Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp1 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Consumer perceptions and supply chain dynamics of millets in the western undulating agroclimatic zone of Odisha, India

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.12152
Submitted
7 October 2025
Published
19-01-2026

Abstract

Research on the effects of supply chain constraints on product availability, perceived quality, convenience, and repeat purchasing in Odisha’s western undulating agroclimatic zone is limited. Therefore, a multistage sampling design was employed to study the production and marketing of finger millet in Kalahandi district, Odisha. Three major millet-growing blocks, i.e., Lanjigarh, M. Rampur and Narla, were purposively selected, with three villages randomly chosen from each. From every village, ten growers were surveyed (n = 90), stratified by farm size. Additional data were collected from farmers, processors, distributors, retailers, millet cafés and agricultural produce market committee (APMC)s through focus group discussions and key informant interviews to examine supply chains and consumer behaviour. Among 60 consumers surveyed, the majority were male (71.67 %) and 53.33 % in the middle age group (31-50 years). Most respondents were married (80 %), lived in nuclear families (73.33 %) and engaged in agriculture (61.67 %). Health benefits emerged as the primary factor influencing purchase decisions (Garretts’mean score 41.79), followed by social media influence, relatives’ suggestions and doctors’ advice. Analysis of supply chains revealed two input channels and three marketing channels, with channel I (formal) preferred for finger millet due to assured minimum support price (MSP). The implementation of the Odisha millet mission (2017) strengthened community-based organisations (CBOs) like farmer producer organizations (FPOs), farmer producer companies (FPCs), farmers’ associations (FAs) involvement. Community based organisations (CBO) satisfaction was highest for market information (94.44 %) and technical skill promotion (92.22 %), but low for credit linkage (6.67 %) and transportation support (4.44 %). Overall, the findings indicate that finger millet marketing is dominated by formal channels, while consumer choices are driven by nutritional awareness, social influence and affordability.

