Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Early Access

Effect of salicylic acid on stay-green efficiency in maize (Zea mays L.) varieties

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.12053
Submitted
29 September 2025
Published
13-04-2026

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the spring and autumn seasons of 2024 at a farm located northwest of Ramadi city to evaluate the effects of foliar application of salicylic acid at four concentrations (0, 150, 300 and 450 mg L-1) on six maize genotypes. The study utilised a split-plot arrangement within a randomised complete block design (RCBD) with three replications. Results showed significant effects of salicylic acid concentration, genotype and their interaction on physiological and yield traits. The highest concentration (450 mg L-1) significantly increased the number of stay green, duration leaf area, kernels per row, 1000-kernel weight and overall grain yield, especially during the autumn season. The genotype Rabee exhibited the greatest number of stay green (14.75) and the highest grain yield (12.33 t ha-1). Salicylic acid also enhanced the stay-green characteristic, which correlated strongly with yield improvement by supporting photosynthetic efficiency and grain filling. Genotypes Rabee and Al-Maha demonstrated superior performance across most measured traits, highlighting their genetic potential. Additionally, salicylic acid application accelerated flowering by reducing the days to 50 % silking, particularly in spring. Environmental conditions in autumn provided greater stability in growth and reproductive phases. Based on these findings, applying  450 mg L-1 salicylic acid to responsive maize genotypes is recommended to improve physiological function and maximise yield under semi-arid conditions.

