Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. sp4 (2025): Recent Advances in Agriculture by Young Minds - III

Analysis of plant growth promoting activities of Azotobacter isolates and study of their phenotypic effects on bio-primed rice seeds (Oryza sativa L.)

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.10392
Submitted
7 July 2025
Published
27-11-2025

Abstract

Rising population demands increased agricultural productivity on limited arable land. Excessive use of chemical fertilizers is already affecting the environment so one must turn to environmental friendly solutions of using plant growth promoting and natural nitrogen fixing microbes and analyze their effects on plants. In this study, Azotobacter spp. was isolated from two different geographic areas and their properties were studied. This study investigates the plant growth-promoting (PGP) potential of three Azotobacter strains (M-1, UL-6, A-2.3) and their consortia on rice seeds through bio-priming under in vitro and pot trial conditions. Among 22 isolates tested for phosphate and zinc solubilization, ammonia and IAA production, siderophore formation and salinity tolerance, these strains (M-1, UL-6. A-2.3) performed best. Bio-priming treatments with these strains and a consortium revealed improved germination rates, vigor index (VI), root and shoot development along with chlorophyll content in rice plants. In vitro results showed a 69.06 % germination rate and 426.98 VI for the consortium, while pot trials highlighted UL-6's enhanced root architecture and shoot length with a germination rate of 56.08 % and VI of 375.32 under controlled environmental conditions. However, in vitro results was not always translate to pot trials, suggesting environmental influences, likely due to soil, microbial competition and abiotic factors in non-sterile conditions. The sequence of the best performing strain UL 6 was submitted to NCBI with the accession number PV864958. This study highlights Azotobacter spp. as potential bio-fertilizers for sustainable agriculture and emphasizes the need for optimized bio-priming protocols to ensure consistent plant growth across varying conditions.

