Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp1 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Effect of conservation tillage on soil penetration resistance, bulk density, porosity and yield of rice (Oryza sativa) in rice-based cropping system

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.10486
Submitted
6 July 2025
Published
18-03-2026

Abstract

Conservation tillage has gained momentum as a sustainable alternative to conventional puddling in rice-based cropping systems, particularly in heavy-textured soils prone to structural degradation. The experiment was conducted during 2024-2025 at the Tamil Nadu Rice Research Institute, Aduthurai, to evaluate the impact of various conservation tillage methods on soil physical properties-namely, bulk density, porosity, penetration resistance and grain yield of rice (Oryza sativa L.) across three consecutive cropping seasons. Twelve treatment combinations were evaluated, including transplanted rice (TPR), non - puddled transplanted rice (NPTR) and direct - seeded rice (DSR), each under three fertiliser levels (100 %, 75 % and 50 % of the recommended dose of fertilisers - RDF), with and without microbial consortia (MC) containing phosphate - solubilising bacteria, potassium - releasing bacteria, zinc - solubilising bacteria and Azospirillum spp. The study revealed that conservation tillage with MC significantly influenced soil physical properties and rice yield. T6 (NPTR with 100 % RDF + MC) had the lowest bulk density (1.40 Mg m-3) at the end of the third season, whereas T1 (TPR with 100 % RDF) maintained the highest bulk density (1.53 Mg m-3), indicating less structural improvement. Soil porosity improved across all treatments, with T6 achieving the highest porosity (52.1 %), representing a 12.28 % increase over the initial value. The mean soil penetration resistance at harvest under T6 had the lowest (135 kPa) at 0–20, 20–40 and 40–60 cm depth in all three seasons. Grain yield was significantly enhanced in T6 (6028 kg ha-¹), followed by T2 (5932 kg ha-1) and T10 (5922 kg ha-1). Hence, the integration of MC with reduced tillage offers a viable strategy to improve soil physical quality and nutrient efficiency by supporting long-term agricultural sustainability.

