Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp1 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Potential use of indigenous medicinal weeds as grain protectants in hilly regions of North-East India

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.11262
Submitted
12 August 2025
Published
05-03-2026

Abstract

Seed beetles are widely prevalent and economically destructive storage pest that infest stored grains on a global scale. Apart from other climatic challenges, Northeast Indian farmers struggle with these pests, resulting in considerable losses in terms of both quantity and quality. The primary objective of this study was to identify environmentally sustainable, readily available and novel alternatives to synthetic insecticides for their management, in addition to neem. In this context, the effectiveness of 6 different indigenous medicinal weeds was studied against the storage beetle (Callosobruchus chinensis) and demonstrated through various experiments on its biological parameters, such as oviposition inhibition, adult mortality and adult emergence percentage, which also correlates with seed damage percentage. The results indicated that seeds treated with Calotropis exhibited the highest mean mortality, the lowest oviposition and the most seed damage, while Zanthoxylum emerged as the subsequent successful treatment, highlighting its first report of insecticidal properties against this storage pest. This was followed by Argemone, Ageratum and Eupatorium. Lantana leaf powder demonstrated the lowest adult mortality rate and highest grain damage; nevertheless, it may be utilised during periods when other plants are scarce. These findings indicate that utilising indigenous medicinal plants as grain protectants during storage can be a viable and environmentally safe alternative to chemicals, provided that they do not possess any potential toxicity risk to people and the grains are thoroughly washed after the treatment prior to consumption. This technique not only promotes sustainability but also preserves the use of native botanical resources, which may benefit local farmers. Further research and development are required to understand their chemical compositions completely and use them as valuable plants.

