Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Early Access

Integrating geostatistics and pollution indices to delineate chromium contamination hotspots and risk zones in an industrial landscape

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.12024
Submitted
27 September 2025
Published
05-03-2026

Abstract

Chromium (Cr) contamination in soils poses a major ecological and human health concern in industrial landscapes, particularly in tannery clusters. In this study, geostatistical methods and pollution indices were integrated to delineate Cr contamination hotspots and ecological risk zones in the Walaja block, Tamil Nadu, India. Sixty-eight surface soil samples were collected in September, 2024 and analysed for physicochemical properties and total Cr concentrations using standard protocols. The contamination factor (CF), geo-accumulation index (Igeo) and ecological risk index (Er) were computed. Spatial interpolation was performed using inverse distance weighting (IDW) and hotspots were identified with the Getis–Ord Gi* statistic. Soil Cr concentrations ranged from 129 to 2625 mg/kg (mean ≈ 601 mg/kg), which is over 27 times the natural background level. Contamination factor (CF) and Igeo values indicated severe to extreme contamination in the northwestern industrial corridor, whereas Er values were mostly in the low-to-moderate risk category due to Cr’s relatively low toxicity factor. Spatial analysis confirmed statistically significant Cr hotspots in tannery zones and cold spots in agricultural areas. Integrated risk zonation
classified approximately 20 % of the study area as high risk, 35-40 % as moderate risk and 40-45 % as low risk. These findings indicate that the high-risk areas coincide with tannery belts, underscoring the urgent need for soil remediation and stricter land-use regulation. The combined geostatistical-index approach provides a robust tool for policymakers to prioritize monitoring and mitigation efforts in industrial regions.

