Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Review Articles

Early Access

Metabolomics studies on Solanaceae members under abiotic stress: A review

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.11264
Submitted
12 August 2025
Published
08-03-2026

Abstract

Plants are known to face various abiotic stresses, which lead to reduced yield. It has been reported that metabolite concentrations vary under different abiotic stress conditions. Metabolomic studies are widely used to analyse the compositions of various metabolites. Metabolomic studies utilise different methods such as gas chromatography (GC), liquid chromatography (LC) in combination with mass spectrometry (MS) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) to analyse metabolites. The complete set of low-molecular weight metabolites present in the cell constitutes the metabolome. The amino acid proline is a major metabolite present in most stressed plants. Plant tissues exhibit altered amino acid and sugar levels under stress. As with other plant groups, similar responses are observed in members of the Solanaceae family. When solanaceous plants are subjected to stress, their cell activates the antioxidant systems to eliminate reactive oxygen species (ROS) produced in response to stress. Reactive oxygen species are scavenged by enzymatic antioxidants such as superoxide dismutase (SOD) and peroxidase (POD), as well as by non-enzymatic antioxidants, including flavonoids and ascorbic acid.

References

  1. 1. Rigano M, De Guzman G, Walmsley A, Frusciante L, Barone A. Production of pharmaceutical proteins in Solanaceae food crops. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14(2):2753–73. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms14022753
  2. 2. Gebhardt C. The historical role of species from the Solanaceae plant family in genetic research. Theor Appl Genet. 2016;129(12):2281–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-016-2804-1
  3. 3. Mukasa-Tebandeke IZ, Karume I, Ssebuwufu J, Wasajja HZ, Nankinga RM. Comparison of antioxidant flavonoid and polyphenol content of three selected Solanaceae genera from Kigezi, Southwest Uganda. Int J Chem Mater Sci. 2022;5(4):40–60. https://doi.org/10.36348/sijcms.2022.v05i04.001
  4. 4. Añibarro-Ortega M, Pinela J, Alexopoulos A, Petropoulos SA, Ferreira ICFR, Barros L. The powerful Solanaceae: food and nutraceutical applications in a sustainable world. Adv Food Nutr Res. 2022;100:131–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.afnr.2022.03.004
  5. 5. Hančinský R, Mihálik D, Mrkvová M, Candresse T, Glasa M. Plant viruses infecting Solanaceae family members in cultivated and wild environments: a review. Plants. 2020;9(5):667. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9050667
  6. 6. Zhu JK. Abiotic stress signaling and responses in plants. Cell. 2016;167(2):313–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.029
  7. 7. Hong J, Yang L, Zhang D, Shi J. Plant metabolomics: an indispensable systems biology tool for plant science. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17(6):767. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17060767
  8. 8. Hall RD, Brouwer ID, Fitzgerald MA. Plant metabolomics and its potential application for human nutrition. Physiol Plant. 2008;132:162–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2007.00989.x
  9. 9. Scossa F, Brotman Y, de Abreu e Lima F, Willmitzer L, Nikoloski Z, Fernie AR. Genomics-based strategies for the use of natural variation in the improvement of crop metabolism. Plant Sci. 2016;242:47–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2015.05.021
  10. 10. Hegeman AD. Plant metabolomics—meeting the analytical challenges of comprehensive metabolite analysis. Brief Funct Genomics. 2010;9:139–48. https://doi.org/10.1093/bfgp/elp053
  11. 11. Okazaki Y, Saito K. Recent advances of metabolomics in plant biotechnology. Plant Biotechnol Rep. 2012;6:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11816-011-0191-2
  12. 12. Khakimov B, Bak S, Engelsen SB. High-throughput cereal metabolomics: current analytical technologies, challenges and perspectives. J Cereal Sci. 2014;59:393–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2013.10.002
  13. 13. Shulaev V, Cortes D, Miller G, Mittler R. Metabolomics for plant stress response. Physiol Plant. 2008;132:199–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2007.01025.x
  14. 14. Marciniak P, Kolińska A, Spochacz M, Chowański S, Adamski Z, Scrano L, et al. Differentiated effects of secondary metabolites from Solanaceae and Brassicaceae plant families on the heartbeat of Tenebrio molitor pupae. Toxins. 2019;11:287. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins11050287
  15. 15. Cárdenas PD, Sonawane PD, Heinig U, Bocobza SE, Burdman S, Aharoni A. The bitter side of the nightshades: genomics drives discovery in Solanaceae steroidal alkaloid metabolism. Phytochemistry. 2015;133:24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2014.12.010
  16. 16. Xue Z, Duan LX, Qi X. Gas chromatography mass spectrometry coupling techniques. In: Qi X, Chen X, Wang Y, editors. Plant Metabolomics: Methods and Applications. Dordrecht: Springer; 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9291-2_2
  17. 17. García-Valencia LE, Valiente-Banuet JI, Trevino V, Díaz de la Garza RI, Rodríguez-López C. Untargeted metabolomics unveils the edaphic stress impact on habanero pepper ripening fruit. ACS Agric Sci Technol. 2023;3:33–44. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsagscitech.2c00132
  18. 18. Jimenez-García SN, Garcia-Mier L, Ramirez-Gomez XS, Guevara-Gonzalez RG, Aguirre-Becerra H, Escobar-Ortiz A, et al. Characterization of key compounds of bell pepper by spectrophotometry and gas chromatography under induced stress. Molecules. 2023;28:3830. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28093830
  19. 19. Zhang J, Liang L, Xie Y, Zhao Z, Su L, Tang Y, et al. Transcriptome and metabolome analyses reveal molecular responses of two pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) cultivars to cold stress. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:819630. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.819630
