter wheat. Nutrient Cycl Agroecosyst. 2021;119:307–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-021-10118-9
  34. 32. Zhang H, Zhang J, Yang J. Improving nitrogen use efficiency of rice crop through an optimized root system and agronomic practices. Crop Environ. 2023;2(4):192–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crope.2023.10.001
  35. 33. Solanki P, Bhargava A, Chhipa H, Jain N, Panwar J. Nano-fertilizers and their smart delivery system. Nanotechnol Food Agric. 2015:81–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14024-7_4
  36. 34. Mohanty S, Nayak A, Bhaduri D, Swain C, Kumar A, Tripathi R, et al. Real-time application of neem-coated urea for enhancing N-use efficiency and minimizing the yield gap between aerobic direct-seeded and puddled transplanted rice. Field Crops Res. 2021;264:108072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108072
  37. 35. Jameson PE. Cytokinin Translocation to and Biosynthesis and Metabolism within, Cereal and Legume Seeds: Looking Back to Inform the Future. Metabolites. 2023;13(10):1076. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo13101076
  38. 36. Reddy KS, Shivay YS, Kumar D, Pooniya V, Prasanna R, Shrivastava M, et al. Relative performance of urea and nano-urea in conjunction with zinc fertilization on growth, productivity and nitrogen use efficiency in spring wheat. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2024;24(2):3593–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-024-01780-3
  39. 37. Sikka R, Kalia A, Ahuja R, Sidhu SK, Chaitra P. Substitution of soil urea fertilization to foliar nano urea fertilization decreases growth and yield of rice and wheat. Plant Soil. 2024:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-024-07157-w

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.