Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp1 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Rainfall variability and sowing window effects on maize genotype performance in Chamarajanagara district, Karnataka

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.10650
Submitted
15 July 2025
Published
18-03-2026

Abstract

The study explores the use of rainfall patterns and maize types in Chamarajanagara district, Karnataka, India, where rainfall varies significantly from place to place and year to year. The researchers used data from weather stations collected every month from January to December 2021 and tested 6 methods to create full maps: Inverse distance weighted (IDW), Spline, Natural neighbour, Trend, Kriging and Topo to Raster. The results show that weather plays a significant role in maize yields, with timing and amount playing a crucial role. Sowing windows or the best weeks to plant seeds, are crucial in this region, as planting too early or too late can lead to water stress. The hybrid MAH 14-5 genotype was found to be particularly effective when sown in the first week of July, resulting in stronger growth, higher nutrition levels and reduced anti-nutritional factors. These findings emphasise the importance of selecting the right planting time to maximise water use efficiency, harness soil conditions and utilise sunlight intensity. Farmers who match sowing to rain peaks can boost yields without extra inputs. The study also highlighted how rain changes over time and space in the district, with some spots experiencing steady showers in June and others experiencing heavy bursts in August, leading to uneven crop growth. Smart planning involves tailoring sowing windows to local rain forecasts, choosing genotypes that fit the area's weather and aligning tasks like fertilising or weeding with rainfall. These steps help farmers adapt and achieve reliable harvests year after year.

References

  1. 1. Tai APK, Martin MV, Heald CL. Threat to future global food security from climate change and ozone air pollution. Nat Clim Change. 2014;4:817-21. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2317
  2. 2. Porter JR, Xie L, Challinor AJ, Cochrane K, Howden SM, Iqbal MM, et al. Food security and food production systems. In: Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Part A: Global and sectoral aspects. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press; 2014. p. 485-533.
  3. 3. Soussana JF, Graux AI, Tubiello FN. Improving the use of modelling for projections of climate change impacts on crops and pastures. J Exp Bot. 2010;61(8):2217-32. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq100
  4. 4. Kay AL, Davies HN. Calculating potential evaporation from climate model data: a source of uncertainty for hydrological climate change impacts. J Hydrol. 2008;358:221-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.06.005
  5. 5. Rabbani B, Safdary AJ. Effect of sowing date and plant density on yield and yield components of three maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes in Takhar climatic conditions of Afghanistan. Cent Asian J Plant Sci Innov. 2021;2(1):109-20.
  6. 6. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAOSTAT statistical database. Rome: FAO; 2020.
  7. 7. Agricultural Market Intelligence Centre. Maize outlook - October 2024. Hyderabad (IN): Professor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University. 2024.
  8. 8. Tsimba R, Edmeades GO, Millner JP, Kemp PD. The effect of planting date on maize grain yields and yield components. Field Crops Res. 2013;150:135-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2013.05.028
  9. 9. Van Roekel RJ, Coulter JA. Agronomic responses of corn hybrids to row width and plant density. Agron J. 2012;104:612-20. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2011.0380
  10. 10. Haarhoff SJ, Swanepoel PA. Plant population and maize grain yield: a global systematic review of rainfed trials. Crop Sci. 2018;58:1819-29. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2018.01.0003
  11. 11. Bruns HA, Abbas HK. Planting date effects on Bt and non-Bt corn in the mid-south USA. Agron J. 2006;98:100-6. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2005.0143
  12. 12. Kucharik CJ. A multidecadal trend of earlier corn planting in the central USA. Agron J. 2006;98:1544-50. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2006.0156
  13. 13. Bhat IA, Singh P. Spatial interpolation techniques for analysing precipitation trends over Kashmir Valley, Jammu & Kashmir, India. Int Res J Mod Eng Technol Sci. 2023;5(2):860-83.
