Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. sp4 (2025): Recent Advances in Agriculture by Young Minds - III

Methodology standardization for assessing leadership patterns among postgraduate agricultural students

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.12690
Submitted
11 November 2025
Published
24-12-2025

Abstract

Leadership plays an essential role in developing professional competence, enhancing decision-making ability and fostering effective teamwork in agricultural education. The present study aimed to identify dominant leadership styles and to analyse factors influencing leadership behaviour among postgraduate agriculture students. The present study was conducted among postgraduate students enrolled in state agricultural universities in Southern India during 2024-25 academic year, with a sample size of 200 respondents selected through random sampling techniques. A descriptive-cum-analytical research design was employed to examine their leadership style, locus of control and resilience orientation. Standardized psychometric methodologies were used for primary data collection, including the leadership effectiveness and adaptability description (LEAD) questionnaire, based on the Hersey and Blanchard situational leadership model and the Nicholson McBride resilience questionnaire (NMRQ). The collected data were analysed to understand the adaptability of leadership behaviour and resilience characteristics among agricultural postgraduates. Both descriptive statistics and the multinomial logistic regression model were employed for analysis. Results revealed that the participating leadership style (38.00 %) was most prevalent among agricultural students, followed by delegating (32.50 %), telling (17.00 %) and selling (12.50 %). The model fitting test (χ² = 38.130; df = 21; p = 0.012) indicated that the fitted model was statistically significant at 1 % level. Among the predictors, gender, order of birth and locus of control significantly influenced leadership orientation, while variables such as previous education background, decision-making ability and future goal orientation were not significant. The findings underscore the need to integrate structured leadership training and psychological development programs within agricultural education to enhance adaptive, inclusive and resilient leadership competencies among future professionals.

