Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp1 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Assessment of GCA and SCA effects in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under sodic soil using line × tester mating design

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.11893
Submitted
21 September 2025
Published
08-04-2026

Abstract

The study utilised a line × tester mating design, crossing twelve diverse female lines with 3 male testers to develop 36 F1 hybrids, evaluated along with three check varieties. The experiment was laid out in a randomized block design with three replications across two sowing environments: timely (E1) and late (E2) sown, for the study of 12 quantitative traits under sodicity conditions. Analysis of variance revealed highly significant genetic variability among genotypes for all traits in both environments. Combining ability analysis indicated the predominance of non-additive gene action for all studied traits, as specific combining ability (SCA) variance consistently exceeded general combining ability (GCA) variance, supported by high estimates of dominance variance and low narrow-sense heritability. Among parents, lines MP-1358 (for early maturity), UP-3043 (for plant height and grain yield) and DBW-302 (for spike length) were identified as superior general combiners. Tester LBRIL-102 also exhibited positive GCA effects for multiple yield components. Several crosses, notably PBW-821 × LBRIL-102 and GW-509 × LBRIL-102, demonstrated highly significant positive SCA effects for critical yield traits like grain yield per plant and harvest index. The study concludes that genetic expression, particularly of non-additive gene effects, was amplified under late-sown conditions (E2). The overwhelming predominance of non-additive gene action strongly suggests that heterosis breeding is the most promising strategy for genetic improvement of wheat for cultivation in sodic soils. The identified superior general combiners and specific cross combinations provide valuable genetic resources for developing high-yielding, stress-tolerant wheat hybrids.

References

  1. 1. Shewry PR, Hey SJ. The contribution of wheat to human diet and health. Food Energy Secur. 2015;4(3):178–202. https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.64
  2. 2. Munns R, Tester M. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2008;59:651–81. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092911
  3. 3. Sharma PC, Sehgal M, Singh D. Sodic soil reclamation and management for wheat production. J Wheat Res. 2019;11(2):45–58.
  4. 4. Reynolds M, Foulkes MJ, Slafer GA, Berry P, Parry MA, Snape JW, et al. Raising yield potential in wheat. J Exp Bot. 2009;60(7):1899–1918. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erp016
  5. 5. Chen F, Gao M, Zhang J, Zuo A, Shang X, Cui D. Molecular characterization of vernalization and response genes in bread wheat from the Yellow and Huai Valley of China. BMC Plant Biol. 2013;13(1):199.
  6. 6. Kumar A, Singh DP, Singh K. Wheat production under saline conditions: Challenges and opportunities. Crop Sci. 2020;60(5):2534–48.
  7. 7. Yamuangmorn S, Jumrus S, Jamjod S, Sringarm K, Arjin C. Responses of purple rice variety to light intensities and soil zinc application on plant growth, yield and bioactive compounds synthesis. J Cereal Sci. 2022;106:103495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2022.103495
  8. 8. Khan NU, Hassan G, Kumbhar MB, Marwat KB, Khan MA, Parveen A, et al. Combining ability analysis to identify suitable parents for heterosis in seed cotton yield, its components and lint% in upland cotton. Ind Crops Prod. 2009;29(1):108–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2008.04.009
  9. 9. Fasahat P, Rajabi A, Rad JM, Derera JJ. Principles and utilization of combining ability in plant breeding. Biom Biostat Int J. 2016;4(1):1–24. https://doi.org/10.15406/bbij.2016.04.00085
  10. 10. Bapela T, Shimelis H, Tsilo TJ, Mathew I. Genetic improvement of wheat for drought tolerance: Progress, challenges and opportunities. Plants. 2022;11(10):1331. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11101331
  11. 11. Zhang X, Lv L, Lv C, Guo B, Xu R. Combining ability of different agronomic traits and yield components in hybrid barley. PloS One. 2015;10(6):e0126828.
  12. 12. Joshi SK, Sharma SN, Singhania DL, Sain RS. Combining ability in the F1 and F2 generations of diallel cross in hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L. em. Thell.). Hereditas. 2004;141(3):287–94.
  13. 13. Akram Z, Ajmal SU, Khan KS, Qureshi R, Zubair M. Combining ability estimates of some yield and quality related traits in spring wheat. Pak J Bot. 2011;43(1):221–31.
  14. 14. Liu Z, Jiang J, Ren A, Xu X, Zhang H, Zhao T, et al. Heterosis and combining ability analysis of fruit yield, early maturity and quality in tomato. Agronomy. 2021;11(4):807. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11040807
  15. 15. Kumar A, Mishra VK, Vyas RP, Singh V. Heterosis and combining ability analysis in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J Appl Genet. 2011;52(3):255–64.
  16. 16. Erkul A, Unay A, Konak C. Inheritance of yield and yield components in a bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cross. Turk J Field Crops. 2010;15(2):137–40.
  17. 17. Shamuyarira KW, Shimelis H, Figlan S, Chaplot V. Combining ability analysis of yield and biomass allocation related traits in newly developed wheat populations. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):11832.
  18. 18. Khan I, Mohammad F, Khan FU. Estimation of genetic parameters of yield and yield traits in wheat genotypes under rainfed conditions. Int J Environ. 2015;4(2):193–205.
  19. 19. Shamsabadi EE, Sabouri H, Soughi H, Sajadi SJ. Genetic analysis of spike traits in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Genetika. 2020;52(2):559–69.
  20. 20. Sharaan AN, Gallab KH, Eid MA. Estimation of genetic parameters for yield and its components in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes under pedigree selection. Int J Agron Agric Res. 2017;10(2):22–30.
  21. 21. Ishaq M, Ahmad G, Afridi K, Ali M, Khan TU, Shah IA, et al. Combining ability and inheritance studies for morphological and yield contributing attributes through line× tester mating design in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Pure Appl Biol (PAB). 2018;7(1):160–68. https://doi.org/10.19045/bspab.2018.70019
  22. 22. Patel NA, Dholariya ND, Delvadiya IR, Akbari VR. Genetic analysis of grain yield, its components and quality parameters in durum wheat (Triticum durumDesf.) over environments. Int J Pure Appl Biosci. 2018;6(2):523–32. https://doi.org/10.18782/2320-7051.6196
  23. 23. Genc Y, Taylor J, Lyons G, Li Y, Cheong J, Appelbee M, et al. Bread wheat with high salinity and sodicity tolerance. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10:1280. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01280
  24. 24. Rocher S, Bougherara H, Benbelkacem A, Ykhlef N, Djekoun A. Genetic analysis of yield components and grain yield in durum wheat. Afr Crop Sci J. 2016;24(3):305–15.
  25. 25. Saeed M, Khalil IH, Nayab D, Anjum SA, Tanveer M. Combining ability and heritability for yield traits in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Pak J Agric Sci. 2016;53(3):577–83.
  26. 26. Awad-Allah MM, Attia KA, Omar AA, Mohamed AH, Habiba RM, Alzuaibr FM, et al. Combining ability and gene action controlling agronomic traits for cytoplasmic male sterile line, restorer lines and new hybrids for developing of new drought-tolerant rice hybrids. Genes. 2022;13(5):906. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13050906

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.