Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp1 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Effect of natural farming on soil fertility and carbon sequestration: A case study from Eastern India

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.11263
Submitted
12 August 2025
Published
04-02-2026

Abstract

Soil degradation from excessive chemical inputs threatens agricultural sustainability, particularly in coastal ecosystems of Odisha. This study evaluated the effects of Natural Farming (NF) and Conventional Farming (CF) on soil fertility, carbon sequestration, microbial populations, crop yield and economics in vegetable cultivation (brinjal, okra, tomato) at Krishi Vigyan Kendra (KVK) Jagatsinghpur during rabi 2022-2023. NF involved the use of Jeevamrit, Beejamrit, mulching, Ghanajeevamrit, Neemaster, Bramhastra, Agniastra while CF followed standard recommended practices. Soil samples (0–15 cm) were analyzed before and after harvest for physical, chemical and biological parameters. NF increased soil pH, improved soil organic carbon (SOC) (0.43 % → 0.45 %) and enhanced nitrogen availability (6.46 % increase), while CF showed a slight SOC decline and lower N improvement. SOC stock increased by 0.16–0.62 Mg/ha under NF but declined by 0.25 to 2.49 Mg/ha under CF. NF significantly increased bacterial (47.5 %), fungal (40.12 %) and actinomycetes (70.4 %) populations over CF. Crop yields under NF were marginally lower, but reduced cultivation costs led to slightly higher benefit-cost ratios (B:C) in all crops. Correlation analysis revealed significant interrelations among soil properties, with carbon sequestration negatively correlated with pH (r = -0.85*). The results demonstrate NF’s potential to improve soil health, enhance carbon sequestration and maintain profitability in coastal vegetable systems, supporting its promotion as a sustainable alternative to CF in climatic vulnerable coastal areas in Odisha and similar agro-climatic regions of the country and beyond.

