Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. sp4 (2025): Recent Advances in Agriculture by Young Minds - III

Exploring a potential mycoherbicidal agent for eco-friendly management of Trianthema portulacastrum L.

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.11793
Submitted
15 September 2025
Published
26-11-2025

Abstract

Trianthema portulacastrum L. is one of the dominant weed species of the garden land ecosystem and poses a severe threat to crop cultivation. Chemical herbicides have the potential to manage the weed effectively, but their persistent residual nature negatively impacts the soil health and ecosystem. Therefore, biological approaches are being necessitated for weed management. Naturally, T. portulacastrum is highly susceptible to various fungal infections, resulting in severe defoliation and necrosis. Hence, a roving field survey was conducted at multiple locations in Tamil Nadu to collect the diseased T. portulacastrum samples and investigate the diversity of fungal pathogens associated with it. A total of 78 fungal isolates were isolated from the infected samples. A detached leaf assay was performed to screen the potential fungal isolates. Morpho-molecular analyses confirmed the potential isolates as Gibbago trianthemae and Fusarium spp. A polymorphism percentage of 68.88 % was observed among the potential G. trianthemae isolates, which were assessed using 10 different ISSR primers. Pot culture experiments revealed that G. trianthemae isolate TVM 2 recorded the maximum disease index of 34.4 %, 41.6 % and 49.3 % at 10, 20 and 30 DAI
(days after inoculation), respectively, followed by isolate MDU 5. The potential fungal pathogen G. trianthemae also exhibited positive results for qualitative analysis of various extracellular and cell wall-degrading enzymes. Hence, there is a potential opportunity to exploit the infectious propagules of G. trianthemae for the development of a mycoherbicide formulation for environmentally friendly management of T. portulacastrum.

