Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Early Access

Exploring the anticancer potential of bioactive fractions of Erythrina variegata L. in MDA-MB-231 cell lines

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.11922
Submitted
23 September 2025
Published
31-03-2026

Abstract

Erythrina variegata L. (Fabaceae) has been traditionally reported to possess antitumour, expectorant, febrifuge, antibacterial and antioxidant properties. In the present work, the methanol extract of stem bark of E. variegata (MEV) and its fractions such as hexane (HFEV), chloroform (CFEV), ethylacetate (EAFEV) and methanol (MFEV) were assessed for their cytotoxic potential against triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cell line MDA-MB-231 using the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay.  In this MTT assay, the chloroform fraction was found to be the most potent. Apoptotic changes induced by CFEV were further examined through acridine orange/ethidium bromide (AO/EB) dual staining and 4′, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining. Expression of the antiapoptotic gene Bcl-2 was analysed by real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Phytochemical profiling of the extract was carried out by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and high resolution liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (HRLC-MS). The findings demonstrated a concentration-dependent cytotoxic effect of CFEV in the cell lines. In silico docking study revealed that compounds like melochinone (-8.4 kcal/mol), sesamin (-7.9 kcal/mol), muricinine (-7 kcal/mol), 5-hydroxy-3-methoxysativan (-7.3 kcal/mol), 2,3-dihydroxy p-cumate (-6.2 kcal/mol) and alpinumisoflavone (-8.3 kcal/mol) had good binding affinity with Bcl-2 protein. Furthermore, it triggered apoptotic cell death through the mitochondrial-dependent intrinsic pathway, suggesting that E. variegata may serve as a promising source of bioactive compounds with therapeutic potential against breast cancer.