  20. 20. Thorat SA, Srivaishnavi M, Kaniyassery A, Padikkal S, Rai PS, Botha A, et al. Physiological and biochemical traits modulate tissue-specific withanolides and untargeted metabolites in Withania somnifera under salinity stress. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2023;203:108011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2023.108011
  21. 21. Merino I, Guasca AO, Krmela A, Arif U, Ali A, Westerberg E, et al. Metabolomic and transcriptomic analyses identify external conditions underlying toxic glycoalkaloid accumulation in potato tubers. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1210850. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1210850
  22. 22. Li D, Zhou C, Li JQ, Dong Q, Miao P, Lin Y, et al. Metabolomic analysis on the mechanism of nanoselenium alleviating cadmium stress and improving the pepper nutritional value. J Nanobiotechnol. 2022;20:523. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-022-01739-5
  23. 23. Reimer JJ, Shaaban B, Drummen N, Ambady SS, Genzel F, Poschet G, et al. Capsicum leaves under stress: using multi-omics analysis to detect abiotic stress network of secondary metabolism in two species. Antioxidants. 2022;11(4):671. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11040671
  24. 24. Raletsena MV, Mdlalose S, Bodede OS, Assress HA, Woldesemayat AA, Modise DM. 1H-NMR and LC-MS based metabolomics analysis of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) cultivars irrigated with fly ash-treated acid mine drainage. Molecules. 2022;27:1187. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27041187
  25. 25. Sun H, Li Q, Mao LZ, Yuan QL, Huang Y, Chen M, et al. Investigating the molecular mechanisms of pepper fruit tolerance to storage via transcriptomics and metabolomics. Horticulturae. 2021;7:242. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7080242
  26. 26. Liu B, Kong L, Zhang Y, Liao Y. Gene and metabolite integration analysis through transcriptome and metabolome brings new insight into heat stress tolerance in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Plants. 2021;10:103. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10010103
  27. 27. Reimer JJ, Thiele B, Biermann RT, Junker-Frohn LV, Wiese-Klinkenberg A, Usadel B, et al. Tomato leaves under stress: a comparison of stress response to mild abiotic stress between a cultivated and a wild tomato species. Plant Mol Biol. 2021;107:177–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-021-01194-0
  28. 28. Calumpang CLF, Saigo T, Watanabe M, Tohge T. Cross-species comparison of fruit metabolomics to elucidate metabolic regulation of fruit polyphenolics among solanaceous crops. Metabolites. 2020;10(5):209. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo10050209
  29. 29. Xu J, Zhou Y, Xu Z, Chen Z, Duan L. Combining physiological and metabolomic analysis to unravel the regulations of coronatine alleviating water stress in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.). Biomolecules. 2020;10:99. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10010099
  30. 30. Wang J, Lv J, Liu Z, Liu Y, Song J, Ma Y, et al. Integration of transcriptomics and metabolomics for pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) in response to heat stress. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(20):5042. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20205042.
  31. 31. Gao XX, Locke S, Zhang JZ, Joshi J, Wang-Pruski G. Metabolomics profile of potato tubers after phosphite treatment. Am J Plant Sci. 2018;9:845–64. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2018.94065
  32. 32. Singh R, Gupta P, Khan F, Singh SK, Sanchita, Mishra T, et al. Modulations in primary and secondary metabolic pathways and adjustment in physiological behaviour of Withania somnifera under drought stress. Plant Sci. 2018;272:42–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2018.03.029
  33. 33. Mibei EK, Owino WO, Ambuko J, Giovannoni JJ, Onyango AN. Metabolomic analyses to evaluate the effect of drought stress on selected African eggplant accessions. J Sci Food Agric. 2015;98(1):205–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.8458
  34. 34. Paupière MJ, Müller F, Li H, Rieu I, Tikunov YM, Visser RG, et al. Untargeted metabolomic analysis of tomato pollen development and heat stress response. Plant Reprod. 2017;30(2):81–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00497-017-0301-6
  35. 35. Khondoker MG, Li H, Sivasithamparam K, Jones MGK, Du X, Ren Y, et al. Metabolic responses of endophytic Nicotiana benthamiana plants experiencing water stress. Environ Exp Bot. 2017;143:59–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2017.08.008
  36. 36. Rabara RC, Tripathi P, Reese RN, Rushton DL, Alexander D, Timko MP, et al. Tobacco drought stress responses reveal new targets for Solanaceae crop improvement. BMC Genomics. 2015;16:484. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-1575-4
  37. 37. Scalabrin E, Radaelli M, Rizzato G, et al. Metabolomic analysis of wild and transgenic Nicotiana langsdorffii plants exposed to abiotic stresses: unraveling metabolic responses. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2015;407:6357–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-015-8770-7
  38. 38. Sung J, Sonn Y, Lee Y, Kang S, Ha S, Hari BK, et al. Compositional changes of selected amino acids, organic acids and soluble sugars in the xylem sap of N-, P-, or K-deficient tomato plants. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci. 2014;178(5):792–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.201500071
  39. 39. Ampofo-Asiama J, Baiye VMM, Hertog MLATM, Waelkens E, Geeraerd AH, Nicolai BM, et al. The metabolic response of cultured tomato cells to low oxygen stress. Plant Biol. 2014;16(3):594–606. https://doi.org/10.1111/plb.12094
  40. 40. Terras-Claveria L, Jáuregui O, Codina C, Tiburcio AF, Bastida J, Viladomat F. Analysis of phenolic compounds by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry.
