Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. sp3 (2025): Advances in Plant Health Improvement for Sustainable Agriculture

Assessing the persistent use of pesticides and adoption of climate-smart pest management practices among the vegetable growers in the Western zone of Tamil Nadu

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.10376
Submitted
30 June 2025
Published
18-12-2025

Abstract

Vegetable crops, vital to the global food chain, may be significantly impacted by climate change. Increased pests and diseases, low yields, crop failures and deteriorating quality issues under adverse climate make it unprofitable. Climate-Smart Pest Management (CSPM) practices combine with intensive surveillance to minimise the hazards of persistent use of pesticides to human health and the environment. Vegetable cultivation is predominant in the Western zone of Tamil Nadu as its topography and climatic factors favour year-round production. A sample of 120 farmers was selected from Dharmapuri, Namakkal and Coimbatore districts. The major pesticides used are organophosphates, carbamates, organochlorines, monocrotophos, methyl parathion, endosulfan etc. More than 70 % of the farmers are applying pesticides than the recommended level. Farmers don’t know the ill effects of overuse due to a lack of awareness and apply it more frequently due to very high pest infestation in tomato, brinjal, bhendi, cauliflower and onion. About 15-20 times, the pesticides were sprayed from flowering to harvest, which may be a greater risk. Pesticide use intensity is on average 2-5 kg a.i./ha for tomato, brinjal and bhendi, cauliflower and onion. The relationship between farmers' perception of the adverse effects suggested that farmers who perceive higher risks of pesticides are more likely to adopt those practices and vice versa. The Ordinal logistic regression implied that the increased yield, reduced input cost, higher market prices and reduced health hazards demonstrate the high, medium and low levels of adoption and beneficial effects of the CSPM practices. Promotion of CSPM to the non-adopters requires massive sensitisation programmes and training, demonstrations, provision of subsidies, support price and financial assistance as strategies to be followed.

