Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Review Articles

Vol. 12 No. sp4 (2025): Recent Advances in Agriculture by Young Minds - III

Unveiling the global nexus of organic farming in horticulture: A bibliometric insight into research trends, thematic evolution and global collaboration

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.12357
Submitted
19 October 2025
Published
24-12-2025

Abstract

Organic farming in horticulture has emerged as a vital component of sustainable agricultural transformation, integrating ecological principles with production efficiency and food quality. This study provides a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of global research trends, thematic evolution and collaborative networks in organic horticulture from 2001 to 2024 based on data extracted from the Scopus database. Employing R–Bibliometrix and VOSviewer, a total of 3190 publications were analysed to identify prolific authors, institutions, countries and evolving research themes. Results revealed a consistent annual growth rate of approximately 11.67 %, with major contributions from the United States, Italy, the Netherlands, Brazil and Spain. Thematic analysis identified “organic production,” “fruit quality,” and “compost” as motor themes, while “sustainability,” “agroecology,” and “soil fertility” represented foundational domains. Keyword evolution indicated a shift from input optimisation and yield studies toward holistic sustainability, biodiversity and climate-resilient systems. Collaboration networks showed strong regional clustering in Europe and North America, though global participation remains uneven. Highly cited works focused on soil ecology, nutrient cycling and quality differentiation, highlighting enduring scientific priorities. The findings underscore organic horticultures’ interdisciplinary nature and its growing role in achieving ecological balance, food safety and climate adaptation. Strengthened international collaboration, particularly across the Global South and the integration of emerging technologies are crucial for equitable and resilient organic production systems worldwide.

References

  1. 1. Knapp J, Sciarretta A. Agroecology: protecting, restoring and promoting biodiversity. BMC Ecol Evol. 2023;4(1):29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862–023–02140–y
  2. 2. Reganold JP, Wachter JM. Organic agriculture in the twenty–first century. Nat Plants. 2016;2:15221. https://doi.org/10.1038/nplants.2015.221
  3. 3. Willer H, Lernoud J. The world of organic agriculture: statistics and emerging trends 2019. Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL) & IFOAM - Organics International; 2019.
  4. 4. Scialabba NE-H, Hattam C. Organic agriculture, environment and food security. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO); 2002.
  5. 5. Lumpkin H. Organic horticulture: the science and practice of growing fruit and vegetables organically. Horticult Rev. 2014;42:1–44.
  6. 6. Mäder P, Fließbach A, Dubois D, Gunst L, Fried P, Niggli U. Soil fertility and biodiversity in organic farming. Science. 2002;296(5573):1694–7. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1071148
  7. 7. Niggli U, Fließbach A, Hepperly P, Scialabba N. Low greenhouse gas agriculture: mitigation and adaptation potential of sustainable farming systems. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO); 2017.
  8. 8. Lori M, Symnaczik S, Mäder P, Deyn GD, Gattinger A. Organic farming enhances soil microbial abundance and activity-a meta-analysis and meta-regression. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(7):e0180442. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180442
  9. 9. Rembiałkowska E. Quality of plant products from organic agriculture. J Sci Food Agric. 2007;87(15):2757–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.3000
  10. 10. Migliorini P, Wezel A. Converging and diverging principles and practices of organic agriculture regulations and agroecology: a review. Agron Sustain Dev. 2017;37(6):63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593–017–0472–4
  11. 11. Fess TL, Kotcon JB, Benedito VA. Crop breeding for low input agriculture: a sustainable response to feed a growing world population. Sustainability. 2011;3(10):1742–72. https://doi.org/10.3390/su3101742
  12. 12. Catarino R, Guerreiro J, Godinho C. Mapping research on organic farming: a bibliometric review. Sustainability. 2020;12(19):7972.
  13. 13. Sharma R, Singh R, Duhan A. Global trends in organic agriculture research: a bibliometric analysis. Environ Dev Sustain. 2022;24:13209–33.
  14. 14. Zhao J, Ji Q, Li Y. Knowledge mapping of organic agriculture research: a scientometric analysis. Sustainability. 2019;11(6):1583. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11236648
  15. 15. Aria M, Cuccurullo C. Bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J Informetrics. 2017;11(4):959–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
  16. 16. Donthu N, Kumar S, Mukherjee D, Pandey N, Lim WM. How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: an overview and guidelines. J Bus Res. 2021;133:285–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
  17. 17. Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA, Pappas G. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J. 2008;22(2):338–42. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07–9492LSF
  18. 18. Wang J, Zheng T, Wang Q, Xu B, Wang L. A bibliometric review of research trends on bioelectrochemical systems. Curr Sci. 2015;109(12):2204–11. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v109/i12/2204–2211
  19. 19. Alsharif AH, Salleh NZM, Baharun R, Hashem EAR, Mansor AA, Ali J, et al. Neuroimaging techniques in advertising research: main applications, development and brain regions and processes. Sustainability. 2021;13(11):6488. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116488
  20. 20. D'Angelo CA, van Eck NJ. Collecting large–scale publication data at the level of individual researchers: a practical proposal for author name disambiguation. Scientometrics. 2020;123(2):883–907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192–020–03410–y
  21. 21. Van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics. 2010;84(2):523–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192–009–0146–3
  22. 22. Jayaraman S, Dang YP, Naorem A, Page KL, Dalal RC. Conservation agriculture as a system to enhance ecosystem services. Agriculture. 2021;11:718. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11080718
  23. 23. Bathaei D, Štreimikiene D. A systematic review of agricultural sustainability indicators. Agriculture. 2023;13(2):241. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13020241
  24. 24. Amorim VL, Silva PJD, Sobral A. Food processing: an overview on links between safety, security, supply chains and Nova classification. Clean Circ Bioeconomy. 2023;5:100047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clcb.2023.100047
  25. 25. Linderhof V, de Lange T, Reinhard S. The dilemmas of water quality and food security interactions in low-and middle-income countries. Front Water. 2021;3:736760. https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2021.736760
  26. 26. Andrews SS, Mitchell JP, Mancinelli R, Karlen DL, Hartz TK, Horwath WR, et al. A comparison of soil quality indexing methods for vegetable production systems in Northern California. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2002;90(1):25–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167–8809(01)00174–8
  27. 27. Di HJ, Cameron KC. Nitrate leaching in temperate agroecosystems: sources, factors and mitigating strategies. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst. 2002;64(3):237–56. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021471531188
  28. 28. Bowles TM, Acosta-Martínez V, Calderón F, Jackson LE. Soil enzyme activities, microbial communities and carbon and nitrogen availability in organic agroecosystems across an intensively managed agricultural landscape. Soil Biol Biochem. 2014;68:252–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.10.004

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.