  41. 41. in senescent and water-stressed tobacco. Plant Sci. 2012;182:71–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2011.02.009
  42. 42. Sánchez-Rodríguez E, Moreno DA, Ferreres F, Rubio-Wilhelmi MM, Ruiz JM. Differential responses of five cherry tomato varieties to water stress: changes on phenolic metabolites and related enzymes. Phytochemistry. 2011;72(8):723–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2011.02.011
  43. 43. Semel Y, Schauer N, Roessner U, Zamir D, Fernie AR. . Metabolite analysis for the comparison of irrigated and non-irrigated field grown tomato of varying genotype. Metabolomics. 2007;3:289–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-007-0055-5
  44. 44. Swartz ME. UPLC™: an introduction and review. J Liq Chromatogr Relat Technol. 2005;28(7–8):1253–63. https://doi.org/10.1081/JLC-200053046
  45. 45. Obata T, Fernie AR. The use of metabolomics to dissect plant responses to abiotic stresses. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2012;69(19):3225–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-012-1091-5
  46. 46. Kumari S, Stevens D, Kind T, Denkert C, Fiehn O. Applying in-silico retention index and mass spectra matching for identification of unknown metabolites in accurate mass GC-TOF mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2011;83(15):5895–902. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac2006137
  47. 47. Chen L, Zhou F, Chen Y, Fan Y, Zhang K, Liu Q, et al. Salicylic acid improves the constitutive freezing tolerance of potato as revealed by transcriptomics and metabolomics analyses. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:609. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24010609
  48. 48. Vanitha A, Kalimuthu K, Chinnadurai V, Sharmila Juliet Y, Prabakaran R. GCMS analysis of leaf and salt stress callus of eggplant (Solanum melongena L.). J Pharm Res Int. 2017;14(6):1-11. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJPR/2016/30425
  49. 49. Roy C, Maji SR, Ghose TK, Bhattacharya SG. Stress causing dynamic changes of four phytohormones in tobacco and tomato: a GC-MS analysis. Res Plant Biol. 2019;9(1):16–22. https://doi.org/10.25081/ripb.2019.v9.3753
  50. 50. Luengwilai K, Saltveit M, Beckles DM. Metabolite content of harvested Micro-Tom tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) fruit is altered by chilling and protective heat-shock treatments as shown by GC-MS metabolic profiling. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2012;63:116–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2011.05.014
  51. 51. Lokesha AN, Shivashankara KS, Ravishankar KV, Geetha GA, Laxman RH, Roy TK, et al. Association of volatile terpenoids and their biosynthetic genes in high-temperature stress tolerance in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). J Hortic Sci. 2024;19(2):1–8. https://doi.org/10.24154/jhs.v19i2.2254
  52. 52. Schripsema J. Application of NMR in plant metabolomics: techniques, problems and prospects. Phytochem Anal. 2010;21(1):14–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/pca.1185
  53. 53. Moco S, Bino RJ, Vorst O, Verhoeven HA, de Groot J, van Beek TA, et al. A liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-based metabolome database for tomato. Plant Physiol. 2006;141(4):1205–18. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.106.078428
  54. 54. Al Sinani SS, Eltayeb EA. The effect of salinity on solamargine and solasonine contents of Solanum incanum plants grown in Oman. SQU J Sci. 2014;19(2):1–7. https://doi.org/10.24200/squjs.vol19iss2pp1-7
  55. 55. Paul AT, Vir S, Bhutani KK. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-based quantification of steroidal glycoalkaloids from Solanum xanthocarpum and effect of different extraction methods on their content. J Chromatogr A. 2008;1208(1–2):141–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2008.08.089
  56. 56. Maurya A, Manika N, Verma RK, Singh SC, Srivastava SK. Simple and reliable methods for the determination of three steroidal glycosides in eight species of Solanum by reversed-phase HPLC coupled with diode array detection. Phytochem Anal. 2013;24(1):87–92. https://doi.org/10.1002/pca.2387
  57. 57. Jayanthi G, Senthilkumar T. LC-MS analysis of a potent medicinal plant Solanum nigrum L. variants black and orange fruits. Int J Bot Stud. 2023;8(4):16-9.
  58. 58. Ben-Abdallah S, Zorrig W, Amyot L, Renaud J, Hannoufa A, Lachâal M, et al. et al. Potential production of polyphenols, carotenoids and glycoalkaloids in Solanum villosum Mill. under salt stress. Biologia. 2019;74:309–24. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-018-00166-y.
