Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Early Access

Molecular characterisation and evolutionary analysis of Papaya ringspot virus infecting papaya (Carica papaya L.)

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.12683
Submitted
11 November 2025
Published
22-04-2026

Abstract

Papaya (Carica papaya L.) is a tropical, commercial fruit with high nutritive and medicinal value. Papaya ringspot virus (PRSV) causes destructive disease in papaya and cucurbit cultivation worldwide. The current study analysed the genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationship of 115 PRSV isolates submitted until December 2024 in NCBI, including one complete genome sequences from Palampur, India characterized in this study. The complete genome of a PRSV Palampur isolate collected during March 2020 from foothills of Himalayan region in northern India was characterized. The Palampur isolate (MW030522.1) showed close identity of 90 % with Bangladesh isolate (MH397222). Species demarcation analysis of nucleotide sequence revealed one major peak ranging between 79–85 %. The nucleotide diversity of the PRSV genome was 0.13. The 5’ end of the genome containing the P1 gene showed high levels of polymorphism. Phylogenetic analysis showed 4 major groups (G1-G4) and one recombinant isolate (MH444652). The results suggest that the geographic region, rather than hosts, is the probable factor determining the genetic diversity of PRSV isolates. Neutrality tests and dN/dS ratio showed negative values, indicating purifying selection. The current study deepens understanding of PRSV genetic diversity and evolution, which can be used for development of effective management strategies against PRSV.

