Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp1 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Impact of natural farming practices on growth and nutritional quality of foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.)

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.11391
Submitted
21 August 2025
Published
13-02-2026

Abstract

Natural farming practices are increasingly recognized as sustainable alternatives to chemical-intensive agriculture, offering benefits for soil health, crop productivity and nutritional quality. A field experiment spanning 2 years (2022–23 and 2023–24) was undertaken at the College of Agriculture, Vishweshwaraiah Canal (VC) Farm, Mandya, University of Agricultural Sciences, Mandya, to evaluate the effects of natural farming systems on the agronomic traits and nutritional quality of foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.). The study was laid out in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with 12 treatments comprising liquid organic manures and microbial consortia, replicated thrice. Results revealed that the combined application of Beejamrutha (seed treatment) + Jeevamrutha at 500 L ha-1 + foliar application of 2.5 % Panchagavya + microbial consortia at 5 kg ha-1 (T12) significantly improved growth attributes, yield and quality parameters over the absolute control. Grain yield increased by approximately 70–72 % in T12 during the respective years, while straw yield improved by over 60 %. Correlation analysis indicated strong positive associations between protein content, swelling index and water absorption capacity, whereas cooking time was negatively correlated with hydration-related traits. Principal component analysis explained 59.24 % of the total variation, clearly distinguishing the superior performance of T12 compared to other treatments. Economic analysis further confirmed higher profitability with T12, achieving a benefit–cost ratio of 3.02 compared to 1.12 in control. Overall, the integration of natural farming inputs enhanced both productivity and grain quality of foxtail millet, emphasizing its potential as a sustainable strategy for resilient and nutrient-rich food production.

