Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Early Access

Effect of biostimulants on soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) tolerance to hydrothermal stress under organic farming in Ukraine

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.12525
Submitted
31 October 2025
Published
14-04-2026

Abstract

Climate change-induced drought and extreme temperatures pose major challenges to global soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) production. Therefore, sustainable strategies to mitigate hydrothermal stress are crucial, particularly in organic farming systems. A field experiment (2022–2024) was conducted in Ukraine to assess the effects of biostimulants on soybean yield under contrasting hydrothermal conditions. The tested biostimulants contained arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) Glomus intraradices (MycoFix), nitrogen-fixing rhizobia Bradyrhizobium japonicum (Anderis) and phytohormonal metabolites from Streptomyces violaceus (Violar). Biostimulant effectiveness was assessed by abscisic acid (ABA) and relative water content (RWC), stomatal resistance (Rs) and yield of organic soybean cv. Adamos. The experimental design included 5 treatments from an untreated control to a combination of 3 biostimulants. Integrated application of MycoFix + Anderis + Violar reduced stress induced ABA accumulation by 35.8–40.0 % vs. the control. This effect was associated with improved plant water status, reflected in higher RWC (94.8–97.2 % vs. 73.2–77.6 %) and lower Rs (1.87–2.39 vs. 3.04–4.53 s×m2/mol), resulting in a 40.6–58.9 % increase in seed yield (3.21–3.82 vs. 2.02–2.63 t/ha). Correlation analysis showed strong relationships between ABA and Rs (r=0.970), ABA and RWC (r=-0.871) and RWC and yield (r=0.992), confirming the integration of hormonal, physiological and agronomic responses. Principal component analysis (PCA) showed that biostimulant treatments explained 93.6 % of total variance, far exceeding temporal climatic variation (4.4 %) and confirming their role in plant adaptation. These findings highlight the potential of multi-component biostimulant systems to improve soybean stress tolerance in organic farming under climate change.

