Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp1 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Assessment of variability and soil–plant nutrient interactions for crop yield prediction in semi-arid Alfisols using regression analysis

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.11117
Submitted
5 August 2025
Published
18-03-2026

Abstract

Precision nutrient management is essential for improving crop productivity in semi-arid Alfisols, where soil variability strongly influences yield. This study evaluated the relationships among soil properties, plant nutrient uptake namely nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K) and crop yields of finger millet, maize, field bean, tomato and brinjal under improved practices (IP) and farmers’ practices (FP) across the North and South Transects of Bengaluru. Multivariate regression models were developed to identify the key predictors of yield under both management systems. Finger millet in the North Transect showed strong associations with plant N, P and K, as well as with soil N and pH. The IP models significantly predicted finger millet yield using plant N, P and K, whereas FP models were primarily driven by plant K and soil K. In the South Transect, maize yield was mainly influenced by plant N and soil N, with IP models significant for P and K uptake in the North and N uptake in the South; FP models were significant only for N uptake in the South. Tomato yield under IP was significantly associated with P uptake, while field bean showed significant FP-based predictions for N uptake. Brinjal showed no significant relationships across nutrients and transects. Micronutrient-based models provided additional predictive power for field bean (North) and maize (South), whereas macronutrient-based soil models remained largely non-significant. Overall, the regression analysis highlighted nutrient-yield linkages and underscored the role of plant nutrient uptake as a reliable predictor for site-specific recommendations in semi-arid Alfisols.