  59. 59. Moreira GC, Anjos GL, Carneiro CN, Ribas RF, Dias FS. Phenolic compounds and photosynthetic activity in Physalis angulata L. (Solanaceae) in response to exogenous abscisic acid application. Phytochem Lett. 2020;40:96–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytol.2020.09.018
  60. 60. Popova I, Sell B, Pillai SS, Kuhl J, Dandurand L. High-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of glycoalkaloids from underexploited Solanum species and their acetylcholinesterase inhibition activity. Plants. 2021;11:269. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11030269
  61. 61. Giannarelli S, Muscatello B, Bogani P, Spiriti MM, Buiatti M, Fuoco R. Comparative determination of some phytohormones in wild-type and genetically modified plants by GC-MS and HPLC-MS/MS. Anal Biochem. 2010;398(1):60–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2009.10.038
  62. 62. Kitsios G, Doonan JH. Cyclin-dependent protein kinases and stress responses in plants. Plant Signal Behav. 2011;6(2):204–9. https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.6.2.14835
  63. 63. Krishnan P, Kruger NJ, Ratcliffe RG. Metabolite fingerprinting and profiling in plants using NMR. J Exp Bot. 2005;56(410):255–65. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eri010
  64. 64. Ratcliffe RG, Shachar-Hill Y. Revealing metabolic phenotypes in plants: inputs from NMR analysis. Biol Rev. 2005;80(1):27–43. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1464793104006530
  65. 65. Pang X, Chen J, Li L, Huang W, Liu J. Deciphering drought resilience in Solanaceae crops: Unraveling molecular and genetic mechanisms. Biology. 2024;13(12):1076. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13121076
  66. 66. Nemadodzi LE, Managa GM, Nemukondeni N. ¹H NMR-based analysis to determine the metabolomics profile of Solanum nigrum L. (black nightshade) grown in greenhouse versus open-field conditions. Metabolites. 2025;15(5):344. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo15050344
  67. 67. Zhang J, Zhang Y, Du Y, Chen S, Tang H. Dynamic metabonomic responses of Nicotiana tabacum plants to salt stress. J Proteome Res. 2011;10(4):1904–14. https://doi.org/10.1021/pr101140n
  68. 68. Sorin C, Mariette F, Musse M, Leport L, Cruz F, Yvin J, et al. Leaf development monitoring and early detection of water deficiency by low-field NMR relaxation in Nicotiana tabacum plants. Appl Sci. 2018;8(6):943. https://doi.org/10.3390/app8060943
  69. 69. Li J, Cang Z, Jiao F, Bai X, Zhang D, Zhai R. Influence of drought stress on photosynthetic characteristics and protective enzymes of potato at seedling stage. J Saudi Soc Agric Sci. 2017;16(1):82–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2015.03.001
  70. 70. Anithakumari AM. Genetic dissection of drought tolerance in potato. Wageningen: Wageningen University and Research; 2011.
  71. 71. Shi S, Fan M, Iwama K, Li F, Zhang Z, Jia L. Physiological basis of drought tolerance in potato under long-term water deficiency. Int J Plant Prod. 2015;9(2):305–20. https://doi.org/10.22069/IJPP.2015.2050
  72. 72. Mona SA, Hashem A, Abd-Allah EF, Alqarawi AA, Soliman DWK, Wirth S, et al. Increased drought resistance by Trichoderma harzianum correlates with elevated secondary metabolites and proline. J Integr Agric. 2017;16(8):1751–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(17)61695-2
  73. 73. Ahanger MA, Hashem A, Abd-Allah EF, Ahmad P. Arbuscular mycorrhiza in crop improvement under environmental stress. In: Emerging technologies and management of crop stress tolerance. Academic Press; 2014. p. 69–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800875-1.00003-X
  74. 74. Hashem A, Abd-Allah EF, Alqarawi AA, Al-Huqail AA, Wirth S, Egamberdieva D. Interaction between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and endophytic bacteria enhances growth of Acacia gerrardii under salt stress. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:1089. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01089
  75. 75. Ahmad P, Hashem A, Abd-Allah EF, Alqarawi AA, John R, Egamberdieva D, et al. Role of Trichoderma harzianum in mitigating NaCl stress in Brassica juncea L. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6:868. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00868
  76. 76. Jatav KS, Agarwal RM, Singh RP, Shrivastava M. Growth and yield responses of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to suboptimal water supply and potassium doses. J Funct Environ Bot. 2012;2(1):39–51. https://doi.org/10.5958/j.2231-1742.2.1.005
  77. 77. Ximénez-Embún MG, Castañera P, Ortego F. Drought stress in tomato increases performance of adapted and non-adapted Tetranychus urticae. J Insect Physiol. 2017;96:73–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2016.10.015
  78. 78. Visentin I, Vitali M, Ferrero M, Zhang Y, Ruyter-Spira C, Novák O, et al. Low strigolactone levels in roots as part of systemic drought signaling in tomato. New Phytol. 2016;212(4):954–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14190
  79. 79. Desoky ESM, Merwad ARM, Rady MM. Natural biostimulants improve saline soil properties and salt-stressed sorghum performance. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 2018;49(8):967–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2018.1448861
  80. 80. Semida WM, Hemida KA, Rady MM. Sequenced ascorbate–proline–glutathione seed treatment enhances cadmium tolerance in cucumber transplants. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2018;154:171–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.02.036
  81. 81. Rady MO, Semida WM, Abd El-Mageed TA, Hemida KA, Rady MM. Glycine betaine foliar application enhances salinity tolerance in onion via antioxidative defense. Sci Hortic. 2018;240:614–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.06.069
  82. 82. Yang KY, Doxey S, McLean JE, Britt D, Watson A, Al Qassy D, et al. Root morphology remodeling by CuO and ZnO nanoparticles affects drought tolerance in plants colonized by beneficial Pseudomonas. Botany. 2018;96(3):175–186. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjb-2017-0124
  83. 83. Semida WM, Abdelkhalik A, Mohamed GF, Abd El-Mageed TA, Abd El-Mageed SA, Rady MM, et al. Zinc oxide nanoparticles enhance drought tolerance in eggplant (Solanum melongena L.). Plants (Basel). 2021;10(2):421. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10020421
  84. 84. Lagat SK. Evaluation of African eggplant accessions for phenotypic traits and adaptation to water stress [MSc thesis]. Nairobi: University of Nairobi; 2016.
