Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. sp4 (2025): Recent Advances in Agriculture by Young Minds - III

Re-evaluating the effect of sulphur fertilization on yield and nutrient uptake in a groundnut-blackgram cropping sequence

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.12493
Submitted
30 October 2025
Published
30-12-2025

Abstract

Comprehensive information on the direct and residual effects of elemental sulphur fertilization on yield and nutrient uptake in sequential legume-based cropping systems, particularly the groundnut–blackgram sequence, remains limited, despite growing evidence of widespread sulphur deficiency and its critical role in crop productivity. The present study was conducted to evaluate the direct and residual effects of sulphur on yield and nutrient uptake in a groundnut-blackgram cropping sequence through a pot culture experiment at the Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU), Coimbatore, in 2021. The experiment was laid out in a completely randomized design (CRD) with six levels of sulphur and three sulphur-oxidizing bacteria (SOB) treatments, each replicated four times. Elemental sulphur was applied at 0, 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60 kg S ha-1 and SOB was applied at three levels-no application, seed treatment and soil application. The results revealed that the application of 60 kg ha-1 sulphur as elemental sulphur combined with soil application of SOB at 2 kg ha-1 significantly enhanced seed yield, nutrient content and nutrient uptake in both crops for direct and residual effects and was on par with S at 40 kg ha-1 . The experiment investigated an alternative source of sulphur nutrition that could reduce sole reliance on gypsum as a sulphur source. A residual notable impact was observed, suggesting that additional sulphur application may be unnecessary for the succeeding crop.

References

  1. 1. Zenda T, Liu S, Dong A, Duan H. Revisiting sulphur-the once neglected nutrient: its roles in plant growth, metabolism, stress tolerance and crop production. Agriculture. 2021;11:626. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11070626
  2. 2. Becana M, Wienkoop S, Matamoros MA. Sulphur transport and metabolism in legume root nodules. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:1434. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01434
  3. 3. Singh KS R, Choudhary MS, O’Neill C, Dhaliwal JS. Revisiting the role of sulphur in crop production: a narrative review. J Agric Food Res. 2024;15:101013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101013
  4. 4. Singh SP, Kumar Y, Singh S. Effect of sources and levels of sulphur on yield, quality and uptake of nutrients in green gram (Vigna radiata). Ann Plant Soil Res. 2017;19(2):143–7.
  5. 5. Godebo T, Laekemariam F, Loha G. Nutrient uptake, use efficiency and productivity of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) as affected by nitrogen and potassium fertilizer in Keddida Gamela Woreda, Southern Ethiopia. Environ Syst Res. 2021;10(12):1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40068-020-00210-4
  6. 6. Williams CH, Steinbergs A. Soil sulphur fractions as chemical indices of available sulphur in some Australian soils. Aust J Agric Res. 1959;10(3): 340–52. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9590340
  7. 7. Ravikumar C, Ariraman R, Ganapathy M, Karthikeyan A. Effect of different sources and levels of sulphur on growth and nutrient uptake of irrigated summer groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) cv. VRI-2 in loamy soils. Plant Arch. 2020;20(1):1947–52.
  8. 8. Solanki DM, Jat JR, Priyanka P, Patel DM, Chauhan KJ. Effect of organic manures, phosphorus and sulphur on growth, yield attributes and yield of summer groundnut in loamy sand. Pharma Innov J. 2023;12(12):1472–6.
  9. 9. Kamal A, Dhaka K, Anjali R. Effect of sulphur application in oilseed crops: a review. Agric Rev. 2024;46(5):748–56. https://doi.org/10.18805/ag.R-2696
  10. 10. Yadav N, Yadav SS, Yadav N, Yadav MR, Kumar R, Yadav LR, et al. Sulphur management in groundnut for higher productivity and profitability under semi-arid condition of Rajasthan, India. Legume Res. 2019;42(4):512–7. https://doi.org/10.18805/LR-3986
  11. 11. Pandey M, Pandey AC. Study of sulphur and phosphorus application on physical characteristics of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) for sustainable oilseed production in Indo-Gangetic plains of eastern Uttar Pradesh. Int J Agric Sci. 2019;15(1):25–31. https://doi.org/10.15740/HAS/IJAS/15.1/25-31
  12. 12. Kolapea SS, Patil AM, Tathe AS. Effect of application of elemental sulphur incubated with different organic amendments on yield and quality of groundnut in sulphur-deficient Inceptisol soil. Asian J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2024;10(3):289–96. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajsspn/2024/v10i3339
  13. 13. Basumatary A, Shangne JJ, Das KN, Bhattacharyya D. Impact of sulphur fertilization on distribution of sulphur fractions and use efficiency in blackgram in subtropical acidic soil of Assam, India. J Plant Nutr. 2018;41(11):1436–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2018.1457683
  14. 14. Beg MZ, Sohrab A, Srivastava DK. Effects of phosphorus on yield and grain protein content of two important Indian pulses. Indian J Life Sci. 2013;2(2):43–8.
  15. 15. Kour S, Arora S, Jalali VK, Bali AS, Gupta M. Direct and residual effect of sulphur fertilization on yield, uptake and use efficiency in Indian mustard and succeeding rice crop. J Plant Nutr. 2014;37(14):2291–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2014.920389
  16. 16. Singh YP, Singh R. Interaction effect of sulphur and phosphorus on growth and nutrient content of blackgram (Phaseolus mungo L.). J Indian Soc Soil Sci. 2004;52(3):266–9.
  17. 17. Saiborne IB, Lenka NK. Effect of sulphur on uptake of major plant nutrients in rapeseed in soils of NEH region of India. Ann Agric Res (New Ser). 2014;35(3):280–4.
  18. 18. Jia H, Chen C, Wang Q, Wei W, Guo J, Ren X, et al. Effects of different forms of sulphur on plant growth and soil properties in cadmium contaminated soils. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2024;24:2706–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-024-01695-z
  19. 19. Anandham R, Gandhi PI, SenthilKumar M, Sridar R, Nalayini P, Sa TM. Sulphur-oxidizing bacteria: a novel bioinoculant for sulphur nutrition and crop production. In: Maheshwari D, editor. Bacteria in agrobiology: plant nutrient management. Berlin: Springer; 2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21061-7_5
  20. 20. Ranadev P, Revanna A, Bagyaraj DJ, Shinde AH. Sulphur oxidizing bacteria in agroecosystems and its role in plant productivity: a review. J Appl Microbiol. 2023;134(8):161. https://doi.org/10.1093/jambio/lxad161
  21. 21. Joshi N, Gothalwal R, Singh M, Dave K. Novel sulphur-oxidizing bacteria consummate sulphur deficiency in oilseed crop. Arch Microbiol. 2021;203(1):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-020-02009-4

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.