Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. sp4 (2025): Recent Advances in Agriculture by Young Minds - III

Assessment of combined influence of soil test crop response-based fertilizer recommendations and nano-fertilizers on post-harvest soil fertility in Alfisols of Karnataka

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.11913
Submitted
22 September 2025
Published
30-12-2025

Abstract

Maize (Zea mays L.) productivity in Alfisols is constrained by low organic matter, nutrient deficiencies and nutrient losses, requiring precision nutrient management. This study evaluated whether Soil test crop response-based (STCR) fertilizer prescriptions integrated with farmyard manure (FYM) and foliar nano-diammonium phosphate (nano-DAP) could improve post-harvest soil fertility across low, medium and high fertility strips at Zonal Agricultural Research Station (ZARS), Gandhi Krishi Vigyana Kendra (GKVK) (Bengaluru) and farmer fields in the Southern Transition Zone (Shivamogga) during Rabi 2024. A randomized complete block design with seven treatments (T1–T7: STCR nitrogen, phosphorus,  potassium  (NPK) at 90 and 100 q ha-1, STCR NPK+FYM, General recommended dose, Soil fertility rating and absolute control) was used; soil physical, chemical and nutrient parameters were measured pre-sowing and at harvest. STCR combined with FYM (T2, T4) improved soil buffering, in the low fertility strip final pH in T2 was 5.98 compared to 5.70 in STCR alone (T1), a rise of 0.28 pH units and produced modest increases in soil organic carbon (T2: 0.46 → 0.49 %, Δ = +0.03 %). Electrical conductivity increased marginally under fertilizer treatments but remained well below salinity risk (maximum observed ~0.095 dS m-1). Residual nutrients varied by approach: blanket approaches (GRD, SFR) left higher post-harvest N and P (In the medium fertility strip available N in T6 = 309 kg ha-1 vs T2 = 226 kg ha-1, Δ = +83 kg ha-1; available P in T6 = 441.6 kg ha-1 vs T2 = 315.1 kg ha-1, Δ  = +126.5 kg ha-1). Potassium depletion was minimized where FYM and STCR were combined. Overall, STCR integrated with FYM and targeted nano-DAP foliar applications enhanced post-harvest soil quality indicators and promoted more efficient nutrient management in Alfisols. These results support adoption of STCR-based integrated nutrient management for sustainable maize production in nutrient-deficient Alfisols of Karnataka.