  85. 85. Ranaweera GKMMK, Fonseka RM, Fonseka H. Morpho-physiological and yield traits of interspecific hybrids of Solanum melongena L. under drought stress. Int J Minor Fruits Med Aromat Plants. 2020;6(1):30–37.
  86. 86. Hassani-Kakhki M, Karimi J, El Borai F, Killiny N, Hosseini M, Stelinski L, et al. Drought stress impairs communication between Solanum tuberosum and subterranean biological control agents. Ann Entomol Soc Am. 2020;113(1):23–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/saz050
  87. 87. Flores-Saavedra M, Plazas M, Vilanova S, Prohens J, Gramazio P. Induction of water stress in major Solanum crops: methodologies for identifying drought-tolerant materials. Sci Hortic. 2023;318:112105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2023.112105
  88. 88. Dong S, Ling J, Song L, Zhao L, Wang Y, Zhao T. Transcriptomic profiling of tomato leaves identifies novel factors responding to dehydration stress. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(11):9725. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24119725
  89. 89. Roldan MVG, Engel B, de Vos RCH, Vereijken P, Astola L, Groenenboom M, et al. Metabolomics reveals organ-specific metabolic rearrangements during early tomato seedling development. Metabolomics. 2014;10(5):958-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-014-0625-2
  90. 90. Prabhavathi V, Yadav JS, Kumar PA, Rajam MV. Abiotic stress tolerance in transgenic eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) expressing bacterial mannitol-1-phosphate dehydrogenase. Mol Breed. 2002;9(2):137–147. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026765026493
  91. 91. Khazaei Z, Estaji A. Foliar ascorbic acid application improves drought tolerance in sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum). Acta Physiol Plant. 2020;42(7):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-020-03106-z
  92. 92. Obidiegwu JE, Bryan GJ, Jones HG, Prashar A. Coping with drought: adaptive responses in potato and perspectives for improvement. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6:542. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00542
  93. 93. López-Serrano L, Canet-Sanchis G, Vuletin Selak G, Penella C, San Bautista A, López-Galarza S, et al. Pepper rootstock and scion physiological responses under drought stress. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10:38. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00038
  94. 94. Mane SP, Robinet CV, Ulanov A, Schafleitner R, Tincopa L, Gaudin A, et al. Molecular and physiological adaptation to prolonged drought in Andean potato leaves. Funct Plant Biol. 2008;35(8):669–688. https://doi.org/10.1071/FP07293
  95. 95. Vasquez-Robinet C, Mane SP, Ulanov AV, Watkinson JI, Stromberg VK, De Koeyer D, et al. Physiological and molecular adaptations to drought in Andean potato genotypes. J Exp Bot. 2008;59(8):2109–2123. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ern073
  96. 96. Parry MAandralojc PJ, Scales JC, Salvucci ME, Carmo-Silva AE, Alonso H, et al. Rubisco activity and regulation as targets for crop improvement. J Exp Bot. 2013;64(3):717–730. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ers336
  97. 97. Muhammad AA. Waterlogging stress in plants: a review. Afr J Agric Res. 2012;7(13):1976–1981. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJARX11.084
  98. 98. Aldana F, García PN, Fischer G. Effect of waterlogging stress on growth, development and symptomatology of cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.). Rev Acad Colomb Cienc Exact Fis Nat. 2014;38(149):393–400. https://doi.org/10.18257/raccefyn.114
  99. 99. Adis MJ, Chavez CA, Prieto MC, Revollar Ochatoma PA, Vidoz ML, Mignolli F, et al. Unveiling flooding tolerance in eggplant (Solanum melongena L.): insights into biomass allocation, photosynthetic resilience and antioxidant defence strategies. Plant Soil. 2025;515:1765-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-025-07688-w
  100. 100. Bhatt RM, Laxman RH, Singh TH, Divya MH, Srilakshmi, Nageswar Rao ADDVS. Response of brinjal genotypes to drought and flooding stress. Veg Sci. 2014;41(2):116–124.
  101. 101. Umicevic S, Kukavica B, Maksimovic I, Gasic U, Milutinovic M, Antic M, et al. Stress response in tomato influenced by repeated waterlogging. Front Plant Sci. 2024;15:1331281. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2024.1331281
  102. 102. Kumar A, Kumari D, Adarsh A, Solankey SS. Advances in abiotic stresses management in potatoes. In: Solankey SS, editor. Advances in research on potato production. Cham: Springer; 2025. p. 297–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-82710-5_14
  103. 103. Gong X, Xu Y, Li H, et al. Antioxidant activation and ROS regulation promote waterlogging resistance in hot pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). BMC Plant Biol. 2022;22:25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-022-03807-2
  104. 104. Sarker KK, Quamruzzaman AKM, Uddin MN, et al. Evaluation of eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) genotypes for short-term waterlogging tolerance. Gesunde Pflanzen. 2023;75:179–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-022-00688-1
  105. 105. Yin J, Niu L, Song X, Ottosen C, Wu Z, Jiang F, et al. Effect of waterlogging on morphology, physiology and fruit yield in tomato genotypes. Veg Res. 2023;3:0031. https://doi.org/10.48130/VR-2023-0031
  106. 106. Tejada-Alvarado JJ, Meléndez-Mori JB, Vilca-Valqui NC, Neri JC, Ayala-Tocto RY, Huaman-Huaman E, et al. Impact of wild Solanaceae rootstocks on morphological and physiological response, yieldand fruit quality of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) grown under deficit irrigation conditions. Heliyon. 2023;9(1):e12755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12755
  107. 107. Ahsan N, Lee DG, Lee SH, Kang KY, Bahk JD, Choi MS, et al. Comparative proteomic analysis of tomato leaves under waterlogging stress. Physiol Plant. 2007;131(4):555–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2007.00980.x
  108. 108. Rasheed R, Iqbal M, Ashraf MA, Hussain I, Shafiq F, Yousaf A, et al. Glycine betaine alleviates waterlogging stress in tomato. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol. 2018;93(4):385–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2017.1373037
  109. 109. Restrepo-Diaz H, Betancourt-Osorio J, Sanchez-Canro D. Nitrogen status and waterlogging effects on tamarillo seedlings. Not Bot Horti Agrobot Cluj-Napoca. 2016;44(2):375–81. https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha44210438
  110. 110. Anuradha M, Sivaraju K, Krishnamurthy V. Effect of waterlogging on physiological characteristics, yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco. Ind J Plant Physiol. 2013;18:67–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40502-013-0008-0
  111. 111. Kumar KM, Sujatha KB, Rajashree V, Kalarani MK. Gas exchange and antioxidant system in solanaceous species under waterlogging. J Agric Ecol. 2018;6:54–63. https://doi.org/10.53911/JAE.2018.6207
  112. 112. Singh H, Kumar P, Kumar A, Kyriacou MC, Colla G, Rouphael Y. Grafting tomato to improve salt tolerance. Agronomy. 2020;10(2):263. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10020263
  113. 113. Giancarla V, Madoșă E, Ciulca S, Adriana C, Camen D, Iuliana C. Salinity stress effects in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) cultivars. J Hortic For Biotechnol. 2020;24(1):61–64.