References

  1. 1. Poudel S, Vennam RR, Shrestha A, Reddy KR, Wijewardane NK, Reddy KN, et al. Resilience of soybean cultivars to drought stress during flowering and early-seed setting stages. Sci Rep. 2023;13:1277. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28354-0
  2. 2. Chaika T, Korotkova I, Shevnikov M, Liashenko V, Horbenko O. Physiological and biochemical aspects of pre-sowing treatment of soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) seeds. Sci Rep Natl Univ Life Environ Sci Ukraine. 2025;21(2):106–19. https://doi.org/10.31548/dopovidi/2.2025.106
  3. 3. Vishwakarma K, Upadhyay N, Kumar N, Yadav G, Singh J, Mishra RK, et al. Abscisic acid signaling and abiotic stress tolerance in plants: A review on current knowledge and future prospects. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:161. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00161
  4. 4. Das S, Shil S, Rime J, Alice AK, Yumkhaibam T, Mounika V, et al. Phytohormonal signaling in plant resilience: Advances and strategies for enhancing abiotic stress tolerance. Plant Growth Regul. 2025;105:329–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-025-01279-6
  5. 5. Danquah A, de Zelicourt A, Colcombet J, Hirt H. The role of ABA and MAPK signaling pathways in plant abiotic stress responses. Biotechnol Adv. 2014;32:40–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.09.006
  6. 6. Awan FK, Khurshid MY, Mehmood A. Plant growth regulators and their role in abiotic stress management. Int J Innov Biosci Res. 2017;1:9–21.
  7. 7. Peleg Z, Blumwald E. Hormone balance and abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2011;14:290–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2011.02.001
  8. 8. Iozia LM, Varone L. Short range shifts in plant physiological responses to induced water stress: Experimental evidence of intraspecific trait variability differentiating neighbouring Mediterranean plant populations. Plant Stress. 2024;13:100556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stress.2024.100556
  9. 9. He M, He CQ, Ding NZ. Abiotic stresses: General defenses of land plants and chances for engineering multistress tolerance. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:1771. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01771
  10. 10. Lee SB, Suh MC. Advances in the understanding of cuticular waxes in Arabidopsis thaliana and crop species. Plant Cell Rep. 2015;34:557–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-015-1772-2
  11. 11. Abhilasha A, Choudhury SR. Molecular and physiological perspectives of abscisic acid mediated drought adjustment strategies. Plants (Basel). 2021;10(12):2769. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10122769
  12. 12. Cutler SR, Rodriguez PL, Finkelstein RR, Abrams SR. Abscisic acid: Emergence of a core signaling network. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2010;61:651–79. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112122
  13. 13. Mathivanan S. Abiotic stress-induced molecular and physiological changes and adaptive mechanisms in plants. In: Fahad S, Saud S, Chen Y, Wu C, Wang D, editors. Abiotic stress in plants. London (UK): IntechOpen; 2021. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.93367
  14. 14. Zhang Z, Chai X, Zhang B, Lu Y, Gao Y, Tariq A, et al. Potential role of root-associated bacterial communities in adjustments of desert plant physiology to osmotic stress. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2023;204:108124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2023.108124
  15. 15. Wang B, Luo Y, Zhong B, Xu H, Wang F, Li W, et al. The abscisic acid signaling negative regulator OsPP2C68 confers drought and salinity tolerance to rice. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):6730. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-91226-2
  16. 16. Hungria M, Nogueira MA, Araujo RS. Soybean seed co-inoculation with Bradyrhizobium spp. and Azospirillum brasilense: A new biotechnological tool to improve yield and sustainability. Am J Plant Sci. 2015;6:811–17. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2015.66087
  17. 17. Smith SE, Read DJ. Mycorrhizal symbiosis. 3rd ed. London: Academic Press; 2008. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2008.0015br
  18. 18. Aremu AO, Masondo NA, Rengasamy KRR, Amoo SO, Gruz J, Bíba O, et al. Physiological role of phenolic biostimulants isolated from brown seaweed Ecklonia maxima on plant growth and development. Planta. 2015;241(6):1313–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-015-2256-x
  19. 19. Sharma H, Chaudhary R, Poonam, Kalia M, Thakur K, Nautiyal S, et al. A sustainable agriculture method using biofertilizers: An eco-friendly approach. Plant Sci Today. 2024;11(3):347–59. https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.3094
  20. 20. Bhavithra R, Sivamurugan AP, Raju M, Suganthi A, Bharathi C. Biostimulant for sustainable pulse production – A review. Plant Sci Today. 2025;12(3):1–14. https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.9336
  21. 21. Kaviya T, Ramah K, Sakthivel N, Sivasakthivelan P, Senthilvalavan P. Impact of biostimulants on crop growth and soil health – A review. Plant Sci Today. 2025;12(sp1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.8499
  22. 22. Korotkova I, Chaika T, Romashko T, Rybalchenko A. Photosynthetic pigments content in emmer wheat plants as criteria of productivity in traditional and organic farming technology. Innov Biosyst Bioeng. 2022;6(1):31–39. https://doi.org/10.20535/ibb.2022.6.1.255277
  23. 23. Tyagi J, Shrivastava N, Sharma AK, Varma A, Pudake RN. Effect of Rhizophagus intraradices on growth and physiological performance of finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.) under drought stress. Plant Sci Today. 2021;8(4):912–23. https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.2021.8.4.1240
