Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp1 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Performance and stability of ridge gourd (Luffa acutangula (L.) Roxb. var. Arka Prasan) under integrated nutrient management in Telangana

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.12017
Submitted
27 September 2025
Published
24-03-2026

Abstract

The increasing demand for organically grown vegetables necessitates adopting sustainable nutrient management practices. This four-year study (2021–24) evaluated 7 Integrated Nutrient Management (INM) strategies on ridge gourd (Luffa acutangular (L) Roxb. cv. Arka Prasan). Key parameters assessed included Days to First Harvest (DFH), Fruit Yield per Hectare (FY/HA), Average Fruit Weight (AFW) and Benefit-Cost Ratio (BCR). Statistical analyses using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), the Eberhart & Russell stability model and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) revealed significant treatment differences. Application of enriched compost at 2.5 t/ha (T₆) consistently outperformed other treatments, recording the highest mean yield (21.83 metric tonne/ha) and BCR (1.958). This treatment also showed perfect stability, with a deviation from regression (S²di) of 0.000 for both yield and profitability, confirming reliability across environments. While T₆ was superior for yield and profitability, treatment T₂ (biofertilizer consortium + compost at 2.5 t/ha) was identified as the earliest to harvest. The findings suggest that enriched compost at 2.5 t/ha is the most effective, stable and economically viable option for ridge gourd cultivation and is strongly recommended for farmer adoption.

