Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp1 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Modelling rice performance in Telangana: CERES-rice calibration and validation for post-monsoon cultivar adaptation

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.11940
Submitted
24 September 2025
Published
08-01-2026

Abstract

Rice, the staple food for more than 60 % of the global population, faces increasing production challenges due to climate variability and resource constraints. Accurate crop growth modelling and yield prediction are therefore essential to strengthen food security and optimise management. This study aimed to calibrate and validate the CERES-rice model within the decision support system for agrotechnology transfer (DSSAT v4.8.5.0) for three cultivars, RNR-15048, KNM-1638 and JGL-24423, across multiple sowing dates under Rabi conditions in Telangana, India. Field experiments were conducted during the rabi seasons of 2023 and 2024 using a split-plot design with five sowing windows and three cultivars. Site-specific weather, soil, crop management and genotype datasets were compiled and genetic coefficients were estimated through iterative calibration. Model performance was evaluated using root mean square error (RMSE), normalised RMSE (nRMSE) and the index of agreement (d). Calibration results showed excellent accuracy, with phenology simulated within ±1 day (nRMSE 1.2–3.7 %; d >0.83) and grain yield deviations <2.5 % (nRMSE 3.4–3.6 %; d >0.85). Biomass and straw yields were reproduced with good agreement (nRMSE <10.5 %). Validation confirmed robust model performance, with phenology and grain yield consistently accurate across cultivars and biomass predictions genotype-dependent but acceptable. Straw yield was more variable, particularly for KNM-1638 (nRMSE 11.2 %), though overall trends were reliable. The calibrated genetic coefficients were physiologically realistic and consistent with Indica rice, confirming the model’s suitability for yield forecasting, sowing window assessment and management optimisation under Rabi conditions. Overall, these findings highlight the potential of the CERES-rice model to support climate-smart rice production strategies in South Asia.

