Research Articles
Vol. 13 No. sp1 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture
Comparative evaluation of various substrates for cost-effective mass multiplication of Beauveria bassiana
Department of Entomology and Agricultural Zoology, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221 005, India
Department of Entomology and Agricultural Zoology, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221 005, India
Department of Entomology and Agricultural Zoology, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221 005, India
Department of Mycology and Plant Pathology, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221 005, India
Department of Entomology and Agricultural Zoology, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221 005, India
Department of Entomology and Agricultural Zoology, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221 005, India; Tirhut College of Agriculture, Dholi, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa, Samastipur, Bihar 843 121, India
Abstract
The white muscardine fungus, Beauveria bassiana (Bals.-Criv.) Vuill., with wide biocontrol potential, requires cost-effective mass multiplication methods to enhance adoption at the field level. A study was conducted at Biocontrol Laboratory, Department of Entomology and Agricultural Zoology, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, for a comparative evaluation of grain-based and artificial substrates for its mass multiplication. Among 6 grains tested, sorghum, chickpea, wheat, rice, maize and green gram; sorghum showed the highest spore yield of 90.96 × 10⁷ spores g-1 and a peak growth rate increase of 138.68 % between days 14 and 21. It also exhibited as the most cost effective substrate, producing 2860.35 × 10⁷ spores ₹-1, surpassing chickpea (60.12 × 10⁷ spores g-1) and wheat (33.08 × 10⁷ spores g-1). Maize and green gram performed poorly in biological and economic terms. Among artificial media, PDA (Potato Dextrose Agar) was the most effective, showing the highest mean radial growth of 36.83 mm and sporulation of 52.54 × 107 spores mL-1, yielding 24,783.02 × 107 spores ₹-1. P1DA (Papaya peels Dextrose Agar) also performed well with radial growth of 31.00 mm, sporulation of 35.41 × 107 spores mL-1 and economical yield of 21,862.96 × 107 spores ₹-1, nearly twice that of BDA (Banana Dextrose Agar) which produced 18.5 × 107 spores mL-1 and 11,419.75 × 107 spores ₹-1. Thus, while PDA is biologically superior, P1DA offers a promising, cost-effective alternative for fungal propagation. This evaluation confirms sorghum and PDA as the best substrates for field- and lab-scale production, respectively.
References
- 1. Shah FA, Pell JK. Entomopathogenic fungi as biological control agents. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2003;61(5-6):413-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-003-1222-3
- 2. Scholte EJ, Knols BGJ, Samson RA, Takken W. Entomopathogenic fungi for mosquito control: A review. J Insect Sci. 2004;4(1):19. https://doi.org/10.1093/jis/4.1.19
- 3. Zimmermann G. Review on safety of the entomopathogenic fungi Beauveria bassiana and Beauveria brongniartii. Biocontrol Sci Technol. 2007;17(6):553-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/09583150701220662
- 4. Jaronski ST, Mascarin GM. Advances in the formulation and application of microbial biocontrol agents. Biol Control. 2017;115:100-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2017.04.009
- 5. Faria MR, Wraight SP. Beauveria bassiana as a biopesticide: Ecology, mode of action, and commercial applications. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2007;27(2):131-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388550701436700
- 6. Jackson MA. Production and formulation of fungal biocontrol agents. In: Butt TM, Jackson C, Magan N, editors. Fungi as biocontrol agents. Wallingford: CAB International; 2001. p. 89-109.
- 7. Mascarin GM, Jaronski ST. Fungal biological control agents: Production, formulation and application technology. Insects. 2016;7(4):52. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects7040052
- 8. Vega FE, Meyling NV, Luangsa-ard JJ, Blackwell M. Fungal entomopathogens: New insights on their ecology. Insects. 2012;3(4):571-638. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects3040571
- 9. Shah FA, Pell JK. Entomopathogenic fungi as biological control agents. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2003;61(5-6):413-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-003-1222-3
- 10. Paiva-Guimarães AGL, Souza DA, Paiva NNS. Alternative substrates for conidiogenesis of the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana. Braz J Biol. 2019;79(4):629-36. https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.185668
- 11. Bhadauria BP, Puri SM, Singh PK. Mass production of entomopathogenic fungi using agricultural products. Bioscan. 2012;7(2):229-32.
- 12. Banu JG, Rajalakshmi S. Standardization of media for mass multiplication of entomopathogenic fungi. Indian J Plant Prot. 2014;42(1):91-3.