References

  1. 1. Sankar GRM, Mishra PK, Srinivasa Rao Ch, Padma Latha Y, Sahadev Reddy B, Babu MVS, et al. Assessment of sustainability of groundnut yield using rainfall, soil moisture and soil fertility variables under arid Alfisols. Indian J Dryland Agric Res Dev. 2010;25(1):39-46.
  2. 2. Sharma KL, Mandal UK, Srinivas K, Vittal KPR, Mandal B, Kusuma Grace J, et al. Long-term soil management effects on crop yields and soil quality in dryland Alfisols. Soil Tillage Res. 2005;83(2):246-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2004.08.002
  3. 3. Vieira SR, Paz Gonzalez A. Analysis of the spatial variability of crop yield and soil properties in small agricultural plots. Bragantia. 2003;62(1):127-38. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0006-87052003000100016
  4. 4. McGregor DFM, Adam-Bradford A, Thompson DA, Simon D. Resource management and agriculture in the periurban interface of Kumasi, Ghana: Problems and prospects. Singap J Trop Geogr. 2011;32(3):382-98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9493.2011.00438.x
  5. 5. Barker AV. Composition and uses of compost. In: Rechigl JE, Mackinnon HC, editors. Agricultural uses of by-products and wastes. Washington (DC): American Chemical Society; 1997. p. 140-62.
  6. 6. Shanthmurthy B, Sathish A, Saralakumari J, Umashankar N, Seenappa C. Quantifying the influence of enriched urban compost and wastes on soil physico-chemical and biological parameters of Bettahalli Village, Bangalore North Taluk: A quantitative analysis. Int J Plant Soil Sci. 2023;35(21):305-15. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2023/v35i213977
  7. 7. Shiralipour A, McConnell DB, Smith WH. Physical and chemical properties of soils as affected by municipal solid waste compost application. Biomass Bioenergy. 1992;3(3-4):261-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0961-9534(92)90030-T
  8. 8. Stratton ML, Rechigl JE. Agronomic benefits of agricultural, municipal, and industrial by-products and their co-utilization: An overview. In: Brown S, Angle JS, Jacobs L, editors. Beneficial co-utilization of agricultural, municipal and industrial by-products. Dordrecht: Springer; 1998. p. 9-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5068-2_2
  9. 9. Jones LD, Cross P, Withers PJA, DeLuca TH, Robinson DA, Quilliam RS, et al. Nutrient stripping: The global disparity between food security and soil nutrient stocks. J Appl Ecol. 2013;50(4):851-62. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12089
  10. 10. Prasad R, Goswami NN. Soil fertility restoration and management for sustainable agriculture in South Asia. Adv Soil Sci. 1992;17:37-77.
  11. 11. Webster DD, Englund EJ. Evaluation and comparison of spatial interpolators II. Math Geol. 1994;26:589-603. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02089243
  12. 12. Meuland M, Van Meirvenne M. Kriging soil texture under different types of non-stationarity. Geoderma. 2003;112(3-4):217-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(02)00308-7
  13. 13. Sathish A, Ramachandrappa BK, Devaraja K, Savitha MS, Thimme Gowda MN, Prashanth KM. Assessment of spatial variability in fertility status and nutrient recommendation in Alanatha Cluster Villages, Kanakapura Taluk, Ramanagara District, Karnataka using GIS techniques. J Indian Soc Soil Sci. 2018;66(2):149-57.
  14. 14. Shruthi Y, Praveen GS, Geetha GP, Sathish A, Ramakrishna Parama VR. Soil test-based nutrient management for Rajapura micro-watershed using GIS-an effective method for improved crop production. In: International Conference on Integrated Land Use Planning for Smart Agriculture; 2016 Nov 10-13; Nagpur. Nagpur: ICAR-NBSS&LUP; 2016.
  15. 15. Harsha M, Sathish A, Ananthakumar MA. Assessment of soil quality indicators of Channegowdarapalya micro-watershed, Tumkur, Karnataka. J Indian Soc Soil Sci. 2021;69(3):233-47.
  16. 16. Jenny H. The soil resource: origin and behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1980. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-6112-4
  17. 17. Sharma KL, Grace JK, Mandal UK, Gajbhiye PN, Srinivas K, Korwar GR, et al. Evaluation of long-term soil management practices using key indicators and soil quality indices in a semi-arid tropical Alfisol. Aust J Soil Res. 2008;46(4):368-77. https://doi.org/10.1071/SR07184
  18. 18. Draper NR, Smith H. Applied regression analysis. New York: John Wiley; 1998.
  19. 19. Gomez KA, Gomez AA. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. New York: John Wiley; 1984.
  20. 20. Jackson ML. Soil chemical analysis. New Delhi: Prentice Hall; 1973.
  21. 21. Walkley AJ, Black CA. An examination of the method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 1934;37:29-38.
  22. 22. Subbiah BV, Asija GL. A rapid procedure for the estimation of available nitrogen in soils. Curr Sci. 1956;25:259-60.
  23. 23. Bray RH, Kurtz LT. Determination of total, organic, and available forms of phosphorus in soils. Soil Sci. 1945;59:39-45. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-194501000-00006
  24. 24. Olsen SR, Cole CV, Watanabe FS. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. Washington (DC): US Government Printing Office; 1954. USDA Circular No. 939.
  25. 25. Piper CS. Soil and plant analysis. Bombay: Hans Publishers; 1966.
  26. 26. Black CA. Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Madison (WI): American Society of Agronomy; 1965.
  27. 27. Lindsay WL, Norvell WA. Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese, and copper. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1978;42:421-8. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1978.03615995004200030009x
  28. 28. Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR, editors. Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties. 2nd ed. Madison (WI): American Society of Agronomy; Soil Science Society of America; 1982.
  29. 29. Solanki RL, Naagar KC, Agarwal SK. Effect of fertilizer based on soil testing for better production of maize (Zea mays L.). Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2017;6(8):725-8. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.608.092
  30. 30. Wani SP, Anantha KH, Kaushal KG. Soil properties, crop yield, and economics under integrated crop management practices in Karnataka, Southern India. World Dev. 2017;93:43-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.12.012
  31. 31. Goswami B, Rahman N. Field application of precise IoT-based soil testing and fertilizer recommendation system in tomato. Pharma Innov J. 2023;12(3):1637-42.
  32. 32. Singh VK, Gautam P, Nanda G, Dhaliwal SS, Pramanick B, Meena SS, et al. Soil test-based fertilizer application improves productivity, profitability and nutrient use efficiency of rice (Oryza sativa L.) under direct-seeded condition. Agronomy. 2021;11(9):1756. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11091756
  33. 33. Ambika V, Yadahalli GS, Chittapur BM, Kulkarni S, Yadahalli VG, Malakannavar S. Influence of land configurations and nutrient levels on growth, yield and economics of Bt cotton. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2017;6(12):3095-102. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.612.361
  34. 34. Parama VRR, Sathish A, Maruthi Sankar GR, Chikkaramappa T, Shruthi Y, Geetha GP, et al. Modeling variability of Alfisols fertility parameters in micro-watersheds of Harve, Chamarajanagara District in semi-arid India. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 2018;49(9):1045-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2018.1448414
  35. 35. Krouk G, Kiba T. Nitrogen and phosphorus interactions in plants: From agronomic to physiological and molecular insights. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2020;57:104-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2020.07.002
  36. 36. Anonymous. Potassium interactions with other nutrients. Better Crops. 1998;82(3):12-13.
  37. 37. Malakannavar S, Aladakatti YR. Response of Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) to liquid bio-fertilizer consortia with varied levels of major nutrients. J Farm Sci. 2021;34(1):44-8. https://doi.org/10.61475/jfm.v34i01.135
  38. 38. Sun J, Li W, Li C, Chang W, Zhang S, Zeng Y, et al. Effect of different rates of nitrogen fertilization on crop yield, soil properties and leaf physiological attributes in banana under subtropical regions of China. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:613760. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.613760
  39. 39. Malakannavar S, Halepyati AS, Yadahalli GS, Chittapur BM, Narayanrao K, Ambika V. Effect of macronutrient and morphoframe manipulation on growth, yield and economics of Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Adv Res. 2018;13(1):1-8. https://doi.org/10.9734/AIR/2018/38557
  40. 40. Das D, Sahoo J, Raza MB, Barman M, Das R. Ongoing soil potassium depletion under intensive cropping in India and probable mitigation strategies. A review. Agron Sustain Dev. 2022;42(1):4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-021-00728-6
  41. 41. Shankar MA, Maruthi Sankar GR, Thimmegowda MN, Nagamani MK. Micronutrient management for soil fertility, nutrient uptake and productivity of green gram (Vigna radiata) and finger millet (Eleusine coracana) under semi-arid Alfisols. Indian J Agron. 2014;59(2):306-16.
  42. 42. Maruthi Sankar GR, Sharma KL, Dhanapal GN, Shankar MA, Mishra PK, Venkateswarlu B, et al. Influence of soil and fertilizer nutrients on sustainability of rainfed finger millet yield and soil fertility in semiarid Alfisols. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 2011;42(12):1462-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2011.577863

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.