Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp1 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Deltamethrin residue dissipation dynamics, consumer safety evaluation and dietary risk assessment in cowpea and soil

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.12321
Submitted
17 October 2025
Published
08-04-2026

Abstract

Deltamethrin is a widely used synthetic pyrethroid insecticide for controlling cowpea pod borers; however, its persistence in crops and soil may raise environmental and food safety concerns. In this study, deltamethrin residues in cowpea pods, leaves and soil were quantified using gas chromatography to evaluate their persistence under field conditions. The half-life of deltamethrin in cowpea pods ranged from 1.73 days at the recommended dose (RD) to 3.15 days at the double dose (DD). Similarly, the half-life ranged from 1.65–1.51 days in leaves and 1.86–1.71 days in soil for RD and DD, respectively. Dietary risk assessment indicated that residue levels in pods exceeded the maximum permissible intake (MPI) of 0.60 mg person-1 day-1 on some sampling days. However, due to rapid degradation and short persistence, deltamethrin can be considered relatively safe when applied at RDs in the cowpea ecosystem.

 

References

  1. 1. Ragab DM, Babiker EE, Eltinay AH. Fractionation, solubility and functional properties of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) proteins as affected by pH and/or salt concentration. Food Chem. 2004;84(2):207–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(03)00203-6
  2. 2. Jayathilake C, Visvanathan R, Deen A, Bangamuwage R, Jayawardana BC, Nammi S, et al. Cowpea: An overview on its nutritional facts and health benefits. J Sci Food Agric. 2018;98(13):4793–806. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.9074
  3. 3. Narayan P, Kumar S. Constraints of growth in area production and productivity of pulses in India: An analytical approach to major pulses. Indian J Agric Res. 2015;49(2):114–24. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-058X.2015.00017.7
  4. 4. Agunbiade TA, Coates BS, Datinon B, Djouaka R, Sun W, Tamo M, et al. Genetic differentiation among Maruca vitrata F. (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) populations on cultivated cowpea and wild host plants: Implications for insect resistance management and biological control strategies. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e92072. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092072
  5. 5. Divekar PA, Halder J, Srivastava K, Sridhar V. Emerging insect pests of vegetable crops under changing climate scenario. Veg Sci. 2024;51:66–76. https://doi.org/10.61180/vegsci.2024.v51.spl.07
  6. 6. Divekar P, Kumar P, Suby SB. Oviposition preference of pink stem borer, Sesamia inferens (Walker) in maize germplasm. J Entomol Zool Stud. 2019;7:1115–9.
  7. 7. Divekar PA, Kumar P, Suby S, Sharma RK, Soumia PS, Pandi G. Screening of maize germplasm for resistance against shoot fly. Indian J Entomol. 2018;80(4):1601–6. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-8172.2018.00260.2
  8. 8. Divekar PA, Mishra A, Singh AK. Plant secondary metabolites for defense against herbivores. In: Plant specialised metabolites: Phytochemistry, ecology and biotechnology. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland; 2025. p.605–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51158-5_24
  9. 9. Divekar PA, Majumder S, Halder J, Kedar SC, Singh V. Sustainable pest management in cabbage using botanicals: Characterisation, effectiveness and economic appraisal. J Plant Dis Prot. 2024;131(1):113–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41348-023-00812-x
  10. 10. Divekar P, Majumder S, Halder J, Dukare A, Singh J. Trilogy: Plants-proteases-insects. In: Plant protection: Present developments and future strategies. 2022. p.143–57.
  11. 11. Divekar PA, Rani V, Majumder S, Karkute SG, Molla KA, Pandey KK, et al. Protease inhibitors: An induced plant defense mechanism against herbivores. J Plant Growth Regul. 2023;42(10):6057–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-022-10767-2
  12. 12. Sreekanth M, Lakshmi MSM, Rao YK. Efficacy and economics of certain new generation novel insecticides against legume pod borer, Maruca vitrata (Geyer) on pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.). J Appl Biol Biotechnol. 2015;3(3):007–010. https://doi.org/10.7324/JABB.2015.3302