  114. 114. Hand MJ, Taffouo VD, Nouck AE, Nyemene KP, Tonfack B, Meguekam TL, et al. Effects of salt stress on plant growth, nutrient partitioning, chlorophyll content, leaf relative water content, accumulation of osmolytes and antioxidant compounds in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) cultivars. Not Bot Horti Agrobo. 2017;45(2):481-90. https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha45210928
  115. 115. Kpinkoun JK, Amoussa AM, Mensah ACG, Komlan FA, Kinsou E, Lagnika L, et al. Effect of salt stress on flowering, fructification and fruit nutrients concentration in a local cultivar of chili pepper (Capsicum frutescens L.). Int J Plant Physiol Biochem. 2019;11(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJPPB2019.0284
  116. 116. De la Torre-González A, Montesinos-Pereira D, Blasco B, Ruiz JM. Influence of the proline metabolism and glycine betaine on tolerance to salt stress in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) commercial genotypes. J Plant Physiol. 2018;231:329-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2018.10.013
  117. 117. Yilmaz K, Akinci IE, Akinci S. Effect of salt stress on growth and Na, K contents of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) in germination and seedling stages. Pak J Biol Sci. 2004;7(4):606-10. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2004.606.610
  118. 118. Jamil M, Kharal MA, Ahmad M, Abbasi GH, Nazli F, Hussain A, Akhtar MFZ. Inducing salinity tolerance in red pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) through exogenous application of proline and L-tryptophan. Soil Environ. 2018;37(2):160–8.
  119. 119. Shams M, Yildirim E, Arslan E, Agar G. Salinity induced alteration in DNA methylation pattern, enzyme activity, nutrient uptake and H₂O₂ content in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) cultivars. Acta Physiol Plant. 2020;42(5):59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-020-03053-9-
  120. 120. Assaha DVM, Liu L, Mekawy AMM, Ueda A, Nagaoka T, Saneoka H. Effect of salt stress on Na accumulation, antioxidant enzyme activities and activity of cell wall peroxidase of huckleberry (Solanum scabrum) and eggplant (Solanum melongena). Int J Agri Biol. 2015;17(6):1149–1156. https://doi.org/10.17957/IJAB/15.0052
  121. 121. Brenes M, Pérez J, González-Orenga S, Solana A, Boscaiu M, Prohens J, et al. Comparative studies on the physiological and biochemical responses to salt stress of eggplant (Solanum melongena) and its rootstock S. torvum. Agriculture. 2020;10(9):328. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10080328
  122. 122. Zhou Y, Diao M, Chen X, Cui J, Pang S, Li Y, et al. Application of exogenous glutathione confers salinity stress tolerance in tomato seedlings by modulating ions homeostasis and polyamine metabolism. Sci Hortic. 2019;250:45–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2019.02.026
  123. 123. Shumaila S, Ullah S. Mitigation of salinity-induced damages in Capsicum annuum L. (Sweet Pepper) seedlings using priming techniques. A future perspectives of climate change in the region. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 2020;51(12):1602–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2020.1791154
  124. 124. Chourasia KN, Lal MK, Tiwari RK, Dev D, Kardile HB, Patil VU, et al. Salinity stress in potato: understanding physiological, biochemical and molecular responses. Life (Basel). 2021;11(6):545. https://doi.org/10.3390/life11060545
  125. 125. Tanveer K, Gilani S, Hussain Z, Ishaq R, Adeel M, Ilyas N. Effect of salt stress on tomato plant and the role of calcium. J Plant Nutr. 2020;43(1):28–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2019.1659324
  126. 126. Ghosh SC, Asanuma KI, Kusutani A, Toyota M. Effect of salt stress on some chemical components and yield of potato. Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2001;47(3):467–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2001.10408411
  127. 127. Al-Zubaidi AHA. Effects of salinity stress on growth and yield of two varieties of eggplant under greenhouse conditions. Res Crops. 2018;19(3):436–40. https://doi.org/10.31830/2348-7542.2018.0001.13
  128. 128. Jaarsma R, de Vries RSM, de Boer AH. Effect of salt stress on growth, Na+ accumulation and proline metabolism in potato (Solanum tuberosum) cultivars. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e60183. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060183
  129. 129. Teixeira J, Fidalgo F. Salt stress affects glutamine synthetase activity and mRNA accumulation on potato plants in an organ-dependent manner. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2009;47(9):807–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2009.05.002