References

  1. 1. Vishwakarma RK, Shivhare US, Gupta RK, Yadav DN, Jaiswal A, Prasad P. Status of pulse milling processes and technologies: A review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2018;58(10):1615–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2016.1274956
  2. 2. Statista. Total area of cultivation for pulses across India from financial year 2014 to 2021, with an estimate for 2022. 2022.
  3. 3. Press Information Bureau, Government of India (DA&FW). State wise yield of major pulses from 2016–17 to 2021–22. 2022.
  4. 4. Tyagi SK, Guru PN, Aarti N, Akhoon AB, Pulin P, Vandana M, et al. Post harvest stored product insects and their management. Ludhiana: ICAR AICRP on PHET, CIPHET; 2019. p. 46. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.31411.78885
  5. 5. Sharon MEM, Abirami CVK, Alagusundaram K. Grain storage management in India. J Postharvest Technol. 2024;2(1):12–24.
  6. 6. Sathish K, Jagdish J, Katlam BP, Mishra SP. Biochemical components conferring resistance to pigeonpea genotypes against Callosobruchus chinensis (L.) under semitropical storage conditions. Legume Res. 2024;47(12):2182–88. https://doi.org/10.18805/LR-4830
  7. 7. Sathyaseelan V, Baskaran V, Mohan S. Efficacy of some indigenous plants against pulse beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis (L.) on green gram. J Entomol. 2008;5(2):128–32. https://doi.org/10.3923/je.2008.128.132
  8. 8. Mounika T, Sahoo SK, Chakraborty D, Debnath MK. Bio-efficacy of botanicals against pulse beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis (L.) in stored chickpea. J Eco-Friendly Agric. 2022;17(1):94–99. https://doi.org/10.5958/2582-2683.2022.00020.X
  9. 9. Bala B, Waluniba, Neog P, Imtinaro L, Vindhya A. Comparative efficacy of some indigenous plant materials as repellent against pulse beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis (L.). Indian J Hill Farming. 2023;36(2):78–85.
  10. 10. Thomas CS, Janine MS, Stephen OD. Natural product-based crop protection compounds: origins and future prospects. J Agric Food Chem. 2023;71(5):2259–69. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.2c06938
  11. 11. Seram D, Senthil N, Pandiyan M, Kennedy JS. Resistance determination of a South Indian bruchid strain against rice bean landraces of Manipur. J Stored Prod Res. 2016;69:199–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2016.08.008
  12. 12. Ragul S, Manivannan N. Bruchid: a serious pest on pulse crops—control measures and breeding advancements. Agric Rev. 2024;45(2):290–96. https://doi.org/10.18805/ag.R-2307
  13. 13. Srinivasan D, Nathan S, Suresh T, Perumalsamy PL. Antimicrobial activity of certain Indian medicinal plants used in folkloric medicine. J Ethnopharmacol. 2001;74(3):217–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8741(00)00345-7
  14. 14. Bairagi SM, Ghule P, Gilhotra R. Pharmacology of natural products: recent approach on Calotropis gigantea and Calotropis procera. Ars Pharm. 2018;59(1):37–44. https://doi.org/10.30827/ars.v59i1.7276
  15. 15. Mlombo NT, Makhubu FN, Dube ZP, Tshikalange TE. Potential use of Argemone ochroleuca Sweet and Argemone mexicana Linn as alternative pesticide. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 2025;136:102534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmpp.2024.102534
  16. 16. Aisha K, Visakh NU, Pathrose B, Mori N, Baeshen RS, Shawer R. Extraction, chemical composition and insecticidal activities of Lantana camara Linn. Molecules. 2024;29(2):344. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29020344
  17. 17. Kotta JC, Lestari ABS, Candrasari DS, Hariono M. Medicinal effect, in silico bioactivity prediction and pharmaceutical formulation of Ageratum conyzoides L. Scientifica. 2020;2020:6420909. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6420909
  18. 18. Ayoola DR, Olonisakin A, Oyeneyin OE. Volatile oil composition, bioactivity and formulations of Chromolaena odorata. Lett Appl NanoBioScience. 2024;13(3):139. https://doi.org/10.33263/LIANBS133.139
  19. 19. Yang J, Song X, Hu H, Zhong W, Cao R, Xu Y, et al. Chemical composition and bioactivities of Zanthoxylum acanthopodium DC. essential oils. Molecules. 2022;27(16):5243. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27165243
  20. 20. Mawthoh ABT, Devina S, Singh KA, Watt HJ. Applications of prickly ash (Zanthoxylum spp.). J Food Chem Nanotechnol. 2024;9(S1):S117–31.
  21. 21. Mario MB, Astuti LP, Hsu JL, Kafle L, Fernando I. Bioefficacy of plant powders against Callosobruchus chinensis. Crop Prot. 2023;167:106200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2023.106200
  22. 22. Seram D, Mohan S, Kennedy JS, Senthil N. Development and damage assessment of Callosobruchus maculatus. In: Navarro S, Jayas DS, Alagusundaram K, editors. Proc 10th Int Conf Controlled Atmosphere and Fumigation in Stored Products. Winnipeg; 2016. p. 25–31.
  23. 23. Samyuktha SM, Malarvizhi D, Mariyammal I, Karthikeyan A, Seram D, Dhasarathan M, et al. Resistance sources in mungbean against South Indian bruchid strain. Agriculture. 2022;12(7):1050. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12071050
  24. 24. Uddin RO, Oyedare OK. Potentials of Calotropis gigantea and Allamanda cathartica against Callosobruchus maculatus. Albanian J Agric Sci. 2019;18(2–3):39–49.
