Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp1 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Native bioagents of the North-eastern Himalayas for the management of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib.) de Bary

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.11673
Submitted
8 September 2025
Published
24-02-2026

Abstract

Meghalaya, a biodiversity-rich state in North-eastern India, is increasingly facing challenges from soil-borne pathogens, particularly Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib.) de Bary, which has emerged as a major threat to vegetable cultivation in the hill farming systems. This fungus causes significant yield losses and its management through chemical means poses risks to soil health, the environment and long-term sustainability. The present study explored 11 native Trichoderma spp. and 5 plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) isolates for the management of S. sclerotiorum affecting various horticultural crops in the state. The Trichoderma and PGPR isolates obtained from the rhizosphere of different crops grown under the Umiam circle of Ri Bhoi district, Meghalaya, were characterised based on morpho-cultural, biochemical, internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and 16s region amplification, respectively. The potent Trichoderma isolates UM-5, UM-10 and the PGPR isolate (PGPR-4) were established as Trichoderma asperellum Samuels, Lieckf. & Nirenberg, Trichoderma harzianum Rifai and Bacillus subtilis (Ehrenb.) Cohn.  In vitro evaluation of the isolates showed that UM-5 and UM-10 exhibited 78.4 %, 87.3 % inhibition, while PGPR-4 showed 67.0 % inhibition of the target pathogen, along with functional and plant growth-promoting attributes in the range higher than 50 % for most of the parameters. The potential biocontrol agents (UM-5, UM-10 and PGPR-4) can be employed alone and in combination with other bio inputs for holistic and eco-friendly management of the soil-borne pathogen.

