Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp1 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Iodine-based nutrient application improves growth, economic yield and agronomic efficiency in tomato

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.10702
Submitted
17 July 2025
Published
30-03-2026

Abstract

Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) is one of the most economical vegetable crop worldwide, often limited by nutrient imbalances and suboptimal management practices. This study evaluated the effect of different iodine sources potassium iodide (KI) and potassium iodate (KIO₃) and application methods (seed priming, soil application and foliar spray) on the growth, phenology and yield of tomato over 2 consecutive years. The experiment comprised 9 treatments laid out in a randomized complete block design (RCBD). The central hypothesis proposed that iodine though not traditionally essential but can enhance photosynthetic performance, flowering efficiency and nutrient-use efficiency. Results revealed that iodine application significantly improved plant height, canopy width and number of branches per plant with the highest values observed under the combined application of KI through seed priming, soil and foliar spray (T8). Foliar applications alone in treatments T4 and T5 also performed effectively and promoted early flowering. Yield parameters including total and marketable yield were significantly enhanced by iodine treatments, with T4 (KI foliar spray) depicting increased total yield by 6.5 % and marketable yield by 7 % over the control. The highest benefit-cost ratio (2.80) was recorded in T4 (KI foliar), indicating superior economic efficiency. The positive responses are attributed to iodine's role in enhancing photosynthetic activity, antioxidant defence and hormonal regulation. While integrated application provided maximum physiological benefits, foliar spray alone emerged as the most practical and cost-effective strategy for field conditions. The study suggested that foliar application of KI at 0.01 % offers a sustainable, cost-effective approach to improve vegetative growth, reproductive efficiency and yield in tomato. This approach offers business potential and precision nutrient management and value-added vegetable production worldwide. Future studies should explore its incorporation with digital nutrient mapping and broader vegetable systems for climate-resilient agriculture.