References

  1. 1. Upadhyay S, Kumar N, Singh VK, Singh A. Isolation, characterization and morphological study of Azotobacter isolates. J Appl Nat Sci. 2015;7(2):984–90. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v7i2.718
  2. 2. Wani SA, Chand S, Wani MA, Ramzan M, Hakeem KR. Azotobacter chroococcum - A potential biofertilizer in agriculture: An overview. Soil Sci Agric Environ Prospect. 2016;2:333–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34451-5_15
  3. 3. Fukagawa NK, Ziska LH. Rice: Importance for global nutrition. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol. 2019;65(Suppl):S2–S3. https://doi.org/10.3177/jnsv.65.S2
  4. 4. Shukla A. Effect of integrated weed management practices on weed dynamics, growth and yield of wet direct seeded rice (Oryza sativa L.). Doctoral dissertation, Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Raipur. 2020.
  5. 5. Kizilkaya R. Nitrogen fixation capacity of Azotobacter spp. strains isolated from soils in different ecosystems and relationship between them and the microbiological properties of soils. J Environ Biol. 2009;30(1):73–82.
  6. 6. Esmailpour A, Hassanzadehdelouei M, Madani A. Impact of livestock manure, nitrogen and biofertilizer (Azotobacter) on yield and yield components of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). 2013;46(2):5–15. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10298-012-0079-5
  7. 7. Sadoff HL. Encystment and germination in Azotobacter vinelandii. Bacteriol Rev. 1975;39(4):516–39. https://doi.org/10.1128/br.39.4.516-539.1975
  8. 8. Chaudhary D, Narula N, Sindhu SS, Behl RK. Plant growth stimulation of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) by inoculation of salinity tolerant Azotobacter strains. Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2013;19:515–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-013-0178-2
  9. 9. Aquilanti L, Favilli F, Clementi F. Comparison of different strategies for isolation and preliminary identification of Azotobacter from soil samples. Soil Biol Biochem. 2004;36(9):1475–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.04.024
  10. 10. Jiménez DJ, Montaña JS, Martínez MM. Characterization of free nitrogen fixing bacteria of the genus Azotobacter in organic vegetable-grown Colombian soils. Braz J Microbiol. 2011;42:846–58. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-83822011000300003
  11. 11. Tsao PH, Ocana G. Selective isolation of species of Phytophthora from natural soils on an improved antibiotic medium. Nature. 1969;223(5206):636–38. https://doi.org/10.1038/223636a0
  12. 12. Mehta S, Nautiyal CS. An efficient method for qualitative screening of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria. Curr Microbiol. 2001;43:51–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002840010259
  13. 13. Rai SN, Gaur AC. Characterization of Azotobacter spp. and effect of Azotobacter and Azospirillum as inoculant on the yield and N-uptake of wheat crop. Plant Soil. 1988;109:131–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02197592
  14. 14. Akhter MS, Hossain SJ, Hossain SA, Datta RK. Isolation and characterization of salinity tolerant Azotobacter sp. Greener J Biol Sci. 2012;2(3):43–51. https://doi.org/10.15580/GJBS.2012.3.110312207
  15. 15. Kasa P, Modugapalem H, Battini K. Isolation, screening, and molecular characterization of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria isolates of Azotobacter and Trichoderma and their beneficial activities. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2015;6(2):360.
  16. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-9668.160006
  17. 16. Cappuccino JC, Sherman N. Ammonia production. Microbiology: A Laboratory Manual. 1992;125–79.
  18. 17. Castric PA. Hydrogen cyanide, a secondary metabolite of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Can J Microbiol. 1975;21(5):613–618. https://doi.org/10.1139/m75-088
  19. 18. Saravanan VS, Kalaiarasan P, Madhaiyan M, Thangaraju M. Solubilization of insoluble zinc compounds by Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus and the detrimental action of zinc ion (Zn²+) and zinc chelates on root knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2007;44(3):235–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.2006.02079.x
  20. 19. Schwyn B, Neilands J. Universal chemical assay for the detection and determination of siderophores. Anal Biochem. 1987;160(1):47–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(87)90612-9
  21. 20. Altaf MM, Ahmad I. In vitro biofilm development and enhanced rhizosphere colonization of Triticum aestivum by fluorescent Pseudomonas sp. J Pure Appl Microbiol. 2019;13(3):1441–449. https://doi.org/10.22207/JPAM.13.3.14
  22. 21. Chennappa G, Naik MK, Amaresh YS, Nagaraja H, Sreenivasa MY. Azotobacter: A potential biofertilizer and bioinoculant for sustainable agriculture. In: Microorganisms for Green Revolution: Volume 1 - Microbes for Sustainable Crop Production. 2017;87–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6241-4_5
  23. 22. Patowary K, Patowary R, Kalita MC, Deka S. Development of an efficient bacterial consortium for the potential remediation of hydrocarbons from contaminated sites. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:1092. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01092
  24. 23. Gospodaryov D, Lushchak V. Some properties of melanin produced by Azotobacter chroococcum and its possible application in biotechnology. Biotechnol Acta. 2011;4(2):61–9.