References

  1. 1. Maiti A, Hasan M K, Sannigrahi S, Bar S, Chakraborti S, Mahto S S, et al. Optimal rainfall threshold for monsoon rice production in India varies across space and time. Commun Earth Environ. 2024;5(1):34-45. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247 - 024 - 01414 - 7
  2. 2. Thirumalai P, Vetrivel A. Kaveri river water dispute and reduction in crop productivity in a sample village depending on river water for irrigation. Appl Ecol Environ Sci. 2021;9(9):814. https://doi.org/10.12691/aees - 9 - 9 - 6
  3. 3. Latha M, Prasad PRK, Prasad PRK, Lakshmipathy R, Srinivasarao V. Effect of integrated nitrogen management on rice and rice fallow rabi crops. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2019;8(1):271-80. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2019.801.030
  4. 4. Raju MVS, Subrahmaniyan K, Porpaavai S, Babu MVS, Rahale CS. Diversification of suitable alternate cropping system for enhancing productivity, profitability and resource use efficiency in Cauvery delta zone of Tamil Nadu. Int J Chem Stud. 2020;8(6):407-15. https://doi.org/10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i6f.10804
  5. 5. Shrestha S, Shrestha J, Jha SK, Khadka D, Paneru P, Gyawaly P. Soil chemical properties under conservation agriculture and cereal - based cropping system in Eastern Tarai of Nepal. J Nepal Agric Res Counc. 2020;6(2):115. https://doi.org/10.3126/jnarc.v6i0.28122
  6. 6. Liu J, Zhang J, Ma Q, Zhou J. Role of plant growth - promoting microbes in enhancing nutrient availability and improving soil health. Agronomy. 2022;13(2):425-32. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13020425
  7. 7. Li Z, Kravchenko A, Cupples AM, Guber A, Kuzyakov Y, Robertson G P, Blagodatskaya Е. Composition and metabolism of microbial communities in soil pores. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):200–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467 - 024 - 47755 - x
  8. 8. Steel RGD, Torrie JH. Principles and procedures of statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1998. p. 65–94.
  9. 9. Longepierre M, Widmer F, Keller T, Weisskopf P, Colombi T, Six J, et al. Limited resilience of the soil microbiome to mechanical compaction within four growing seasons of agricultural management. ISME Commun. 2021;1(1):34521. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43705 - 021 - 00046 - 8
  10. 10. Singh PK, Singh M, Tripathi BN. Glomalin: an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal soil protein. Protoplasma. 2013;250(3):663–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709 - 012 - 0453 - z
  11. 11. Six J, Bossuyt H, Degryze S, Denef K. A history of research on the link between (micro) aggregates, soil biota and soil organic matter dynamics. Soil Tillage Res. 2024;79(3):7–31.
  12. 12. Shahane AJ, Singh R, Ghosh PK, Bhatt BP. Crop establishment methods, use of microbial consortia, biofilms and zinc fertilization for enhancing productivity and profitability of rice - wheat cropping system. Indian J Agron. 2021;64(4):407–14.
  13. 13. Naveen Kumar G. Impact of conservation tillage and nitrogen management on soil temperature and moisture in aerobic rice. Indian J Soil Conserv. 2024;70(4):17–31.
  14. 14. Costa OY, Raaijmakers JM, Kuramae EE. Microbial extracellular polymeric substances: ecological function and impact on soil aggregation. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:10989. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01636
  15. 15. Manu A, Sharma AR, Singh G, Choudhary M. Influence of microbial consortia mediated in - situ rice straw management options on yield, profitability and energy use in rice - wheat cropping system. Agric Res. 2021;10(2):553–64.
  16. 16. Janati W, Mikou K, Ghadraoui LE, Errachidi F. Growth stimulation of two legumes (Vicia faba and Pisum sativum) using phosphate - solubilizing bacteria inoculation. Front Microbiol. 2023;14(1):23–32. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1212702
  17. 17. Celik I, Ortas I, Kilic S. Effects of compost, mycorrhiza, manure and fertilizer on some physical properties of a Chromoxerert soil. Soil Tillage Res. 2010;106(2):233–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2009.12.002
  18. 18. Jat ML, Saharawat YS, Gupta R. Conservation agriculture in cereal systems of South Asia: The role of mechanization. In: Conservation agriculture: global prospects and challenges. 2011. p. 151–170.
  19. 19. Shrestha RK, Sitaula BK, Bajracharya RM. Tillage and residue management effects on soil properties under rice - wheat system in Nepal. Soil Tillage Res. 2022;198(5):104533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2019.104533
  20. 20. Liu X, Mei S, Salles J F. Inoculated microbial consortia perform better than single strains in living soil: A meta - analysis. Appl Soil Ecol. 2023;18(4):105011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2023.105011
  21. 21. Tripathi RP, Sharma P, Singh S. Soil physical properties and response of rice (Oryza sativa) and wheat (Triticum aestivum) to conservation tillage and mechanized sowing. Indian J Agric Sci. 2017;77(11):681–6.
  22. 22. Verhulst N, Govaerts B, Verachtert E, Castellanos - Navarrete A, Mezzalama M, Wall PC, et al. Conservation agriculture, improving soil quality for sustainable production systems. Int J Agric Sustain. 2011;9(1):39–48. https://doi.org/10.3763/ijas.2010.0550
  23. 23. Shahid M, Singh UB, Khan MS, Singh PK, Kumar R, Singh RN, et al. Bacterial ACC deaminase: Insights into enzymology, biochemistry, genetics and potential role in amelioration of environmental stress in crop plants. Front Microbiol. 2023;14(3):223–30. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1132770
  24. 24. Biswas A, Hasan B, Singh V. Biological soil quality and seasonal variation on enzyme activities under conservation agriculture - based rice–mustard system. Soil Tillage Res. 2022;10(6):105.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.