Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp1 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Effect of foliar nano urea plus combined with split nitrogen application on growth, physiological parameters and grain yield of finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.)

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.12244
Submitted
13 October 2025
Published
27-01-2026

Abstract

Nano-fertilizers are gaining attention as a sustainable strategy to optimize physiological performance and crop productivity. A field experiment was conducted during the summer and rabi seasons of 2024 at Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU), Coimbatore, to evaluate the effect of nano urea plus (NUP) on growth, physiological parameters and grain yield of transplanted finger millet. Twelve treatment combinations with varying nitrogen levels (recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) and organic sources) with foliar NUP (0.75 %) sprays at tillering and panicle-initiation stages were evaluated. Nitrogen fertilization integrated with NUP significantly enhanced crop vigour, canopy development and biomass accumulation. At the final growth stage, 100 % RDF + one NUP spray (T₁) improved plant height by 35 %, leaf area index (LAI) by 60 %, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) by 35 % and growth indices-crop growth rate (CGR), relative growth rate (RGR) and absolute growth rate (AGR)-by 50 % compared to the absolute control, contributing to superior physiological efficiency. The same treatment also produced the highest grain yield (2588 and 2555 kg ha-1) in both seasons. This performance was statistically comparable to 75 % RDF with two NUP sprays and 100 % RDF alone. These findings indicate that foliar application of NUP with optimal nitrogen application can strengthen nutrient-use efficiency and support sustainable nutrient management in finger millet production.   

 

