Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp1 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Evaluation of sweet flag (Acorus calamus L.) rhizome for its chemical properties and their effect on growth and seed longevity in field bean (Lablab purpureus L.)

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.12667
Submitted
19 November 2025
Published
15-02-2026

Abstract

Sweet flag (Acorus calamus L.), known for its pesticidal and seed-quality–enhancing properties due to its essential oil richness. The study quantified sweet flag rhizome compounds and assessed their effectiveness in improving field bean (var. HA-5) under field and lab conditions. Essential oil was extracted by hydro-distillation and quantified using gas chromatography. A foliar spray experiment was conducted using a randomized complete block design to assess the effects of sweet flag rhizome powder, rhizome oil, and a chemical check on crop growth, pest and disease incidence. A nine-month storage study was conducted under laboratory conditions to evaluate seed storability. The essential oil yield aveaged 0.29 % and was dominated by β-asarone. Results indicated that moderate concentrations of sweet flag rhizome powder and oil significantly improved seed emergence, plant growth, and plant stand, while also reducing pest and disease incidence. Seed treatment with rhizome powder at 10 g/kg consistently maintained higher seed quality during storage. Sweet flag rhizome–based treatments demonstrated strong potential as eco-friendly options for enhancing field performance and seed storability.

References

  1. 1. Sadohara R, Cichy K, Thompson H, Uebersax MA, Siddiq M, Wiesinger J. Nutritional attributes, health benefits, consumer perceptions and sustainability impacts of whole pulses and pulse flour-based ingredients. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2025;1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2025.2538544
  2. 2. Ingle SM, Devmore JP, Bhave SG, Thorat MPB. Genetic variability for yield and yield attributing traits in F5 generation of lablab bean (Lablab purpureus L. Sweet) genotypes. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2020;9(4):466–75. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.904.055
  3. 3. Pratheeksha KH. Botanical description, medicinal uses and pharmacological actions of Lablab purpureus. Int J Res Rev. 2022;9(4):238–42. https://doi.org/10.52403/ijrr.20220428
  4. 4. Shukla UN, Mishra ML. Present scenario, bottlenecks and expansion of pulse production in India: A review. Legume Res. 2020;43(4):461–69.
  5. 5. Anonymous. Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of India. Annual report. New Delhi; 2023.
  6. 6. Hajam YA, Kumar R. Management of stored grain pest with special reference to Callosobruchus maculatus, a major pest of cowpea: A review. Heliyon. 2022;8(1):e08703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08703
  7. 7. Paikaray SS, Satapathy SN, Sahoo BK. Estimation of yield loss due to pulse beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis (L.), on different mung bean cultivars. J Pharm Innov. 2022;11(3):924–27.
  8. 8. Lokesh GB. Sweet flag (Acorus calamus): cultivation and economic aspects. Indian J Nat Prod Resour. 2004;3(1):19–21.
  9. 9. Mssillou I, Agour A, Allali A, et al. Antioxidant, antimicrobial and insecticidal properties of essential oil from leaves of Dittrichia viscosa L. Molecules. 2022;27(7):2282. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27072282
  10. 10. Khwairakpam AD, Damayenti YD, Deka A, et al. Acorus calamus: a bio-reserve of medicinal values. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol. 2018;29(2):107–22. https://doi.org/10.1515/jbcpp-2016-0132
  11. 11. Aryal S, Poudel A, Kafle K, Aryal LN. Insecticidal toxicity of essential oil of Nepalese Acorus calamus against Sitophilus zeamais. Heliyon. 2023;9(11):e22130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22130
  12. 12. Wang A, Zhou Y, Fu X, et al. Structural derivatives of β-asarone from Acorus calamus Linn. as insecticide candidates and their mechanism against small brown planthopper. Agronomy. 2024;14:10. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14102420
  13. 13. Lee JY, Lee JY, Yun BS, Hwang BK. Antifungal activity of β-asarone isolated from Acorus gramineus rhizomes against plant pathogenic fungi. J Agric Food Chem. 2004;52(8):2244–50. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf035204o
  14. 14. Liu XC, Zhou LG, Liu ZL, Du SS. Insecticidal constituents of essential oil of Acorus calamus rhizomes against Liposcelis bostrychophila. Molecules. 2013;18(5):5684–94. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules18055684
  15. 15. Prakash M, Ophelia AG, Narayanan GS. Effect of botanical seed pelleting and foliar spray on morpho-physiological traits and yield of black gram. Legume Res. 2021;44(4):511–17.
  16. 16. Veerappan V, Ranganathan U, Mannar J. Effect of organic foliar spray with pulse sprout extract on seed yield and quality of rice (Oryza sativa). J Plant Nutr. 2019;42:900–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2019.1567764
  17. 17. Irshad S, Matloob A, Iqbal S, et al. Foliar application of potassium and moringa leaf extract improves growth and productivity of kabuli chickpea. PLoS One. 2022;17(2):e0263323. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263323
  18. 18. Sireesha E, Tiwari R. Field efficacy of botanical extracts against pod borers on pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan). Ecol Environ Conserv. 2024;7:1–4. https://doi.org/10.53550/EEC.2024.v30i04s.046
  19. 19. Muhammad A, Kashere MA. Neem (Azadirachta indica): an eco-friendly botanical insecticide for managing insect pests – a review. FUDMA J Sci. 2020;4(4):484–91. https://doi.org/10.33003/fjs-2020-0404-506
  20. 20. Bhalekar NB, Shelar VR, Bhingarde TM. Impact of pre-harvest spray of insecticides and botanicals on seed yield for control of pulse beetle in mung bean. J Pharm Innov. 2023;12(1):2761–64.
  21. 21. Anwar R, Ali S, Zeshan MA, et al. Effect of Fusarium wilt on chickpea germplasm and its management. Int J Agric Sci. 2022;44(3):1–9.
  22. 22. Patil SB, Goyal A, Chitgupekar SS, Kumar S, El-Bouhssini M. Sustainable management of chickpea pod borer: A review. Agron Sustain Dev. 2017;37(4):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-017-0428-8
  23. 23. Rajput SB, Tonge MB, Karuppayil SM. Traditional uses and pharmacological profile of Acorus calamus and other Acorus species. Phytomedicine. 2014;21(3):268–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phymed.2013.09.020
  24. 24. Shalini K, Chandel SR, Atri S, et al. Therapeutic properties and applications of Acorus calamus: A review. Asian J Microbiol Biotechnol Environ Sci. 2021;23(1):122–36. https://doi.org/10.53550/AJMBES.2022.v24i01.022
  25. 25. Bhosle S, Ingle P. Conservation status, ethnobotanical characteristics and biological studies of Acorus calamus L. J Exp Agric Int. 2025;47(3):308–18. https://doi.org/10.9734/jeai/2025/v47i33337
  26. 26. Khanal D, Neupane SB, Bhattarai A, et al. Evaluation of botanical powders for management of rice weevil (Sitophilus oryzae) in Nepal. Adv Agric. 2021;2021:8878525. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8878525
  27. 27. Surabhi VK, Gouda R, Nethra N. Influence of seed treatment with nanoparticles on seed quality and storability of pigeon pea cv. BRG-2. Int J Chem Stud. 2021;9(1):3645–51. https://doi.org/10.22271/chemi.2021.v9.i1ay.11799
  28. 28. Lakshmi SJ, Roopa Bai RS, Sharanagouda H, Ramachandra CT, Nadagouda S. Effect of zinc oxide nanoparticles on pulse beetle (Callosobruchus maculatus) in green gram. J Entomol Zool Stud. 2020;8(4)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.