  14. 14. Goodale CL, Aber JD, Ollinger SC. Mapping monthly precipitation, temperature and solar radiation for Ireland with polynomial regression and a digital elevation model. Clim Res. 1998;10:35-49. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr010035
  15. 15. Goovaerts P. Geostatistical approaches for incorporating elevation into the spatial interpolation of rainfall. J Hydrol. 2000;228(1-2):113-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00144-X
  16. 16. Vicente-Serrano SM, Saz-Sánchez MA, Cuadrat JM. Comparative analysis of interpolation methods in the Middle Ebro Valley (Spain): application to annual precipitation and temperature. Clim Res. 2003;24:161-80. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr024161
  17. 17. Lloyd CD. Assessing the effect of integrating elevation data into the estimation of monthly precipitation in Great Britain. J Hydrol. 2005;308(1-4):128-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.10.026
  18. 18. Hofstra N, Haylock M, New M, Jones PP, Frei C. Comparison of six methods for the interpolation of daily European climate data. J Geophys Res. 2008;113:D21110. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010100
  19. 19. Yao X, Fu B, Lü Y, Chang R, Wang S, Wang Y, et al. The multi-scale spatial variance of soil moisture in the semi-arid Loess Plateau of China. J Hydrol. 2021;593:125901.
  20. 20. Tao T, Chocat B, Liu S, Xin K. Uncertainty analysis of interpolation methods in rainfall spatial distribution - a case of small catchment in Lyon. J Water Resour Prot. 2009;2:136-44. https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2009.12018
  21. 21. Garcia M, Peters-Lidard CD, Goodrich DC. Spatial interpolation of precipitation in a dense gauge network for monsoon storm events in the southwestern United States. Water Resour Res. 2008;44(5):1-14. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005788
  22. 22. Hao Y, Mu S, Li S, Hu Y, Hu X, Liu Y. Improved inverse distance weighting interpolation method based on spatiotemporal correlation. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf. 2023;12(2):83.
  23. 23. Hengl T, Heuvelink GBM, Rossiter DG. About regression-kriging: from equations to case studies. Comput Geosci. 2007;33(10):1301-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2007.05.001
  24. 24. Setianto A, Triandini T. Comparison of kriging and inverse distance weighted (IDW) interpolation methods in lineament extraction and analysis. J Southeast Asian Appl Geol. 2013;5(1):21-9. https://doi.org/10.22146/jag.7204
  25. 25. Zhu X, Liu D, Yan C, Duan Z, Chen X, Duan Y, et al. A new method for spatial interpolation of meteorological data using deep learning. J Hydrol. 2022;605:127310.
  26. 26. Gong L, Kanevski M, Guo D, Yang F. Spatial interpolation with uncertainty: a survey. ACM Comput Surv. 2023;55(8):1-36. https://doi.org/10.1145/3538225
  27. 27. Zhu X, Chen F, Guo H. Gaussian process regression kriging for spatial interpolation of soil moisture. Remote Sens. 2023;15(6):1613.
  28. 28. Gräler B, Pebesma E, Heuvelink G. Spatio-temporal interpolation using gstat. R J. 2023;8(1):204-18. https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2016-014
  29. 29. Wadoux AMC, Heuvelink GBM, de Bruin S, Brus DJ. Spatial cross-validation is not the right way to evaluate map accuracy. Ecol Model. 2022;457:109692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2021.109692
  30. 30. Gupta RP. Remote sensing geology. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2005. p. 627.
  31. 31. Filho O, Soares W, Fernandez C. Mapping of the water table levels of unconfined aquifers using two interpolation methods. J Geogr Inf Syst. 2016;8:480-94. https://doi.org/10.4236/jgis.2016.84040
  32. 32. Liang L, Hale D. A stable and fast implementation of natural neighbor interpolation. CWP-657. Golden (CO): Center for Wave Phenomena, Colorado School of Mines. 2010.