  24. 24. Igiehon ON, Babalola OO. Rhizobium and mycorrhizal fungal species improved soybean yield under drought stress conditions. Curr Microbiol. 2021;78(4):1615–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-021-02432-w
  25. 25. DSTU 4289:2004. Soil quality. Determination of humus content by Tyurin method (modified by Simakov). Kyiv (UA): State Committee of Ukraine for Technical Regulation and Consumer Policy; 2004.
  26. 26. DSTU 4114:2002. Soil quality. Determination of mobile compounds of phosphorus and potassium by the Chirikov method. Kyiv (UA): State Committee of Ukraine for Technical Regulation and Consumer Policy; 2002.
  27. 27. Li YN, Wu HL, Nie JF, Li SF, Yu YJ, Zhang SR, et al. Interference-free determination of abscisic acid and gibberellin in plant samples using excitation-emission matrix fluorescence based on oxidation derivatization coupled with second-order calibration methods. Anal Methods. 2009;1:115–22. https://doi.org/10.1039/B9AY00048H
  28. 28. Larbi A. Relative water content (RWC) and leaf senescence as screening tools for drought tolerance in wheat. In: Cantero-Martínez C, Gabiña D, editors. Mediterranean rainfed agriculture: Strategies for sustainability. Zaragoza: CIHEAM; 2004. p. 193–96.
  29. 29. Askari SH, De-Ville S, Hathway EA, Stovin V. Estimating evapotranspiration from commonly occurring urban plant species using porometry and canopy stomatal conductance. Water (Basel). 2021;13:2262. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13162262
  30. 30. Montgomery DC. Design and analysis of experiments. 9th ed. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley; 2017.
  31. 31. Fujita Y, Yoshida T, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. Pivotal role of the AREB/ABF-SnRK2 pathway in ABRE-mediated transcription in response to osmotic stress in plants. Physiol Plant. 2013;147:15–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2012.01635.x
  32. 32. Osakabe Y, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K, Tran LS. ABA control of plant macroelement membrane transport systems in response to water deficit and high salinity. New Phytol. 2014;202:35–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12613
  33. 33. Verma V, Ravindran P, Kumar PP. Plant hormone-mediated regulation of stress responses. BMC Plant Biol. 2016;16:86. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-016-0771-y
  34. 34. Porcel R, Zamarreño ÁM, García-Mina JM, Aroca R. Involvement of plant endogenous ABA in Bacillus megaterium PGPR activity in tomato plants. BMC Plant Biol. 2014;14:36. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-14-36
  35. 35. Samanta I, Ghosh K, Saikia R, Savita, Jha Maity P, Chowdhary G. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi – A natural tool to impart abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Plant Signal Behav. 2025;20(1):2525843. https://doi.org/10.1080/15592324.2025.2525843
  36. 36. Sobhani SMA, Alavifazel M, Ardakani MR, Modhej A, Lak S. Influence of mycorrhizal fungi and biochar on nitrogen use efficiency correlated with yield and yield components of wheat. Plant Sci Today. 2022;9(3):509–17. https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.1486
  37. 37. Barnawal D, Bharti N, Pandey SS, Pandey A, Chanotiya CS, Kalra A. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria enhance wheat salt and drought stress tolerance by altering endogenous phytohormone levels and TaCTR1/TaDREB2 expression. Physiol Plant. 2017;161(4):502–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.12614
  38. 38. Rashad FM, Fathy HM, El-Zayat AS, Elghonaimy AM. Isolation and characterization of multifunctional Streptomyces species with antimicrobial, nematicidal and phytohormone activities from marine environments in Egypt. Microbiol Res. 2015;175:34–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2015.03.002
  39. 39. Hidri R, Metoui-Ben Mahmoud O, Debez A, Saadani O, Barhoumi Z, Ben Hamed K, et al. Dual PGPR-AMF inoculation offsets salinity stress impact on the fodder halophyte Sulla carnosa by concomitantly modulating plant ABA content and leaf antioxidant response. J Plant Growth Regul. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-024-11438-0
  40. 40. Juge C, Prévost D, Bertrand A, Bipfubusa M, Chalifour FP. Growth and biochemical responses of soybean to double and triple microbial associations with Bradyrhizobium, Azospirillum and arbuscular mycorrhizae. Appl Soil Ecol. 2012;61:147–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2012.05.006
  41. 41. Rossetim MFT, Motta ACV, Kondo YR, Ruthes BES, Hungria M, Salles JF, et al. Enhancing soybean yield through inoculation of multifunctional microbial consortia. Int J Agron. 2025;2025:9491715. https://doi.org/10.1155/ioa/9491715
  42. 42. Tharani M, Jeberlin PB, Ramesh PT, Manikandan K, Rajinimala N, Theradimani M, et al. Rhizosphere borne beneficial microbes for promoting plant growth in calcareous and sodic soils – An overview. Plant Sci Today. 2025;12(sp3):1–9. https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.8599
  43. 43. Shukla PS, Shotton K, Norman E, Neily W, Critchley AT, Prithiviraj B. Seaweed extract improve drought tolerance of soybean by regulating stress-response genes. AoB Plants. 2018;10(1):plx051. https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plx051
  44. 44. Phan VH, Le TTH, Pham DM, Nguyen LTT, Nguyen KC, Bui TM. Effects of concentration and time of brassinosteroid treatment on growth and yield of soybean under drought stress conditions. Plant Sci Today. 2024;11(2):612–19. https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.3089
  45. 45. Hines S, van der Zwan T, Shiell K, Shotton K, Prithiviraj B. Alkaline extract of the seaweed Ascophyllum nodosum stimulates arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and their endomycorrhization of plant roots. Sci Rep. 2021;11:13491. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93035-9

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.