References

  1. 1. Nanjundeswaraswamy TS, Swamy DR. Leadership styles. Adv Manag. 2014;7(2):57-68.
  2. 2. Dulewicz V, Higgs M. Assessing leadership styles and organisational context. J Manag Psychol. 2005;20(2):105-23. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940510579759
  3. 3. Bwalya A. Leadership styles. Glob Sci J. 2023;11(8):118-33.
  4. 4. Hersey P, Blanchard KH. Grid principles and situationalism: both! A response to Blake and Mouton. Group Organ Stud. 1982;7(2):207-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/105960118200700207
  5. 5. Yukl G. Toward a behavioral theory of leadership. Organ Behav Hum Perform. 1971;6(4):414-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(71)90026-2
  6. 6. Behrendt P, Matz S, Goritz AS. An integrative model of leadership behavior. Leadersh Q. 2017;28(1):229-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.08.002
  7. 7. Graeff CL. Evolution of situational leadership theory: A critical review. Leadersh Q. 1997;8(2):153-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(97)90014-X
  8. 8. Arfanaldy SR. Effective leadership styles in project management: A literature analysis of their impact on project success. Int J Mul Appr Res Sci. 2025;3(2):652-65. https://doi.org/10.59653/ijmars.v3i02.1544
  9. 9. Husin M. Implementation of situational leadership style of principals in 21st century vocational schools. Int J Econ Bus. 2025;1(3):116-23.
  10. 10. Puspitaningrum Y, Arisyahidin A. The influence of situational leadership style on teacher performance. Syntax Literate J Ilm Indones. 2025;10(5):5213-27. https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v10i5.57915
  11. 11. Chinawa NC, Edung AM. Principals' demographics, transformational leadership style and school productivity. Int J Innov Pedagog Tech. 2025;5(1):23-47.
  12. 12. Antonopoulou H, Matzavinou P, Giannoukou I, Halkiopoulos C. Teachers' digital leadership and competencies in primary education. Educ Sci. 2025;15(2):114-27. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020215
  13. 13. Eagly AH, Johannesen-Schmidt MC. The leadership styles of women and men. J Soc Issues. 2001;57(4):781-97. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00241
  14. 14. Sulloway FJ. Born to rebel: birth order, family dynamics and creative lives. Pantheon Books; 1996.
  15. 15. Rotter JB. Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychol Monogr Gen Appl. 1966;80(1):87-99. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0092976
  16. 16. Ng TW, Sorensen KL, Eby LT. Locus of control at work: A meta-analysis. J Organ Behav. 2006;27(8):1057-87. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.416
  17. 17. Gore JS, Griffin DP, McNierney D. Does internal or external locus of control have a stronger link to mental and physical health. Psychol Stud. 2016;61(3):181-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-016-0361-y
  18. 18. Blanchard AL, Henle CA. Correlates of different forms of cyberloafing: The role of norms and external locus of control. Comput Hum Behav. 2008;24(3):1067-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.03.008
  19. 19. Junaedi E, Ali J. The influence of situational leadership style and work orientations on employee performance in Jakarta Islamic banking industry. ITQAN J Islam Econ Manag Finance. 2025;4(1):11-22. https://doi.org/10.57053/itqan.v4i1.57
  20. 20. Cairns TD, Hollenback J, Preziosi RC, Snow WA. A study of Hersey and Blanchard's situational leadership theory. Leadersh Organ Dev J. 1998;19(2):113-26. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437739810208692
  21. 21. Pilafas G, Strongylaki NP, Papaioannou D, Menti D, Lyrakos G. Adaptation of Nicholson McBride Resilience Questionnaire (NMRQ) in Greek. Health Res J. 2020;6(4):123-31. https://doi.org/10.12681/healthresj.25629
  22. 22. Adebamowo O, Mike A. Investigating situational leadership influence on artisans' performance in construction sites in Lagos. FUOYE J Manag Innov Entrep. 2025;4(1):277-95.
  23. 23. Haider AH, Vaqar M, Hussain MAA, Ahmad S, Rahim KA, Shaikh NQ, et al. From medical school to global health leadership. BMC Med Educ. 2025;25(1):241-59. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07602-z
  24. 24. Del Pino-Marchito A, Galan-Garcia A, Plaza-Mejia MD. The Hersey and Blanchard's situational leadership model revisited. World Dev J. 2025;6(2):63. https://doi.org/10.3390/world6020063
  25. 25. Thompson G, Vecchio RP. Situational leadership theory: A test of three versions. Leadersh Q. 2009;20(5):837-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.06.014
  26. 26. Vroom VH. Educating managers for decision making and leadership. Manag Decis. 2003;41(10):968-78. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740310509490
  27. 27. Tunda AY, Bhuyan B. The impact of birth order on digital identity formation. Indian J Health Wellbeing. 2025;16(1):117-22.
  28. 28. Babiker A, Alshakhsi S, Al-Thani D, Montag C, Ali R. Attitude towards AI: potential influence of conspiracy belief, XAI experience and locus of control. Int J Hum Comput Interact. 2025;41(13):7939-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2401249
  29. 29. Silalahi M, Abdurohim A, Romy E, Candra V, Sudirman A. The involvement locus of control, servant leadership and innovative work behavior to improve teacher performance. J Pendidik Progresif. 2022;12(2):751-63. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v12.i2.202227
  30. 30. Gogo S, Musonda I. The use of the exploratory sequential approach in mixed-method research. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(12):72-6. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19127276
  31. 31. Hunt W, Sarkar S, Warhurst C. Measuring the impact of AI on jobs at the organization level. Res Policy. 2022;51(2):104-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104425
  32. 32. Shen W, Joseph DL. Gender and leadership: a criterion-focused review. Hum Resour Manag Rev. 2021;31(2):65-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2020.100765
  33. 33. Smith SG, Sinkford JC. Gender equality in the 21st century: overcoming barriers to women's leadership. J Dent Educ. 2022;86(9):1144-73. https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.13059
  34. 34. Tremmel M, Wahl I. Gender stereotypes in leadership. Front Psychol. 2023;14(4):103-22. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1034258
  35. 35. Sakti RF, Sidjabat S, Sundari P, Subagio M, Prasidi A. Identifying the characteristic delegation of leadership: Study literature review. Greenat Int J Tour Manag. 2025;3(1):34-46. https://doi.org/10.38035/gijtm.v3i1.343
  36. 36. Baker EL, Murphy SA. Delegation: a core leadership skill. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2022;28(4):430-42.https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000001545
  37. 37. Norris KR, Ghahremani H, Lemoine GJ. Is it laissez-faire leadership or delegation. J Leadersh Organ Stud. 2021;28(3):322-39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051821997407
  38. 38. Alavi S, Ehlig PA, Habel J. Transformational and transactional sales leadership during a global pandemic. J Pers Sell Sales Manag. 2022;42(4):324-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/08853134.2022.2101462
  39. 39. Warman W, Poernomo SA, Januar S, Amon L. Leadership style and principal supervision in improving teacher performance. EduLine J Educ Learn Innov. 2022;2(1):17-24. https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.eduline581
  40. 40. Haq AM, Roesminingsih E. Situational leadership skills of foundation heads. Munaddhomah J Manag Pendidik Islam. 2024;5(1):26-40. https://doi.org/10.31538/munaddhomah.v5i1.545
  41. 41. Hrynova M, Gollob R, Yahodnikova V. Participation in the context of developing pupils' leadership qualities. Rev Rom Educ Multidimens. 2024;16(1):16-29. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/16.1/809
  42. 42. Krasniqi I, Hajdari R. Leadership styles and their impact on decision-making effectiveness. Qual Access Success. 2024;25(201):278-89. https://doi.org/10.47750/QAS/25.201.24
  43. 43. Abuhassira HY, Razak AZ, Hoque KE. The impact of transformational leadership on classroom interaction. Educ Inf Technol. 2024;29(17):22757-78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12701-3
  44. 44. Sari IM, Sowiyah HH. Situational leadership practices in school: a literature review. Int J Curr Sci Res Rev. 2022;5(7):568-87.
  45. 45. Nabella SD, Rivaldo Y, Kurniawan R, Nurmayunita N, Sari DP, Luran MF, et al. The influence of leadership and organizational culture mediated by organizational climate on governance. J Educ Soc Res. 2022;12(5):119-30. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2022-0127

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.