Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp1 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Incidence pattern of pod borer complex on different red gram cultivars in relation to various weather factors in the Terai agro-ecological zone of West Bengal

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.11309
Submitted
16 August 2025
Published
27-01-2026

Abstract

A study, conducted in the Instructional Farm of Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya (UBKV) during 2023-24 and 2024-25, unveils valuable insights about the seasonal occurrence pattern of pod borer complex on different red gram cultivars and identifies the most promising cultivar under the Terai agro-climatic situation of West Bengal. The study reported 5 species of pod borers, namely Maruca vitrata (Fabricius) , Exelastis atomosa (Walsingham), Lampides boeticus (Linnaeus), Melanagromyza obtusa (Malloch)  and Apion clavipes Gerstäcker, infesting the red gram plants in this region. Of them, the population was lowest for M. vitrata (6.31 larvae/plant) and highest for L. boeticus (10.93 larvae/plant). Among the red gram cultivars screened, Pusa Arhar-16 had faced the highest pod borer incidence with 24.43 larvae/plant, whereas the cultivar Upas-120 faced the least incidence with 16.93 larvae/plant. In both seasons, the sampled pod borer complexes were characterized by less dominance and greater evenness. The seasonal incidence pattern suggested the 48th–49th standard meteorological week (SMW), the 50th–51st SMW and the 4th–6th SMW as the most critical periods of pod borer incidence in early-, mid- and late-maturity cultivars respectively. The incidence was initiated by M. vitrata for all the cultivars, followed by E. atomosa and L. boeticus, while M. obtusa and A. clavipes arrived later in the season. Different weather factors were noted to have significant influences on the seasonal occurrence of these pests. Among the 7 cultivars, Upas-120 was recorded with significantly (p < 0.001) greater yield (85.04 g/m2), whereas yield was lowest for Pusa Arhar-16 (58.22 g/m2), suggesting Upas-120 as the most promising cultivar for this region.

