Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp1 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Assessment of soybean yield using thermal indices

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.10505
Submitted
14 July 2025
Published
05-03-2026

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at all India coordinated research project on soybean, Dharwad in 2022 to assess the performance of soybean cultivars in terms of thermal indices and yield components. Ten soybean cultivars including three checks were evaluated in a randomized block design. Significant genotypic variation was observed in Growing Degree Days (GDD), with DSb 23 and DSb 39 recorded the highest GDD from Flower Initiation (FI) to Physiological Maturity (PM). Phenothermal Index (PTI) showed a consistent slight increase during crop development, with DSb 39 having the highest PTI at maturity. Heat Use Efficiency (HUE) differed significantly among cultivars, with DLSb 5 recording the highest value. DLSb 5 recorded the highest seed yield (31.21 q/ha), followed by DSb 34. Significantly lowest yield (18.83 q/ha) was recorded in DLSb 1, which also showed the lowest HUE. Significant variation in the number of pods per plant was also found, with DLSb 5 recorded the highest number of pods. Yield was positively associated with the number of pods per plant. The findings highlight the potential of DLSb 5 and DSb 34 as promising cultivars under varied thermal environments. These findings highlight key traits that improve soybean yield.

References

  1. 1. Soybean Processors Association of India. SOPA databank. Indore; 2023. https://www.sopa.org/databank
  2. 2. Kuruvila V, Varughese K, Iruthayaraj MR. Seasonal variation in yield and heat unit requirement of maize (Zea mays L.). Crop Res. 1995:67–73.
  3. 3. Rai HK, Suryawanshi A, Dangi DD. Computation of thermal indices for soybean in Madhya Pradesh. JNKVV Res J. 2015;49(2):189–92.
  4. 4. Sharma R, Kumar DS, Brar AS, Singh SP. Phenological behaviour of gobhi sarson (Brassica napus L.) and thermal indices as influenced by drip irrigation and fertigation schedules under semi-arid subtropical conditions of Punjab. J Agrometeorol. 2021;23(4):416–22. https://doi.org/10.54386/jam.v23i4.146
  5. 5. Kumar N, Kumar S, Nain AS, Roy S. Thermal indices in relation to crop phenology of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and urd (Vigna mungo L.) at Tarai region of Uttarakhand. Mausam. 2014;65(2):215–8. https://doi.org/10.54302/mausam.v65i2.977
  6. 6. Kiran BO, Chimmad VP. Correlation studies on effect of temperature regimes on phenology, growing degree days, heat use efficiency and seed yield in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes. Int J Pure Appl Biosci. 2018;2(6):248–52. https://doi.org/10.18782/2320-7051.2915
  7. 7. Chae S, Shin P, Youn J, Sung J, Jeon S. The effect of sowing date on soybean growth and yield under changing climate in the southern coastal region of Korea. Agriculture. 2025;15(11):1174. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15111174
  8. 8. Monteith JL. Consistency and convenience in the choice of units for agricultural science. Exp Agric. 1984;20(2):105–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479700000946
  9. 9. Masle J, Doussinault G, Farquhar GD, Sun B. Foliar stage in wheat correlates better to photothermal time than to thermal time. Plant Cell Environ. 1989;12(3):235–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1989.tb01938.x
  10. 10. Adsul DL, Wagh RS, Deshmukh DV, Bharud RW. Morpho-physiological studies of soybean genotypes for yield differences. J Agric Res Technol. 2014;39(3):417–23.
  11. 11. Baraskar VV, Kachhadia VH, Vachhani JH, Barad HR, Patel MB, Darwankar MS. Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill). Electron J Plant Breed. 2014;5(4):802–6.
  12. 12. Deosthali VD, Salunke CS, Akmanchi AA. Relationship of LAI and biomass of soybean with agroclimatic indices. J Agrometeorol. 2005;7(2):249–54. https://doi.org/10.54386/jam.v7i2.852
  13. 13. Singh A, Rao VU, Singh D, Singh R. Study on agrometeorological indices for soybean crop under different growing environments. J Agrometeorol. 2007;9(1):81–5. https://doi.org/10.54386/jam.v9i1.1096
  14. 14. Neog P, Bhuyan J, Baruah N. Thermal indices in relation to crop phenology and seed yield of soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill). J Agrometeorol. 2008:388–92.
  15. 15. Kaushik DK, Patel SR, Chandrawanshi SK, Khavse R, Chaudhary JL. Study on agrometeorological indices for soybean crop under different sowing dates in Chhattisgarh region of India. Indian J Agric Res. 2015;49(3):282–5. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-058X.2015.00046.3
  16. 16. Oz M, Karasu A, Goksoy AT, Turan ZM. Interrelationships of agronomical characteristics in soybean (Glycine max) grown in different environments. Plant Breed. 2009;11(1):85–8.
  17. 17. Ali A, Iqbal Z, Safdar ME, Ashraf M, Aziz M, Asif M, et al. Comparison of yield performance of soybean varieties under semi-arid conditions. J Anim Plant Sci. 2013;23(3):828–32.
  18. 18. Chamundeswari N, Aher RP. Character association and component analysis in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill). Ann Biol. 2003;19(2):199–203.
  19. 19. Nagarajan D, Kalaimagal T, Murugan E. Correlation and path coefficient analysis for yield and yield attributes in soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.). Int J Farm Sci. 2015;5(3):28–34.
  20. 20. Mahbub MM, Shirazy BJ. Evaluation of genetic diversity in different genotypes of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill). Am J Plant Biol. 2016;1(1):24–9.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.