Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. sp4 (2025): Recent Advances in Agriculture by Young Minds - III

Farmers' attitude analysis on beneficiaries of field and horticultural crops under the farmer first program (FFP) in Khordha district of Odisha

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.11999
Submitted
26 September 2025
Published
08-12-2025

Abstract

This study investigates the attitudes of 148 beneficiaries (77 crop-based, 71 horticulture-based) of the farmer FIRST programme (FFP) in Khordha district, Odisha, using a validated Likert-scale instrument and ex-post facto design. Results showed that 55.8 % of crop-based and 66.2 % of horticulture-based farmers held favourable attitudes toward the programme, with 25.97 % and 14.09 % respectively having a highly favourable outlook. Weighted Mean Scores for core dimensions highlight strong endorsement of participatory decision-making (WMS: 3.87 for crops, 4.14 for horticulture), improved productivity (WMS: 3.66 and 4.10) and programme relevance (WMS: 3.70 and 4.09), affirming FFPs’ positive impact on farm confidence and researcher-farmer collaboration. However, notable concerns persist regarding equitable benefit sharing, affordability of technologies and inclusion-specifically, scores for farm women and landless inclusion (WMS: 3.57 crop, 3.68 horticulture) and low ratings for benefit distribution and communication (WMS: ~1.7 for both groups). Regression analysis identifies education, mass media use, annual income, cosmopoliteness and self-esteem as significant predictors influencing farmer attitudes, accounting for 61-69 % of attitude variation (Adjusted R2 = 0.62–0.61). Practical implications include the need for targeted outreach to marginalised farmers, affordable technology solutions and inclusive extension strategies to maximise FFPs’ impact. These results reinforce participatory extension as a driver of empowerment, innovation and sustainable agricultural development in diverse, transitioning rural contexts.   

References

  1. 1. Röling NG, Wagemakers MAE, editors. Facilitating sustainable agriculture: Participatory learning and adaptive management in times of environmental uncertainty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998.
  2. 2. Indian Council of Agricultural Research - Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture (ICAR-CRIDA). Farmer FIRST Programme: Technology assessment, refinement and transfer. Hyderabad (India): ICAR-CRIDA; 2022. https://www.icar-crida.res.in/FFP.html.
  3. 3. Indian Council of Agricultural Research - Agricultural Technology Application Research Institute (ICAR-ATARI). Recent advances in Farmer FIRST Programme: Reflection and progress report. Kolkata (India): ICAR-ATARI; 2024. https://www.atarikolkata.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Recent-Advances-in-Farmer-FIRST-Programme_Refelction-from-ICAR-ATARI-Kolkata.pdf.
  4. 4. Serawat RK. Knowledge and attitude of farmers towards crop-based module under Farmer FIRST Programme in Jodhpur District of Rajasthan [masters' thesis]. Jodhpur: Agriculture University; 2021.
  5. 5. Singh K, Kumar P, Kalra VP, Singh D. Economic, social and behavioral development of farmers through Farmer FIRST Programme in Punjab. Indian Farming. 2022;72(8):38-41.
  6. 6. Chowdhury T, Ahmed J, Hossain MT, Roy MC, Ashik-Uz-Zaman M, Uddin MN, et al. Knowledge, attitudes and biosecurity practices among the small-scale dairy farmers in Sylhet district, Bangladesh. Vet Med Sci. 2023;9(5):2221-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.1199
  7. 7. Mulugeta T, Ilomo M, Mueke A, Onyango C, Matsaunyane L, Kritzinger Q, et al. Smallholder farmers' knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding agricultural inputs with a focus on agricultural biologicals. Heliyon. 2024;10(4):e26719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26719
  8. 8. Yamane T. Statistics: An introductory analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Harper and Row; 1967.
  9. 9. Chambers R, Jiggins J. Agricultural research for resource-poor farmers: A parsimonious paradigm. Agric Admin Ext. 1987;27(2):87-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/0269-7475(87)90021-3
  10. 10. Pretty JN. Regenerating agriculture: Policies and practice for sustainability and self-reliance. London: Earthscan; 1995.
  11. 11. Bihari B, Mishra KK, Kumar V, Singh SK. Assessment of participatory approaches in agricultural extension: Evidence from India. Indian J Ext Educ. 2020;56(1):24-9.
  12. 12. Reddy AA, Mishra D. Farmer Producer Organizations (FPOs): Status, issues and suggested policy reforms. Econ Polit Wkly. 2017;52(20):78-86.
  13. 13. Singh R, Kumar P, Singh A. Impact of participatory extension approaches on knowledge and adoption of farmers in India. J Community Mobil Sustain Dev. 2019;14(2):227-33.
  14. 14. Joshi PK, Gulati A, Birthal PS, Tewari L. Agriculture diversification in South Asia: Patterns, determinants and policy implications. World Dev. 2020;136:105112.
  15. 15. Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed. New York: Free Press; 2003.
  16. 16. Feder G, Slade R. The acquisition of information and the adoption of new technology. Am J Agric Econ. 1984;66(3):312-20. https://doi.org/10.2307/1240798

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.