References

  1. 1. Madhu B. Advances in renewable energy-based drying systems for food materials: a comprehensive review of innovations, smart integration and sustainability. J Food Process Eng. 2025;48(9):e70207. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpe.70207
  2. 2. Sood S, Joshi DC, Chandra AK, Kumar A. Phenomics and genomics of finger millet: current status and future prospects. Planta. 2019;250(3):731–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-019-03159-6
  3. 3. Kumudha A. Millet revolution in Tamil Nadu: ensuring a healthy future generation. Economics. 2024;12(2):7126. https://doi.org/10.3390/economics12107126
  4. 4. Aribam P, Shahane AA, Singh AK. Millet cultivation in North-east hill region of India: a review. Agric Rev. 2024;45(3):1–12. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-0547.2024.00001.0
  5. 5. Ravi SC, Umesh KB, Bellundagi V. An econometric analysis of resource use efficiency of finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.) production in Karnataka. Economic Affairs. 2017;62(3):495–501. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-4666.2017.00061.4
  6. 6. Skorupka M, Nosalewicz A. Ammonia volatilization from fertilizer urea—a new challenge for agriculture and industry in view of growing global demand for food and energy crops. Agriculture. 2021;11(9):822. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11090822
  7. 7. Shanmugavel D, Rusyn I, Solorza-Feria O, Kamaraj SK. Sustainable SMART fertilizers in agriculture systems: a review on fundamentals to in-field applications. Sci Total Environ. 2023;904:166729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166729
  8. 8. Li S, Liu X, Yin L, Wang S, Deng X. Alteration in lipid metabolism is involved in nitrogen deficiency response in wheat seedlings. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2024;214:108883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2023.11.011
  9. 9. Krasilnikov P, Taboada MA, Amanullah. Fertilizer use, soil health and agricultural sustainability. Agriculture. 2022;12(4):462. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12040462
  10. 10. Liu L, Zheng X, Wei X, Kai Z, Xu Y. Excessive application of chemical fertilizer and organophosphorus pesticides induced total phosphorus loss from planting causing surface water eutrophication. Sci Rep. 2021;11:23015. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-02454-9
  11. 11. Verma M, Loganathan VA. Hydrogeochemical constraints on uranium contamination of groundwater for drinking water supplies and associated health risks. Groundw Sustain Dev. 2023;23:100973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2023.100973
  12. 12. Dapkekar A, Deshpande P, Oak MD, Paknikar KM, Rajwade JM. Zinc use efficiency is enhanced in wheat through nanofertilization. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):6832. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25247-5
  13. 13. Babu S, Singh R, Yadav D, Rathore SS, Raj R, Avasthe R, et al. Nanofertilizers for agricultural and environmental sustainability. Chemosphere. 2022;287:133451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133451
  14. 14. Kihara J, Bolo P, Kinyua M, Rurinda J, Piikki K. Micronutrient deficiencies in African soils and the human nutritional nexus: opportunities with staple crops. Environ Geochem Health. 2020;42:3015–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-019-00467-0
  15. 15. Verma SK, Kumar M, Verma A, Roy S. Effect of foliar application of nano fertilizers on soil properties of rice (Oryza sativa L.) under Western UP, India. Int J Plant Soil Sci. 2024;36(9):973–79. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2024/v36i330537
  16. 16. Mahapatra A, Mohanty S, Nikhitha D, Khatua R. Effect of foliar application of nano urea on growth, yield and economics of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) in coastal Odisha. Int J Res Agron. 2025;8(5):213–15. https://doi.org/10.33545/2618060X.2025.v8.i5c.2911
  17. 17. Jha A, Pathania D, Sonu, Damathia B, Raizada P, Rustagi S, et al. Panorama of biogenic nano-fertilizers: a road to sustainable agriculture. Environ Res. 2023;235:116456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2023.116456
  18. 18. Raliya R, Saharan V, Dimkpa C, Biswas P. Nanofertilizer for precision and sustainable agriculture: current state and future perspectives. J Agric Food Chem. 2018;66(26):6487–503. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.8b02256
  19. 19. Jariwala H, Santos RM, Lauzon JD, Dutta A, Wai Chiang Y. Controlled release fertilizers (CRFs) for climate-smart agriculture: a comprehensive review on release mechanism, materials, methods of preparation and effect on environmental parameters. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2022;29(36):53967–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20890-y
  20. 20. Sikka R, Kalia A, Ahuja R, Sidhu SK, Chaitra P. Substitution of soil urea fertilization to foliar nano urea fertilization decreases growth and yield of rice and wheat. Plant Soil. 2025;512(1–2):1475–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-024-06355-x
  21. 21. Yadav A, Yadav K, Abd-Elsalam KA. Nanofertilizers: types, delivery and advantages in agricultural sustainability. Agrochemicals. 2023;2(2):296–336. https://doi.org/10.3390/agrochemicals2020019
  22. 22. Beig B, Niazi MB, Sher F, Jahan Z, Malik US, Khan MD, et al. Nanotechnology-based controlled release of sustainable fertilizers: a review. Environ Chem Lett. 2022;20:2709–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-022-01455-3
  23. 23. Subbiah BV, Asija GL. A rapid procedure for estimation of available nitrogen in soil. Curr Sci. 1956;25:259–60.
  24. 24. Olsen SR, Robertson S. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. US Dep Agric Circ. 1954.
  25. 25. Stanford G, English L. Use of the flame photometer in rapid soil tests for K and Ca. Agron J. 1949;41(9):446–7. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1949.00021962004100090012x
  26. 26. Jackson ML. Methods of chemical analysis. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice Hall; 1973.
  27. 27. Walkley A, Black IA. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 1934;37(1):29–38. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003
  28. 28. CPG. 2020. Crop production guide. Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore and Department of Agriculture, Government of Tamil Nadu, Chennai.
