Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. sp4 (2025): Recent Advances in Agriculture by Young Minds - III

Entrepreneurial behaviour of coconut (Cocos nucifera) farmers in Krishnagiri district, Tamil Nadu

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.11983
Submitted
25 September 2025
Published
24-12-2025

Abstract

Coconut is a vital plantation crop sustaining millions of rural households in India, yet productivity and profitability remain constrained by ageing palms, fragmented holdings, pest and disease pressures and weak value chains. It is becoming more widely acknowledged that farmers can overcome these obstacles by engaging in entrepreneurial behaviour, which is characterised by innovativeness, risk orientation, planning and market orientation.  The Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) was used as the analytical framework in this study to evaluate the entrepreneurial behaviour of coconut farmers in Krishnagiri district of Tamil Nadu. A structured interview schedule was used to gather data from 120 randomly chosen farmers and analysis of moment structures (AMOS)'s confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and structural equation modelling (SEM) were used to test the extended TPB model. The findings of the study validate the applicability of TPB in perennial cash crops and offer actionable insights for policy and extension. The constructs showed high internal reliability (Cronbach’s α > 0.70) and acceptable fit indices for the measurement and structural models. Path analysis showed that behavioural intention (BI) significantly predicted actual entrepreneurial behaviour (β = 0.832, p < 0.001), while perceived behavioural control (PBC) had a strong positive influence on BI (β = 0.492, p < 0.001). Strengthening farmers’ perceived control through training, credit access and infrastructural support can enhance entrepreneurial intentions and ensure their translation into sustainable agribusiness behaviour.

