Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Review Articles

Vol. 12 No. sp4 (2025): Recent Advances in Agriculture by Young Minds - III

Recent approaches to enhance post-harvest handling of cut flowers for global export market

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.10419
Submitted
2 July 2025
Published
26-11-2025

Abstract

The global floriculture industry, particularly the trade in cut flowers, has witnessed significant growth over recent decades, becoming a vital component of agricultural exports for many nations. However, cut flowers are highly perishable commodities, highly susceptible to physiological deterioration, microbial contamination and abiotic stresses post-harvest. Effective postharvest handling is essential to preserve quality attributes such as colour, turgidity, scent and vase life parameters critical for consumer satisfaction and marketability. This review explores recent scientific and technological advances in postharvest handling practices aimed at enhancing flower longevity and ensuring competitiveness in international markets. Topics include the use of chemical preservatives, ethylene inhibitors and genetic improvements; advances in microbial control using UV-C, ozone and essential oils; integration of automated grading systems using AI and machine vision; and the adoption of innovative, sustainable packaging solutions including biodegradable materials, smart packaging and Modified Atmosphere Packaging (MAP).

References

  1. 1. Devrani N, Kakkar P, Sahu A, Tiwari C. Global trends in floriculture. Floric Landscaping Chron Revital Floric Sect Sri Lanka Collab Insights. 2023;190–221.
  2. 2. Anumala NV, Kumar R. Floriculture sector in India: Current status and export potential. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol. 2021;96(5):673–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2021.1902863
  3. 3. Jhanji S, Kaur G, Chumber M. Deciphering flower senescence physiology: Advancements in post-harvest storage and preservation techniques for enhancing longevity. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol. 2025;100(2):164–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2024.2404039
  4. 4. Al-Dairi M, Pathare PB, Al-Yahyai R, Opara UL. Mechanical damage of fresh produce in postharvest transportation: Current status and future prospects. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2022;124:195–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2022.04.018
  5. 5. Duan Z, Liu W, Zeng S, Zhu C, Chen L, Cui W. Research on a real-time, high-precision end-to-end sorting system for fresh-cut flowers. Agriculture. 2024;14(9):1532. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14091532
  6. 6. El-Ramady HR. Integrated nutrient management and postharvest of crops. Sustain Agric Rev. 2013;13:163–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00915-5_8
  7. 7. Brahma BJ, Antil RS, Yadav SK, Kaushik N. A study on the effect of silver nitrate and 8-hydroxyquinoline citrate pulsing solutions on Lilium cut flowers. J Appl Nat Sci. 2023;15(2). https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v15i2.4608
  8. 8. Kumar N, Srivastava GC, Dixit K. Flower bud opening and senescence in roses (Rosa hybrida L.). Plant Growth Regul. 2008;55:81–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-008-9263-x
  9. 9. Sharma S, Thakur AK, Maiti R. Post-harvest technology for reducing stress on bioresource: Recent advances and future needs. Bioresour Stress Manag. 2016;229–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0995-2_12
  10. 10. Veen H. Silver thiosulphate: An experimental tool in plant science. Sci Hortic. 1983;20(3):211–24.
  11. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4238(83)90001-8
  12. 11. Davies PJ. The plant hormones: their nature, occurrence and functions. In: Plant hormones: physiology, biochemistry and molecular biology. Springer; 1995. p. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0473-9_1
  13. 12. Paul V, Pandey R. 1-Methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) treatments. In: Novel postharvest treatments of fresh produce. CRC Press; 2017. p. 149–216. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315370149-7
  14. 13. Hooker MT. The history of Holland. Bloomsbury Publishing USA; 1999. https://doi.org/10.5040/9798400664847
  15. 14. Chen L, Wang M, Wang H, Zhou C, Yuan J, Li X, et al. Isothermal storage delays the senescence of post-harvest apple fruit through the regulation of antioxidant activity and energy metabolism. Foods. 2023;12(9):1765. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12091765
  16. 15. Hatibarua P, Talukdar MC, Mahanta S, Sarmah R, Deka K, Das J. Effect of different wet packaging methods on flower quality of Anthurium for long distance transportation. Pharma Innov J. 2022;11:1785–7.