References

  1. 1. Gharde Y, Singh PK, Dubey RP, Gupta PK. Assessment of yield and economic losses in agriculture due to weeds in India. Crop Prot. 2018;107:12-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2018.01.007
  2. 2. Saitheja V, Thirukumaran K, Sendhilvel V, Karthikeyan R, Kalarani MK, Vellaikumar S, et al. Scope and potential of herbicidal values of the fungal pathogens and its secondary metabolites for sustainable weed management. Plant Prot Sci. 2024;60(2):109-26. https://doi.org/10.17221/31/2024-PPS
  3. 3. Sreeja E, Arthanari PM, Sendhilvel V, Somasundaram E. Isolation, identification and pathogenicity assay of fungal species on horse purslane (Trianthema portulacastrum L.). Int J Environ Clim Change. 2022;12(11):685-90. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2022/v12i1131021
  4. 4. Kumar V, Aggarwal NK, Aneja KR. Three fungal pathogens associated with horse purslane (Trianthema portulacastrum) in North India. Indian J Weed Sci. 2017;49(4):411-3. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-8164.2017.00106.X
  5. 5. Pilli GG, Kumar PR, Pilaka B. Selection of some fungal pathogens for biological control of Trianthema portulacastrum L., a common weed of vegetable crops. J Appl Biol Biotechnol. 2016;4(4):90-6. https://doi.org/10.7324/JABB.2016.40411
  6. 6. Ray P, Vijayachandran LS. Evaluation of indigenous fungal pathogens from horse purslane (Trianthema portulacastrum) for their relative virulence and host range assessments to select a potential mycoherbicidal agent. Weed Sci. 2013;61(4):580-5. https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-D-12-00076.1
  7. 7. Bohra B, Vyas BN, Godrej NB, Mistry KB. Evaluation of Alternaria alternata (Fr.) Keissler for biological control of Trianthema portulacastrum L. Indian Phytopathol. 2006;58(2):184-8.
  8. 8. Aneja KR, Khan SA, Kaushal S. Management of horse purslane (Trianthema portulacastrum L.) with Gibbago trianthemae Simmons in India. In: Spencer NR, editor. Proceedings of the X International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds; USA: Montana State University. 2000. p. 27-33.
  9. 9. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus. 1990;12:13-5.
  10. 10. Amiryousefi A, Hyvönen J, Poczai P. iMEC: Online marker efficiency calculator. Appl Plant Sci. 2018;6(6):e01159. https://doi.org/10.1002/aps3.1159
  11. 11. Ray P, Hill MP. Impact of feeding by Neochetina weevils on pathogenicity of fungi associated with water hyacinth in South Africa. J Aquat Plant Manag. 2012;50:79-84.
  12. 12. Chaube HS, Singh US. Plant disease management: principles and practices. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1991. p. 319.
  13. 13. Gomez KA, Gomez AA. Statistical procedures for agriculture research. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 2010.
  14. 14. Sharafaddin AH, Hamad YK, El_Komy MH, Ibrahim YE, Widyawan A, Molan YY, et al. Cell wall degrading enzymes and their impact on Fusarium proliferatum pathogenicity. Eur J Plant Pathol. 2019;155(3):871-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-019-01818-8
  15. 15. Hemati A, Aliasgharzad N, Khakvar R. In vitro evaluation of lignocellulolytic activity of thermophilic bacteria isolated from different composts and soils of Iran. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol. 2018;14:424-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2018.04.010
  16. 16. Mahfooz M, Dwedi S, Bhatt A, Raghuvanshi S, Bhatt M, Agrawal PK. Evaluation of antifungal and enzymatic potential of endophytic fungi isolated from Cupressus torulosa D. Don. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2017;6(7):4084-100. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.607.424
  17. 17. Saadaoui M, Faize M, Bonhomme L, Benyoussef NO, Kharrat M, Chaar H, et al. Assessment of Tunisian Trichoderma isolates on wheat seed germination, seedling growth and Fusarium seedling blight suppression. Microorganisms. 2023;11(6):1512. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11061512
  18. 18. Coniglio RO, Fonseca MI, Villalba LL, Zapata PD. Screening of new secretory cellulases from different supernatants of white rot fungi from Misiones, Argentina. Mycology. 2017;8(1):1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/21501203.2016.1267047
  19. 19. Kumar V, Kumar N, Aneja KR, Kaur M. Gibbago trianthemae, phaeodictyoconidial genus, cause leaf spot disease of Trianthema portulacastrum. Arch Phytopathol Plant Prot. 2016;49(1-4):48-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/03235408.2016.1152066
  20. 20. Gaddeyya G, Kumar PR. Botanical description, eco-physiology and control of Trianthema portulacastrum Linn. J Crop Weed. 2015;11(2):47-54.
  21. 21. Gaddeyya G, Kumar PR. Epidemics of a fungal weed pathogen Gibbago trianthemae Simmons. Int J Adv Life Sci. 2016;9(4):547-56.
  22. 22. Félix-Gastélum R, Valdez-Leyva AB, Fierro-Coronado RA, Maldonado-Mendoza IE. First report of stem blight and leaf spot in horse purslane caused by Gibbago trianthemae in Sinaloa, Mexico. Can J Plant Pathol. 2021;43(3):431-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/07060661.2020.1829063
  23. 23. Gandipilli G, Peethala KRK, Pilaka B. Gibbago trianthemae Simmons, a biocontrol agent of horse purslane weed: research and prospect. J Agric Sci Technol A. 2015;5:824-32.
  24. 24. Akhtar KP, Sarwar N, Saleem K, Ali S. Gibbago trianthemae causes Trianthema portulacastrum (horse purslane) blight in Pakistan. Australas Plant Dis. 2013;8:109-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13314-013-0108-8
  25. 25. Simmons EG. Gibbago, a new phaeodictyoconidial genus of Hyphomycetes. Mycotaxon. 1986;27:107-11.
  26. 26. Harish J, Jambhulkar PP, Bajpai R, Arya M, Babele PK, Chaturvedi SK, et al. Morphological characterization, pathogenicity screening, and molecular identification of Fusarium spp. isolates causing postflowering stalk rot in maize. Front Microbiol. 2023;14:1121781. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1121781
  27. 27. Younesi H, Darvishnia M, Bazgir E, Chehri K. Morphological, molecular and pathogenic characterization of Fusarium spp. associated with chickpea wilt in western Iran. J Plant Prot Res. 2021;61(4):402-13. https://doi.org/10.24425/jppr.2021.139250
  28. 28. Khatik SK, Mathur K, Bagri GK, Kumari R, Bagri DK, Bagdi DL. Study for host range of Gibbago trianthemae mycoherbicide. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2018;7(3):872-3.
  29. 29. Gandipilli G. Isolation, host specificity and biocontrol potential of Gibbago trianthemae against horse purslane weed. Indian J Weed Sci. 2017;49(3):306-8. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-8164.2017.00082.X
  30. 30. Mitchell JK. Gibbago trianthemae, a recently described hyphomycete with bioherbicide potential for control of horse purslane (Trianthema portulacastrum). Plant Dis. 1988;72(4):354-5. https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-72-0354
  31. 31. Kubicek CP, Starr TL, Glass NL. Plant cell wall-degrading enzymes and their secretion in plant-pathogenic fungi. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2014;52(1):427-51. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-102313-045831
  32. 32. Kaur M, Aggarwal NK, Yadav A, Gupta R. Evaluation of ligninolytic activity of fungal pathogens isolated from Parthenium weed. Adv Zool Bot. 2016;4(2):23-9. https://doi.org/10.13189/azb.2016.040202
  33. 33. Kaur M, Aggarwal NK. Enzymatic activities of pathogenic species of Alternaria, isolated from Parthenium. Indian J Weed Sci. 2017;49(2):207-10. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-8164.2017.00055.7

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.