References

  1. 1. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). FAOSTAT statistical database: crops and livestock products. Rome: FAO; 2023. https://www.fao.org/faostat
  2. 2. Coconut Development Board. Coconut statistics 2023-24. Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare, Government of India; 2024. https://coconutboard.gov.in/Statistics.aspx
  3. 3. India Brand Equity Foundation (IBEF). Indian coconut industry report. Ministry of Commerce & Industry, Government of India; 2024. https://www.ibef.org
  4. 4. Zainol FA, Arumugam N, Daud WNW, Suhaimi NAM, Ishola BD, Ishak AZ, et al. Coconut value chain analysis: a systematic review. Agriculture. 2023;13(7):1379. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13071379
  5. 5. Zainol FA, Arumugam N, Daud WNW, Suhaimi NAM, Ishola BD, Ishak AZ, et al. Coconut value chain analysis: a systematic review. Agriculture. 2023;13(7):1379. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13071379
  6. 6. Tolinggi WK, Salman D, Rahmadanih, Iswoyo H. Farmer regeneration and knowledge co-creation in the sustainability of coconut agribusiness in Gorontalo, Indonesia. Open Agric. 2023;8(1):20220162. https://doi.org/10.1515/opag-2022-0162
  7. 7. Arumugam T, Hatta MAM. Improving coconut using modern breeding technologies: challenges and opportunities. Plants. 2022;11(24):3414. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11243414
  8. 8. Mansfield S, Asigau B, van Koten C, Paudel S, Bowie M, Jackson TA, et al. Assessment of coconut palm damage caused by coconut rhinoceros beetle, Oryctes rhinoceros (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). N Z J Crop Hortic Sci. 2024;52(4):336-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/01140671.2023.2278791
  9. 9. Abbas K, Zhu Y, Yang Q. The role of entrepreneurial orientation on farmers’ adoption of crop diversification under climate change: Evidence from rural Pakistan. Clim Risk Manag. 2025;100709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2025.100709
  10. 10. Ntow TK, Wongnaa CA, Nyadu-Addo R, Addison M, Awunyo-Vitor D, Abokyi E. Effects of entrepreneurial behaviour on market outlets choice: Evidence from rice producers in Ashanti Region, Ghana. Sustain Technol Entrep. 2023;2(2):100037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stae.2023.100037
  11. 11. Jusoh A, Hassan AAG, Loganathan N, Kogid M, Latif HA, Zakaria NH, et al. Empowering smallholder coconut farmers through e-commerce: A preliminary study on current business models, opportunities and digital readiness in Malaysia. J Contemp Manag Stud. 2025;1(1):1-12.
  12. 12. Honlah E, Segbefia AY, Forkuo D, Abass K. The exports of dehusked coconuts from southwestern Ghana: Implications for coconut farmers’ role in a rural virgin coconut oil value chain. Soc Sci Humanit Open. 2024;9:100851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100851
  13. 13. Ihou AFY, Paul MJ. Entrepreneurial landscape of farmers: a comprehensive review using bibliometric and systematic analysis. J Scientometr Res. 2025;14(2):1-14. https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.20251405
  14. 14. Madhesh M, Parvathi S. Economic empowerment through coir industry: a study on production and market dynamics in Tamil Nadu’s Namakkal District. J Econ Bus Issues. 2025;5(1):26-44. https://www.jebiacademic.org/index.php/jebi/article/view/116
  15. 15. Anil K, Gowda VG, Shivalingaiah Y, Pankaja H, Nandini HM. Harnessing coconut farming: entrepreneurial behaviour of growers in Hassan District, Karnataka, India. J Exp Agric Int. 2025;47(4):84-95. https://doi.org/10.9734/jeai/2025/v47i43359
  16. 16. Garima, Dhingra A, Centobelli P, Cerchione R. Factors and activities considered by first-generation agripreneurs for agribusiness sustainable development: a study of Haryana, India. Sustainability. 2023;15(9):7109. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097109
  17. 17. Viswanathan PK. The rationalization of agriculture in Kerala: Implications for the natural environment, agro-ecosystems and livelihoods. Agrar South J Polit Econ. 2014;3(1):63-107. https://doi.org/10.1177/2277976014530232
  18. 18. Mansingh JP, Madhumithra M, Ihou AF, Nisha A, Vidhya AS, Anbarasan P. Entrepreneurial behaviour of farmers: a bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review. Multidiscip Rev. 2025;8(7):2025202. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2025202
  19. 19. Vieira F, Santana HE, Jesus M, Santos J, Pires P, Vaz-Velho M, et al. Coconut waste: Discovering sustainable approaches to advance a circular economy. Sustainability. 2024;16(7):3066. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16073066
  20. 20. Divya PM, Roopa BS, Manusha C, Balannara P. A concise review on oil extraction methods, nutritional and therapeutic role of coconut products. J Food Sci Technol. 2023;60(2):441-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-022-05352-0
  21. 21. Partonezhad N, Safaei SA, Mousivand M, Ataei P. The formation of entrepreneurial behaviour among agriculture students in the academic environment: the integration of psychological and behavioural traits. Results Eng. 2025;105689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.105689
  22. 22. Thakur N, Sharma R, Thakur P, Shilpa, Chaturvedi A, Khushwaha R, et al. Exploring the entrepreneurial behaviour of vegetable growers: influential factors and implications for agricultural development. Front Sustain Food Syst. 2025;9:1512414. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1512414
  23. 23. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behaviour. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50(2):179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  24. 24. Senger I, Borges JAR, Machado JAD. Using the theory of planned behaviour to understand the intention of small farmers in diversifying their agricultural production. J Rural Stud. 2017;49:32-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.10.006
  25. 25. Stauder J. Using the theory of planned behaviour to explore the intention of farmers to use livestock protection measures. Mt Res Dev. 2023;43(2):R22-30. https://doi.org/10.1659/mrd.2022.00034
  26. 26. Sok J, Borges JR, Schmidt P, Ajzen I. Farmer behaviour as reasoned action: a critical review of research with the theory of planned behaviour. J Agric Econ. 2021;72(2):388-412. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12408
  27. 27. Che Nawi N, Mamun AA, Hassan AA, Wan Ibrahim WSA, Mohamed AF, Permarupan PY. Agro-entrepreneurial intention among university students: a study under the premises of the theory of planned behaviour. SAGE Open. 2022;12(1):21582440211069144. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211069144
  28. 28. Phung QA, Dao N. Farmers’ perceptions of sustainable agriculture in the Red River Delta, Vietnam. Heliyon. 2024;10(7):e28576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28576
  29. 29. Borges JAR, Oude Lansink AG, Ribeiro CM, Lutke V. Understanding farmers’ intention to adopt improved natural grassland using the theory of planned behaviour. Livest Sci. 2014;169:163-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2014.09.014
  30. 30. Menozzi D, Halawany-Darson R, Mora C, Giraud G. Motives towards traceable food choice: a comparison between French and Italian consumers. Food Control. 2015;49:40-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.09.006
  31. 31. Wauters E, Bielders C, Poesen J, Govers G, Mathijs E. Adoption of soil conservation practices in Belgium: an examination of the theory of planned behaviour in the agri-environmental domain. Land Use Policy. 2010;27(1):86-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.02.009
  32. 32. Lu M, Guo B, Li J. Using the extended theory of planned behaviour to explore the effect of farmer differentiation on their intention to revitalize idle homesteads: empirical evidence from Shaanxi, China. Sustainability. 2024;16(18):8252. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16188252
  33. 33. Shiri N, Mehdizadeh H, Khoshmaram M, Azadi H. Determinants of entrepreneurial alertness: towards sustainable agribusiness development. Br Food J. 2022;124(7):2279-98. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-07-2021-0825
  34. 34. George D, Mallery P. SPSS for Windows step by step: a simple guide and reference. 11.0 update. Boston (MA): Allyn & Bacon; 2003.
  35. 35. Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model. 1999;6(1):1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  36. 36. Bagozzi RP, Yi Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models. J Acad Mark Sci. 1988;16(1):74-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327
  37. 37. Adams AJ, Hodgson T. Calibration of casing/tubing design criteria by use of structural reliability techniques. SPE Drill Complet. 1999;14(1):21-7. https://doi.org/10.2118/55041-PA
  38. 38. Li J, Jiang R, Tang X. Assessing psychological factors on farmers’ intention to apply organic manure: an application of the extended theory of planned behaviour. Environ Dev Sustain. 2024;26(1):2467-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02829-y
  39. 39. Waiswa D, Muriithi BW, Murage AW, Ireri DM, Maina F, Chidawanyika F, et al. The role of social-psychological factors in the adoption of push-pull technology by small-scale farmers in East Africa: application of the theory of planned behaviour. Heliyon. 2025;11(1):e41449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41449
  40. 40. Feisthauer P, Hartmann M, Börner J. Behavioural factors driving farmers’ intentions to adopt spot spraying for sustainable weed control. J Environ Manag. 2024;353:120218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120218
  41. 41. Bi X, Zou W. The effect of farmers’ cognition on the inconsistency between behaviour and intention in manure application. SAGE Open. 2024;14(4):21582440241286583. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241286583
  42. 42. Ahmed H, Ekman L, Lind N. Planned behaviour, social networks and perceived risks: understanding farmers' behaviour toward precision dairy technologies. J Dairy Sci. 2024;107(5):2968-82. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2023-23861
  43. 43. Batbay Ö, Kahramanoğlu İ. Using the theory of planned behaviour to understand and manage the factors affecting farmers’ intention in pesticide use. Cleaner and Circular Bioeconomy. 2024;9:100126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clcb.2024.100126

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.