  17. 16. Dhiman MR, Kumar R, Kumar S. Postharvest handling and disease management of cut flowers. In: Postharvest handling and diseases of horticultural produce. CRC Press; 2021. p. 415–30. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003045502-35
  18. 17. Erbs G, Newman MA. Plant diseases caused by prokaryotes: Bacteria and mollicutes. In: Agrios’ plant pathology. Elsevier; 2024. p. 465–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-822429-8.00016-9
  19. 18. Vijay Rakesh Reddy S, Sudhakar Rao DV, Sharma RR, Preethi P, Pandiselvam R. Role of ozone in post-harvest disinfection and processing of horticultural crops: A review. Ozone Sci Eng. 2022;44(1):127–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/01919512.2021.1994367
  20. 19. Gąstoł M, Błaszczyk U. Effect of magnetic field and UV-C radiation on postharvest fruit properties. Agriculture. 2024;14(7):1167. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14071167
  21. 20. Xu Y, Bassi A. Non-thermal plasma decontamination of microbes: A state of the art. Biotechnol Prog. 2025;41(2):e3511. https://doi.org/10.1002/btpr.3511
  22. 21. Sun X, Baldwin E, Bai J. Applications of gaseous chlorine dioxide on postharvest handling and storage of fruits and vegetables – A review. Food Control. 2019;95:18–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.07.044
  23. 22. Tanasă F, Nechifor M, Teacă CA. Essential oils as alternative green broad-spectrum biocides. Plants. 2024;13(23):3442. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13233442
  24. 23. Marshall D. Sanitation, sterilization and disinfection. Mosbys Compr Rev Vet Tech E-Book. 2024;222.
  25. 24. Sosnowski MR, Fletcher JD, Daly AM, Rodoni BC, Viljanen-Rollinson SLH. Techniques for the treatment, removal and disposal of host material during programmes for plant pathogen eradication. Plant Pathol. 2009;58(4):621–35.
  26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.2009.02042.x
  27. 25. Lalam R, Lavanya K, Nadella V, Kiran BR. Automatic sorting and grading of fruits based on maturity and size using machine vision and artificial intelligence. J Sci Res Rep. 2025;31(1):153–63. https://doi.org/10.9734/jsrr/2025/v31i12754
  28. 26. Soleimanipour A, Chegini GR. A vision-based hybrid approach for identification of Anthurium flower cultivars. Comput Electron Agric. 2020;174:105460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2020.105460
  29. 27. Xu Z, Jiang D. AI-powered plant science: transforming forestry monitoring, disease prediction and climate adaptation. Plants. 2025;14(11):1626. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14111626
  30. 28. Jin T, Han X. Robotic arms in precision agriculture: A comprehensive review of the technologies, applications, challenges and future prospects. Comput Electron Agric. 2024;221:108938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2024.108938
  31. 29. Liberty JT, Habnabakize E, Adamu PI, Bata SM. Advancing food manufacturing: Leveraging robotic solutions for enhanced quality assurance and traceability across global supply networks. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2024;104705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2024.104705
  32. 30. van Liemt G. The world cut flower industry: Trends and prospects. International Labour Office; 1999.
  33. 31. Cheng K. Sustainable packaging approaches for current waste challenges. Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 2019.
  34. 32. Samanta KK, Basak S, Chattopadhyay SK. Potentials of fibrous and nonfibrous materials in biodegradable packaging. Environ Footpr Packag. 2016;75–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-913-4_4
  35. 33. Wani MA, Din A, Nazki IT, Rehman TU, Al-Khayri JM, Jain SM, et al. Navigating the future: Exploring technological advancements and emerging trends in the sustainable ornamental industry. Front Environ Sci. 2023;11:1188643. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1188643
  36. 34. Ghoshal G. Recent trends in active, smart and intelligent packaging for food products. In: Food packaging and preservation. Elsevier; 2018. p. 343–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-811516-9.00010-5
  37. 35. Álvarez-Hernández MH, Martínez-Hernández GB, Avalos-Belmontes F, Castillo-Campohermoso MA, Contreras-Esquivel JC, Artés-Hernández F. Potassium permanganate-based ethylene scavengers for fresh horticultural produce as an active packaging. Food Eng Rev. 2019;11:159–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12393-019-09193-0
  38. 36. George J, Kumar R, Aaliya B, Sunooj KV. Packaging solutions for monitoring food quality and safety. In: Engineering aspects of food quality and safety. Springer; 2023. p. 411–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30683-9_14