  13. 13. Kodandaram MH, Divekar PA, Wangi N, Mohite NR, Rai AB. Optimising sucking pest control in okra: An analysis of flupyradifurone 200 SL effectiveness, phytotoxicity, safety to natural enemies, pollinators and cost-efficiency. J Plant Dis Prot. 2024;131(3):757–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41348-024-00885-2
  14. 14. Yule S, Srinivasan R. Evaluation of bio-pesticides against legume pod borer, Maruca vitrata Fabricius (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), in laboratory and field conditions in Thailand. J Asia Pac Entomol. 2013;16(4):357–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aspen.2013.05.001
  15. 15. Divekar PA, Patel SK, Manimurugan C, Singh V, Singh J. Spinetoram, a selective novel insecticide able to check key lepidopteran pests in cabbage ecosystem. Pak J Zool. 2024;56(2):743–52 https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/20220724130756
  16. 16. Divekar PA, Singh K, Verma CK, Rai AB, Singh B, Yadav S, et al. Assessment of bee flora and development of a floral calendar in relation to pharmaceutical potential of honey and bee pollen in Eastern Uttar Pradesh, India. Ann Phytomed. 2023;12(1):844–55. https://doi.org/10.54085/ap.2023.12.1.55
  17. 17. Divekar PA, Mishra A, Kumar R. Bee pollination in vegetables: Current status, challenges and prospects. Circ Agric Syst. 2024;4(1). https://doi.org/10.48130/cas-0024-0015
  18. 18. Grigolli JFJ, Lourenção ALF, Ávila CJ. Field efficacy of chemical pesticides against Maruca vitrata Fabricius (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) infesting soybean in Brazil. Am J Plant Sci. 2015;6(4):537. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2015.64058
  19. 19. Mahalle RM, Taggar GK. Insecticides against Maruca vitrata (Fabricius) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) on pigeonpea. Pestic Res J. 2018;30(2):235–40. https://doi.org/10.5958/2249-524X.2018.00037.7
  20. 20. Central Insecticides Board & Registration Committee (CIBRC). Major uses of pesticides (insecticides) as on 01.06.2023. https://ppqs.gov.in/sites/default/files/1._major_use_of_pesticides_insecticides_as_on_01.06.2023.pdf
  21. 21. National Pesticide Information Center. Deltamethrin general fact sheet. http://npic.orst.edu/factsheets/DeltaGen.html
  22. 22. Jiries AG, Al Nasir FM, Beese F. Pesticide and heavy metals residues in wastewater, soil and plants at a wastewater disposal site near Al-Lajoun Valley, Karak, Jordan. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2002;133:97–07. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012923832506
  23. 23. Yu Y, Zhou QX. Adsorption characteristics of pesticides methamidophos and glyphosate by two soils. Chemosphere. 2005;58(6):811–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.08.064
  24. 24. Majumder S, Verma CK, Rani V, Rani AT, Pandey KK, Singh J. Residue dynamics and food safety evaluation of fungicide kresoxim-methyl in green chilli (Capsicum annuum L.). Int J Environ Anal Chem. 2022;102(19):7433–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/03067319.2020.1830986
  25. 25. Majumder S, Singh P, Pandey J, Abhinay A, Sharma S, Divekar PA, et al. Residue dissipation kinetics, safety evaluation and decontamination of deltamethrin in tomato and soil. Trends Hortic. 2024;7(1):3985. https://doi.org/10.24294/th.v7i1.3985
  26. 26. Majumder S, Pandey J, Divekar PA, Ali EO, Pandey KK, Behera TK. Dissipation kinetics, food safety evaluation and decontamination of chlorantraniliprole in cowpea. J Environ Sci Health B. 2023;58(5):389–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601234.2023.2216125
  27. 27. Paul A, Khan Z, Bhattacharyya A, Majumder S, Banerjee K. Multiclass pesticide residue analysis in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) using high performance liquid chromatography–high resolution (Orbitrap) mass spectrometry: a simultaneous screening and quantitative method. J Chromatogr A. 2021;1648:462208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2021.462208
  28. 28. Majumder S, Singh S, Divekar PA, Pandey KK, Behera TK. Residue dissipation kinetics, safety evaluation and decontamination of hexaconazole in green chilli. Int J Environ Anal Chem. 2022;1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/03067319.2022.2078201