References

  1. 1. Directorate of GPAD. Production of cotton, maize and potatoes. Baghdad: Central Statistical Organisation, Ministry of Planning, Iraq; 2020. p. 19.
  2. 2. Abd MS, Abdul ZA, Ghadir MA. Response of maize hybrids and inbred to yield and its components under irrigation interval. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2021;904:012003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/904/1/012003
  3. 3. Abdul-Razaq MMA, Taleb MS. Response of maize to salicylic acid and mechanical cultivation in reducing some biotic and abiotic stresses and their effect on growth characteristics and yield. Euphrates J Agric Sci. 2018;10(1):167–75.
  4. 4. Al-Sheikhli AA, Yaemur AA. Effect of training method and spraying gibberellic and salicylic acid on some flower characters of snapdragon plants (Antirrhinum majus L.). Arab J Sci Res Publ. 2019;3(2):42–57. https://doi.org/10.26389/ajsrp.o210119
  5. 5. Arfan M, Athar HR, Ashraf M. Does exogenous application of salicylic acid through the rooting medium modulate growth and photosynthetic capacity in two differently adapted spring wheat varieties under salt stress? J Plant Physiol. 2007;164(6):685–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2006.05.010
  6. 6. Abdulhamed ZA, Hwaidi MI, Alqaisi MRM. Determination of maize genotypes performance under water deficit using ISSR molecular index. Plant Sci Today. 2023;10(1):30–37. https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.1728
  7. 7. Bayat S, Sepehri A. Paclobutrazol and salicylic acid application ameliorate the negative effect of water stress on growth and yield of maize plants. J Res Agric Sci. 2012;8(2):127–39.
  8. 8. Abd HS, Abdulhamed ZA, Ghadir MA. Estimation of genetic parameters using full diallel cross in maize under different irrigation intervals. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2021;904:012054. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/904/1/012054
  9. 9. Abdul-Hamed ZA, Abood NM, Noaman AH. Heterosis in sunflower using cytoplasmic male sterility. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2021;779:012127. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/779/1/012127
  10. 10. Ghazi D. Impact of drought stress on maize (Zea mays L.) plant in presence or absence of salicylic acid spraying. J Soil Sci Agric Eng. 2017;8(6):223–29. https://doi.org/10.21608/jssae.2017.37382
  11. 11. Habibpor SS, Naderi A, Lak S, Faraji H, Mojaddam M. Effects of salicylic acid on morphological and physiological characteristics of sweet corn hybrids under water stress conditions. J Fundam Appl Sci. 2016;8(3):522–43. https://doi.org/10.4314/jfas.v8i3s.234
  12. 12. Hamad HS, Abdulhamed ZA. Role of salicylic acid in stay-green, growth and yield of two-purpose maize hybrid. Bionatura. 2022;7(4):33. https://doi.org/10.21931/RB/2022_mex?07.04.33
  13. 13. Hamad HS, Abdulhamed ZA. Estimation of combining ability of growth, yield and its components of maize under salicylic acid concentrations. Bionatura. 2023;8(1). https://doi.org/10.21931/RB/CSS/2023.08.03.67
  14. 14. Haseeb A, Inamullah K, Waqas L, Muhammad FJ, Muhammad DA. Effect of salicylic acid on yield and yield components of maize under reduced irrigation. Int J Environ Sci Nat Resour. 2018;9(3):1–6.
  15. 15. Abdulhamed ZA, Abas SA, Noaman AH, Abood NM. Genetic performance of inbred and hybrids of maize under irrigation interval. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2021;904:012001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/904/1/012001
  16. 16. Horvath E, Brunner S, Bela K, Papdi C, Szabados L, Tari I, et al. Exogenous salicylic acid-triggered changes in glutathione transferases and peroxidases are key factors in the successful salt stress acclimation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Funct Plant Biol. 2015;42(12):1129–40. https://doi.org/10.1071/FP15119
  17. 17. Abdulhamed ZA, Al-Baurki FR. Morphological and molecular characterisation using ISSR-PCR markers for half diallel crossing of five flax genotypes. AIP Conf Proc. 2023;2977:040040. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0181920
  18. 18. Ibrahim MM, Abdulhamed ZA. Efficiency of selection in inducing genetic-molecular variations in sunflower. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2023;1158:062032. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1158/6/062032
  19. 19. Jasim AH, Hasson KM, Rashid HM. Effect of salicylic acid and phosphorus spraying on maize (Zea mays L.) yield under conditions of incomplete irrigation. Ann West Univ Timisoara Ser Biol. 2017;20(1):21.
  20. 20. Hamad HS, Abdulhamed ZA, Abood NM. Genotypic and phenotypic variance, correlation and path coefficient analysis in maize. Anbar J Agric Sci. 2024;22(2). https://doi.org/10.32649/ajas.2024.149998.1265
  21. 21. Kadioglu A, Saruhan N, Terezi R. Relations between antioxidant enzymes and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in common bean varieties differing in sensitivity to drought stress. Russ J Plant Physiol. 2011;58(1):60–68. https://doi.org/10.1134/S102144371101016X
  22. 22. Leslie CA, Romani RJ. Inhibition of ethylene biosynthesis by salicylic acid. Plant Physiol. 1988;88(3):833–37. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.88.3.833
  23. 23. Poor P, Borbely P, Bodi N, Bagyanszki M, Georgenyi MT. Effects of salicylic acid on photosynthetic activity and chloroplast morphology under light and prolonged darkness. Photosynthetica. 2019;57:367–76. https://doi.org/10.32615/ps.2019.040
  24. 24. Saedpanah P, Mohammadi K, Fayaz F. Agronomic traits of forage maize (Zea mays L.) in response to spraying of nano fertilizers, ascorbic acid and salicylic acid. J Res Ecol. 2016;4(2):359–65.
  25. 25. Said MT, Hamd-Alla WA. Impact of foliar spraying with antioxidants and intercropping pattern of maize and soybean on yields and its attributes. J Plant Prod. 2018;9(12):1069–73. https://doi.org/10.21608/jpp.2018.36630
  26. 26. Tahjib-Ul-Arif M, Siddiqui MN, Sohag AAM, Sakil MA, Rahman MM, Polash MAS, et al. Salicylic acid-mediated enhancement of photosynthesis attributes and antioxidant capacity contributes to yield improvement of maize plants under salt stress. J Plant Growth Regul. 2018;37(4):1318–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-018-9867-y
  27. 27. Wahid SA, Noaman AH, Abdulhamed ZA, Hamad HS, Abdulkareem BM. Genetic parameters using line × tester mating design for growth, yield and quality of maize. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2024;1371:052079. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1371/5/052079
  28. 28. Abdulhamed ZA, Abdulkareem BM, Noaman AH. Efficiency of ISSR markers to detect genetic and molecular variation between barley genotypes. Int J Agric Stat Sci. 2021;17(Suppl 1):1503–08.
  29. 29. Mukhlif FH, Ramadan ASA, Hammody DT, Mousa MO, Shahatha SS. Molecular assessment of genetic divergence among maize genotypes. SABRAO J Breed Genet. 2023;55(3):739–48. https://doi.org/10.54910/sabrao2023.55.3.12
  30. 30. Abdulhamed ZA, Abas SA, Noaman AH, Abood NM. Review on the development of drought-tolerant maize genotypes in Iraq. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2021;904:012010. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/904/1/012010
  31. 31. Abd-Allah Ramadan AS, Ghadeer MA, Muhammad AA. Estimation of combining ability and gene action of maize (Zea mays L.) lines using line × tester crosses. Biochem Cell Arch. 2020;20(1):1769. https://doi.org/10.35124/bca.2020.20.1.1769
  32. 32. Ali IM, AbdulKafoor AH, Al-Janabi YA, Ramadan ASA. Impact of irrigation intervals and ascorbic acid concentrations on growth and anatomical characteristics of soybean. Anbar J Agric Sci. 2025;23(1). https://doi.org/10.32649/ajas.2025.186770
  33. 33. Abdulkafoor AH, Ramadan ASAA, Ibrahim MM, Alobaidy BSJ, Kosaj KI. Improving growth traits and yield of several sesame varieties by effect of planting distances between rows. Bionatura. 2023;8(2):7. https://doi.org/10.21931/rb/css/2023.08.02.7

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.