References

  1. 1. Spohrer R, Larson M, Maurin C, Laillou A, Capanzana M, Garrett GS. The growing importance of staple foods and condiments used as ingredients in the food industry and implications for large-scale food fortification programs in Southeast Asia. Food Nutr Bull. 2013;34(2 Suppl 1):S50-61. https://doi.org/10.1177/15648265130342S107
  2. 2. Shankar T, Malik GC, Banerjee M, Dutta S, Praharaj S, Lalichetti S, et al. Prediction of the effect of nutrients on plant parameters of rice by artificial neural network. Agronomy. 2022;12(9):2123.
  3. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12092123
  4. 3. Malhi GS, Kaur M, Kaushik P. Impact of climate change on agriculture and its mitigation strategies: A review. Sustainability. 2021;13(3):1318. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031318
  5. 4. Indiastat. Season-wise area, production productivity of rice in India [Internet]; 2023 [cited 2025 Nov 20]. Available from: https://www.indiastat.com
  6. 5. Basso B, Cammarano D, Carfagna E. Review of crop yield forecasting methods and early warning systems. In: Proceedings of the first meeting of the scientific advisory committee of the global strategy to improve agricultural and rural statistics; 2013 Jul 18; Rome, Italy. Rome: FAO; 2013. p. 241.
  7. 6. Shamim M, Shekh AM, Pandey V, Patel HR, Lunagaria MM. Simulating the phenology, growth and yield of aromatic rice cultivars using CERES-rice model under different environments. J Agrometeorol. 2012;14(1):31-34. https://doi.org/10.54386/jam.v14i1.1376
  8. 7. Holzworth DP, Snow V, Janssen S, Athanasiadis IN, Donatelli M, Hoogenboom G. Agricultural production systems modelling and software: current status and future prospects. Environ Model Softw. 2015;72:276-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.12.013
  9. 8. Abayechaw D. Review on decision support system for agrotechnology transfer (DSSAT) model. Inf Syst. 2021;10(6):126-33. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijiis.20211006.13
  10. 9. Chandran MS, Banerjee S, Mukherjee A, Nanda MK, Mondal S, Kumari VV. Evaluating the impact of projected climate on rice-wheat-groundnut cropping sequence in lower Gangetic plains of India: a study using multiple GCMs, DSSAT model and long-term sequence analysis. Theor Appl Climatol. 2021;145(3):1243-58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-021-03700-2
  11. 10. Alejo LA. Assessing the impacts of climate change on aerobic rice production using the DSSAT-CERES-rice model. J Water Clim Change. 2021;12(3):696-708. https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2020.286
  12. 11. Rajasivaranjan T, Anandhi A, Patel NR, Irannezhad M, Srinivas CV, Veluswamy K, et al. Integrated use of regional weather forecasting and crop modeling for water stress assessment on rice yield. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):16985. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-19750-z
  13. 12. Goswami P, Dutta G. Evaluation of DSSAT model (CERES rice) on rice production: a review. Int J Chem Stud. 2020;8(5):404-09.
  14. https://doi.org/10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i5f.10327
  15. 13. Subbiah BV, Asija GL. A rapid procedure for determination of available nitrogen in soil. Curr Sci. 1956;25:259-60.
  16. 14. Olsen SR, Cole CV, Watanabe FS, Dean LA. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. USDA Circ No. 939. Washington (DC): United States Department of Agriculture; 1954.
  17. 15. Jackson ML. Soil chemical analysis. New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India Private Limited; 1973.
  18. 16. Walkley A, Black CA. An examination of Degitigaroff method for determining soil organic matter and proposed modification of chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 1934;37:29-34.
  19. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003
  20. 17. Hunt LA, Boote KJ. Data for model operation, calibration and evaluation. In: Tsuji GY, Hoogenboom G, Thornton PK, editors. Understanding options for agricultural production. Dordrecht: Springer; 1998. p. 9-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3624-4_2
  21. 18. Hunt LA. Genotype-environment interactions in crop models. Can J Plant Sci. 1993;73(3):447-56.
  22. 19. Loague K, Green RE. Statistical and graphical methods for evaluating solute transport models: overview and application. J Contam Hydrol. 1991;7(1-2):51-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-7722(91)90038-3
  23. 20. Willmott CJ. Some comments on the evaluation of model performance. Bull Am Meteorol Soc. 1982;63(11):1309-13. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1982)063<1309:SCOTEO>2.0.CO;2
  24. 21. White JW, Hoogenboom G. Simulating effects of genes for physiological traits in a process-oriented crop model. Agron J. 1996;88(3):416-22. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1996.00021962008800030009x
  25. 22. Boote KJ, Kropff MJ, Bindraban PS. Physiology and modelling of traits in crop plants: implications for genetic improvement. Agric Syst. 2001;70(2-3):395-420. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-521X(01)00053-1
  26. 23. Hoogenboom G, White JW, Messina CD. From genome to crop: integration through simulation modeling. Field Crops Res. 2004;90(1):145-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2004.07.014
  27. 24. Singh H, Singh KN, Hasan B. Evaluation of CERES-rice model (v.4.0) under temperate conditions of Kashmir Valley, India. Cereal Res Commun. 2007;35(4):1723-32. https://doi.org/10.1556/CRC.35.2007.4.18
  28. 25. Vysakh A, Ajithkumar B, Subba Rao AVM. Evaluation of CERES-rice model for the selected rice varieties of Kerala. J Agrometeorol. 2016;18(1):120-3. https://doi.org/10.54386/jam.v18i1.913
  29. 26. Maniruzzaman M, Biswas JC, Hossain MB, Haque MM, Naher UA, Biswas A, et al. Evaluating the CERES-rice model under dry season irrigated rice in Bangladesh: calibration and validation. J Agric Crop Res. 2017;5(6):96-107.
  30. 27. Ebrahimirad H, Amiri E, Babazadeh H, Sedghi H. Calibration and evaluation of Ceres-rice model under different density and water managements. Appl Ecol Environ Res. 2018;16(5). https://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1605_64696482
  31. 28. Akinbile CO. Assessment of the CERES-rice model for rice production in Ibadan, Nigeria. Agric Eng Int CIGR J. 2013;15(1):19-26.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.