  33. 33. Carrera-Hernández JJ, Gaskin SJ. Spatio-temporal analysis of daily precipitation and temperature in the Basin of Mexico. J Hydrol. 2007;336(3-4):231-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.12.021
  34. 34. Khentouche A, Dridi H. Variability analysis of temporal and spatial annual rainfall in the Massif of Aures (East of Algeria). Geogr Technica. 2019;14(1):36-48. https://doi.org/10.21163/GT_2019.141.03
  35. 35. Kumar S, Santosh. Temporal and spatial dynamics of rainfall in Satluj River Basin, Himachal Pradesh, India. Int Lett Chem Phys Astron. 2015;54:150-65. https://doi.org/10.56431/p-6p2zo2
  36. 36. Kumar B, Chattopadhyay R, Singh M, Chaudhari N, Kodari K, Barve A. Deep learning-based downscaling of summer monsoon rainfall data over Indian region. Theor Appl Climatol. 2021;143:1145-56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-020-03489-6
  37. 37. Gadgil S, Rajendran K, Pai DS. A new rain-based index for the Indian summer monsoon rainfall. Mausam. 2019;70(3):485-500. https://doi.org/10.54302/mausam.v70i3.253
  38. 38. Sharma KK, Singh AK, Dubey SK. Rainfall trend analysis for crop planning under rainfed conditions in district Agra of Uttar Pradesh. Mausam. 2018;69(4):599-606. https://doi.org/10.54302/mausam.v69i4.424
  39. 39. Sahu J, Chaudhary JL, Murari K, Puranik HV. Impact of seasonal rainfall trend and its variability on crop production in rainshadow districts of Chhattisgarh: a case study in Kawardha district. Int J Chem Stud. 2020;8(2):2639-45. https://doi.org/10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i2an.9149
  40. 40. Sontakke NA, Singh HN, Singh N. Rainfall spatial variability and its impact on important environment processes in India. AIP Conf Proc. 2009;1146(1):136-68. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3183539
  41. 41. Tashayo B, Honarbakhsh A, Akbari M, Eftekhar M. Land suitability assessment for maize farming using a GIS-AHP method for a semi-arid region, Iran. J Saudi Soc Agric Sci. 2020;19:332-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2020.03.003
  42. 42. Sowmyalatha BS, Shubhashree KS, Thimmegowda V. Rainfall and temperature variability analysis of ZARS, Mandya in Karnataka. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2019;8(5):44-50. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2019.805.006
  43. 43. Sharma C, Ojha CSP. Changes of annual precipitation and probability distributions for different climate types of the world. Water. 2019;11:2092. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11102092
  44. 44. Shreyas R, Punith DL, Bhagirathi, Anantha Krishna, Evagiri GM. Exploring different probability distributions for rainfall data of Kodagu - an assisting approach for food security. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2020;9(2):2972-80. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.902.339
  45. 45. Zeleke A, Tesfaye K, Tadesse T, Alem T, Ademe D, Adgo E. Analysis of climate variability and trends for climate-resilient maize farming system in major agroecology zones of Ethiopia. Adv Meteorol. 2023;2023:9562601. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/9562601
  46. 46. Kumar N, Chandrawanshi SK, Chaudhari NV, Patidar A, Chaudhari SN, Radadia GG. Decadal trend analysis of annual and seasonal rainfall of past 115 years at South Gujarat. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2017;6(10):4805-15. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.610.448
  47. 47. Antal A, Guerreiro PMP, Cheval S. Comparison of spatial interpolation methods for estimating the precipitation distribution in Portugal. Theor Appl Climatol. 2021;145:1193-206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-021-03675-0
  48. 48. Ananias DRS, Liska GR, Beijo LA, Liska GJR, de Menezes FS. The assessment of annual rainfall field by applying different interpolation methods in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. SN Appl Sci. 2021;3:687. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-021-04679-1
  49. 49. Pratoomchai W, Tantanee S, Ekkawatpanit C. A comprehensive grid-based rainfall characteristics in the Central Plain River Basin of Thailand. Tech Geogr. 2020;15(2):47-56. https://doi.org/10.21163/GT_2020.152.06
  50. 50. Kumar B, Atey K, Singh BB, Chattopadhyay R, Acharya N, Singh N, et al. On the modern deep learning approaches for precipitation downscaling. Earth Sci Inform. 2023;16:1459-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-023-00970-4
  51. 51. Park NW, Kyriakidis PC, Hong S. Geostatistical integration of coarse resolution satellite precipitation products and rain gauge data to map precipitation at fine spatial resolutions. Remote Sens. 2017;9:255. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9030255
  52. 52. Gulma UL. An analysis of temporal rainfall variability in Argungu area over the last half climatic year (1995-2012): implication on rainfed crop production. Acad J Interdiscip Stud. 2013;2(12):117. https://doi.org/10.5901/ajis.2013.v2n12p117
  53. 53. Mahan J, Payton P. An agrocentric analysis of regional rain patterns as they relate to a rained cotton cropping system on the southern High Plains of Texas. Agriculture. 2017;7:93. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture7110093
  54. 54. Berzsenyi Z, Dang Q. Effect of sowing date and N fertilisation on the yield and yield stability of maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids in a long-term experiment. Acta Agron Hung. 2008;56(3):247-64. https://doi.org/10.1556/AAgr.56.2008.3.1
  55. 55. Nagy J. Effect of sowing date on the yield and quality of maize hybrids with different growing seasons. Acta Agron Hung. 2009;57(4):389-99. https://doi.org/10.1556/AAgr.57.2009.4.1
  56. 56. Tittonell P, Giller KE. When yield gaps are poverty traps: the paradigm of ecological intensification in African smallholder agriculture. Field Crops Res. 2013;143:76-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2012.10.007
  57. 57. Khajoane TJ. Genotype and environmental effects on maize grain yield, nutritional value and milling quality. [thesis]. 2022.