References

  1. 1. Ahmed R, Abd Samad MY, Uddin MK, Quddus MA, Motalib Hossain MA. Recent trends in the foliar spraying of zinc nutrient and zinc oxide nanoparticles in tomato production. Agronomy. 2021;11. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11102074.
  2. 2. Wang C, Li M, Duan X, Abu-Izneid T, Rauf A, Khan Z, et al. Phytochemical and nutritional profiling of tomatoes; impact of processing on bioavailability-a comprehensive review. Food Rev Int. 2023;39:5986–6010.https://doi.org/10.1080/87559129.2022.2097692
  3. 3. Yang J, Mattoo AK, Liu Y, Zvomuya F, He H. Trade-offs of organic and organic-inorganic fertiliser combinations in tomato quality and yield: A global meta-analysis (1992–2021). Euro J Agron. 2023;151:126985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2023.126985.
  4. 4. Al-Shammary AAG, Al-Shihmani LSS, Fernández-Gálvez J, Caballero-Calvo A. Optimizing sustainable agriculture: A comprehensive review of agronomic practices and their impacts on soil attributes. J Environ Manage. 2024;364:121487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121487.
  5. 5. Indiatstat. Datanet India Pvt. Ltd. Socio-economic information domain. ITeS company; 2000. https://www.indiastat.com
  6. 6. Kiferle C, Martinelli M, Salzano AM, Gonzali S, Beltrami S, Salvadori PA, et al. Evidences for a nutritional role of iodine in plants. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.616868.
  7. 7. Sacco A, Raiola A, Calafiore R, Barone A, Rigano MM. New insights in the control of antioxidants accumulation in tomato by transcriptomic analyses of genotypes exhibiting contrasting levels of fruit metabolites. BMC Genomics. 2019;20:43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-5428-4.
  8. 8. Medrano-Macías J, Leija-Martínez P, González-Morales S, Juárez-Maldonado A, Benavides-Mendoza A. Use of Iodine to Biofortify and Promote Growth and Stress Tolerance in Crops. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01146.
  9. 9. Zhang Y, Cao H, Wang M, Zou Z, Zhou P, Wang X, et al. A review of iodine in plants with biofortification: Uptake, accumulation, transportation, function and toxicity. Sci Total Environ. 2023;878:163203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163203.
  10. 10. Lawson PG, Daum D, Czauderna R, Meuser H, Härtling JW. Soil versus foliar iodine fertilization as a biofortification strategy for field-grown vegetables. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00450.
  11. 11. Riyazuddin R, Singh K, Iqbal N, Nisha N, Rani A, Kumar M, et al. Iodine: an emerging biostimulant of growth and stress responses in plants. Plant Soil. 2023;486:119–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-022-05750-5
  12. 12. Collins EJ, Bowyer C, Tsouza A, Chopra M. Tomatoes: An extensive review of the associated health impacts of tomatoes and factors that can affect their cultivation. Biology (Basel). 2022;11:239. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11020239
  13. 13. Karunathilake EMBM, Le AT, Heo S, Chung YS, Mansoor S. The path to smart farming: innovations and opportunities in precision agriculture. Agric. 2023;13:1593. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13081593
  14. 14. Ajayi OC. User acceptability of sustainable soil fertility technologies: Lessons from farmers' knowledge, attitude and practice in southern Africa. J Sustain Agric. 2007;30(3):21–40. https://doi.org/10.1300/J064v30n03_04
  15. 15. Dobermann A. Nutrient use efficiency–measurement and management. In: IFA international workshop on fertiliser best management practices, Brussels, Belgium; 2007. p.1–28.
  16. 16. Moradi L, Siosemardeh A. Combination of seed priming and nutrient foliar application improved physiological attributes, grain yield and biofortification of rainfed wheat. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1287677. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1287677
  17. 17. Sinclair TR, Vadez V. Physiological traits for crop yield improvement in low N and P environments. Plant and Soil. 2002;245(1):1–5. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020624015351
  18. 18. Ikram NA, Ghaffar A, Khan AA, Nawaz F, Hussain A. Foliar iodine application: A strategy for tomato biofortification and yield optimization. J Plant Nutr. 2025;48(3):540–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2024.2407483
  19. 19. Li X, Cao X, Li J, Xu J, Ma W, Wang H, et al. Effects of high potassium iodate intake on iodine metabolism and antioxidant capacity in rats. J Trace Elem Med Bio. 2020;62:126575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtemb.2020.126575.
  20. 20. Castro-Camba R, Sánchez C, Vidal N, Vielba JM. Plant development and crop yield: The role of gibberellins. Plants. 2022;11(19):2650. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11192650
  21. 21. Smith MR, Rao IM, Merchant A. Source-sink relationships in crop plants and their influence on yield development and nutritional quality. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01889
  22. 22. Julius BT, Leach KA, Tran TM, Mertz RA, Braun DM. Sugar transporters in plants: New insights and discoveries. Plant Cell Physiol. 2017;58:1442–60. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcx090.
  23. 23. Allahverdian M, Rahmani F. Epibrassinolide seed priming alleviates alkaline stress by enhancing antioxidant defense in dragonhead plants. Sci Reports. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-30763-2
  24. 24. Alim MA, Hossain SI, Ditta A, Hasan MK, Islam MR, Hafeez AG, et al. Comparative efficacy of foliar plus soil application of urea versus conventional application methods for enhanced growth, yield, agronomic efficiency and economic benefits in rice. ACS Omega. 2023;8(39):35845–55. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c03483
  25. 25. Stefko R, Frajtova-Michalikova K, Strakova J, Novak A. Digital twin-based virtual factory and cyber-physical production systems, collaborative autonomous robotic and networked manufacturing technologies and enterprise and business intelligence algorithms for industrial metaverse. Equilibrium. J Econ Policy. 2025;20(1):389−425. https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.3557
  26. 26. Chatterjee S, Kliestik T, Rowland Z, Bugaj M. Immersive collaborative business process and extended reality-driven industrial metaverse technologies for economic value co-creation in 3D digital twin factories. Oeconomia Copernicana. 2025;16(1). https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.3596
  27. 27. Nakachew K, Yigermal H, Assefa F, Gelaye Y, Ali S. Review on enhancing the efficiency of fertiliser utilization: Strategies for optimal nutrient management. Open Agric. 2024;9. https://doi.org/10.1515/opag-2022-0356
  28. 28. Minofar B, Milčić N, Maroušek J, Gavurová B, Maroušková A. Understanding the molecular mechanisms of interactions between biochar and denitrifiers in N₂O emissions reduction: Pathway to more economical and sustainable fertilisers. Soil Tillage Res. 2025;248:106405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2024.106405
  29. 29. Kliestik T, Kral P, Bugaj M, Durana P. Generative artificial intelligence of things systems, multisensory immersive extended reality technologies and algorithmic big data simulation and modelling tools in digital twin industrial metaverse. Equilibrium. 2024;19(2). https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.3108
  30. 30. Zvarikova K, Gajanova L, Horak J. Exploring CSR performance as a proxy for competitive advantage across sectors in the Central European countries. Oeconomia Copernicana. 2024;15(3). https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.3247

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.