Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp1 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Real-time contingency measures for coping with agricultural drought in semi-arid vertisols of southern Tamil Nadu, India

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.11049
Submitted
2 August 2025
Published
13-02-2026

Abstract

Rainfed agriculture in semi-arid regions is increasingly threatened by climate change-induced rainfall deficits and erratic dry spells, especially during critical crop stages such as establishment, flowering and maturity. These weather anomalies often extend over 2–3 weeks, significantly reducing the crop yields and threatening farmers’ livelihoods. In response, real-time contingency measures (RTCM) have been introduced as a micro-level adaptive strategy to combat drought and flood events through timely and site-specific interventions. The present study conducted over five cropping seasons (2019–2024) evaluated the effectiveness of RTCM in vertisols under rainfed cultivation of drought-tolerant Sorghum K12, a short-duration climate-resilient variety. The study systematically assessed dryness and wetness periods using the rainfall-to-pan evaporation ratio and categorizing drought episodes into early, mid and terminal stages. In response to these temporal stresses, a set of climate-resilient technologies was implemented, including resowing, in-situ moisture conservation through ridge-furrow planting, closure of deep soil cracks with crop residues as mulches and foliar sprays of KCl and ZnSO4 to alleviate plant water stress. These interventions were triggered by real-time observations of soil moisture and rainfall variability. In this study, Percent Available Soil Moisture (PASM) was used as a key indicator to assess soil moisture availability, monitor agricultural drought, evaluate crop moisture stress and justify crop survival, which also supports the timely implementation of RTCM. Over the five-year period, grain yield increased by an average of 45.6 % with an annual increase ranging from 30.2 % to 58.9 % under RTC treatments compared to the control. Rainwater productivity improved significantly, ranging from 0.54 to 0.65 kg/m³ and the benefit-cost ratio (B:C) increased from 2.02 to 3.06, underscoring the economic viability of the RTCM. Biomass yield and harvest index were significantly higher under RTCM, with LSD values confirming statistical significance at 5 % level. Notably, yield stability was achieved even during low-rainfall years such as 2022–23, demonstrating the effectiveness of adaptive drought management strategies. The findings confirm that RTCM offers a robust framework to minimize drought-induced yield losses, enhance soil moisture retention and ensure profitability in vertisol-based rainfed systems of southern Tamil Nadu.