References

  1. 1. Payen S, Basset-Mens C, Perret S. LCA of local and imported tomato: An energy and water trade-off. J Clean Prod. 2015;87:139-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.007
  2. 2. Dumitru EA, Berevoianu RL, Tudor VC, Teodorescu FR, Stoica D, Giuca A, et al. Climate change impacts on vegetable crops: A systematic review. Agriculture. 2023;13(10):1891. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13101891
  3. 3. Janaki Rani A, Kavitha B, Abirami S, Narmadha N, Murugan PP, Sumathi E, et al. Pesticide in Indian agriculture: Consumption pattern and farmers’ perception. Plant Sci Today. 2025;12(2):1-4. https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.6210
  4. 4. Ahmad MF, Ahmad FA, Alsayegh AA, Zeyaullah M, AlShahrani AM, Muzammil K, et al. Pesticides impacts on human health and the environment with their mechanisms of action and possible countermeasures. Heliyon. 2024;10(7):1-26.e29128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29128
  5. 5. Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce & Industry (FICCI). The role of crop-protection industry in driving sustainability in the agriculture sector. New Delhi: Crop Protection Committee, FICCI. 2024.
  6. 6. Schneider L, Rebetez M, Rasmann S. The effect of climate change on invasive crop pests. Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2022;50:100895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cois.2022.100895
  7. 7. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Integrated pest management (IPM) principles. Washington, DC: EPA. 2024.
  8. 8. Kabir MH, Rainis R. Do farmers not widely adopt environmentally friendly technologies? Lessons from Integrated Pest Management (IPM). Mod Appl Sci. 2015;9:208-15. https://doi.org/10.5539/mas.v9n3p208
  9. 9. Bouri M, Arslan KS, Şahin F. Climate-smart pest management in sustainable agriculture: promises and challenges. Sustainability. 2023;15(5):4592. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054592
  10. 10. Heeb L, Jenner E, Cock MJW. Climate-smart pest management: building resilience of farms and landscapes to changing pest threats. J Pest Sci. 2019;92:951-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-019-01083-y
  11. 11. Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC), Government of India. Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change. New Delhi: MoEF&CC; 2024.
  12. 12. Government of Tamil Nadu (GoTN). Policy note 2023–2024, Demand No. 5. Department of Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare. Chennai: GoTN; 2023.
  13. 13. Sharma A, Kumar V, Shahzad B. Worldwide pesticide usage and its impacts on the ecosystem. SN Appl Sci. 2019;1:1446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-1485-1
  14. 14. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Pesticides use and trade, 1990–2022. Rome: FAO; 2024.
  15. 15. Van Drooge HL, Groeneveld NC, Schipper J. Data on application frequency of pesticide for risk assessment purposes. Ann Occup Hyg. 2001;45(1):95-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4878(00)00112-5
  16. 16. Onyando ZO, Omukunda E, Okoth P, Khatiebi S, Omwoma S, Otieno P, et al. Screening and prioritization of pesticide application for potential human health and environmental risks in large-scale farms in Western Kenya. Agriculture. 2023;13(6):1178. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13061178
  17. 17. Taha M. Determinants of intensity of adoption of improved onion production package in Dugda Bora district, East Shoa, Ethiopia [master’s thesis]. Haramaya (ET): Haramaya University; 2007.
  18. 18. Mann SP. Introductory statistics. 7th ed. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons; 2010. p. 750.
  19. 19. Pradyot RJ, Purna CT, Keshav LM. Determinants of adoption of climate-resilient practices and their impact on yield and household income. J Agric Food Res. 2023;14:100659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2023.100659
  20. 20. Greene W. Econometric analysis. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Prentice Hall; 2008.
  21. 21. Mesfin EL, Abebe AW, Seid AT. Ordinal logistic regression analysis in determining factors associated with socioeconomic status of households in Tepi town, Southwest Ethiopia. Sci World J. 2022;2022:2415692. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2415692
  22. 22. Liang J, Bi G, Zhan C. Multinomial and ordinal logistic regression analyses with multi-categorical variables using R. Ann Transl Med. 2020;8(16):982. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-2020-57
  23. 23. Brant R. Assessing proportionality in the proportional odds model for ordinal logistic regression. Biometrics. 1990;46(4):1171-8. https://doi.org/10.2307/2532457
  24. 24. Sattler C, Kachele H, Verch G. Assessing the intensity of pesticide use in agriculture. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2007;119(3-4):299-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2006.07.017
  25. 25. Martey E, Nimo A, Prince ME, Fosu M, Buah SSJ, Bidzakin J, et al. Fertilizer adoption and use intensity among smallholder farmers in Northern Ghana. Sustain Agric Res. 2014;3:24-36. https://doi.org/10.5539/sar.v3n1p24
  26. 26. Singh PK, Varshney JG. Adoption level and constraints in rice production technology. Indian Res J Ext Educ. 2010;10(1):91-4.
  27. 27. Jain R, Arora A, Raju SS. A novel adoption index of selected agricultural technologies: Linkages with infrastructure and productivity. Agric Econ Res Rev. 2009;22:109-20.
  28. 28. Almaz GA, Mekuria YG. Analysis of rural women’s participation in rice production using ordinal logistic regression model. J Rural Dev. 2019;38(2):234-65. https://doi.org/10.25175/jrd/2019/v38/i2/146745
  29. 29. Okuthe IK. The influence of institutional factors on the adoption of integrated natural resource management technologies by small-scale farmers in South-Western Kenya. J Agric Sci. 2014;6:16-32. https://doi.org/10.19026/ajas.6.4850
  30. 30. Hedlund J, Longo SB, York R. Agriculture, pesticide use and economic development: A global examination (1990–2014). Rural Sociol. 2020;85(2):519-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.12303
  31. 31. Bebber DP, Ramotowski MA, Gurr SJ. Crop pests and pathogens move polewards in a warming world. Nat Clim Change. 2013;3:985-88. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1990
  32. 32. Singh V, Dwivedi SN, Deo SVS. Ordinal logistic regression model describing factors associated with extent of nodal involvement in oral cancer patients and its prospective validation. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020;20:95. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-00985-1

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.