  25. 25. Seram D, Kennedy JS, Senthil N, Pandiyan M. Bruchid fitness under multigenerational rearing. J Entomol Zool Stud. 2019;7(4):529–38.
  26. 26. Ali Khan ST, Youngs CG. Variation in protein content of field peas. Can J Plant Sci. 1973;53:37–41. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps73-005
  27. 27. Oo K, Win T, Khai A, Fu P. Multifunctional plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Am J Plant Sci. 2020;11(6):773–92. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2020.116055
  28. 28. Panse VG, Sukhatme PV. Statistical methods for agricultural workers. New Delhi: ICAR; 1985. p. 87–9.
  29. 29. Chandana CR, Kalita S, Rakesh V, et al. Eco-friendly nanobiopesticide as seed protectant. J Stored Prod Res. 2025;114:102763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2025.102763
  30. 30. Limma S, Singh SPN, Singh MK. Evaluation of plant powder and oil against Callosobruchus chinensis. Indian J Entomol. 2023;86(2):562–4. https://doi.org/10.55446/IJE.2023.812
  31. 31. Barry RB, Michel AE, Tagne GF, et al. Effectiveness of Calotropis procera leaf powder against cowpea bruchid. Arch Curr Res Int. 2025;25(2):96–110. https://doi.org/10.9734/acri/2025/v25i21071
  32. 32. Vijayalakshmi G, Elango K, Adlin PVE, Vadivel C, Surya RR, Thennarasi A, et al. Insecticidal properties of plant extracts against Callosobruchus chinensis Linn. Legume Res. 2021;44(11):1386–91. https://doi.org/10.18805/LR-4652
  33. 33. Khandaitaray T, Mishra PR, Satapathy NS, Panigrahi S, Panigrahi C, Mishra S, et al. Plant essential oils for pulse beetle management, Callosobruchus chinensis L. in stored chickpea. Plant Sci Today. 2025;12(2). https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.4628
  34. 34. Ghosh S, Roy A, Kundagrami S. Natural plant extracts for Callosobruchus maculatus management. Indian J Agric Res. 2026;59(12):1927–36. https://doi.org/10.18805/IJARe.A-5733
  35. 35. Dougherty LR, van Lieshout E, McNamara KB, Moschilla JA, Arnqvist G, Simmons LW. Sexual conflict in Callosobruchus maculatus. Proc Biol Sci. 2017;284(1855):20170132. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.0132.
  36. 36. Nathanial OA. Repellent effects of Calotropis procera and Parquetina nigrescens. Int J Multidiscip Res Dev. 2019;6(10):207–9.
  37. 37. Mmuta EC, Ogbuagu JO, Arinze RU, Aniecheonwu EA, Agusiobo KT, Echekoba CA, et al. GC-MS bioactive compounds of Vigna radiata root extract. J Pharm Biopharm Res. 2024;6(1):468–76. https://doi.org/10.25082/JPBR.2024.01.003
  38. 38. Raj A, Karam N, Bhumita P, Shafi AAM. ITK approaches against Callosobruchus chinensis. J Adv Biol Biotechnol. 2025;28(9):547–53. https://doi.org/10.9734/jabb/2025/v28i92905
  39. 39. Mawthoh ABT, Seram D, Singh KA, Watt HJ. Larvicidal potential of Zanthoxylum acanthopodium. J Entomol Res. 2024;48(4):557–62. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-4576.2024.00108.3
  40. 40. Mounika T, Vardhan PNH, Hath TK, Badavath A. Botanical powders against Callosobruchus chinensis. Environ Conserv J. 2025;26(1):264–73. https://doi.org/10.36953/ECJ.28632892
  41. 41. Isman MB. Botanical insecticides in modern agriculture. Annu Rev Entomol. 2006;51:45–66. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.51.110104.151146
  42. 42. Ghosh A, Chowdhury N, Chandra G. Plant extracts as mosquito larvicides. Indian J Med Res. 2012;135:581–98.
  43. 43. Ileke KD, Idoko JE, Ojo DO, Adesina BC. Botanical protectants against Sitophilus zeamais. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol. 2020;27:101702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2020.101702
  44. 44. Ojianwuna CC, Umoru PA. Effects of Cymbopogon citratus and Ocimum suave. Afr J Agric Res. 2010;5(20):2837–40.
  45. 45. Songa JM, Rono W. Indigenous methods for bruchid control in stored beans. Int J Pest Manag. 1998;44(1):1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/096708798228446
  46. 46. Oni MO. Evaluation of Capsicum powders against storage pests. Int J Biol. 2010;3(2):185–88. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijb.v3n2p185
  47. 47. Kesari V, Rangan L. Storage proteins in Pongamia pinnata. AoB Plants. 2011;2011:plr026. https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plr026
  48. 48. Trivedi A, Nayak N, Kumar J. Botanicals in stored grain pest management. J Entomol Zool Stud. 2018;6(3):295–300.
  49. 49. Houghton PJ, Ren Y, Howes MJ. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors from plants and fungi. Nat Prod Rep. 2006;23:181–99. https://doi.org/10.1039/b508966b
  50. 50. Alabi OY, Adewole MM. Essential oil of Moringa oleifera as cowpea seed protectant. Afr Crop Sci J. 2017;25(1):71–81. https://doi.org/10.4314/acsj.v25i1.5
  51. 51. Varsha RM, Das AV, Mahajan M, Khanna R. Ocular Calotropis poisoning in India. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021;69(9):2417–20. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_3434_20
  52. 52. Deshmukh NS, Jaideep K, Muntha S, Subah S, Clayton PR. Toxicity and clastogenic potential of Ageratum conyzoides. J Med Clin Res Rev. 2024;8(6):1–22. https://doi.org/10.33425/2639-944X.1383

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.