References

  1. 1. Giaquinto AN, Sung H, Newman LA, Freedman RA, Smith RA, Star J, et al. Breast cancer statistics 2024. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74(6):477–95. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21863
  2. 2. Kesireddy M, Elsayed L, Shostrom VK, Agarwal P, Asif S, Yellala A, et al. Overall survival and prognostic factors in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: a national cancer database analysis. Cancers. 2024;16(10):1791. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16101791
  3. 3. Li Y, Zhang H, Merkher Y, Chen L, Liu N, Leonov S, et al. Recent advances in therapeutic strategies for triple-negative breast cancer. J Hematol Oncol. 2022;15(1):121. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-022-01341-0
  4. 4. Cai Y, Luo Q, Sun M, Corke H. Antioxidant activity and phenolic compounds of 112 traditional Chinese medicinal plants associated with anticancer. Life Sci. 2004;74(17):2157–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2003.09.047
  5. 5. Jiangsu New Medical College, editor. A dictionary of Chinese herbal medicine. Shanghai: Shanghai People's Press; 1977. p. 1941–42.
  6. 6. Sarragiotto MH, Filho HL, Marsailoi AJ. Eritrosine-N-oxide and erythartine-N-oxide, two novel alkaloids from Erythrina mulungu. Can J Chem. 1972;59:1272.
  7. 7. Ito K, Haruna M, Jinno V, Furukawa H. Studies on the Erythrina alkaloids. XI. Alkaloids of Erythrina crystagalli LINN. Structure of a new alkaloid, crystamidine. Chem Pharm Bull. 1976;24:52–55. https://doi.org/10.1248/cpb.24.52
  8. 8. John R, Kariyil BJ, Usha PTA, Surya S. Apoptosis mediated cytotoxic potential of Erythrina variegata L. stem bark in human breast carcinoma cell lines. Indian J Exp Biol. 2021;59(7):437–47.
  9. 9. Mosmann T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods. 1983;65(1-2):55–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1759(83)90303-4
  10. 10. Ribble D, Goldstein NB, Norris DA, Shellman YG. A simple technique for quantifying apoptosis in 96-well plates. BMC Biotechnol. 2005;5:12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-5-12
  11. 11. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods. 2001;25(4):402–08. https://doi.org/10.1006/meth.2001.1262
  12. 12. Harborne JB. The natural distribution in angiosperms of anthocyanins acylated with aliphatic dicarboxylic acids. Phytochemistry. 1986;25(8):1887–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(00)81168-1
  13. 13. Irulandi K, Geetha S, Tamilselvan A, Mehalingam P. GC-MS analysis and phytochemical studies of methanolic fruits extract of Garcinia cambogia Hort ex Boerl and Ziziphus trinervia Roth. J Adv Appl Sci Res. 2016;1(3):90–95. https://doi.org/10.46947/joaasr13201623
  14. 14. Filimonov DA, Lagunin AA, Gloriozova TA, Rudik AV, Druzhilovskii DS, Pogodin PV, et al. Prediction of the biological activity spectra of organic compounds using the PASS online web resource. Chem Heterocycl Compd. 2014;50(3):444–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10593-014-1496-1
  15. 15. De Luca A, Sibilio G, De Luca P, Del Guacchio E. DNA barcoding to confirm the morphological identification of the coral trees (Erythrina spp., Fabaceae) in the ancient gardens of Naples (Campania, Italy). Plants. 2018;7(2):43. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants7020043
  16. 16. John R, Kariyil BJ, PTA U. Apoptosis mediated cytotoxic potential of Erythrina variegata L. stem bark in human breast carcinoma cell lines. Indian J Exp Biol. 2021;59(7):437–47.
  17. 17. Gopalakrishnan A, Kariyil BJ, John R, Usha PA. Phytochemical evaluation and cytotoxic potential of chloroform soluble fraction of methanol extract of Thespesia populnea in human breast cancer cell lines. Pharmacogn Mag. 2019;15(62):150–54.
  18. 18. Olawale F, Bodede O, Ariatti M, Singh M. Isolation, characterization, antioxidant and anticancer activities of compounds from Erythrina caffra stem bark extract. Antioxidants. 2025;14(9):1035. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox14091035
  19. 19. Sharma D, Rawat I, Goel HC. Anticancer and anti-inflammatory activities of some dietary cucurbits. Indian J Exp Biol. 2015;53:216–21.
  20. 20. Thompson CB. Apoptosis in the pathogenesis and treatment of disease. Science. 1995;267(5203):1456–62. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7878464
  21. 21. Hengartner MO. The biochemistry of apoptosis. Nature. 2000;407(6805):770–76. https://doi.org/10.1038/35037710
  22. 22. AmeliMojarad M, Pourmahdian A. The inhibitory role of stigmasterol on tumor growth by inducing apoptosis in Balb/c mouse with spontaneous breast tumor (SMMT). BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2022;23(1):42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40360-022-00578-2
  23. 23. Gotow T, Shibata M, Kanamori S, Tokuno O, Ohsawa Y, Sato N, et al. Selective localization of Bcl-2 to the inner mitochondrial and smooth endoplasmic reticulum membranes in mammalian cells. Cell Death Differ. 2000;7(7):666–74. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.cdd.4400694
  24. 24. Lee W, Song G, Bae H. In vitro and in silico study of the synergistic anticancer effect of alpinumisoflavone with gemcitabine on pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma through suppression of ribonucleotide reductase subunit-M1. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2025;204:106969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2024.106969
  25. 25. Piotrowska-Kempisty H, Ruciński M, Borys S, Kucińska M, Kaczmarek M, Zawierucha P, et al. 3′-Hydroxy-3,4,5,4′-tetramethoxystilbene, the metabolite of resveratrol analogue DMU-212, inhibits ovarian cancer cell growth in vitro and in a mice xenograft model. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):32627. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep32627
  26. 26. Horvath P, Aulner N, Bickle M, Davies AM, Nery ED, Ebner D, et al. Screening out irrelevant cell-based models of disease. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2016;15(11):751–69. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd.2016.175

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.