  29. 29. European Commission Directorate-General for Health and Food Safety (SANTE). Guidance document SANTE/11312/2021: Analytical quality control and method validation procedures for pesticide residues analysis in food and feed. 2021.
  30. 30. Hingmire S, Oulkar DP, Utture SC, Shabeer TA, Banerjee K. Residue analysis of fipronil and difenoconazole in okra by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry and their food safety evaluation. Food Chem. 2015;176:145–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.12.049
  31. 31. Abdallah O, El Agamy M, Abdelraheem E, Malhat F. Buprofezin dissipation and safety assessment in open-field cabbage and cauliflower using GC/ITMS employing an analyte protectant. Biomed Chromatogr. 2019;33(6):e4492. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmc.4492
  32. 32. Saha S, Mondal R, Mukherjee S, Sarkar M, Kole RK. Persistence of acetamiprid in paddy and soil under West Bengal agro-climatic conditions. Environ Monit Assess. 2017;189:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-5871-0
  33. 33. Singh SB, Kulshrestha G. Residues of thiamethoxam and acetamiprid, two neonicotinoid insecticides, in/on okra fruits (Abelmoschus esculentus L.). Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2005;75(5):945–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-005-0841-6
  34. 34. Pramanik SK, Bhattacharyya J, Dutta S, Dey PK, Bhattacharyya A. Persistence of acetamiprid in/on mustard (Brassica juncea L.). Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2006;76(2):356–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-006-0929-7
  35. 35. Gupta M, Shanker A. Persistence of acetamiprid in tea and its transfer from made tea to infusion. Food Chem. 2008;111(4):805–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.04.046
  36. 36. Wu J, Wang K, Zhang H. Dissipation and residue of acetamiprid in watermelon and soil in the open field. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2012;89:644–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-012-0733-5
  37. 37. Fu D, Zhang S, Wang M, Liang X, Xie Y, Zhang Y, et al. Dissipation behavior, residue distribution and dietary risk assessment of cyromazine, acetamiprid and their mixture in cowpea and cowpea field soil. J Agric Food Chem. 2020;68(12):4540–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.10495
  38. 38. Sanyal D, Chakma D, Alam S. Persistence of a neonicotinoid insecticide, acetamiprid on chili (Capsicum annuum L.). Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2008;81:365–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-008-9479-5
  39. 39. Yu XY, Mu CL, Gu C, Liu C, Liu XJ. Impact of woodchip biochar amendment on the sorption and dissipation of pesticide acetamiprid in agricultural soils. Chemosphere. 2011;85(8):1284–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.07.031
  40. 40. European Communities. Technical guidance document on risk assessment in support of Commission Directive 93/67/EEC, Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94, and Directive 98/8/EC. Part II: Environmental risk assessment. 2nd ed. 2003. https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/16960216/tgdpart2_2ed_en.pdf
  41. 41. Li Y, Zhang K, Chen J, Zhang L, Feng F, Cheng J, et al. Rhizosphere bacteria help to compensate for pesticide-induced stress in plants. Environ Sci Technol. 2024;58(28):12542–53. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c04196
  42. 42. Liu H, Ciric L, Bhatti M. Phytoremediation of organic pollution using leguminous plants and auxiliary additives: principles and advantages. Chem Biol Technol Agric. 2025;12(1):98. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-025-00797-9
  43. 43. Donna M, Pigna G, Scapino M, Colombatto P, Varetto P, Blandino M. Pesticide application management for the cultivation of soybean and chickpea for food supply chains with zero residues. J Agric Food Res. 2025;19:101567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101567
  44. 44. University of Hertfordshire, Agriculture & Environment Research Unit (AERU). Pesticide Properties Database. Hatfield (UK): University of Hertfordshire;2017. https://sitem.herts.ac.uk/aeru/ppdb/en/

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.