References

  1. 1. Sarkar S, Panda S, Yadav KK, Kandasamy P. Pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) an important food legume in Indian scenario-a review. Legume Res. 2020;43(5):601-10.
  2. 2. Mallikarjuna N, Saxena KB, Jadhav DR. Cajanus. In: Kole C, editor. Wild crop relatives: genomic and breeding resources-legume crops and forages. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2011. p. 21-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14387-8_2
  3. 3. Siambi M, Omanga PGA, Songa W. Status and needs of national pigeon pea research programme in Kenya. Int Pigeon pea Newslett. 1992;16:31-6.
  4. 4. Bhattacharjee S, Singh AK, Kumar M, Sharma SK. Phosphorus, sulfur and cobalt fertilization effect on yield and quality of soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill) in acidic soil of northeast India. Indian J Hill Farm. 2013;26(2):63-6.
  5. 5. Ghritlahre SK, Singh A, Singh IP, Singh F, Katiyar PK, Singh NP. Current status and way forward for scaling up productivity of pigeonpea in Madhya Pradesh-a review. Agric Rev. 2024;45(2):196-206.
  6. 6. Mathukia RK, Ponkia HP, Polara AM. In situ conservation and zinc fertilization for rainfed pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.). Bioscan. 2016;11(1):247-50.
  7. 7. ICRISAT. Pigeonpea overview. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics; 2024.
  8. 8. Sharma HC, Clement SL, Ridsdill S, Rangarao GV, Bouhssini MEL, Ujagir R, et al. Insect pest management in food legumes: the future strategies. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Food Legumes Research Conference; New Delhi, India; 2005. p. 18-22.
  9. 9. Gopali JB, Teggelli RD, Mannur M, Yelshetty S. Web-forming lepidopteran, Maruca vitrata (Geyer): an emerging and destructive pest in pigeon pea. Karnataka J Agric Sci. 2010;23:35-8.
  10. 10. Deshmukh AY, Khan MI, Aherkar SK, Bhamre VK. Estimation of avoidable losses due to pod borer complex of pigeon pea under Akola conditions in Maharashtra. Pest Manag Econ Zool. 2003;11(2):127-30.
  11. 11. Singh RS, Chakravorty S, Chandra M. Diversity of pod-associated insect pests and natural enemies in pigeonpea and crop losses in Bundelkhand region, India. Flor Fauna. 2013;19(2):294-302.
  12. 12. Kumar S, Ajaharuddin SKMD, Tejaswini R, Patel A. Impact of weather parameters on population fluctuation of major sucking pests in summer mung bean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]. Legume Res. 2024;47:1-6. https://doi.org/10.18805/LR-5317
  13. 13. Pal S, Samanta S, Banerjee A. Seasonal incidence of pulse aphid (Aphis craccivora Koch.) and its natural enemies on field pea (Pisum sativum L.) in relation to abiotic factors in West Bengal. Legume Res. 2023;46(12):1680-5.
  14. 14. Singh C. Modern techniques of raising field crops. 2nd ed. New Delhi: Oxford and IBH; 1983.
  15. 15. Daniel JA, Chitra N, Mathialagan M. Diversity of harmful and beneficial insect fauna in pigeonpea Cajanus cajan (L.) ecosystem in Tamil Nadu, India. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2018;7(8):396-402. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.708.045
  16. 16. Sreekanth M, Ratnam M, Seshamahalakshmi M, Rao YK, Narayana E. Population build-up and seasonal abundance of spotted pod borer, Maruca vitrata (Geyer) on pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.). J Appl Biol Biotechnol. 2015;3(4):43-5.
  17. 17. Rawat RK, Keval R, Ganguly S, Chakravarty S. Seasonal incidence of plume moth, Exelastis atomosa (Lepidoptera: Pterophoridae) on long-duration pigeon pea, Cajanus cajan. Flor Fauna. 2017;23:445-52. https://doi.org/10.33451/florafauna.v23i2pp445-452
  18. 18. Arunkumar A, Naik C. Effectiveness of newer insecticides against pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.) pod borers. Mysore J Agric Sci. 2019;53(3):54-8.
  19. 19. Shannon CE. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J. 1948;27(3):379-423. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x
  20. 20. Margalef R. Temporal succession and spatial heterogeneity in phytoplankton. In: Buzzati-Traverso AA, editor. Perspectives in marine biology. California: University of California Press; 1958. p. 323-49. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520350281-024
  21. 21. Pielou EC. The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections. J Theor Biol. 1966;13:131-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(66)90013-0
  22. 22. Simpson EH. Measurement of diversity. Nature. 1949;163(4148):688. https://doi.org/10.1038/163688a0
  23. 23. ICRISAT. Identification and management of pigeon pea and chickpea insect pests in Asia. Information bulletin no. 57. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics; 1999.
  24. 24. R Core Team. The R project for statistical computing. Austria: R Foundation; 2024.