References

  1. 1. Gowda NN, Siliveru K, Prasad PV, Bhatt Y, Netravati BP, Gurikar C. Modern processing of Indian millets: a perspective on changes in nutritional properties. Foods. 2022;11(4):499. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11040499
  2. 2. India Brand Equity Foundation (IBEF). Indian millets: global leadership [Internet]. New Delhi: IBEF; 2024 [cited 2025 Sep 12]. Available from: https://www.ibef.org/discover-india/indian-millets
  3. 3. Reddy R, Patel D. A study on consumers’ awareness and preference towards millets and its products in Vizianagaram District, Andhra Pradesh, India. Asian J Agric Ext Econ Sociol. 2023;41(6):9–16. https://doi.org/10.9734/AJAEES/2023/v41i61915
  4. 4. Prasanna. An empirical analysis of consumer behavior towards value-added products of millets in Bengaluru urban district [thesis]. Bengaluru: University of Agricultural Sciences; 2023. Available from: https://krishikosh.egranth.ac.in/items/a43d6717-4dc1-40d4-abf5-35eb62a75760
  5. 5. Vaswani L, Mathur A, Beniwal A, Saharan H. Market dynamics and consumer insights for value-added pearl millet products: empirical evidence from Rajasthan, India. Asian J Agric Ext Econ Sociol. 2024;42(10):91–100. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajaees/2024/v42i102565
  6. 6. Rao DB, Wali VS, Hashimoto N, Paithankar P, Chakrabarti K, Avinandan V, et al. Formative assessment: barriers and opportunities in improving consumption of millets in India [Internet]. Hyderabad: Nutri Hub, Indian Institute of Millets Research (IIMR); 2025 [cited 2026 Jan 5]. Available from: https://www.nutrihubiimr.com/_files/ugd/807889_68522bf07fd44ae49e02a3d768074510.pdf
  7. 7. Reddy AA, Raju SS, Suresh A, Kumar P. Analysis of pearl millet market structure and value chain in India. J Agribus Dev Emerg Econ. 2018;8(2):406–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/JADEE-02-2016-0007
  8. 8. Sangappa, Charishma E, Babu KS, Rafi D, Laxmi B. Strengthening millet value chain through farmer producer organizations. Indian J Ext Educ. 2023. Available from: https://doi.org/10.48165/IJEE.2023.59305
  9. 9. Kothari CR. Research methodology: methods and techniques. 2nd ed. New Delhi: New Age International Publishers; 2004.
  10. 10. Pathak H, Kiran KN, Gauraha AK. Consumer awareness and consumption pattern of millets and millet-based products in Raipur city, Chhattisgarh. Indian J Agric Econ. 2023;78(3):486–500. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.345233
  11. 11. Joshi J, Kumar SS, Rout RK, Rao PS. Millet processing: prospects for climate-smart agriculture and transition from food security to nutritional security. J Future Foods. 2025;5(5):470–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfutfo.2024.08.004
  12. 12. Sasirekha N, Kowsalya S, Rao BD. Revival of millets introduction in public distribution system-improving accessibility and consumption. J Res ANGRAU. 2025;53(1):135–42.
  13. 13. National Sample Survey Office (NSSO). Household consumption of various goods and services in India, 2011–12 [Internet]. New Delhi: Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India; 2014 [cited 2026 Jan 5]. Available from: https://microdata.gov.in/NADA/index.php/catalog/1
  14. 14. Singh S, Vemireddy V. Transitioning diets: a mixed methods study on factors affecting inclusion of millets in the urban population. BMC Public Health. 2023;23(1):2003. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16872-5
  15. 15. Kumar GS, Kulkarni M, Rathi N. Evolving food choices among the urban Indian middle-class: a qualitative study. Front Nutr. 2022;9:844413. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.844413
  16. 16. Shevkani K, Kaur R, Singh N, Hlanze DP. Colour, composition, digestibility, functionality and pasting properties of diverse kidney beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) flours. Curr Res Food Sci. 2022;5:619–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crfs.2022.03.006
  17. 17. Patil B, Kumar V, Merwade MN. Effect of inter row spacing and fertilizer levels on crop growth, seed yield and seed quality of perennial fodder sorghum cv. CoFS-29. Range Manag Agrofor. 2018;39(1):59–64.
  18. 18. Devi PB, Vijayabharathi R, Sathyabama S, Malleshi NG, Priyadarisini VB. Health benefits of finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.) polyphenols and dietary fiber: a review. J Food Sci Technol. 2014;51(6):1021–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-011-0584-9
  19. 19. Subhalakshmi K, Selvarani G, Velusamy R, Ramakrishnan K, Prabakaran K. Socio-economic determinants of awareness and utilization of millets and its value-added products among rural consumers in Madurai district, Tamil Nadu, India. J Exp Agric Int. 2024;46(8):682–92.
  20. 20. Kaur M, Banga G. Consumer awareness and behavioural trends in the adoption of millets and millet-based products. Arch Curr Res Int. 2025;25(3):135–44.
  21. 21. Keshari P, Kumari S. Millets consumption behaviour of urban adult population and its linkages: evidence from a community-based study. Indian J Prev Soc Med. 2025;56(1):24–30.
  22. 22. Birthal PS, Roy D, Negi DS. Enhancing farmers’ income through value chain development and market linkages: challenges and opportunities. Agric Econ Res Rev. 2017;30(1):1–12.
  23. 23. Bhushan H. Impact of government intervention in procurement of rice and wheat in Jammu region [doctoral dissertation]. Jammu: Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology; 2023. Available from: https://krishikosh.egranth.ac.in/server/api/core/bitstreams/96f1d420-1b64-4279-95f50ada6447002c/content
  24. 24. Nagaraja TE, Parveen SG, Aruna C, Hariprasanna K, Singh SP, Singh AK, et al. Millets and pseudocereals: a treasure for climate resilient agriculture ensuring food and nutrition security. Indian J Genet Plant Breed. 2024;84(1):1–37. https://doi.org/10.31742/ISGPB.84.1

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.