Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp1 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Physico-chemical characterisation of corn cob biochar produced through slow pyrolysis in a low-cost metallic kiln

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.11338
Submitted
19 August 2025
Published
13-04-2026

Abstract

Biochar production represents a sustainable approach to biomass management and soil fertility improvement. This study synthesised biochar from corn cob residue through slow pyrolysis using a low-cost, custom-designed metallic kiln and evaluated its key physico-chemical properties. The produced biochar exhibited an alkaline pH (7.53), moderate electrical conductivity (1.35 dS m-1) and a high total organic carbon content (70.1 %). Nutrient analysis revealed appreciable levels of macro- and micronutrients (N: 1.48 %, P: 0.42 %, K: 2.30 %, S: 0.27 %, Zn: 5.3 ppm and Cu: 5.3 ppm), along with a favorable C:N ratio (47:36). Its high porosity (73 %) and substantial surface area (926 m² g-1) suggest strong potential for improving soil structure, nutrient retention and long-term carbon sequestration. The pyrolysis process achieved a biochar recovery of 47 %, indicating efficient carbon retention and minimal biomass loss. The study hypothesised that controlled slow pyrolysis of corn cob residue using an affordable, decentralised kiln could produce biochar with desirable agronomic properties and economic viability. This is particularly important because corn cob waste is abundant and often burned, contributing to pollution, while escalating fertiliser costs demand cost-effective nutrient alternatives. The results confirm that simple, low-cost reactor systems can convert agricultural waste into high-quality biochar with physicochemical properties comparable to those produced using advanced technologies. The findings highlight opportunities for decentralised biochar production, low-cost fertiliser substitution and carbon-credit generation. With the global biochar market valued at USD 0.76–2.2 billion, corn cob-based biochar holds strong commercial potential. Future work should include field-scale evaluation, quality standardisation and techno-economic assessments utilising digital twins and AI-based modeling to optimise its agricultural and environmental applications.

References

  1. 1. Lehmann J, Joseph S. Biochar for environmental management: An introduction. In: Biochar for environmental management. 2015:1–13. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003297673-1
  2. 2. Chia CH, Downie A, Munroe P. Characteristics of biochar: Physical and structural properties. In: Biochar for environmental management. 2015:89–109.
  3. 3. Mohan D, Sarswat A, Ok YS, Pittman CU Jr. Review on the organic and inorganic contaminants removal from water with biochar, a renewable, low cost and sustainable adsorbent. Bioresour Technol. 2014;160:191–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.01.120
  4. 4. Woolf D, Amonette JE, Street-Perrott FA, Lehmann J, Joseph S. Sustainable biochar to mitigate global climate change. Nat Commun. 2010;1(1):56. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1053
  5. 5. Lehmann J, Gaunt J, Rondon M. Review on bio-char sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change. 2006;11:403–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-005-9006-5
  6. 6. Spokas KA, Cantrell KB, Novak JM, Archer DW, Ippolito JA, Collins HP, et al. Biochar: A synthesis of its agronomic impact beyond carbon sequestration. J Environ Qual. 2012;41(4):973–89. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2011.0069
  7. 7. Wiedner K, Glaser B. Traditional use of biochar. In: Biochar for environmental management. 2015:15–37. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203762264
  8. 8. Shenbagavalli S, Mahimairaja S. Production and characterization of biochar from different wastes. Int J Plant Anim Environ Sci. 2012;2(1):197–201.
  9. 9. Rajkovich S, Enders A, Hanley K, Hyland C, Zimmerman AR, Lehmann J. Corn growth and nitrogen nutrition after additions of biochars with varying properties to a temperate soil. Biol Fertil Soils. 2012;48:271–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-011-0624-7
  10. 10. Piper J. Diffusion of hydrogen in copper–palladium alloys. J Appl Phys. 1966;37(2):715–21. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1708243
  11. 11. Jackson ML. Soil chemical analysis. New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India Pvt Ltd; 1973. p.151–54.
  12. 12. Greenberg AE, Clesceri LS, Eaton AD. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Washington DC: Am Public Health Assoc; 1926.
  13. 13. Tabatabai MA. Sulfur. In: Methods of soil analysis: Part 2 chemical and microbiological properties. 1982;9:501–38. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmogr9.2.2ed.c28
  14. 14. Nagula S, Usha PB, Thampatti M, Joseph B. Tender coconut husk derived biochar impact on soil properties, yield and fruit quality of banana. J Indian Soc Soil Sci. 2021;69(3):334–38. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-0228.2021.0050.5
  15. 15. Agegnehu G, Bass AM, Nelson PN, Bird MI. Benefits of biochar, compost and biochar–compost for soil quality, maize yield and greenhouse gas emissions in tropical agricultural soil. Sci Total Environ. 2016;543:295–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.054
  16. 16. Omara P, Aula L, Oyebiyi FB, Eickhoff EM, Carpenter J, Raun WR. Biochar application in combination with inorganic nitrogen improves maize grain yield, nitrogen uptake and use efficiency in temperate soils. Agronomy. 2020;10(9):1241. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10091241
  17. 17. Kumari KGID, Moldrup P, Paradelo M, de Jonge LW. Phenanthrene sorption on biochar-amended soils: Application rate, aging and physicochemical properties of soil. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2014;225:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-014-2105-8
  18. 18. Wang L, Butterly CR, Wang Y, Herath MSK, Xi YG, Xiao XJ. Effect of crop residue biochar on soil acidity amelioration in strongly acidic tea garden soils. Soil Use Manag. 2014;30:119–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12096
  19. 19. Ibrahim HM, Al-Wabel MI, Usman AR, Al-Omran A. Effect of Conocarpus biochar application on the hydraulic properties of a sandy loam soil. Soil Sci. 2013;178(4):165–73. https://doi.org/10.1097/SS.0b013e3182979eac
  20. 20. Siddiqui AR, Nazeer S, Piracha MA, Saleem MM, Siddiqi I, Shahzad SM, et al. The production of biochar and its possible effects on soil properties and phosphate solubilizing bacteria. J Appl Agric Biotechnol. 2016;1(1):27–40.
  21. 21. Omotade I, Momoh S, Oluwafemi B, Agboola E. Comparative analysis of nutrient composition in biochar produced from different feedstocks at varying pyrolysis temperature. Environ Res Technol. 2020;3(2):64–70. https://doi.org/10.35208/ert.747833
  22. 22. Rodríguez L, Salazar P, Preston TR. Effect of biochar and biodigester effluent on growth of maize in acid soils. In: Integrated farming systems for food and energy in a warming, resource-depleting world. 2009:84–97.
  23. 23. Soinne H, Hovi J, Tammeorg P, Turtola E. Effect of biochar on phosphorous sorption and clay soil aggregate stability. Geoderma. 2014;219:162–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.12.022
  24. 24. Novak JM, Busscher WJ, Laird DL, Ahmedna M, Watts DW, Niandou MAS. Impact of biochar amendment on fertility of a southeastern coastal plain soil. Soil Sci. 2009;174(2):105–12. https://doi.org/10.1097/SS.0b013e3181981d9a
  25. 25. Hamdani SAF, Aon M, Ali L, Aslam Z, Khalid M, Naveed M. Application of Dalbergia sissoo biochar enhanced wheat growth, yield and nutrient recovery under reduced fertilizer doses in calcareous soil. Pak J Agric Sci. 2017;54(1):107–15. https://doi.org/10.21162/PAKJAS/17.5102

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.