Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. sp4 (2025): Recent Advances in Agriculture by Young Minds - III

Optimisation of parameters suitable for paddy thresher

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.11306
Submitted
16 August 2025
Published
28-11-2025

Abstract

Post-harvest processing plays a key role in reducing grain losses and improving overall yield in crops, including paddy. Despite many advancements in agricultural mechanisation, the small and marginal farmers face challenges due to the high cost and limited availability of suitable equipment. This study aims to address this gap by comparing the performance of three types of threshing cylinders: spike tooth, wire loop and rasp bar on two paddy varieties, namely CO 54 and CO 55. The comparative analysis will enable the farmers to select the threshing cylinder best suited for their needs, in maximising output and preserving grain quality. The performance was evaluated across different feed rates (70-126 kg h-1) and cylinder speeds (550-950 rpm). The parameters, such as output capacity, threshing efficiency, unthreshed grain loss, broken grain loss and total grain loss were evaluated. Response Surface Methodology (RSM) was used for optimisation. The results showed that feed rate had a stronger effect than cylinder speed on most performance indicators. Among the three, the spike tooth cylinder gave the best results, with a maximum threshing efficiency of 96.81 % and a consistent output of 67.50 kg h-1 at 650 to 750 rpm and 126 kg h-1 feed rate. It also had the lowest unthreshed loss (3.19 %), broken grain loss (1.47 %) and total grain loss (4.66 %) under these levels of feed rate and rpm. The wire loop cylinder matched the output for CO 55 but had higher losses under extreme conditions. The rasp bar showed the least broken grain loss (0.88 %) but higher total grain loss (up to 16.16 %). CO 55 performed better than CO 54 across all measures. ANOVA results confirmed the significance of results for the variables such as feed rate and cylinder speed, with strong model fits (R² > 0.99). The thresher showed optimal results at feed rate of 90 to 105 kg h-1 and cylinder speed of 650-750 rpm. This study provides valuable insights for improving the efficiency and thereby the sustainability of small-scale paddy threshing by offering optimised operating conditions.

References

  1. 1. Government of India, Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare. Department of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Economics, Statistics & Evaluation Division. Agricultural Statistics at a Glance 2023 [Internet]. New Delhi: Government of India; 2023 [cited 2025 Nov 26]. https://desagri.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Agricultural-Statistics-at-a-Glance-2023.pdf
  2. 2. Singh D, Yadav R, Rajput V. Mechanization trends in paddy threshing. Curr Agric. 2023;47(1).
  3. 3. Pandey K, Verma S. Influence of concave clearance on threshing efficiency. Agric Mach Dig. 2020;35(1):40-5.
  4. 4. Sivasubramaniam R, Rathinavel R, Ramasamy K, Kavitha AP, Mohankumar S, Suthakar B, et al. Mechanization challenges in selected distinct agricultural systems in India. J Exp Agric Int. 2024;46:122-9. https://doi.org/10.9734/jeai/2024/v46i92811
  5. 5. Singh R, Kumar V, Gupta M. Speed optimization for improved grain threshing. Mech Agric. 2016;8(3):72-8.
  6. 6. Singh RKP, Ghadge SV, Satapathy KK, Pandey MM. Design and development of motorised wire loop paddy thresher for hilly region. J Agric Eng (India). 2003;40:71-4. https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2003404.1059
  7. 7. Abdeen MA, Salem AE, Zhang G. Longitudinal axial flow rice thresher performance optimization using the Taguchi technique. Agriculture. 2021;11(2):88. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11020088
  8. 8. Xu L, Li Y, Ma C, Li H. Design and experiment of threshing and separating unit with double axial cylinder. Trans CSAE. 2009;40:55-8.
  9. 9. Aga RW. Design, structural analysis and prototype testing of spike tooth cylinder for rice thresher machine. Int J Sci Res Eng Manag. 2025;9(6):1-9. https://doi.org/10.55041/ijsrem50937
  10. 10. Hailemesikel ST, Alebachew M, Delele MA, Ali AN, Fanta SW, Kidanemariam G. Effects of machine-crop parameters on mechanical grain damage in rice threshing. Cogent Food Agric. 2024;10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2024.2337101
  11. 11. Lal S, Jogdand SV, Naik RK, Koumary NK. Comparative evaluation of performance of traditional method and commercially available pedal operated paddy thresher with the developed machine. J Sci Res Rep. 2024;30(8):647-55. https://doi.org/10.9734/jsrr/2024/v30i82286
  12. 12. Smith DW, Sims BG, O’Neill DH. Testing and evaluation of agricultural machinery and equipment: principles and practices. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organisation. 1994.
  13. 13. Amponsah SK, Addo AK, Dzisi A, Moreira J, Ndindeng SA. Performance evaluation and field characterization of the Sifang mini rice combine harvester. Appl Eng Agric. 2017;33(4):479-89. https://doi.org/10.13031/aea.11876
  14. 14. Cooper GF. Cylinder/concave performance from laboratory tests. II. In: Grain and forage harvesting: Proceedings of the First International Grain and Forage Conference. 1977. Ames (IA). St. Joseph (MI): American Society of Agricultural Engineers. 1977.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.