References

  1. 1. NRAA. Prioritization of districts for development planning in India: A composite index approach. New Delhi: National Rainfed Area Authority; 2020. p. 85.
  2. 2. Sharma KD. Rain-fed agriculture could meet the challenges of food security in India. Curr Sci. 2011;100(11):1615–16.
  3. 3. Rao CS, Rejani R, Rama Rao CA, Rao KV, Osman M, Reddy KS, et al. Farm ponds for climate-resilient rainfed agriculture. Curr Sci. 2017;112(3):471–77. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v112/i03/471-477
  4. 4. Montieth JL. Weather and water in the Sudano-Sahelian zone. In: Sivakumar MVK, Wallace JS, Rénard C, Giroux C, editors. Soil Water Balance in the Sudano-Sahelian Zone: Proceedings of the International Workshop; 1991 Feb; Niamey, Niger. Wallingford (UK): IAHS Press, Institute of Hydrology; 1991. p. 11–30.
  5. 5. Bal SK, Minhas PS. Atmospheric stressors: challenges and coping strategies. In: Minhas PS, editor. Abiotic stress management for resilient agriculture. Singapore: Springer Nature; 2017. p. 9–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5744-1_2
  6. 6. Mishra AK, Singh VP. A review of drought concepts. J Hydrol. 2010;391:202–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.07.012
  7. 7. Wilhite DA, Glantz MH. Understanding the drought phenomenon: the role of definitions. Water Int. 1985;10:111–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508068508686328
  8. 8. Tebaldi C, Hayhoe K, Arblaster JM, Meehl GA. Going to the extremes: an inter-comparison of model-simulated historical and future changes in extreme events. Clim Change. 2006;79:185–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9051-4
  9. 9. Bal SK, Sandeep VM, Vijaya Kumar P, Subbarao AVM, Pramod VP, Srinivasarao Ch, et al. Assessing impact of dry spells on the principal rainfed crops in major dryland regions of India. Agric For Meteorol. 2022;313:108768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108768
  10. 10. Douville H, Chauvin F, Broqua H. Influence of soil moisture on the Asian and African monsoons. Part I: Mean monsoon and daily precipitation. J Clim. 2001;14(11):2381–403. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2001)014<2381:IOSMOT>2.0.CO;2
  11. 11. Namias J. Factors in the initiation, perpetuation and termination of drought. Extr Publ IASH Comm Surf Waters. 1960;51:81–94.
  12. 12. Machado S, Bynum ED, Archer TL, Bordovsky J, Rosenow DT, Peterson C, et al. Spatial and temporal variability of sorghum grain yield: influence of soil, water, pests and diseases relationships. Precis Agric. 2002;3:389–406. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021597023005
  13. 13. Stephens DJ, Lyons TJ. Rainfall-yield relationships across the Australian wheat belt. Aust J Agric Res. 1998;49:211–24. https://doi.org/10.1071/A96139
  14. 14. Bal SK, Shivaramu HS, Vijaya Kumar P, Lingaraj H, Sandeep VM, SubbaRao AVM, et al. Re-evaluating soil moisture based drought criteria for rainfed crops in peninsular India. Front Environ Sci. 2024;12:1319912. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1319912
  15. 15. Anonymous. Manual for drought management. New Delhi: Department of Agriculture, Cooperation & Farmers Welfare, Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Government of India; 2016. p. 37–9.
  16. 16. Doorenbos J, Pruitt WO. Guidelines for predicting crop water requirements. FAO Irrig Drain Pap. 1977;24:193.
  17. 17. ICAR-CRIDA. Manual on drought management: real time contingency planning. Hyderabad: Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture; 2020.
  18. 18. Chary RG, Venkateswarlu B, Sharma SK, Mishra SK, Rana DS, Kute G. Agronomic research in dry land farming in India: an overview. Indian J Agron. 2012;57:157–67.
  19. 19. Srinivasarao Ch, Ravindra Chary G, Mishra PK, Nagarjuna Kumar R, Maruthisankar GR, Venkateswarlu B, et al. Real time contingency planning: initial experiences from AICRPDA. Hyderabad: ICAR-CRIDA; 2013. p. 63.
  20. 20. Reddy GS, Ramakrishna YS, Ravindra Chary G, Maruthisankar GR. Crop and contingency planning for rainfed regions of India: a compendium by AICRPDA. Hyderabad: ICAR-CRIDA; 2008. p. 174.
  21. 21. AICRPDA. All India Coordinated Research Project for Dryland Agriculture Reports. Kovilpatti: ICAR–Agricultural Research Station, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University; 2021.
  22. 22. Soil Survey Staff. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd ed. Agriculture Handbook No. 436. Washington, DC: USDA, NRCS; 1999.
  23. 23. Crop Production Guide. Chennai: Department of Agriculture, Government of Tamil Nadu; 2020.
  24. 24. Liao Y, Cao HX, Xue WK, Liu X. Effects of the combination of mulching and deficit irrigation on the soil water and heat, growth and productivity of apples. Agric Water Manag. 2021;243:106482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106482
  25. 25. Mo F, Wang JY, Xiong YC, Nguluu SN, Li FM. Ridge-furrow mulching system in semiarid Kenya: a promising solution to improve soil water availability and maize productivity. Eur J Agron. 2016;80:124–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2016.07.005
  26. 26. Gardner WH. Water content. In: Klute A, editor. Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. 2nd ed. Madison: ASA and SSSA; 1986. p. 493–544. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.1.2ed.c21
  27. 27. Rossato L, Alvalá RC, Marengo JA, Zeri M, Cunha AP, Pires L, Barbosa HA. Impact of soil moisture on crop yields over Brazilian semiarid. Front Environ Sci. 2017;5:73. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2017.00073
  28. 28. Sushama L, Khaliq MN, Laprise R. Dry spell characteristics over Canada in a changing climate as simulated by the Canadian RCM. Glob Planet Change. 2010;74:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2010.07.004
  29. 29. Vinnarasi R, Dhanya CT. Changing characteristics of extreme wet and dry spells of Indian monsoon rainfall. J Geophys Res Atmos. 2016;121(5):2146–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024310
  30. 30. Mishra SK, Simranjeet KS, Chandran MAS, Bal SK. Dynamics of dry spells and their impact on crop productivity. Indian J Dryland Agric Res Dev. 2024;39(2):22–32. https://doi.org/10.5958/2231-6701.2024.00013.6
  31. 31. Srinivasarao CH, Venkateswarlu B, Sikka AK, Prasad YG, Ravindra Chary G, Rao KV, et al. District agricultural contingency plans to address weather aberrations and for sustainable food security in India. Hyderabad: ICAR-CRIDA; 2015. p. 22.
  32. 32. Srinivasarao CH, Chary GR, Rani N, Baviskar VS. Real time implementation of agricultural contingency plans to cope with weather aberrations in Indian agriculture. Mausam. 2016;67(1):183–94. https://doi.org/10.54302/mausam.v67i1.1176
  33. 33. AICRPDA. NICRA annual reports 2011–2014. Kovilpatti: ICAR–Agricultural Research Station, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University; 2025.
  34. 34. Molden D. Accounting for water use productivity. SWIM Publication No. 1. Colombo: International Water Management Institute; 2001.
  35. 35. Sharma BR, Rao KV, Vittal KPR, Ramakrishna YS, Amarasinghe U. Estimating the potential of rainfed agriculture in India: prospects for water productivity improvements. Agric Water Manag. 2010;97:23–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2009.08.002

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.