- 13. Akbar S, Bilal M. Optimization of solid-state fermentation for enhanced conidial production of Beauveria bassiana on wheat bran. Biocontrol Sci Technol. 2016;26(7):929-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/09583157.2016.1163591
- 14. Faria MR, Wraight SP. Beauveria bassiana as a biopesticide: ecology, mode of action, and commercial applications. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2007;27(2):131-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388550701436700
- 15. Prasad CS, Pal R. Mass production and economics of entomopathogenic fungi utilizing agro-industrial wastes as substrates. Scholars J Agric Vet Sci. 2013;1(1):28-32.
- 16. Mishra S, Kumar P, Malik A. Suitability of agricultural by-products as production medium for spore production by Beauveria bassiana HQ917687. Int J Recycling Org Waste Agric. 2016;5(2):179-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40093-016-0121-0
- 17. Sharma R, Yadav AN. Optimization of fermentation parameters for improved conidial production of Beauveria bassiana. Biotechnol Rep. 2015;5:25-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.btre.2014.11.003
- 18. Pava-Ripoll M, van Frankenhuyzen K, Jenkins J. Effects of substrate composition on endophytic colonization of Beauveria bassiana. Biocontrol Sci Technol. 2012;22(7):771-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/09583157.2012.689254
- 19. Bidochka MJ, St Leger RJ, Roberts DW. Ecology of Beauveria and Metarhizium: Fungal endophytes and rhizosphere colonists. In: Insect pathology. 2nd ed. Academic Press; 2012. p. 305-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-384984-7.00010-2
- 20. Goettel MS, Glare TR. Entomopathogenic fungi and their role in regulation of insect populations. In: Insect pathology. CAB International; 2010.
- 21. Kankale MD, Kelwatkar NM, Das SB, Sontakke BK. Selection of suitable and economic substrate for mass production of Beauveria bassiana. J Biol Control. 2014;28(1):63-7.
- 22. Javar S, Farrokhi S, Naeimi S. Comparison of survival and pathogenicity of Beauveria bassiana spores produced in solid vs liquid fermentation on whitefly. J Plant Prot Res. 2023;63(1):72-80. https://doi.org/10.24425/jppr.2023.146077
- 23. Singh R, Verma KD, Singh J, Nigam R, Singh M, Kumar A. Multiplication of entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo) on solid and liquid media. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2017;6(6):2424-6.
- 24. Mascarin GM, Jaronski ST. The production and uses of Beauveria bassiana as a microbial insecticide. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016;32(11):177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-016-2124-9
- 25. Banu JG, Rajalakshmi S. Standardization of media for mass multiplication of entomopathogenic fungi. Indian J Plant Prot. 2014;42(1):91-3.
- 26. Zhao D, Liu B, Wang Y, Zhu X, Duan Y, Chen L. Screening for nematicidal activities of Beauveria bassiana and associated fungus using culture filtrate. Afr J Microbiol Res. 2013;7(11):974-8. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJMR12.1378
- 27. Jaronski ST, Mascarin GM. Advances in the formulation and application of microbial biocontrol agents. Biol Control. 2017;116:100-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2017.04.009
- 28. Ravindra J, Patil CS, Naik A. Effect of different grain media on growth and sporulation of Beauveria bassiana. Pest Manag Hortic Ecosyst. 2019;21(2):132-6.
- 29. Kumar V, Singh B, Srivastava P. Agro-industrial waste utilization for fungal biopesticide production: Strategies and prospects. Waste Biomass Valor. 2022;13(8):2337-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-021-01627-5
- 30. Manzar MS, Khan S, Shukla RP. Comparative study on different substrates for mass production of entomopathogenic fungi. J Biol Control. 2019;33(2):112-8.
- 31. Kavya N, Singh R, Shanker R, Prasanth P, Alok, Arya S. Evaluation of most suitable medium for the mass production of entomopathogenic fungi Beauveria bassiana. Biol Forum Int J. 2022;14(4):911-5. https://doi.org/10.36713/epra2016/v10i4/202206419
- 32. Amandeep K, Singh N, Saini K. Conidial production of Beauveria bassiana on agricultural substrates. Afr J Microbiol Res. 2014;8(32):3110-7. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJMR2014.6848
- 33. Prasad CS, Pal R. Mass production and economics of entomopathogenic fungi utilizing agro-industrial wastes as substrates. Scholars J Agric Vet Sci. 2015;2(1):28-32.
- 34. Singh R, Chawla M, Bhat R. Potential use of fruit peel waste for microbial biopesticide production. J Clean Prod. 2020;264:121649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121649
- 35. Sala A, de la Vega MC, Vinale F. Conidia production of the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana in solid-state fermentation. J Environ Manage. 2023;344:118673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118673
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.