  39. 37. Neumann T. Comparative analysis of long-distance transportation with the example of sea and rail transport. Energies. 2021;14(6):1689. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14061689
  40. 38. Tiamiyu NAT. Exploring next generation packaging systems in a refrigerated container using CFD modelling. Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University; 2020.
  41. 39. Dauda WP, Dantata IJ, Adetunji CO, Abraham P, Ifeanyi UJ, Glen E, et al. The effect of evaporative coolant structure on ornamental plants. In: Evaporative coolers for the postharvest management of fruits and vegetables. Elsevier; 2023. p. 209–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-89864-5.00011-4
  42. 40. Fadda A, Palma A, Azara E, D’Aquino S. Effect of modified atmosphere packaging on overall appearance and nutraceutical quality of pot marigold held at 5 °C. Food Res Int. 2020;134:109248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109248
  43. 41. Kou L, Turner ER, Luo Y. Extending the shelf life of edible flowers with controlled release of 1-methylcyclopropene and modified atmosphere packaging. J Food Sci. 2012;77(5):S188–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2012.02683.x
  44. 42. Burana C, Kurokura T, Yamaki Y, Yamane K. Modified atmosphere (MA) and 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) combination treatment extends the postharvest life of carnations. Environ Control Biol. 2014;52(3):131–6. https://doi.org/10.2525/ecb.52.131
  45. 43. Zeltzer S, Meir S, Mayak S. Modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) for long-term shipment of cut flowers. In: IV International Conference on Postharvest Science 553. 2000. p. 631–4. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2001.553.152
  46. 44. Poonsri W. Effects of active and passive modified atmosphere packaging on biochemical properties of cut Dendrobium orchid flowers. Heliyon. 2021;7(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07197
  47. 45. Poonsri W. Effect of modified and controlled atmosphere storage on enzyme activity and senescence of Dendrobium orchids. Heliyon. 2020;6(9). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05070
  48. 46. Patel T, Singh A. Effect of different modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) films and cold storage temperatures (5, 10 and 15 °C) on keeping quality of gerbera (Gerbera jamesonii) flowers. In: IX International Symposium on Postharvest Quality of Ornamental Plants 847. 2008. p. 353–8. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2009.847.48
  49. 47. Ali SM, Nidoni U, Palanimuthu SH, Ramappa K, Ramesh G, Naik N. Enhancing shelf life and freshness retention in jasmine flowers (Jasminum multiflorum L.) through post-harvest chemical treatments. Int J Adv Biochem Res. 2024;8:265–70. https://doi.org/10.33545/26174693.2024.v8.i3Sd.720
  50. 48. Chrysargyris A, Tzionis A, Xylia P, Tzortzakis N. Effects of salinity on Tagetes growth, physiology and shelf life of edible flowers stored in passive modified atmosphere packaging or treated with ethanol. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:1765. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01765
  51. 49. Pal S, Kumar Ghosh P, Bhattacharjee P. Effect of packaging on shelf-life and lutein content of marigold (Tagetes erecta L.) flowers. Recent Pat Biotechnol. 2016;10(1):103–20. https://doi.org/10.2174/1872208310666160725195516
  52. 50. Yahia EM, Singh SP. Tropical fruits. In: Modified and controlled atmospheres for the storage, transportation and packaging of horticultural commodities. CRC Press; 2009. p. 415–62. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420069587-20
  53. 51. Dastagiri D, Sharma BP, Dilta BS. Effect of wrapping materials and cold storage durations on keeping quality of cut flowers of Ornithogalum thyrsoides Jacq. Indian J Appl Res. 2014;4(2):4–6. https://doi.org/10.15373/2249555X/FEB2014/71
  54. 52. Díaz JMS, Jiménez-Becker S, Jamilena M. A screening test for the determination of cut flower longevity and ethylene sensitivity of carnation. Hortic Sci. 2017;44(1):153. https://doi.org/10.17221/134/2015-HORTSCI
  55. 53. Aros D, Orellana K, Escalona V. Modified atmosphere packaging as a method to extend postharvest life of tulip flowers. N Z J Crop Hortic Sci. 2017;45(3):202–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/01140671.2017.1296872
  56. 54. Faust JE, Dole JM. Cut flowers and foliages. CABI; 2021. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781789247602.0000
  57. 55. Desai YG, Bhujel S, Bharadwaj RMM. Fruit Science Chronicles: A Collaborative Insight. Vol. 1. 1st ed. Stella International Publication; 2024. 178 p.