References

  1. 1. Singh R, Sharma PK, Dahiya RP. Organic agriculture: A comprehensive production management system. J Sustain Agric. 2021;15(2):123–45. https://doi.org/10.52253/vjta.2022.v03i01.03
  2. 2. Evenson RE, Gollin D. Assessing the impact of the Green Revolution, 1960 to 2000. Science. 2003;300(5620):758–62. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1078710
  3. 3. Qaim M. Globalisation of agrifood systems and sustainable nutrition. Proc Nutr Soc. 2017;76(1):12–21. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0029665116000598
  4. 4. Meghalaya Small Farmers’ Agri-Business Consortium (Meghalaya SFAC). Horticulture in Meghalaya at a glance. Shillong: Meghalaya SFAC; 2019.
  5. 5. Koppert Global. Soil-borne diseases in row crops: A growing threat to crop health and yield. Koppert; 2025.
  6. 6. Boland GJ, Hall R. Index of plant hosts of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Can J Plant Pathol. 1994;16(2):93–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/07060669409500766
  7. 7. Saharan GS, Mehta N. Sclerotinia diseases of crop plants: Biology, ecology and disease management. Dordrecht: Springer; 2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8408-9
  8. 8. Garg H, Li H, Sivasithamparam K, Kuo J, Barbetti MJ. The infection processes of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in cotyledon tissue of a resistant and a susceptible genotype of Brassica napus. Ann Bot. 2010;106(6):897–908. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcq196
  9. 9. Zimmer RC, Campbell C. First report of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum on Lathyrus sativus. Can Plant Dis Surv. 1990;70(1):17–8. https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-90-1554A
  10. 10. Purdy LH. Sclerotinia sclerotiorum: History, diseases and symptomatology, host range, geographic distribution and impact. Phytopathology. 1979;69(8):875-80. https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-69-875
  11. 11. Willetts HJ, Wong JAL. The biology of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, S. trifoliorum and S. minor with emphasis on specific nomenclature. Bot Rev. 1980;46:101–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02860868
  12. 12. Manjunatha N, Devi TP, Prabhakaran N, Navali GV. Morphological and molecular diversity of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib.) de Bary isolates of India. Bioscan. 2014;9(Suppl 4):1763–7.
  13. 13. Bora M, Das BC, Borah TR, Duarah DP, Helim R. Compatible bioagents to enhance efficacy against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. J Krishi Vigyan. 2024;12(1):25–32. https://doi.org/10.5958/2349-4433.2024.00005.9
  14. 14. Paster N, Bullerman LB. Mould spoilage and mycotoxin formation in grains as controlled by physical means. Int J Food Microbiol. 1988;7:257–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1605(88)90044-x
  15. 15. Harman GE, Howell CR, Viterbo A, Chet I, Lorito M. Trichoderma species—opportunistic, avirulent plant symbionts. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004;2(1):43–56. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro797
  16. 16. Howell CR. The role of antibiosis in biocontrol. In: Harman GE, Kubicek CP, editors. Trichoderma and Gliocladium. Vol. 2. Enzymes, biological control and commercial applications. London: Taylor & Francis; 2006. p. 173-84. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781482267945
  17. 17. Harish S, Kavino M, Kumar N, Saravanakumar D, Soorianathasundaram K, Samiyappan R. Biohardening with plant growth-promoting rhizosphere and endophytic bacteria induces systemic resistance against banana bunchy top virus. Appl Soil Ecol. 2008;39(2):187–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2007.12.006
  18. 18. White TJ, Bruns T, Lee SJWT, Taylor J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ, editors. PCR protocols: A guide to methods and applications. San Diego: Academic Press; 1990. p. 315–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1
  19. 19. Edwards U, Rogall TH, Blocker H, Emde M, Bottger EC. Isolation and direct complete nucleotide determination of entire genes. Characterization of gene coding for 16S ribosomal RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989;17:7843-53. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/17.19.7843
  20. 20. Nguyen C, Yan W, Le Tacon F, Lapeyrie F. Genetic variability of phosphate solubilizing activity by monocaryotic and dicaryotic mycelia of the ectomycorrhizal fungus Laccaria bicolor (Maire) P.D. Orton. Plant Soil. 1992;143:193–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00007873
  21. 21. Abdenaceur R, Benzina Tihar F, Djeziri M, Hadjouti R, Oukali Z, Sahir Halouane F. Effective biofertilizer Trichoderma spp. isolates with enzymatic activity and metabolites enhancing plant growth. Int Microbiol. 2022;25:817–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10123-022-00263-8
  22. 22. Saravanan VS, Subramoniam SR, Raj SA. Assessing in vitro solubilization potential of different zinc solubilizing bacterial (ZSB) isolates. Braz J Microbiol. 2007;38(3):403–8.
  23. 23. Vincent JM. Distortion of fungal hyphae in the presence of certain inhibitors. Nature. 1947;159(4051):850. https://doi.org/10.1038/159850b0
  24. 24. Gomez KA, Gomez AA. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1984. 680 p.
  25. 25. Singh V, Yadav RP. Morphological variability in Trichoderma isolates collected from different geographical locations. Ann Plant Prot Sci. 2013;21(1):84–7. https://doi.org/10.17221/66/2011-PPS
  26. 26. Sharma KK, Singh US. Cultural and morphological characterization of rhizospheric isolates of fungal antagonist Trichoderma. J Appl Nat Sci. 2014;6(2):451–6. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v6i2.481
