Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp1 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Multidimensional vulnerability in paddy-based agriculture of the Cauvery Delta, India: A quantitative assessment of economic distress and constraint hierarchies

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.12793
Submitted
5 December 2025
Published
11-03-2026

Abstract

This study examines multidimensional agricultural vulnerability in the Cauvery Delta of Tamil Nadu, India, with particular attention to farm-size inequality, economic distress and resilience outcomes relevant to agricultural policy. Using a multistage stratified random sampling design, primary data were collected from paddy farmers across 3 delta districts and analysed through rank based quotient (RBQ) analysis and comparative statistical techniques. The results identify a hierarchy of severe production, institutional and market-related constraints, indicating that vulnerability in the delta is not episodic but structurally embedded. Economic analysis highlights pronounced disparities in debt–asset ratios across farm-size categories, with marginal and small farmers facing disproportionately higher financial stress and weaker resilience compared to larger landholders. The Composite Economic Vulnerability Index (CEVI) and related social and institutional indicators further reveal deficits in adaptive capacity and institutional trust, reinforcing cycles of vulnerability among resource-constrained farmers. Overall, the findings demonstrate that agricultural vulnerability in the Cauvery Delta is shaped by intersecting economic and institutional inequalities rather than isolated agronomic factors. The study provides policy-relevant empirical evidence to inform targeted interventions aimed at enhancing resilience, reducing farm-size–based inequities and strengthening institutional support mechanisms in deltaic paddy systems.

References

  1. 1. Thamizoli P, Pisupati B. Sustainable development–stories from those making it possible. Fledge, India; 2015.
  2. 2. Gulati A, Mohan G. Towards sustainable, productive and profitable agriculture: Case of rice and sugarcane. Working paper; 2018.
  3. 3. Birthal PS, Khan T, Negi DS, Agarwal S. Impact of climate change on yields of major food crops in India: Implications for food security. Agricultural Economics Research Review. 2014;27(2):145–55. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-0279.2014.00019.6
  4. 4. Adger WN. Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change. 2006;16(3):268–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006
  5. 5. Folke C, Carpenter SR, Walker B, Scheffer M, Chapin T, Rockström J. Resilience thinking: Integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecology and Society. 2010;15(4). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03610-150420
  6. 6. Ribot JC, Peluso NL. A theory of access. Rural Sociology. 2003;68(2):153–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1549-0831.2003.tb00133.x
  7. 7. Nair J. Labour, mechanisation, intermediaries, rain: Farmers in Tamil Nadu’s ‘rice bowl’ are up against a host of challenges. Down To Earth. 2024.
  8. 8. Marsh S. India: Climate adaptation in Vennar Subbasin in Cauvery Delta Project. 2016.
  9. 9. Arockiam AJ, Theodore RK, Suresh R, Sebastian S, Kumar DS. Constraints faced by rice growers in Cauvery Delta Zone of Tamil Nadu in cultivation of TNAU modern rice varieties.
  10. 10. Mehta L. The politics and poetics of water: The naturalisation of scarcity in Western India. Orient Blackswan; 2005.
  11. 11. Khandekar N, Srinivasan V. Dispute resolution in the Cauvery Basin, India. In: Handbook of Catchment Management. 2021:549–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119531241.ch22
  12. 12. Gupta A, Barik SK, Chauhan PS. Towards sustainable delta ecosystems: Pollution mitigation for achieving SDGs in Indian delta region. In: Solid Waste Management in Delta Region for SDGs Fulfillment: Delta Sustainability by Waste Management. Springer; 2024. p. 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-58253-0_2
  13. 13. Sen A. Poverty and famines: An essay on entitlement and deprivation. Oxford University Press; 1982. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198284632.001.0001
  14. 14. Nagaraj RA, Geethalakshmi V, Murugananthi D, Ravikumar R, Manonmani S, Bhuvaneswari K, et al. Evaluating the impact of climatic factors and variability on rice production over varied seasons in irrigated rice system of peninsular India through empirical approach. Plant Science Today. 2024;11:5332. https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.5332
  15. 15. Tamilmounika R, Muthumanickam D, Pazhanivelan S, Ragunath K, Kumaraperumal R, Sivamurugan A. Rice area mapping and methane emission pattern in the Cauvery Delta region of Tamil Nadu. Environment Conservation Journal. 2025;26(3):775–83. https://doi.org/10.36953/ECJ.31363015
  16. 16. Kuenzer C, Renaud FG. Climate and environmental change in river deltas globally: Expected impacts, resilience and adaptation. In: The Mekong Delta System: Interdisciplinary Analyses of a River Delta. Springer; 2012. p. 7–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3962-8_2
  17. 17. Prasad P, Gupta P, Belsare H, Mahendra CM, Bhopale M, Deshmukh S, et al. Mapping farmer vulnerability to target interventions for climate-resilient agriculture: Science in practice. Water Policy. 2023;25(8):815–34. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2023.036
  18. 18. Werulkar J, Pande M. Developing an integrated triangular framework: Beyond siloed interventions in Vidarbha’s persistent farmer suicide crisis. Advances in Consumer Research. 2025;2:4800–15.
  19. 19. Adityan S, Dhamodharan T, Rajasekaran R, Selvi RP. Advancement in knowledge and adoption of grape growing farmers in Theni District of Tamil Nadu. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajaees/2021/v39i1130753
  20. 20. Watts MJ, Bohle HG. The space of vulnerability: The causal structure of hunger and famine. Progress in Human Geography. 1993;17(1):43–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/030913259301700103
  21. 21. Kising’u T. Smart agricultural technologies and sustainability of agricultural projects in Kwale County, Kenya. Reviewed Journal of Science & Technology. 2025;3(1):17–42.
  22. 22. Kennedy A, Maple MJ, McKay K, Brumby SA. Suicide and accidental death in Australia’s rural farming communities: A review of the literature. Rural and Remote Health. 2014;14(1):230–43. https://doi.org/10.22605/RRH2517
  23. 23. Levien M. Dispossession without development: Land grabs in neoliberal India. Oxford University Press; 2018. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190859152.001.0001
  24. 24. Maulik PK, Daniel M, Devarapalli S, Kallakuri S, Kaur A, Ghosh A, et al. Mental health care support in rural India: A cluster randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2024;81(11):1061–70. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.2305
  25. 25. Saju S, Reddy SK, Bijjal S, Annapally SR. Farmer’s mental health and well-being: Qualitative findings on protective factors. Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice. 2024;15(2):307. https://doi.org/10.25259/JNRP_403_2023
  26. 26. Gruère G, Sengupta D. Bt cotton and farmer suicides in India: An evidence-based assessment. Journal of Development Studies. 2011;47(2):316–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2010.492863
  27. 27. Sathyamala C. Meat-eating in India: Whose food, whose politics and whose rights? Policy Futures in Education. 2019;17(7):878–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210318780553
  28. 28. Andimuthu R, Palanisamy P, Pavithrapriya S, Mathivanan M, Joseph K, SN AI. Assessing crop resilience: Climate change impact on major crops across agro climatic zones of Tamil Nadu, India under SSP 2–4.5 scenario. Theoretical and Applied Climatology. 2025;156(7):362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-025-05582-0

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.