References

  1. 1. Shahi UP, Singh VK, Kumar A, Singh P, Dhyani BP, Singh A. Effect of site-specific nutrient management on productivity, soil fertility and nutrient uptake in maize (Zea mays). Indian J Agron. 2020;65(4):432-8. https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v65i4.3006
  2. 2. Bekele D, Birhan M. The characteristics, distribution and management of Alfisols. Int J Res Stud Agric Sci. 2021;7(6):1-6. https://doi.org/10.20431/2454-6224.0706001
  3. 3. Ramachandrappa BK, Sathish A, Dhanapal G, Babu PN. Nutrient management strategies for enhancing productivity of dryland crops in Alfisols. Indian Journal of Dryland Agricultural Research and Development.2014;29(1):49-55. https://doi.org/10.5958/2231-6701.2014.01215.9
  4. 4. Murthy RK, Nagaraju B, Govinda K, Uday Kumar SN, Basavaraja PK, Saqeebulla HM, et al. Soil test crop response nutrient prescription equations for improving soil health and yield sustainability—a long-term study under Alfisols of southern India. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2024;15:1439523. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2024.1439523
  5. 5. Kekeli MA, Wang Q, Rui Y. The role of nano-fertilizers in sustainable agriculture: boosting crop yields and enhancing quality. Plants. 2025;14:554. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14040554
  6. 6. Shiferaw B, Prasanna BM, Hellin J, Bänziger M. Crops that feed the world 6. Past successes and future challenges to the role played by maize in global food security. Food Sec. 2011;3(3):307-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-011-0140-5
  7. 7. Tilman D, Cassman KG, Matson PA, Naylor R, Polasky S. Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature. 2002;418:671-7. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01014
  8. 8. Anand SR, Vishwanatha J, and Rajkumar RH. 2017. Site specific nutrient management (SSNM) using “Nutrient Expert” for hybrid maize (Zea mays L.) under zero tillage in Thungabhadra Project (TBP) command area of Karnataka. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 6(8):3597–3605. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.608.432
  9. 9. Ramamoorthy B, Narsimhan RL, Dinesh RS. Fertilizer application for specific yield targets of Sonora 64 wheat. Indian Farming. 1967;17(5):43-5.
  10. 10. Singh VK, Das A. Soil test crop response based nutrient management for enhancing productivity and soil health in maize systems. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2019;19(1):158-74.
  11. 11. Raliya R, Saharan V, Dimkpa C, Biswas P. Nanofertilizer for precision and sustainable agriculture: current state and future perspectives. J Agric Food Chem. 2016;64(31):6899-913. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.6b02156
  12. 12. Prasad R, Bhattacharyya A, Nguyen QD. Nanotechnology in sustainable agriculture: recent developments, challenges and perspectives. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:1508. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.01508
  13. 13. Jackson ML. Soil chemical analysis. New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India Pvt Ltd; 1973. p. 485.
  14. 14. Walkley A, Black CA. An examination of the method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 1934;37:29-38. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003
  15. 15. Subbiah GV, Asija GL. A rapid procedure for the estimation of available nitrogen in soil. Curr Sci. 1956;25:258-60.
  16. 16. Ramesh K, Chandrasekaran B, Balasubramanian R. Organic amendments and their role in sustainable soil management. Agric Rev. 2016;37(3):197-204.
  17. 17. Patil MB, Tolanur SI, Shaikh AA. Effect of organic and inorganic nutrient sources on soil properties and yield in maize. Indian J Agron. 2021;66(2):125-31.
  18. 18. Sharma PK, Prasad R. Long-term effect of fertilizers on soil acidification. Fertil News. 2002;47(3):53-9.
  19. 19. Singh YV. STCR-based gradient experiment with sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) to NPK fertilizers in the alluvial soil. Indian J Crop Ecol. 2014;2(2):83-6.
  20. 20. Sharma KL, Srinivasarao C, Vittal KPR, Wani SP. Integrated nutrient management for enhancing soil quality and crop productivity in rainfed systems. Indian J Fert. 2016;12(4):64-81.
  21. 21. Jayaraman S, Sahu M, Sinha NK, Mohanty M, Chaudhary RS, Yadav B, et al. Conservation agricultural practices impact on soil organic carbon, soil aggregation and greenhouse gas emission in a Vertisol. Agriculture. 2022;12:1004. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12071004
  22. 22. Srinivasarao C, Venkateswarlu B, Lal R, Singh AK, Vittal KPR. Long-term effects of soil fertility management on carbon sequestration in a Vertisol in the semi-arid tropics of central India. Soil Res. 2014;52(6):498-507.
  23. 23. Deshmukh KK, Bisen NK, Chourasia SK. Influence of soil test based fertilization on soil fertility and productivity of rice. Madras Agric J. 2012;99(10):704-6. https://doi.org/10.29321/MAJ.10.100174
  24. 24. Vidyavathi G, Kammar MR. Use of soil test crop response approach in direct seeded rice. J Krishi Vigyan. 2017;6(1):213-6. https://doi.org/10.5958/2349-4433.2017.00082.4
  25. 25. Santhosha HM. Effect of STCR based integrated nutrient management on yield and economics of maize [MSc thesis]. Dharwad: UAS Dharwad; 2013.
  26. 26. Santhi R, Muthusamy M, Dey P, Mathan KK. Soil test-based fertilizer recommendations for targeted yield of crops and soil fertility restoration. Indian J Fert. 2011;7(8):26-37.
  27. 27. Subba Rao A, Reddy KS. Soil test based fertilizer recommendations (STFR): a review. J Indian Soc Soil Sci. 2005;53(4):377-93.
  28. 28. Ramakrishna A, Venkateswarlu B, Vittal KPR, Subba Reddy G. Soil test-based fertilizer recommendations for crops in dryland agriculture. Bulletin No. 02/2009. Hyderabad: CRIDA; 2009.
  29. 29. Verma BC, Pramanik P, Bhaduri D. Organic fertilizers for sustainable soil and environmental management. In: Nutrient dynamics for sustainable crop production. Singapore: Springer; 2019. p. 289-313. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8660-2_10
  30. 30. Rajput PS, Babhulkar PS, Jadhao SD. Long-term effect of nutrient management on soil fertility and productivity under sorghum-wheat cropping sequence in Vertisol. Indian J Agric Res. 2016;50(2):156-60.
  31. 31. Ashwini HS. Effect of integrated nutrient management on soil properties and crop yield in maize-groundnut cropping system [MSc thesis]. Dharwad: UAS Dharwad; 2007.
  32. 32. Kumar V, Goyal V, Dahiya R, Dey P. Impact of long-term application of organic and inorganic nutrient through inductive cum targeted yield model on soil physical properties under pearl millet-wheat cropping system. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 2021;52(20):2500-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2021.1953050
  33. 33. Krishna Murthy R, Bhavya N, Govinda K, Annappa NN, Basavaraja PK, Uday Kumar SN, et al. Inductive cum targeted yield model-based integrated fertilizer prescription for sweet corn (Zea mays L. saccharata) on Alfisols of Southern India. PLoS One. 2024;19(8):e0307168. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307168
  34. 34. Dotaniya ML, Singh M, Dey P, Rajendiran S. Nutrient budgeting and soil fertility management through integrated plant nutrient system in maize-wheat cropping system. J Plant Nutr. 2022;45(6):778-89.
  35. 35. Krishna Murthy R, Govind K, Uday Kumar SN, Basavaraja PK, Mohamed Saqeebulla H. Influence of different approaches and forms of fertilizer application on yield and nutrient uptake of hybrid maize. Theor Biol Forum. 2023;12:252-9. https://doi.org/10.61739/TBF.2023.12.2.252
  36. 36. Kaur P, Saini KS, Sharma S, Kaur J, Bhatt R, Alamri S, et al. Increasing the efficiency of the rice-wheat cropping system through integrated nutrient management. Sustainability. 2023;15(17):12694. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151712694

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.