  29. 29. Purnima M, Rangasami SS, Pushpam R, Marimuthu S. Enhancing animal nutritional security through biofortification of fodder maize using nano urea plus and nano zinc oxide. Indian J Anim Res. 2025;59(11):1856–64. https://doi.org/10.18805/IJAR.B-5623
  30. 30. Palaniswamy KM, Gomez KA. Length–width method for estimating leaf area of rice. Agron J. 1974;66:430–3. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1974.00021962006600030027x
  31. 31. Radford PJ. Growth analysis formulae—their use and abuse. Crop Sci. 1967;7:171–5. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1967.0011183X000700030001x
  32. 32. Williams RF. The physiology of plant growth with special reference to the concept of net assimilation rate. Ann Bot. 1946;10:41–72. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42906970
  33. 33. Rajesh H, Yadahalli GS, Chittapur BM, Halepyati AS, Hiregoudar S. Growth, yield and economics of sweet corn (Zea mays L. saccharata) as influenced by foliar sprays of nano fertilisers. J Farm Sci. 2021;34(4):381–5. https://doi.org/10.61475/jfm.v34i04.157
  34. 34. Schjoerring JK, de Castro SA. Knowledge synthesis on foliar nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences; 2023.
  35. 35. Bhargavi G, Sundari A. Effect of nano urea on the growth and yield of rice (Oryza sativa) under SRI in the Cauvery delta zone of Tamil Nadu. Crop Res. 2023;58(1):12–7. https://doi.org/10.31830/2454-1761.2023.CR-885
  36. 36. Galloway JN, Leach AM, Bleeker A, Erisman JW. A chronology of human understanding of the nitrogen cycle. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013;368(1621):20130120. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0120
  37. 37. Samui S, Sagar L, Sankar T, Manohar A, Adhikary R, Maitra S, et al. Growth and productivity of rabi maize as influenced by foliar application of urea and nano urea. Crop Res. 2022;57(3):136–40. https://doi.org/10.31830/2454-1761.2022.019
  38. 38. Sharma SK, Sharma PK, Mandeewal RL, Sharma V, Chaudhary R, Pandey R, et al. Effect of foliar application of nano urea under different nitrogen levels on growth and nutrient content of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.). Int J Plant Soil Sci. 2022;34(20):149–55. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2022/v34i2031138
  39. 39. Ojha A, Singh R, Sinha J. Effect of nano urea and foliar spray of urea on growth and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Int J Environ Clim Change. 2023;13(11):474–81. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i330537
  40. 40. Amanullah, Ullah H, Soliman Elshikh M, Alwahibi MS, Alkahtani J, Muhammad A, et al. Nitrogen contents in soil, grains and straw of hybrid rice differ when applied with different organic nitrogen sources. Agriculture. 2020;10(9):386. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10090386
  41. 41. Pal RK, Maurya DK, Kumar S, Singh R. Assessing the influence of nano urea on the growth and yield of irrigated wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) crop. Int J Environ Clim Change. 2023;13(12):843–51. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i330537
  42. 42. Srivastava A, Singh R. Effect of nitrogen and foliar spray of urea and nano urea on growth and yield of rabi maize (Zea mays L.). Int J Plant Soil Sci. 2023;35(18):2037–44. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2023/v35i330537
  43. 43. Sahu TK, Kumar M, Kumar N, Chandrakar T, Singh DP. Effect of nano urea application on growth and productivity of rice (Oryza sativa L.) under midland situation of Bastar region. Pharma Innov J. 2022;11(6):185–7. https://doi.org/10.22271/tpi.2022.v11.i6c.12912
  44. 44. Leghari AH, Laghari GM, Ansari MA, Mirjat MA, Laghari UA, Leghari SJ, et al. Effect of NPK and boron on growth and yield of wheat variety TJ-83 at Tandojam soil. Adv Environ Biol. 2016;10(10):209–16. https://doi.org/10.9734/aeb/2016/31179
  45. 45. Shree K, Augustine R, Manuel IR, Balaganesh B, Kumar D. Effect of soil and foliar applications on growth and productivity of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.). Asian J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2024;10(2):236–41. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajsspn/2024/v10i230157
  46. 46. Reddy KS, Shivay YS, Kumar D, Pooniya V, Prasanna R, Shrivastava M, et al. Relative performance of urea and nano urea in conjunction with zinc fertilization on growth, productivity and nitrogen use efficiency in spring wheat. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2024;24:3593–609. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2024.05.0201
  47. 47. Manikandan A, Subramanian K. Evaluation of zeolite-based nitrogen nano-fertilizers on maize growth, yield and quality on inceptisols and alfisols. Int J Plant Soil Sci. 2016;9(4):1–9. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2016/22103
  48. 48. Mandal A, Singh T, Sarkar A, Dass A, Parihar CM, Chaudhary M, et al. Effect of nano urea and irrigation regimes on growth parameters of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Indian J Agron. 2024;69(2):228–32. https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v69i2.5514
  49. 49. Upadhyay PK, Dey A, Singh VK, Dwivedi BS, Singh T, Rajanna GA , et al. Conjoint application of nano urea with conventional fertilizers: an energy efficient and environmentally robust approach for sustainable crop production. PLoS One. 2023;18(7):e0284009. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284009
  50. 50. Azam K, Singh AK, Nand V, Sahbaz M. Economic viability of conventional and nano urea on different crop establishment methods of rice (Oryza sativa L.): a cost and benefits analysis. Ecol Environ Conserv. 2025;31:113–22. https://doi.org/10.53550/EEC.2025.v31i05s.016
  51. 51. Pruthviraj N, Jayadeva HM, Pushpa K, Geetha KN, Prakash SS, Shankar AG. Impact of different methods of nano fertilizers application on soil chemical properties and fertility status in sunflower growing soils. Mysore J Agric Sci. 2022;56(1):275–84.
  52. 52. Sannathimmappa HG, Patil M, Channagouda RF, Patil C. Effect of nano nitrogen and nano zinc nutrition on growth and yield of irrigated maize in southern transition zone of Karnataka. Pharma Innov J. 2023;12(1):1706–9.
  53. 53. Arya GR, Manivannan V, Marimuthu S, Sritharan N. Effect of foliar application of nano urea on yield attributes and yield of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.). Int J Plant Soil Sci. 2022;34(21):502–7. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2022/v34i2131293

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.