  25. 24. Mukhtar H, Bashir H, Nawaz A, Haq I. Optimization of growth conditions for Azotobacter species and their use as biofertilizer. J Bacteriol Mycol. 2018;6:274–78. https://doi.org/10.15406/jbmoa.2018.06.00217
  26. 25. Kaviyarasan GP, Shricharan SP, Kathiravan RP. Studies on isolation, biochemical characterization and nitrogen fixing ability of Azotobacter sp. isolated from agricultural soils. Int J Sci Eng Appl Sci. 2020;6(11):118–25. https://doi.org/10.13141/RG.2.2.33382.65600
  27. 26. Kumari S, Yadav KS, Kaur H, Kishor S. Effect of Azotobacter and Pseudomonas along with various levels of NPK on growth and flowering of marigold cv. Pusa Narangi Gainda. Indian J Agric Sci. 2021;91(2):630–35. https://doi.org/10.15740/HAS/IJAS/17.2/630-635
  28. 27. Nosrati R, Owlia P, Saderi H, Rasooli I, Malboobi MA. Phosphate solubilization characteristics of efficient nitrogen fixing soil Azotobacter strains. Iran J Microbiol. 2014;6(4):285.
  29. 28. Kumar V, Narula N. Solubilization of inorganic phosphates and growth emergence of wheat as affected by Azotobacter chroococcum mutants. Biol Fertil Soils. 1999;28:301–05. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003740050497
  30. 29. Garg SK, Bhatnagar A, Kalla A, Narula N. In vitro nitrogen fixation, phosphate solubilization, survival and nutrient release by Azotobacter strains in an aquatic system. Bioresour Technol. 2001;80(2):101–09. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00081-5
  31. 30. Evstatieva Y. Characterization and morphological study of Azotobacter sp. strain. Annual of Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski” Faculty of Biology. 2019;383–93.
  32. 31. Sulaiman KH, Al-Barakah FN, Assafed AM, Dar BAM. Isolation and identification of Azospirillum and Azotobacter species from Acacia spp. at Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Bangladesh J Bot. 2019;48(2):239–51. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjb.v48i2.47546
  33. 32. Shrivastava R, Shrivastava AK, Dewangan N. Combined application of Azotobacter and urea to improve growth of rice (Oryza sativum). IOSR J Environ Sci Toxicol Food Technol. 2015;1(3):67–72.
  34. 33. Chennappa G, Naik MK, Adkar-Purushothama CR, Amaresh YS, Sreenivasa MY. PGP potential, abiotic stress tolerance and antifungal activity of Azotobacter strains isolated from paddy soils. 2016.
  35. 34. Jain D, Kaur G, Bhojiya AA, Chauhan S, Khandelwal SK, Meena RH, et al. Phenetic characterization of nitrogen fixing Azotobacter from rhizospheric soil of Southern Rajasthan. J Pure Appl Microbiol. 2021;15(1):428–36. https://doi.org/10.22207/JPAM.15.1.40
  36. 35. Williams HJ, Edwards TG. Estimation of cyanide with alkaline picrate. J Sci Food Agric. 1980;31(1):15–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740310104
  37. 36. Maheshwari DK, Dubey RC, Aeron A, Kumar B, Kumar S, Tewari S, et al. Integrated approach for disease management and growth enhancement of Sesamum indicum L. utilizing Azotobacter chroococcum TRA2 and chemical fertilizer. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;28:3015–024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-012-1112-4
  38. 37. Jnawali AD, Ojha RB, Marahatta S. Role of Azotobacter in soil fertility and sustainability - A review. Adv Plants Agric Res. 2015;2(6):1–5.
  39. 38. Fomina M, Alexander IJ, Hillier S, Gadd GM. Zinc phosphate and pyromorphite solubilization by soil plant-symbiotic fungi. Geomicrobiol J. 2004;21:351–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490450490462066
  40. 39. Jones DL, Darrah PR. Role of root-derived organic acids in the mobilization of nutrients from the rhizosphere. Plant Soil. 1994;166:247–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00008338
  41. 40. Aung A, Sev TM, Mon AA, San Yu S. Detection of abiotic stress tolerant Azotobacter species for enhancing plant growth promoting activities. J Sci Innov Res. 2020;9(2):48–53. https://doi.org/10.31254/jsir.2020.9203
  42. 41. Kraemer SM. Iron oxide dissolution and solubility in the presence of siderophores. Aquat Sci. 2004;66:3–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-003-0690-5
  43. 42. Saravanan VS, Kumar MR, Sa TM. Microbial zinc solubilization and their role on plants. In: Bacteria in Agrobiology: Plant Nutrient Management. 2011;47–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21061-7_3
  44. 43. Baars O, Zhang X, Gibson MI, Stone AT, Morel FM, Seyedsayamdost MR. Crochelins: Siderophores with an unprecedented iron-chelating moiety from the nitrogen-fixing bacterium Azotobacter chroococcum. Angew Chem. 2018;130(2):545–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.201709720
  45. 44. Lynch JM. Origin, nature and biological activity of aliphatic substances and growth hormones found in soil. In: Soil Organic Matter and Biological Activity. 1985;151–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5105-1_5
  46. 45. Bhattacharyya C, Banerjee S, Acharya U, Mitra A, Mallick I, Haldar A, et al. Evaluation of plant growth promotion properties and induction of antioxidative defense mechanism by tea rhizobacteria of Darjeeling, India. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):15536. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72439-z
  47. 46. Sagar A, Sayyed RZ, Ramteke PW, et al. Synergistic effect of Azotobacter nigricans and nitrogen phosphorus potassium fertilizer on agronomic and yield traits of maize (Zea mays L.). Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:952212. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.952212