  130. 130. Çelik Ö, Atak Ç. The effect of salt stress on antioxidative enzymes and proline content of two Turkish tobacco varieties. Turk J Biol. 2012;36(3):339–56. https://doi.org/10.3906/biy-1108-11
  131. 131. Arbona V, Manzi M, Ollas CD, Gómez-Cadenas A. Metabolomics as a tool to investigate abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14(3):4885–911. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms14034885
  132. 132. Giannakoula AE, Ilias IF. The effect of water stress and salinity on growth and physiology of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Arch Biol Sci (Belgrade). 2013;65(2):611-20. https://doi.org/10.2298/ABS1302611G
  133. 133. Hamooh BT, Sattar FA, Wellman G, Mousa MAA. Metabolomic and biochemical analysis of two potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) cultivars exposed to in vitro osmotic and salt stresses. Plants (Basel). 2021;10(1):98. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10010098
  134. 134. Genzel F, Dicke MD, Junker-Frohn LV, Neuwohner A, Thiele B, Putz A, et al. Impact of moderate cold and salt stress on the accumulation of antioxidant flavonoids in the leaves of two Capsicum cultivars. J Agric Food Chem. 2021;69(23):6431-43. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.1c00908
  135. 135. Fidalgo F, Santos I, Teixeira J, Araújo SS, Salema R. Effects of long-term salt stress on antioxidant defence systems, leaf water relations and chloroplast ultrastructure of potato plants. Ann Appl Biol. 2004;145(2):185–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2004.tb00374.x
  136. 136. Hossain MM, Nonami H. Effect of salt stress on physiological response of tomato fruit grown in hydroponic culture system. Hort Sci (Prague). 2012;39(1):26-32. https://doi.org/10.17221/63/2011-HORTSCI
  137. 137. Huez-López MA, Ulery AL, Samani Z, Picchioni G, Flynn RP. Response of chile pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) to salt stress and organic and inorganic nitrogen sources: I. Growth and yield. Trop Subtrop Agroecosyst. 2011;14(1):137–47. https://doi.org/10.56369/tsaes.681
  138. 138. Abul-Soud MA, Abd-Elrahman SH. Foliar selenium application to improve the tolerance of eggplant grown under salt stress conditions. Int J Plant Soil Sci. 2015;9(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.9734/IJPSS/2016/19992
  139. 139. Naeem M, Basit A, Ahmad I, Mohamed HI, Wasila H. Effect of salicylic acid and salinity stress on the performance of tomato plants. Gesunde Pflanzen. 2020;72(4):393–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-020-00521-7
  140. 140. Königshofer H, Tromballa HW, Löppert HG. Early events in signalling high-temperature stress in tobacco BY-2 cells involve alterations in membrane fluidity and enhanced hydrogen peroxide production. Plant Cell Environ. 2008;31(12):1771–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2008.01880.x
  141. 141. Abbas Y, Mansha S, Waheed H, Siddiq Z, Hayyat MU, Zhang YJ, et al. NaCl stress, tissue-specific Na+ and K+ uptake and their effect on growth and physiology of Helianthus annuus L. and Solanum lycopersicum L. Sci Hortic. 2024;326:112454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2023.112454
  142. 142. Ji L, Li P, Su Z, Li M, Guo S. Cold-tolerant introgression line construction and low-temperature stress response analysis for bell pepper. Plant Signal Behav. 2020;15(7):1773097. https://doi.org/10.1080/15592324.2020.1773097
  143. 143. Camejo D, Rodríguez P, Morales MA, Dell'Amico JM, Torrecillas A, Alarcón JJ. High temperature effects on photosynthetic activity of two tomato cultivars with different heat susceptibility. J Plant Physiol. 2005;162(3):281–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2004.07.014
  144. 144. Hazra P, Samsul HA, Sikder D, Peter KV. Breeding tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) resistant to high temperature stress. Int J Plant Breed. 2007;1(1):31–40.
  145. 145. Rivero RM, Ruiz JM, Romero L. Oxidative metabolism in tomato plants subjected to heat stress. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol. 2004;79(4):560–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2004.11511805
  146. 146. Bai C, Wu C, Ma L, Fu A, Zheng Y, Han J, et al. Transcriptomics and metabolomics analyses provide insights into postharvest ripening and senescence of tomato fruit under low temperature. Hort Plant J. 2023;9(1):109-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpj.2021.09.001
  147. 147. Luthra SK, Gupta VK, Lal M, Tiwari JK. Genetic parameters for tuber yield components, late blight resistance and keeping quality in potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.). Potato J. 2018;45(2):107-115.