References

  1. 1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). The state of the world’s land and water resources for food and agriculture 2022 – Systems at breaking point. Rome: FAO; 2022. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb9910en
  2. 2. Hou D, Jia X, Wang L, McGrath SP, Zhu YG, Hu Q, et al. Global soil pollution by toxic metals threatens agriculture and human health. Science. 2025;388(6744):316–21. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adr5214
  3. 3. Jaishankar M, Tseten T, Anbalagan N, Mathew BB, Beeregowda KN. Toxicity, mechanism and health effects of some heavy metals. Interdiscip Toxicol. 2014;7(2):60. https://doi.org/10.2478/intox-2014-0009
  4. 4. Huo XN, Li H, Sun DF, Zhou LD, Li BG. Combining geostatistics with Moran’s I analysis for mapping soil heavy metals in Beijing, China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2012;9(3):995–1017. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph9030995
  5. 5. Huang C, Gou Z, Ma X, Liao G, Deng O, Yang Y. Quantification of sources and potential risks of cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury and arsenic in agricultural soils in a rapidly urbanizing region of southwest China: The case of Chengdu. Front Public Health. 2024;12:1400921. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1400921
  6. 6. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Vol. 100D: Radiation. Lyon: IARC; 2012.
  7. 7. Ratnalu GV, Dhakate R, More S. Distribution and human health hazard appraisal with special reference to chromium in soils from Peenya industrial area, Bengaluru City, South India. J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2022;20(1):79–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40201-021-00757-z
  8. 8. Islam MM, Rahman T, Urmi AAZ, Mamun MIR, Shoeb M. Impact of the tannery industrial zone on physicochemical and microbiological quality of Dhaleshwari river water, Bangladesh. J Bangladesh Acad Sci. 2025;49(1):45–55. https://doi.org/10.3329/jbas.v49i1.75146
  9. 9. Ambiga K, Annadurai R, Vinayagamoorthy R. Nitrate and chromium contamination in groundwater from effluent of tanneries and drastic vulnerability index map: A case study of Ranipet area, Vellore district, Tamilnadu. Indian J Sci Technol. 2016;9:40. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i40/92439
  10. 10. Murugaiyan S, Velusamy S, Maheswari M, Dhevagi P, Kalpana P, Dinesh GK, Prasad S, Shivprasad. Evaluation and speciation of heavy metals in the soil of the suburban region of Southern India. Soil Sediment Contam. 2022;31(6):520–39.
  11. 11. Sinduja M, Sathya V, Maheswari M, Dhevagi P, Sivakumar U, Chitdeshwari T, et al. Chromium speciation and agricultural soil contamination in the surrounding tannery regions of Walajaphet, Vellore district, Southern India. Madras Agric J. 2022;3(1–3):1. https://doi.org/10.1080/15320383.2022.2030298
  12. 12. Anna university, centre for climate change and disaster management. Ranipet district profile. Chennai: Anna University; 2023. https://www.annauniv.edu/cccdm/districtprofiles/ranipet.html
  13. 13. Arivoli S, Vassou M, Tennyson S, Meeran M, Ramanan A, Divya S, Kamatchi P. Analysis of soil and water quality in selected villages of Ranipet district, Tamil Nadu, India. Magnesium. 2021;200:200. http://dx.doi.org/10.12944/CWE.16.2.14
  14. 14. Central Ground Water Board (CGWB). Groundwater yearbook of Tamil Nadu and U.T. of Puducherry (2018–2019). 2019.
  15. 15. Marius K, Venkatasubramanian G. Exploring urban economic resilience: The case of a leather industrial cluster in Tamil Nadu. Savoirs et Mondes Indiens Working Papers Series. 2017. https://doi.org/10.3917/ried.236.0137
  16. 16. Soil science division staff. Soil survey manual. Washington (DC): USDA, Natural Resources Conservation Service; 2017. p. 603. (USDA Handbook No. 18). Minor amendments 2018.
  17. 17. American public health association (APHA). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 23rd ed. Washington (DC): APHA; 2017. https://www.standardmethods.org/
  18. 18. Jackson ML. Soil chemical analysis. New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India Pvt Ltd; 1973.
  19. 19. Walkley A, Black IA. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 1934;37(1):29–38. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003
  20. 20. US Environmental Protection Agency. Method 3051a- microwave assisted acid digestion of sediments, sludges, soils and oils; 1998.
  21. 21. Ahamad MI, Song J, Sun H, Wang X, Mehmood MS, Sajid M, et al. Contamination level, ecological risk and source identification of heavy metals in the hyporheic zone of the Weihe River, China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(3):1070. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17031070
  22. 22. Ni J, Yuan C, Zheng J, Liu Y. Distributions, contamination level and ecological risk of heavy metals in surface sediments from intertidal zone of the Sanmen Bay, East China. J Sea Res. 2022;190:102302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seares.2022.102302
  23. 23. Muller G. Index of geo-accumulation in sediments of the Rhine River. 1969.
  24. 24. Hakanson L. An ecological risk index for aquatic pollution control. Water Res. 1980;14(8):975–1001. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(80)90143-8
  25. 25. Turekian KK, Wedepohl KH. Distribution of the elements in some major units of the Earth’s crust. Geol Soc Am Bull. 1961;72(2):175–92. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1961)72
  26. 26. Sun L, Guo D, Liu K, Meng H, Zheng Y, Yuan F, Zhu G. Levels, sources and spatial distribution of heavy metals in soils from a typical coal industrial city of Tangshan, China. Catena. 2019;175:101–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2018.12.014
  27. 27. Getis A, Ord JK. The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geogr Anal. 1992;24(3):189–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1992.tb00261.x
  28. 28. Zhang C, Luo L, Xu W, Ledwith V. Use of local Moran’s I and GIS to identify pollution hotspots of Pb in urban soils of Galway, Ireland. Sci Total Environ. 2016;556:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.166
  29. 29. Kabata-Pendias, Alina. Trace elements in soils and plants. 3rd ed. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2000. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420039900
  30. 30. Oruko RO, Edokpayi JN, Msagati TA, Tavengwa NT, Ogola HJ, Ijoma G, et al. Investigating chromium status, heavy metal contamination and ecological risk assessment via tannery waste disposal in sub-Saharan Africa (Kenya and South Africa). Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2021;28(31):42135–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13703-1
  31. 31. Zulfiqar U, Haider FU, Ahmad M, Hussain S, Maqsood MF, Ishfaq M, et al. Chromium toxicity, speciation and remediation strategies in soil-plant interface: A critical review. Front Plant Sci. 2023;13:1081624. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1081624
  32. 32. Eze O, Tukura B, Atolaiye B, Opaluwa O. Index model assessment of heavy metal pollution in soils selected from three irrigated farm sites in Abuja, Nigeria. Int J Adv Sci Res Eng. 2018;4(6):93–105. https://doi.org/10.31695/IJASRE.2018.32758
  33. 33. McBride MB. Environmental chemistry of soils. New York: Oxford University Press; 1994.
  34. 34. Sparks DL. Environmental soil chemistry. 2nd ed. San Diego (CA): Academic Press; 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012656446-4/50001-3
  35. 35. Kabata-Pendias A. Trace elements in soils and plants. 4th ed. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2010. https://doi.org/10.1201/b10158
  36. 36. Rinklebe J, Shaheen SM. Redox chemistry of chromium in soils and sediments. Chemosphere. 2017;613–14:1140–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.02.153
  37. 37. Lee SZ, Chang L, Ehrlich RS. The relationship between adsorption of Cr(VI) and soil properties. J Environ Sci Health, Part A. 1999:34(4):809–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529909376867
  38. 38. Ali Z, Malik R, Shinwari Z, Qadir A. Enrichment, risk assessment and statistical apportionment of heavy metals in tannery-affected areas. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2015;12(2):537–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-013-0428-4
  39. 39. Dhal B, Thatoi HN, Das NN, Pandey BD. Chemical and microbial remediation of hexavalent chromium from contaminated soil and groundwater. Chemosphere. 2019;230:366–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.01.048
  40. 40. Xiao W, Zhang Y, Li T, Chen B, Wang H, He Z, et al. Reduction kinetics of hexavalent chromium in soils and its correlation with soil properties. J Environ Qual. 2012;41(5):1452–58. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2012.0061
  41. 41. Violante A, Cozzolino V, Perelomov L, Caporale AG, Pigna M. Mobility and bioavailability of heavy metals and metalloids in soil environments. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2010;10(3):268–92. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-95162010000100005
  42. 42. Veluprabakaran V, Kavitha M. Evaluation of heavy metals in ground and surface water in Ranipet, India utilizing HPI model. Environ Monit Assess. 2023;195(7):875. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11452-x
  43. 43. Kim SM, Choi Y. Assessment of lead and zinc contamination in beach sands by hotspot analysis. J Coastal Res. 2019;91(SI):321–5. https://doi.org/10.2112/SI91-065.1
  44. 44. Torgalkar V, Mohidin R, Turati S, Torsello V. How India’s leather industry is polluting a major river basin. Eco-Business. 2025. https://www.eco-business.com/news/how-indias-leather-industry-ispolluting-a-major-river-basin/
  45. 45. Ouabo RE, Sangodoyin AY, Ogundiran MB. Assessment of ordinary kriging and IDW methods for modeling chromium and cadmium soil pollution in e-waste sites in Douala, Cameroon. J Health Pollut. 2020;10(26):200605. https://doi.org/10.5696/2156-9614-10.26.200605
  46. 46. Al Hamdani Mo. Spatial analysis of soil heavy metals in Dohuk, North of Iraq (Doctoral dissertation); 2024. http://hdl.handle.net/11513/4089

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.