  27. 27. Asis A, Shahriar SA, Naher L, Saallah S, Fatihah HNN, Kumar V, et al. Identification patterns of Trichoderma strains using morphological characteristics, phylogenetic analyses and lignocellulolytic activities. Mol Biol Rep. 2021;48(4):3285–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-021-06321-0
  28. 28. Wagh PP, Barhate BG, Gaikwad HD, Deokar CD, Kshirsagar CR. Morphological and cultural variability of Trichoderma spp. Int J Chem Stud. 2021;9(1):112–5. https://doi.org/10.22271/chemi.2021.v9.i1b.11214
  29. 29. Ajiboye MD, Iwuala EN, Komolafe AAR, Chukwuma MD, David OA, Ajewole TO, et al. Molecular and phylogenetic profiling of native Trichoderma bioagents from rhizosphere of local plants in South-West Nigeria. Fuoye J Pure Appl Sci. 2025;10(1):84–101. https://doi.org/10.55518/fjpas.KCWN3166
  30. 30. Vinale F, Sivasithamparam K, Ghisalberti EL, Marra R, Woo SL, Lorito M. Trichoderma–plant–pathogen interactions. Microbiology. 2008;154(3):895-904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.07.002
  31. 31. Iswati R, Aini LQ, Soemarno, Abadi AL. Exploration and characterization of indigenous Trichoderma spp. as antagonist of Rhizoctonia solani and plant growth promoter of maize. Biodiversitas. 2024;25(4):1375-85. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d250405
  32. 32. Prasad RM, Sagar BV, Devi GU, Triveni S, Rao SK, Chari DK. Isolation and screening of bacterial and fungal isolates for plant growth promoting properties from tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2017;6(8):753-61. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.608.096
  33. 33. Joo JH, Hussein KA. Biological control and plant growth promotion properties of volatile organic compound-producing antagonistic Trichoderma spp. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:897668. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.897668
  34. 34. Tripathy A, Dash D, Rath CC. Plant growth promotion and in vitro bio-activities evaluation of endophytic fungal communities associated with Oryza sativa L. Environ Conserv J. 2023;29(2):793-801. http://doi.org/10.53550/EEC.2023.v29i02.042
  35. 35. Arif M, Verma V, Priyadarshini A, Satnami L, Mishra A, Ansari M, et al. Evaluation of Trichoderma spp. as a plant growth promoter and antagonist of major pulse pathogens. J Food Legumes. 2023;36(4):278-87. https://doi.org/10.59797/jfl.v36.i4.164
  36. 36. Dutta P, Das BC, Islam M. Eco-friendly strategies for management of Sclerotinia rot of French bean. J Biol Control. 2008;22(2):405-10. https://doi.org/10.18311/jbc/2008/3777
  37. 37. Sharma J, Godika S, Ghasolia RP, Goyal SK, Yadav AL. Evaluation of bioagents against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum causing Sclerotinia rot of Indian mustard. J Mycol Plant Pathol. 2016;46(2):220–5.
  38. 38. Yadav RS, Yadav GK, Yadav AK, Mishra P, Yadav MK, Mishra AK. Molecular characterization of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum Sacc. initiating white mold disease in French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and its biological management. Legume Res. 2022;45(6):789–97. https://doi.org/10.18805/LR-4872
  39. 39. Bergmans L, Moisiadis P, Van Meerbeek B, Quirynen M, Lambrecht P. Microscopic observation of bacteria: Review highlighting the use of environmental SEM. Int Endod J. 2005;38:775–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.00999.x
  40. 40. Gavande SS, Maurya A, Sharma S. Isolation and characterization of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) from rhizosphere of major crops grown in Marathwada region of Maharashtra, India. Vegetos. 2024;37:637–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42535-023-00779-y
  41. 41. Vaseekaran S, Balakumar S, Arasaratnam V. Isolation and identification of a bacterial strain producing thermostable alpha-amylase. Trop Agric Res. 2010;22(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.4038/tar.v22i1.2603
  42. 42. Kumar A, Kumar A, Devi S, Patil S, Payal C, Negi S. Isolation, screening and characterization of bacteria from rhizospheric soils for different plant growth promotion (PGP) activities: An in vitro study. Recent Res Sci Technol. 2012;4(1):1-5.
  43. 43. Kesaulya H, Baharuddin, Zakaria B, Syaiful SA. Isolation and physiological characterization of PGPR from potato plant rhizosphere in medium land of Buru Island. Procedia Food Sci. 2015;3:190–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profoo.2015.01.021
  44. 44. Vinodkumar S, Nakkeeran S, Renukadevi P, Malathi VG. Biocontrol potentials of antimicrobial peptide producing Bacillus species: Multifaceted antagonists for the management of stem rot of carnation caused by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:446. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00446
  45. 45. Massawe VC, Hanif A, Farzand A, Mburu DK, Ochola SO, Wu L, et al. Volatile compounds of endophytic Bacillus spp. have biocontrol activity against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Phytopathology. 2018;109(1):125–34. https://doi.org/10.1094/phyto-04-18-0118-r
  46. 46. Villarreal-Delgado MF, Parra-Cota FI, Cira-Chávez LA, Estrada-Alvarado MI, de los Santos-Villalobos S. Bacillus sp. FSQ1: A promising biological control agent against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, the causal agent of white mold in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Biol Bull. 2021;48(6):729–39. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062359021060182
  47. 47. Islam MR, Akanda AM, Hossain MM, Hossain MM. First characterization of a newly emerging phytopathogen, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum causing white mold in pea. J Basic Microbiol. 2021;61(10):923–39. https://doi.org/10.1002/jobm.202100223
  48. 48. Fuga CAG, Lopes EA, Vieira BS, Cunha WV. Efficiency and compatibility of Trichoderma spp. and Bacillus spp. isolates on the inhibition of Sclerotium cepivorum. Rev Cienc Agrar. 2016;44(4):526–31. https://doi.org/10.15361/1984-5529.2016v44n4p526-531

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.