  25. 25. Nair N, Shah SK, Thangjam B, Debnath MR, Das P, Dey B, et al. Insect pest complex of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) in agro-ecosystem of Tripura, northeast India. J Entomol Zool Stud. 2017;5(4):765-71.
  26. 26. Chakravarty S, Agnihotri M, Kumar L. Diversity of insect fauna associated with pigeonpea and their succession in relation to crop phenology at Pantnagar, Uttarakhand. J Exp Zool India. 2016;19(1):1327-32.
  27. 27. Bijewar AK, Das SB, Saxena AK. Succession of insect pest complex and their natural enemies in pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2019;8(7):619-28. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2019.807.077
  28. 28. Patel A. Physicobiochemical evaluation of certain promising varieties/genotypes of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan Millsp. L.). [PhD dissertation]. India: Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology; 2023.
  29. 29. Anantharaju P, Muthiah AR. Biochemical components in relation to pest incidence of pigeonpea spotted pod borer (Maruca vitrata) and blister beetle (Mylabris spp.). Legume Res. 2008;31(2):87-93.
  30. 30. Kanieski MR, Longhi SJ, Soares PRC. Methods for biodiversity assessment: Case study in an area of Atlantic forest in southern Brazil. In: Şen B, Grillo O, editors. Selected studies in biodiversity. IntechOpen; 2018. p. 45-58. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.71824
  31. 31. Layek U, Kundu A, Das N, Mondal R, Karmakar P. Intercropping with pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L. Millsp.): influence on pollinator assemblage and yield of neighbouring non-leguminous crops. Life. 2023;13(1):193. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13010193
  32. 32. Yadav RS, Rai SN, Prasad S, Singh J. Diversity of insect pests in pigeonpea, Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp. in eastern Uttar Pradesh. J Appl Zool Res. 2009;20(1):127-31.
  33. 33. Chopade BJ, Mehendale SK, Narangalkar AL, Desai VS, Sapkal SD. Seasonal incidence of pod borer complex of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.). J Entomol Zool Stud. 2020;8(5):1041-7.
  34. 34. Udayababu P, Sowjanya P, Jogarao P. Seasonal dynamics of pests of pigeonpea in relation with weather in high altitude zone of Andhra Pradesh. Acta Bot. 2021;(G):8-20.
  35. 35. Sujayanand GK, Chandra A, Pandey S, Bhatt S. Seasonal abundance of spotted pod borer, Maruca vitrata Fabricius in early pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] and its management through farmscaping in Uttar Pradesh. Legume Res. 2021;44(2):233-9. https://doi.org/10.18805/LR-4329
  36. 36. Kumar R, Niwas R, Khichar ML, Kamboj M, Kartik. Population dynamics of insect pests in different growing environments and their relationship with microclimate of pigeonpea cultivars. Agric Rev. 2025;46(3):492-9.
  37. 37. Bale JS, Masters GJ, Hodkinson ID, Awmack C, Bezemer TM, Brown VK, et al. Herbivory in global climate change research: direct effects of rising temperature on insect herbivores. Glob Chang Biol. 2002;8:1-16. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2002.00451.x
  38. 38. Sharma HC, Franzmann BA. Biology of the legume pod borer, Maruca vitrata (Fabricius) and its damage to pigeonpea and adzuki bean. Int J Trop Insect Sci. 2000;20(2):99-108. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742758400018737
  39. 39. Sujayanand GK, Datta D, Singh F. Insect pest succession and screening for spotted pod borer tolerance in short-duration pigeonpea. J Food Legumes. 2020;33(2):71-6.
  40. 40. Beirne BP. Effects of precipitation on crop insects. Can Entomol. 1970;102(11):1360-73. https://doi.org/10.4039/Ent1021360-11
  41. 41. Suneel Kumar GV, Subba Rao G. Influence of weather parameters on population dynamics of insect pests of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.). Andhra Agric J. 2015;62(2):377-83.
  42. 42. Jat BL, Dahiya KK, Lal R, Niwas R. Effect of weather parameters on seasonal incidence of pod borer complex in pigeon pea. J Agrometeorol. 2017;19(3):255-8. https://doi.org/10.54386/jam.v19i3.666
  43. 43. Ugale MV, Bantewad SD, Gore SH. Seasonal incidence of major insect pests of pigeon pea in relation to weather parameters. Int J Adv Biochem Res. 2024;SP-8(12):396-401. https://doi.org/10.33545/26174693.2024.v8.i12Se.3211
  44. 44. Meena SS, Verma SK, Choudhary R, Nehra M, Panwar RK, Singh JP. Interpretation of genotype × environment interaction and grain yield stability in advanced lines of pigeon pea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] grown at different altitudes. Chem Sci Rev Lett. 2017;6(22):1113-19.
  45. 45. Gupta K, Khura TK, Kushwaha HL, Parray RA, Sarkar SK. Influence of moisture content on germination and physico-mechanical properties of pulses. Legume Res. 2023;46(8):973-80. https://doi.org/10.18805/LR-5125

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.