Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp1 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Morpho-cultural and biochemical characterization of Trichoderma isolates and their efficacy in controlling cotton root rot

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.11625
Submitted
4 September 2025
Published
05-03-2026

Abstract

Trichoderma species are essential for crop productivity, nutrient uptake, abiotic stress resistance and root growth and development. This study was conducted to evaluate the morpho-cultural, biochemical and biocontrol activities of different Trichoderma isolates against cotton root rot. It was observed that maximum mycelial growth (53.67 mm) was recorded by HST2, whereas the least (36.33 mm) was shown by HMT2 after 6 DAI (days after incubation). All the isolates had colonies that ranged in colour from light green to pale green to dark green. The native Trichoderma isolates showed reverse colony colours from creamish white and colourless to yellowish, accompanied by wavy to smooth colony edges. Conidia ranged in length from 2.69 to 4.66 µm. Among the isolates, HFtT produced the longest conidia, with an average length of 4.66 µm. The conidial width of the isolates ranged from 2.31 to 3.65 µm, with the maximum width (3.65 µm) recorded in HFtT. The native HST2 isolate showed positive results for all the biocontrol activities. The antagonistic potential of different native Trichoderma isolates against cotton root rot causing pathogens RB5 and RS2 was evaluated under both in vitro and in vivo conditions. In vitro dual-culture results revealed that HST2 exhibited the highest mycelial growth inhibition (72.78 % in RB5 and 72.50 % in RS2), followed by HMT2. Under in vivo conditions, minimum disease incidence and maximum disease control were shown by HST2 (10 % and 10 %) and (57.13 % and 57.13 %) respectively, in both Desi and American cotton.

.

References

  1. 1. Dennis C, Webster J. Antagonistic properties of species-groups of Trichoderma. III. Hyphal interaction. Trans Br Mycol Soc. 1971;57:363–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1536(71)80050-5
  2. 2. Elad Y, Chet I, Henis Y. Degradation of plant pathogenic fungi by Trichoderma harzianum. Can J Microbiol. 1982;28:719–25. https://doi.org/10.1139/m82-110
  3. 3. Lynch JM. In vitro identification of Trichoderma harzianum as a potential antagonist of plant pathogens. Curr Microbiol. 1987;16:49–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01568169
  4. 4. Ridout CJ, Coley-Smith JR, Lynch JM, et al. Enzyme activity and electrophoretic profile of extracellular protein induced by cell walls of Rhizoctonia solani. J Gen Microbiol. 1986;132:2345–52. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-132-8-2345
  5. 5. Mitchell R, Alexander M. Lysis of soil fungi by bacteria. Can J Microbiol. 1963;15:689–96.https://doi.org/10.1139/m63-023
  6. 6. Henis Y, Chet I. Microbiological control of plant pathogens. Adv Appl Microbiol. 1975;19:85–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2164(08)70426-X
  7. 7. Bull AT, Chesters CGC. The biochemistry of laminarin and the nature of laminarinase. Adv Enzymol. 1966;28:325–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470122730.ch5
  8. 8. Reese ET, Mandels M. β-1,3-glucanase in fungi. Can J Microbiol. 1959;5:173–85.https://doi.org/10.1139/m59-022
  9. 9. Dubey SC, Suresh M, Singh B, et al. Evaluation of Trichoderma species against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris for integrated management of chickpea wilt. Biol Control. 2007;40:118–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2006.06.006
  10. 10. Papavizas GC. Trichoderma and Gliocladium: biology, ecology and potential for biocontrol. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 1985;23:23–54. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.py.23.090185.000323
  11. 11. McIntyre M, Nielsen J, Arnau J, Brink VH, Hansen K, et al. Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Fungal Genetics ; 2004 Apr 7-20; Copenhagen, Denmark. [Conference proceedings]. 2004.
  12. 12. Haas D, Defago G. Biological control of soil-borne pathogens by fluorescent pseudomonads. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005;3:307–19. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1129
  13. 13. Pal KK, Gardener BM. Biological control of plant pathogens. Plant Health Instr. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHI-A-2006-1117-02
  14. 14. Weindling R. Trichoderma lignorum as a parasite of other soil fungi. Phytopathology. 1932;22:837–45.
  15. 15. Harman GE, Howell CR, Viterbo A, Chet I, Lorito M. Trichoderma species-opportunistic, avirulent plant symbionts. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004;2:243–56. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro797
  16. 16. Kushwaha M, Verma AK. Antagonistic activity of Trichoderma spp. against isolated and identified plant pathogens. Int J Chem Biol Sci. 2014;1:1–6.
  17. 17. Olabiyi TI, Ruocco M. In vitro competition bioassay on the effect of Trichoderma species and crop pathogenic fungi. J Biol Agric Healthc. 2013;3:115–20.
  18. 18. Shahid M, Srivastava M, Singh A, Kumar V, Rastogi S, Pathak N, et al. Comparative study of Trichoderma harzianum and Trichoderma viride for controlling wilt disease in pigeon pea. J Microb Biochem Technol. 2014;6:110–15. https://doi.org/10.4172/1948-5948.1000130
  19. 19. Alwathnani HA, Perveen K. Biological control of Fusarium wilt of tomato by antagonist fungi and cyanobacteria. Afr J Biotechnol. 2012;11:1100–05. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB11.3361
  20. 20. Hajieghrari B, Torabi-Giglou M, Mohammadi MR, Davari M, et al. Biological potential of Iranian Trichoderma isolates in control of soil-borne plant pathogenic fungi. Afr J Biotechnol. 2008;7:967–72.
  21. 21. Zhang F, Yuan J, Yang X, Cui Y, Chen L, Ran W, et al. Putative Trichoderma harzianum mutant promotes cucumber growth through enhanced indole acetic acid production and colonization. Plant Soil. 2013;368:433–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-012-1519-6
  22. 22. Harman GE. Overview of mechanisms and uses of Trichoderma spp. Phytopathology. 2006;96:190–94. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-96-0190
  23. 23. Yedidia I, Shoresh M, Kerem Z, Benhamou N, Kapulnik Y, Chet I. Induction of systemic resistance in cucumber by Trichoderma asperellum and phytoalexin accumulation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003;69:7343–53. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.69.12.7343-7353.2003
  24. 24. Rajput A, Khanzada M, Shahzad S, et al. Effect of organic substrates and carbon and nitrogen sources on growth and shelf life of Trichoderma harzianum. J Agric Sci Technol. 2014;16:731–45.
  25. 25. Rangaswami G. Diseases of crop plants in India. New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India Pvt Ltd; 1972.
  26. 26. Bakker AW, Schippers B. Microbial cyanide production in the rhizosphere and Pseudomonas-mediated plant growth stimulation. Soil Biol Biochem. 1987;19:451–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(87)90037-X
  27. 27. Brick JM, Bostock RM, Silverstone SE, et al. Rapid in situ assay for indole acetic acid production by bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1991;57:535–38. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.57.2.535-538.1991
  28. 28. Schwyn B, Neilands JB. Universal chemical assay for siderophore detection. Anal Biochem. 1987;160:47–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(87)90612-9
  29. 29. Morton DJ, Stroube WH. Antagonistic and stimulatory effects of soil microorganisms on Sclerotium sp. Phytopathology. 1955;45:417–20.
  30. 30. Vincent JM. Distortion of fungal hyphae in the presence of certain inhibitors. Nature. 1947;159:850. https://doi.org/10.1038/159850b0
  31. 31. Murray MG, Thompson WF. Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1980;8:4321–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/8.19.4321

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.