  58. 56. Behdani B, Fan Y, Bloemhof JM. Cool chain and temperature-controlled transport: An overview of concepts, challenges and technologies. Sustain Food Supply Chains. 2019;167–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-813411-5.00012-0
  59. 57. Kitinoja L. Use of cold chains for reducing food losses in developing countries. Population. 2013;6(1.23):5–60.
  60. 58. Kubo Y. Ethylene, oxygen, carbon dioxide and temperature in postharvest physiology. In: Abiotic stress biology in horticultural plants. Springer; 2014. p. 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55251-2_2
  61. 59. Mustafa MFMS, Namasivayam N, Demirovic A. Food cold chain logistics and management: A review of current development and emerging trends. J Agric Food Res. 2024;101343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101343
  62. 60. Selvam AP, Al-Humairi SNS. The impact of IoT and sensor integration on real-time weather monitoring systems: A systematic review. 2023. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3579172/v1
  63. 61. Karithi EM. Evaluation of the efficacy of CoolBot™ cold storage technology to preserve quality and extend shelf life of mango fruits. University of Nairobi; 2016.
  64. 62. Siegler J. How Miami became the gateway for flowers in the USA. Int J Teach Case Stud. 2020;11(3):208–22. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTCS.2020.111136
  65. 63. de Keijzer ROB. A new journey from flower to vase. 2024.
  66. 64. Kelley KM. Environmental constraints on marketing, production and postharvest shelf life of edible flowers. Michigan State University; 2000.
  67. 65. Spence C. Using ambient scent to enhance well-being in the multisensory built environment. Front Psychol. 2020;11:598859. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.598859
  68. 66. Simonson A, Schmitt BH. Marketing aesthetics: The strategic management of brands, identity and image. Simon and Schuster; 1997.
  69. 67. Barbero S. Packaging design in the digital age: a systemic approach to e-commerce. 2020.
  70. 68. Rayna T, Striukova L. Involving consumers: The role of digital technologies in promoting ‘prosumption’ and user innovation. J Knowl Econ. 2021;12:218–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-016-0390-8
  71. 69. Nyamete LK. Supply chain resilience strategies and performance of floricultural firms in Nakuru county, Kenya. 2024.
  72. 70. Parker-Strak R, Boardman R, Barnes L, Doyle S, Studd R. Product development, fashion buying and merchandising. Text Prog. 2022;54(4):247–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405167.2023.2182062
  73. 71. Kaur R, Watson JA. A scoping review of postharvest losses, supply chain management and technology: implications for produce quality in developing countries. J ASABE. 2024;67(5):1103–31. https://doi.org/10.13031/ja.15660
  74. 72. Bandara K, Katukurunda K. Exploring the Blockchain’s Green Revolution in Medicinal Plant Supply Chains (Blossoming Trust)–A Review. J Agric Value Addit. 2024;7(2). https://doi.org/10.4038/java.v7i2.137
  75. 73. Cil AY, Abdurahman D, Cil I. Internet of Things enabled real time cold chain monitoring in a container port. J Shipp Trade. 2022;7(1):9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41072-022-00110-z
  76. 74. Pajic V, Andrejic M, Chatterjee P. Enhancing cold chain logistics: A framework for advanced temperature monitoring in transportation and storage. Mechatron Intell Transp Syst. 2024;3(1):16–30. https://doi.org/10.56578/mits030102
  77. 75. Mebrat S, Degwale A, Mekonen T, Mebrat A. Flower production prospects and sustainability challenges in Ethiopia: A systematic review. Front Environ Sci. 2022;10:1026544. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1026544
  78. 76. Garcia E de S, Quaresma N, Aemro YB, Coimbra AP, De Almeida AT. Cooling with the sun: Empowering off-grid communities in developing countries with solar-powered cold storage systems. Energy Res Soc Sci. 2024;117:103686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103686
  79. 77. Proietti S, Scariot V, De Pascale S, Paradiso R. Flowering mechanisms and environmental stimuli for flower transition: Bases for production scheduling in greenhouse floriculture. Plants. 2022;11(3):432. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11030432
  80. 78. Nelson R, Wiesner-Hanks T, Wisser R, Balint-Kurti P. Navigating complexity to breed disease-resistant crops. Nat Rev Genet. 2018;19(1):21–33. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg.2017.82
  81. 79. Lan YC, Tam VW, Xing W, Datt R, Chan Z. Life cycle environmental impacts of cut flowers: A review. J Clean Prod. 2022;369:133415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133415

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.