References

  1. 1. Kole C, Muthamilarasan M, Henry R, Edwards R, Sharma R, Abberton M. Application of genomics-assisted breeding for generation of climate-resilient crops: progress and prospects. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6:563. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00563
  2. 2. Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare. Annual report 2023–24. 2. Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of India. 2023. www.indiastat.com
  3. 3. Hariprasanna K. Foxtail millet: nutritional importance and cultivation aspects. Indian Farming. 2016;73(1):47–9.
  4. 4. Wang ZH, Li SX, Malhi S. Effects of fertilization and other agronomic measures on nutritional quality of crops. J Sci Food Agric. 2008;88(1):7–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.3084
  5. 5. Gore NS, Sreenivasa MN. Influence of liquid organic manures on growth, nutrient content and yield of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) in sterilized soil. Karnataka J Agric Sci. 2011;24(2):153–7.
  6. 6. Shailaja B, Mishra I, Gampala S, Singh VJ, Swathi K. Panchagavya-an eco-friendly insecticide and organic growth promoter of plants. Int J Adv Res. 2014;2(11):22–6.
  7. 7. Mahdi SS, Hassan GI, Samoon SA, Rather HA, Dar SA, Zehra B. Bio-fertilizers in organic agriculture. J Phytol. 2010;2(10):42–54.
  8. 8. Walkley A, Black IA. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 1934;37(1):29–38. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003
  9. 9. Jackson ML. Soil Chemical Analysis. New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd.; 1973.
  10. 10. Subbiah BV, Asija GL. A rapid procedure for determination of available nitrogen in soil. Curr Sci. 1956;25:259–60.
  11. 11. Sosulski FW, Garratt MO, Slinkard AE. Functional properties of ten legume flours. Int J Food Sci Technol. 1976;9:66–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0315-5463(76)73614-9
  12. 12. Huchchannanavar S, Yogesh LN, Prashant SM. Nutritional and physicochemical characteristics of foxtail millet genotypes. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2019;8(1):1773–8. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2019.801.188
  13. 13. Singh N, Kaur L, Sandhu KS, Kaur J. Physicochemical, cooking and textural properties of milled rice from different Indian rice cultivars. Food Chem. 2005;89:253–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.02.032
  14. 14. Hedge JE, Hofreiter BT. Carbohydrate Chemistry. New York: Academic Press; 1962.
  15. 15. Gomez KA, Gomez AA. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1984.
  16. 16. Selvaraj N. Report on organic farming at horticulture research station. Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Ooty; 2003. p. 2–5.
  17. 17. Yogananda SB, Devakumar N, Shruthi MK, Ningaraju. Growth and yield of cowpea as influenced by different sources of organic manures. In: National Symposium on Organic Agriculture for Sustainable Food Security; 2015; Tamil Nadu, India. p. 113.
  18. 18. Oprea CA, Bolohan C, Marin DI. Effects of fertilization and row spacing on grain sorghum yield grown in south-eastern Romania. AgroLife Sci J. 2017;6(1).
  19. 19. Kumaresan G, Karthikeyan B, Shanthi R. Effect of different formulations of Azotobacter bioinoculant on growth and yield of maize. Plant Arch. 2019;19(2):3077–81.
  20. 20. Vishwajith, Devakumar RN. Effect of organic nutrient management on growth and yield of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.). Mysore J Agric Sci. 2018;52(3):519–28.
  21. 21. Singh V, Naseeruddin KH, Rana DK. Effect of organic manures on growth, yield and quality of radish (Raphanus sativus L.) cv. Pusa Desi. HortFlora Res Spectr. 2016;5(2):129–33.
  22. 22. Supriya ME, Bhagyalakshmi T, Yogananda SB, Yogesh GS. Influence of various organic manures on growth and yield of radish at different growth stages (Raphanus sativus L.). Int J Plant Soil Sci. 2024;36(6):540–8. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2024/v36i64656
  23. 23. Yogananda SB, Devakumar N, Thimmegowda P, Shruthi GK. Influence of biodigester liquid and farmyard manure on growth and yield of rice (Oryza sativa). Indian J Agron. 2019;64(1):54–7. https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v64i1.5232
  24. 24. Garjila YA. Effect of cow dung manure on growth and yield of finger millet (Eleusine coracana L. Gaertn). Niger Agric J. 2020;51(1):151–4.
  25. 25. Boraiah B, Devakumar N, Palanna KB. Yield and quality parameters of capsicum (Capsicum annuum L. var. grossum) as influenced by organic liquid formulations. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2018;6(1):333–8. https://doi.org/10.18782/2320-7051.5563
  26. 26. Devi KN, Singh MS, Singh NG, Athokpam HS. Effect of integrated nutrient management on growth and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J Crop Weed. 2011;7(2):23–7.
  27. 27. Sahare D. Impact of organic manures and liquid organic manures on growth, yield and quality of aerobic rice. Int J Environ Sci. 2015;9(1-2):563–7. https://doi.org/10.15740/HAS/IJAS/11.1/183-188
  28. 28. Thumar CM, Dhadhal MS, Chaudhari NN, Hadiya NJ, Ahir NB. Growth, yield attributes and economics of summer pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) as influenced by integrated nutrient management. Int J Agric Sci. 2016;8(59):3344–6.
  29. 29. Lokhande PB, Dhamak AL, Patil NM, Ingole AJ, Satwadhar PP. Effect of vermicompost and organic formulations on growth and yield of soybean grown on Vertisol. Int J Environ Clim Change. 2023;13(4):23–30. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i41708
  30. 30. Prem L, Kumar NS, Poonkodi P, Venkatesan S. A sustainable revolution in agriculture: a review of zero budget natural farming for enhancing soil fertility and crop productivity. Int J Agric Innov Res. 2023;12(3):2319–1473.
  31. 31. Shanikumar, Kumar S, Maji S, Pandey VK. Effect of inorganic fertilizers and bio-fertilizers on growth, yield and quality of radish (Raphanus sativus L.). Int J Plant Sci. 2016;1(11):71–4. https://doi.org/10.15740/HAS/IJPS/11.1/71-74
  32. 32. Jolliffe IT, Cadima J. Principal component analysis: A review and recent developments. Philos Trans R Soc A. 2016;374:20150202. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0202

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.