  58. 58. Hemalatha S, Sreelatha D, Anuradha M, Sai Kumar R. Crop weather relations in maize (Zea mays L.). J Agrometeorol. 2013;15(2):165-6. https://doi.org/10.54386/jam.v15i2.1470
  59. 59. Li Y, Kong D, Fu Y, Sussman MR, Wu H. The effect of developmental and environmental factors on secondary metabolites in medicinal plants. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2020;148:80-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.01.006
  60. 60. Park H, Jeong S. Leaf area index in earth system models: how the key variable of vegetation seasonality works in climate projections. Environ Res Lett. 2021;16(3):034027. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abe2cf
  61. 61. Deribe H. Review on effects of drought stress on maize growth, yield and its management strategies. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 2025;56(1):123-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2024.2404663
  62. 62. Farooq M, Rehman A, Wahid A, Siddique KH. Physiology of grain development in cereals. In: Handbook of plant and crop physiology. 2nd ed. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2021. p. 246-60. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003093640-19
  63. 63. Liu X, Wang X, Wang X, Gao J, Luo N, Meng Q, et al. Dissecting the critical stage in the response of maize kernel set to individual and combined drought and heat stress around flowering. Environ Exp Bot. 2020;179:104213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2020.104213
  64. 64. Liaqat W, Akmal M, Ali J. Sowing date effect on production of high yielding maize varieties. Sarhad J Agric. 2018;34(1):102-13. https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.sja/2018/34.1.102.113
  65. 65. Zhou B, Yue Y, Sun X, Wang X, Wang Z, Ma W, et al. Maize grain yield and dry matter production responses to variations in weather conditions. Agron J. 2016;108:196-204. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2015.0196
  66. 66. Duvick DN. The contribution of breeding to yield advances in maize (Zea mays L.). Adv Agron. 2005;86:83-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(05)86002-X
  67. 67. Teng Z, Chen Y, Meng S, Duan M, Zhang J, Ye N. Environmental stimuli: a major challenge during grain filling in cereals. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(3):2255. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24032255
  68. 68. Badu-Apraku B, Talabi AO, Ifie BE, Chabi YC, Obeng-Antwi K, Haruna A, et al. Gains in grain yield of extra-early maize during three breeding periods under drought and rainfed conditions. Crop Sci. 2018;58(6):2399-412. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2018.03.0168
  69. 69. Hallauer AR, Carena MJ, Filho JBM. Quantitative genetics in maize breeding. New York: Springer; 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0766-0_12
  70. 70. Robert M, Kpoti M, Gunn MN, Creux N. Projecting the effect of climate change on planting date and cultivar choice for South African dryland maize production. Agric For Meteorol. 2023;341:109695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2023.109695
  71. 71. Rajath HP, Kumar C, Hanumanthappa M, Bhanuprakash HR, Vishwanth VE. Yogesh GS, et al. Optimizing maize productivity: impact of sowing dates on growth and yield parameters of diverse genotypes in Karnataka’s southern dry zone. Plant Sci Today. 2025. https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.9449

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.