References

  1. 1. Peter KV, Abraham Z. Biodiversity in horticultural crops. New Delhi: Daya Publishing House; 2017.
  2. 2. Shodhan Jain HS, Vasudevan SN, Hanumantharaya BG, Vishwanath K, Marappa N. Comprehensive assessment of ridge gourd (Luffa acutangula (L.) Roxb.). Pharma Innov J. 2023;12(12):743.
  3. 3. Tasnim KN, Singh D, Singh V, Alexander K. Evaluation of ridge gourd hybrids for growth, yield and quality (Luffa acutangula L.). Int J Chem Stud. 2025;9(8S):5214. https://doi.org/10.33545/26174693.2025.v9.i8Sj.5214
  4. 4. Gopalan C, Sastri BVR, Balasubramanian SC. Nutritive value of Indian foods. Hyderabad: Natl Inst Nutr; 2007.
  5. 5. Pullaiah T. Encyclopedia of world medicinal plants. Vol. 4. Hyderabad: AP Regency Publications; 2006. p. 1962-4
  6. 6. Kandoliya UK, Marviya GV, Bodar NP, Bhadja NV, Golakiya BA. Nutritional and antioxidant components of ridge gourd (Luffa acutangula L. Roxb.) fruits of promising genotypes and varieties. Sch J Agric Vet Sci. 2016;3(5):397-401.
  7. 7. Manikandaselvi S, Vadivel V, Brindha P. Review on Luffa acutangula L.: ethnobotany, phytochemistry, nutritional value and pharmacological properties. Int J Curr Pharm Rev Res. 2016;7(3):151-5.
  8. 8. Willer H, Lernoud J, editors. The world of organic agriculture: statistics and emerging trends 2019. Frick (Switzerland): Res Inst Org Agric (FiBL) & IFOAM-Organics Int; 2019.
  9. 9. Savci S. An agricultural pollutant: chemical fertilizers. Int J Environ Sci Dev. 2012;3(1):73-80. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJESD.2012.V3.191
  10. 10. Choudhary M, Datta A, Jat HS, Yadav AK, Gathala MK, Sapkota TB, et al. Pan-India assessment of soil health. Curr Sci. 2018;114(5):988-96.
  11. 11. Aulakh MS, Grant CA. Integrated nutrient management for sustainable crop production. J Crop Improv. 2008;21(1):35-90. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780367803216
  12. 12. Thakur AK, Uphoff N, Antony E. Integrated nutrient management: a way forward for sustainable agriculture. J Soil Water Conserv. 2021;20(4):365-73.
  13. 13. Adhikary S. Vermicompost: the story of organic gold. J Clean Prod. 2012;23:91-8.
  14. 14. Lazcano C, Domínguez J. The use of vermicompost in sustainable agriculture: impact on plant growth and soil fertility. In: Miransari JI, editor. Soil nutrients. New York: Nova Science Publishers; 2011. p. 1-23
  15. 15. Biswas DR, Narayanasamy G. Rock phosphate enriched compost: an approach to improve phosphorus availability in soil. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst. 2006;74(2):143-55.
  16. 16. Mahanty T, Bhattacharjee S, Goswami M, Bhattacharyya P, Das B, Ghosh A, et al. Biofertilizers: a potential approach for sustainable agriculture development. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2017;24(4):3315-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-8104-0
  17. 17. Singh J, Munshi AD, Singh D, Meena BR, Singh AK, Nagar A, et al. Identification of new stable resistant sources and agro-morphological performance of sponge gourd germplasm against tomato leaf curl New Delhi virus incidence. Front Plant Sci. 2024;15:1373352. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2024.1373352
  18. 18. Ceccarelli S. Genotype by environment interaction and breeding for marginal conditions. Euphytica. 2015;198(1):1-17.
  19. 19. Senta PB, Purohit VL. Influence of integrated nutrient management on soil properties, nutrient content and uptake by ridge gourd (Luffa acutangula L.). Pharma Innov J. 2023;12(12):927.
  20. 20. Khaytan N, Perez GA, Tongyoo P, Reanwarakorn K, Chunwongse J, Wongpraneekul A, et al. Screening for ToLCNDV tolerance in ridge gourd germplasm, inheritance study and SNP marker identification using GWAS based on DArTseq. Sci Hortic. 2025;339:113867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2024.113867
  21. 21. Crossa J. Statistical analyses of multilocation trials. In: Brady NC, editor. Adv Agron. Vol. 44. Cambridge (MA): Academic Press; 1990. p. 55-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60818-4
  22. 22. Eberhart SA, Russell WA. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci. 1966;6(1):36-40. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1966.0011183X000600010011x
  23. 23. Jolliffe I. Principal component analysis. In: Lovric M, editor. Int Encycl Stat Sci. Berlin: Springer; 2011. p. 1094-6 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04898-2_455
  24. 24. Gomez KA, Gomez AA. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1984
  25. 25. Sukhatme PV. Statistical methods for agricultural workers. New Delhi: Indian Council Agric Res; 1957
  26. 26. Yadav BK, Lourduraj AC, Kumar S. Effect of organic and inorganic fertilizers on growth, yield and quality of tomato. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2019;8(3):4441-4.
  27. 27. Meena RK, Jain PK, Kumar S. Effect of integrated nutrient management on growth and yield of cucumber. Ann Plant Soil Res. 2017;19(1):108-11.
  28. 28. Asha K, Singh A, Verma R. Exploitation of beneficial microbes as biofertilizers for sustainable crop production. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2018;7(1):1845-51.
  29. 29. Singh R, Kumar S, Singh YV. Effect of integrated nutrient management on growth, yield and quality of sponge gourd. Indian J Hortic. 2010;67(3):336-9.
  30. 30. Patel HS, Patel NB, Sarvaiya JP, Chawla SL. Integrated nutrient management on growth and yield of ridge gourd (Luffa acutangula L.) cv. GARG-1. Pharma Innov J. 2021;10(8):1064-9.
  31. 31. Choudhary K, Paliwal R, Mahariya JS, Singh H, Gupta NK. Plant growth improvement in ridge gourd through integrated nutrient management practices. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2020;9(3):1-9. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.903.143
  32. 32. Ali A, Niu G, Masabni J, Ferrante A, Cocetta G. Integrated nutrient management of fruits, vegetables and crops through the use of biostimulants, soilless cultivation and traditional and modern approaches: a mini review. Agric. 2024;14(8):1330. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14081330

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.