  48. 47. Sindhu SS, Parmar P, Phour M, Sehrawat A. Potassium-solubilizing microorganisms (KSMs) and their effect on plant growth improvement. In: Potassium solubilizing microorganisms for sustainable agriculture. New Delhi: Springer India; 2016. p. 171–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2776-2_13
  49. 48. Singh G, Biswas DR, Marwaha TS. Mobilization of potassium from waste mica by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and its assimilation by maize (Zea mays) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): A hydroponics study under phytotron growth chamber. J Plant Nutr. 2010;33(8):1236–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904161003765760
  50. 49. Baba ZA, Hamid B, Sheikh TA, Alotaibi SH, El Enshasy HA, Ansari MJ, et al. Psychrotolerant Mesorhizobium sp. isolated from temperate and cold desert regions solubilizes potassium and produces multiple plant growth-promoting metabolites. Molecules. 2021;26(19):5758. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26195758
  51. 50. Leaungvutiviroj C, Ruangphisarn P, Hansanimitkul P, Shinkawa H, Sasaki K. Development of a new biofertilizer with a high capacity for N₂ fixation, phosphate and potassium solubilization and auxin production. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2010;74(5):1098–101. https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb.90898
  52. 51. Abdel Latef AAH, Omer AM, Badawy AA, Osman MS, Ragaey MM. Strategy of salt tolerance and interactive impact of Azotobacter chroococcum and/or Alcaligenes faecalis inoculation on canola (Brassica napus L.) plants grown in saline soil. Plants. 2021;10(1):110. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10010110
  53. 52. Abdul-Baki AA, Anderson JD. Vigor determination in soybean seed by multiple criteria. Crop Sci. 1973;13(6):630–633. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1973.0011183X001300060013x
  54. 53. Sahoo RK, Ansari MW, Dangar TK, Mohanty S, Tuteja N. Phenotypic and molecular characterization of efficient nitrogen-fixing Azotobacter strains from rice fields for crop improvement. Protoplasma. 2014;251:511–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-013-0547-2
  55. 54. Bashan Y, De-Bashan LE. How the plant growth-promoting bacterium Azospirillum promotes plant growth - A critical assessment. Adv Agron. 2010;108:77–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(10)08002-8
  56. 55. Hashmi I, Paul C, Al-Dourobi A, Sandoz F, Deschamps P, Junier T, et al. Comparison of the plant growth-promotion performance of a consortium of Bacilli inoculated as endospores or as vegetative cells. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2019;95(11):fiz147. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiz147
  57. 56. Perrig D, Boiero ML, Masciarelli OA, Penna C, Ruiz OA, Cassán FD, et al . Plant-growth-promoting compounds produced by two agronomically important strains of Azospirillum brasilense, and implications for inoculant formulation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007;75:1143–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-007-0909-9
  58. 57. Kennedy IR, Choudhury ATMA, Kecskés ML. Non-symbiotic bacterial diazotrophs in crop-farming systems: Can their potential for plant growth promotion be better exploited? Soil Biol Biochem. 2004;36(8):1229–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.04.006
  59. 58. Saharan BS, Nehra V. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: A critical review. Life Sci Med Res. 2011;21(1):30.
  60. 59. Romero-Perdomo F, Abril J, Camelo M, Camelo A, Zúñiga D, Uribe D, et al. Azotobacter chroococcum as a potentially useful bacterial biofertilizer for cotton (Gossypium hirsutum): Effect in reducing N fertilization. Rev Argent Microbiol. 2017;49(4):377–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ram.2017.04.006
  61. 60. Neuhoff D, Neumann G, Weinmann M. Testing plant growth promoting microorganisms in the field - A proposal for standards. Front Plant Sci. 2024;14:1324665. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1324665
  62. 61. Bashan Y, Prabhu SR, De-Bashan LE, Kloepper JW. Disclosure of exact protocols of fermentation, identity of microorganisms within consortia, formation of advanced consortia with microbe-based products. Biol Fertil Soils. 2020;56:443–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-020-01464-x
  63. 62. Soliman SA, Abdelhameed RE, Metwally RA. In vivo and in vitro evaluation of the antifungal activity of the PGPR Bacillus amyloliquefaciens RaSh1 (MZ945930) against Alternaria alternata with growth promotion influences on Capsicum annuum L. plants. Microb Cell Fact. 2023;22(1):70. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-023-02080-8
  64. 63. Khare E, Arora NK. Effects of soil environment on field efficacy of microbial inoculants. In: Plant microbes symbiosis: Applied Facets. New Delhi: Springer India; 2014. p. 353–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2068-8_19
  65. 64. Basu A, Prasad P, Das SN, Kalam S, Sayyed RZ, Reddy MS, et al. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) as green bioinoculants: Recent developments, constraints, and prospects. Sustainability. 2021;13(3):1140. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031140
  66. 65. Joshi P, Saini A, Banerjee S, Bose R, Bhandari MS, Pandey A, et al. Agriculturally important microbes: Challenges and opportunities. In: Microbiological activity for soil and plant health management. 2021;1–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2922-8_1

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.