  148. 148. Rykaczewska K. The impact of high temperature during growing season on potato cultivars with different response to environmental stresses. Am J Plant Sci. 2013;4(12):2386–93. http://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2013.412295
  149. 149. Tiwari RK, Lal MK, Naga KC, Kumar R, Chourasia KN, Subhash S, et al. Emerging roles of melatonin in mitigating abiotic and biotic stresses of horticultural crops. Sci Hortic. 2020;272:109592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109592
  150. 150. Morris WL, Hancock RD, Ducreux LJM, Morris JA, Usman M, Verrall SR, et al. Day-length dependent restructuring of the leaf transcriptome and metabolome in potato genotypes with contrasting tuberization phenotypes. Plant Cell Environ. 2014;37(6):1351–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12238
  151. 151. Saha SR, Hossain MM, Rahman MM, Kuo CG, Abdullah S. Effect of high temperature stress on the performance of twelve sweet pepper genotypes. Bangladesh J Agric Res. 2010;35(3):525–34. ttps://doi.org/10.3329/bjar.v35i3.6459
  152. 152. Airaki M, Leterrier M, Mateos RM, Valderrama R, Chaki M, Barroso JB, et al. Metabolism of reactive oxygen species and reactive nitrogen species in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) plants under low temperature stress. Plant Cell Environ. 2012;35(2):281–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2011.02310.x
  153. 153. Zhang J, Jiang X, Li T, Yang Z. Effect of moderately high temperature stress on photosynthesis and carbohydrate metabolism in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) leaves. Afr J Agric Res. 2012;7(3):487–492. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR11.2062
  154. 154. Zhang Z, Lan M, Han X, Wu J, Wang-Pruski G. Response of ornamental pepper to high-temperature stress and role of exogenous salicylic acid in mitigating high temperature. J Plant Growth Regul. 2020;39:133–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-019-09969-y
  155. 155. Li Y, Ren K, Hu M, He X, Gu K, Hu B, et al. Cold stress in the harvest period: effects on tobacco leaf quality and curing characteristics. BMC Plant Biol. 2021;21(1):131. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-021-02895-w
  156. 156. Jin J, Zhang H, Zhang J, Liu P, Chen X, Li Z, Xu Y, Lu P, Cao P. Integrated transcriptomics and metabolomics analysis to characterize cold stress responses in Nicotiana tabacum. BMC Genomics. 2017;18(1):496. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-3871-7
  157. 157. Concellón A, Anon MC, Chaves AR. Effect of low temperature storage on physical and physiological characteristics of eggplant fruit (Solanum melongena L.). LWT Food Sci Technol. 2007;40(3):389–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2006.02.004
  158. 158. Rajitha KD, Channakeshava BC, Bhanuprakash K. Differential response of brinjal (Solanum melongena L.) genotypes for high temperature stress on seed quality traits and peroxidase activity. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2018;7(5):3131–3141. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.705.366
  159. 159. Nothmann J, Koller D. Effects of low-temperature stress on fertility and fruiting of eggplant (Solanum melongena). Exp Agric. 1975;11(1):33–38. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479700006207
  160. 160. Wu X, Yao X, Chen J, Zhu Z, Zhang H, Zha D. Brassinosteroids protect photosynthesis and antioxidant system of eggplant seedlings from high-temperature stress. Acta Physiol Plant. 2014;36:251–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-013-1406-7
  161. 161. Piacentini D, Della Rovere F, Lanni F, Cittadini M, Palombi M, Fattorini L, et al. Brassinosteroids interact with nitric oxide in the response of rice root systems to arsenic stress. Environ Exp Bot. 2023;209:105287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2023.105287
  162. 162. Puzanskiy RK, Yemelyanov VV, Shavarda AL, Gavrilenko TA, Shishova MF. Age- and organ-specific difference of potato (Solanum phureja) plant metabolome. Russ J Plant Physiol. 2018;65:813–823. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1021443718060122
  163. 163. Rabara RC, Tripathi P, Reese RN, Rushton DL, Alexander D, Timko MP, et al. Tobacco drought stress responses reveal new targets for Solanaceae crop improvement. BMC Genomics. 2015;16:484. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-1575-4
  164. 164. Aydın Akbudak M, Yildiz S, Filiz E. Pathogenesis-related protein-1 (PR-1) genes in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.): bioinformatics analyses and expression profiles in response to drought stress. Genomics. 2020;112(6):4089–4099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2020.07.004
  165. 165. Naik B, Kumar V, Rizwanuddin S, Chauhan M, Choudhary M, Gupta AK, et al. Genomics, proteomics and metabolomics approaches to improve abiotic stress tolerance in tomato plant. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(3):3025. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24033025
  166. 166. Senthilkumar KM, Raju S, Velumani R, Gutam S. Transcriptome analysis and identification of leaf, tuberous root and fibrous root tissue-specific high temperature stress-responsive genes in sweet potato. J Hortic Sci. 2023;18(1):53-59. https://doi.org/10.24154/jhs.v18i1.2131
  167. 167. Abbas A, Mansha S, Waheed H, Siddiq Z, Hayyat MU, Zhang Y, et al. NaCl stress, tissue-specific Na+ and K+ uptake and their effect on growth and physiology of Helianthus annuus L. and Solanum lycopersicum L. Sci Hortic. 2024;326:112454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2023.112454
  168. 168. Pang X, Chen J, Li L, Huang W, Liu J. Deciphering drought resilience in Solanaceae crops: unraveling molecular and genetic mechanisms. Biology (Basel). 2024;13(12):1076. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13121076
  169. 169. Villarino GH, Hu Q, Scanlon MJ, Mueller L, Bombarely A, Mattson NS. Dissecting tissue-specific transcriptomic responses from leaf and roots under salt stress in Petunia hybrida Mitchell. Genes (Basel). 2017;8(8):195. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes8080195
  170. 170. Akbudak AM, Yildiz S, Filiz E. Pathogenesis-related protein-1 (PR-1) genes in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.): bioinformatics analyses and expression profiles in response to drought stress. Genomics. 2020;112(6):4089–4099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2020.07.004

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.