References

  1. 1. Thankachan A, Das DM, Sahoo N, Raul SK, Sahoo BC, Bhuyan S, et al. Estimation of soil erosion and delineation of erosion risk zones in the Kesinga catchment of Mahanadi river basin using RUSLE and GIS. Indian J Soil Conserv. 2022;50(3):167–76.
  2. 2. Panda C, Das DM, Raul SK, Sahoo BC. Sediment yield prediction and prioritization of sub-watersheds in the Upper Subarnarekha basin (India) using SWAT. Arab J Geosci. 2021;14(9):809–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-07170-8
  3. 3. White PJ, Crawford JW, Díaz Álvarez MC, García Moreno R. Soil management for sustainable agriculture. Appl Environ Soil Sci. 2012;2012:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/850739
  4. 4. Ray SL, Sahu AP, Paul JC, Das DM, Raul SK, Kundu SK. Climate change impact on hydro-climatic fluxes in Kantamal catchment of the Middle Mahanadi River Basin, India. J Agric Eng (India). 2024;61(6):890–9. https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2024616.1894
  5. 5. Verma S, Chandel RS, Kaushal R, Yankit P, Sharma S. Soil quality management through zero budget natural farming. ICAR News. 2018;24(3):8–9.
  6. 6. Das DM, Majhi P, Sen J, Panda D, Das S, Purohit S, et al. Integrated climate-resilient practices for enhancing yield and water productivity of rice in rainfed saline-affected coastal ecosystem of Odisha, India. J Exp Agric Int. 2025;47(11):124–34. https://doi.org/10.9734/jeai/2025/v47i113855
  7. 7. Duddigan S, Collins CD, Hussain Z, Osbahr H, Shaw LJ, Sinclair F, et al. Impact of zero budget natural farming on crop yields in Andhra Pradesh, SE India. Sustainability. 2022;14(3):1689:1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031689
  8. 8. Fitzpatrick IC, Millner N, Ginn F. Governing the soil: natural farming and bionationalism in India. Agric Hum Values. 2022;39(4):1391–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-022-10327-0
  9. 9. Kumar R, Kumar S, Yashavanth BS, Meena PC, Indoria AK, Kundu S, et al. Adoption of natural farming and its effect on crop yield and farmers’ livelihood in India. Hyderabad: ICAR-NAARM; 2020. p. 1–130.
  10. 10. Jackson ML. Soil chemical analysis. New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd. 1973:1–498.
  11. 11. Subbiah BV, Asija GL. A rapid procedure for estimation of nitrogen in soils. Curr Sci. 1956;25:259–60.
  12. 12. Bray RH, Kurtz LT. Determination of total, organic and available forms of phosphorus in soils. Soil Sci. 1945;59(1):39–46. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-194501000-00006
  13. 13. Walkley A, Black IA. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 1934;37(1):29–38. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003
  14. 14. Duddigan S, Shaw LJ, Sizmur T, Gogu D, Hussain Z, Jirra K, et al. Natural farming improves crop yield in SE India when compared to conventional or organic systems by enhancing soil quality. Agron Sustain Dev. 2023;43(2):22:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-023-00884-x
  15. 15. Kumar R, Kumar S, Yashavanth BS, Venu N, Meena PC, Dhandapani A, et al. Natural farming practices for chemical-free agriculture: implications for crop yield and profitability. Agriculture. 2023;13(3):647:1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13030647
  16. 16. Behera RD, Biswal S, Priyadarshini S, Das I, Mishra PJ, Barik NC, et al. Influence of natural farming practices in different crops at West Central Table Land Zone of Odisha. Asian J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2025;11(1):258–62. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajsspn/2025/v11i1478
  17. 17. Choudhary RL, Jat RS, Singh HV, Dotaniya ML, Meena MK, Meena VD, et al. Low budget natural farming practices for cultivation of rapeseed and mustard. In: Meena RK, Ram H, Saxena A, Kumar R, editors. Natural farming: Basics and application. Venture Graphics; 2024. p. 122–33.
  18. 18. Liao J, Xu Q, Xu H, Huang D. Natural farming improves soil quality and alters microbial diversity in a cabbage field in Japan. Sustainability. 2019;11(11):3131:1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11113131
  19. 19. Smith J, Yeluripati J, Smith P, Nayak DR. Potential yield challenges to scale-up of zero budget natural farming. Nat Sustain. 2020;3(3):247–52. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0469-x
  20. 20. Moccia S, Chiesa A, Oberti A, Tittonell PA. Yield and quality of sequentially grown cherry tomato and lettuce under long-term conventional, low-input and organic soil management systems. Eur J Hortic Sci. 2006;71(4):183–9. https://doi.org/10.1079/ejhs.2006/135235
  21. 21. Murmu K, Ghosh BC, Swain DK. Yield and quality of tomato grown under organic and conventional nutrient management. Arch Agron Soil Sci. 2013;59(10):1311–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2012.711472
  22. 22. Yadav S, Kanawjia A, Chaurasiya R, Sharma A, Padhiary GG, Yadav AK. Response of bio-enhancer on growth and yield of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum (L.) Mill.). Int J Chem Stud. 2019;7(3):180–4.
  23. 23. Gore NS, Sreenivasa MN. Influence of liquid organic manures on growth, nutrient content and yield of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Karnataka J Agric Sci. 2011;24(2):153–7.
  24. 24. Chadha S, Rameshwar A, Saini JP, Paul YS. Vedic Krishi: sustainable livelihood option for small and marginal farmers. Indian J Tradit Knowl. 2012;11(3):480–6.
  25. 25. Devakumar N, Shubha S, Gowder SB, Rao GG. Microbial analytical studies of traditional organic preparations beejamrutha and jeevamrutha. Build Organic Bridges. 2014;2:639–42.
  26. 26. Sharma SK, Ravisankar N, Jain NK, Sarangi SK. Natural farming: current status, research and case studies. Indian J Agron. 2023;68(22):1–15.
  27. 27. Lakhani H, Bodar N. Natural farming and mulching synergies: enhancing soil health and crop productivity in Indian agroecosystems. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2025;14(6):1450–58. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2025.1406.002
  28. 28. Dhivya C, Murugan PP, Senthilkumar M, Arunkumar R. Opportunities and challenges on natural farming. Asian J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2024;10(4):301–9. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajsspn/2024/v10i4405

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.