References

  1. 1. Koul B, Pudhuvai B, Sharma C, Kumar A, Sharma V, Yadav D, et al. Carica papaya L.: a tropical fruit with benefits beyond the tropics. Diversity. 2022;14(8):683. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14080683
  2. 2. Chinnasamy K, Krishnan NK, Balasubramaniam M, Balamurugan R, Lakshmanan P, Karuppasami KM, et al. Nutrient formulation: a sustainable approach to combat PRSV and enhance productivity in papaya. Agriculture. 2025;15(2):201. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15020201
  3. 3. Parris GK. A new disease of papaya in Hawaii. Proc Am Soc Hortic Sci. 1938;36:263–5.
  4. 4. Gonsalves D. Control of papaya ringspot virus in papaya: a case study. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 1998;36(1):415–37. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.36.1.415
  5. 5. Tripathi S, Suzuki JY, Ferreira SA, Gonsalves D. Papaya ringspot virus-P: characteristics, pathogenicity, sequence variability and control. Mol Plant Pathol. 2008;9(3):269–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1364-3703.2008.00467.x
  6. 6. Capoor SP, Varma PM. A mosaic disease of Carica papaya in the Bombay province. Curr Sci. 1948;17(9):265–66.
  7. 7. Roy G, Jain RK, Bhat AI, Varma A. Comparative host range and serological studies of papaya ringspot potyvirus isolates. Indian Phytopathol. 1999;52(1):14–17.
  8. 8. dos Santos Martins D, Ventura JA, Rita de Cássia AL, Fornazier MJ, Rezende JA, Culik MP, et al. Aphid vectors of papaya ringspot virus and their weed hosts in orchards in Brazil. Crop Prot. 2016;90:191–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2016.08.030
  9. 9. Kalleshwaraswamy CM, Krishna Kumar NK, Dinesh MR, Verghese A, Ranganth HR, Venugopalan R. Role of transient aphid vectors on temporal spread of papaya ringspot virus in South India. Acta Hortic. 2007;740:251–58. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2007.740.30
  10. 10. Jyotika RK, Harish S, Karthikeyan G, Kumar KK, Murugan M, Jayakanthan M, et al. Molecular approaches for management of papaya ringspot virus infecting papaya: a comprehensive review. Mol Biol Rep. 2024;51(1):981. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-024-09920-9
  11. 11. Herold F, Weibel J. Electron microscopic demonstration of papaya ringspot virus. Virology. 1962;18(2):302–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6822(62)90017-X
  12. 12. Yeh SD, Kung YJ, Bau HJ, Yu TA, Raja JA. Generation of papaya hybrid variety with broad-spectrum transgenic resistance to papaya ringspot virus and papaya leaf-distortion mosaic virus. Transgenic Plant J. 2010;4(1):37–44.
  13. 13. Azad MA, Amin L, Sidik NM. Gene technology for papaya ringspot virus disease management. Sci World J. 2014;2014:768038. ttps://doi.org/10.1155/2014/768038
  14. 14. Jensen DD. Virus diseases of plants and their insect vectors with special reference to Hawaii. Proc Hawaii Entomol Soc. 1946;12:535–610.
  15. 15. Ventura JA, Costa H, da Tatagiba JS. Papaya diseases and integrated control. In: Naqvi SAMH, editor. Diseases of fruits and vegetables. Vol. II. Dordrecht: Springer; 2004. p. 201–68https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2607-2_7
  16. 16. Sharma SK, Tripathi S. Papaya ringspot virus-P: overcoming limitations of resistance breeding in Carica papaya L. In: Plant virus–host interaction. Cambridge (MA): Academic Press; 2014. p. 177–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-411584-2.00009-3
  17. 17. Babu KS, Banerjee A. Biological and molecular evidence of papaya ringspot virus pathotype P from mid-hills of Meghalaya, India. Indian Phytopathol. 2018;71:611–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42360-018-0097-9
  18. 18. Maina S, Barbetti MJ, Edwards OR, Minemba D, Areke MW, Jones RAC. Genetic connectivity between papaya ringspot virus genomes from Papua New Guinea and Northern Australia. Plant Dis. 2019;103:737–47. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-07-18-1136-RE
  19. 19. Bau HJ, Kung YJ, Raja JA, Chan SJ, Chen KC, Chen YK, et al. Potential threat of new pathotype of papaya leaf distortion mosaic virus infecting transgenic papaya resistant to papaya ringspot virus. Phytopathology. 2008;98(7):848–56. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-98-7-0848
  20. 20. Yeh SD, Gonsalves D. Practices and perspective of control of papaya ringspot virus by cross protection. In: Advances in disease vector research. New York: Springer; 1994. p. 237–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2590-4_9
  21. 21. Medina-Salguero AX, Cornejo-Franco JF, Grinstead S, Mowery J, Mollov D, Quito-Avila DF. Genetic characterization of mild isolate of papaya ringspot virus type-P and assessment of cross-protection potential. PLoS One. 2021;16(2):e0241652. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241652
  22. 22. Mishra R, Patil S, Patil A, Patil BL. Sequence diversity studies of papaya ringspot virus isolates in South India. Virusdisease. 2019;30(2):261–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13337-019-00512-x
  23. 23. Castillo XO, Fermin G, Tabima J, Rojas Y, Tennant PF, Fuchs M, et al. Phylogeography and molecular epidemiology of papaya ringspot virus. Virus Res. 2011;159(2):132–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virusres.2011.04.011
  24. 24. Saleem A, Ali Z, Yeh SD, Saeed W, Binat Imdad A, Akbar MF, et al. Genetic variability and evolutionary dynamics of atypical papaya ringspot virus infecting papaya. PLoS One. 2021;16(10):e0258298. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258298
  25. 25. Hamim I, Al Rwahnih M, Borth WB, Suzuki JY, Melzer MJ, Wall MM, et al. Papaya ringspot virus isolates from papaya in Bangladesh: detection, characterization and distribution. Plant Dis. 2019;103:2920–24. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-12-18-2186-RE
  26. 26. Gibbs AJ, Ohshima K, Phillips MJ, Gibbs MJ. Prehistory of potyviruses: initial radiation during dawn of agriculture. PLoS One. 2008;3(6):e2523. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002523
  27. 27. Yang MZ, Hao ZG, Ren ZT, Tang R, Wu QH, Zhou LY, et al. Genetic variability and evolutionary dynamics of papaya ringspot virus and papaya leaf distortion mosaic virus infecting feral papaya in Hainan Island. Phytopathology. 2024;114(11):2442–52. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-01-24-0022-R
  28. 28. Premchand U, Mesta RK, Devappa V, Basavarajappa MP, Venkataravanappa V, Narasimha Reddy LR, et al. Survey, detection and characterization of papaya ringspot virus from southern India and management of papaya ringspot disease. Pathogens. 2023;12(6):824. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12060824
  29. 29. Basavaraj YB, Kumar A, Jain RK, Kumar P, Parameswari B, Prakash J. Molecular diversity of papaya ringspot virus in India: genetic recombination and mutations among isolates. Indian Phytopathol. 2019;72(3):497–511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42360-019-00157-2

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.