Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp1 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

A rapid, high-throughput, non-invasive approach for assessing drought tolerance in rose (Rosa spp.) using RGB-derived vegetation indices

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.12819
Submitted
19 November 2025
Published
08-04-2026

Abstract

Drought stress poses a significant threat to rose (Rosa spp.) cultivation, impacting plant vigor, floral quality and marketability. Traditional drought screening methods are often destructive and labor-intensive, limiting their application in large-scale breeding programs. This study presents a non-destructive and high-throughput phenotyping approach for assessing drought responses in rose using RGB-derived vegetation indices (VIs) obtained from multi-angle imaging. Twenty-eight diverse rose genotypes were evaluated under well-watered (WW) and induced drought (ID) conditions using a LemnaTec Scanalyzer 3D platform. A total of 56 indices from side-view (SV) and top-view (TV) images were computed to quantify canopy color, greenness and pigment-related traits. Analysis of variance revealed significant genotypic differences and strong genotype × treatment (G × T) interactions across most indices, demonstrating their sensitivity to drought-induced physiological changes. Multivariate analyses, including Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Pearson correlation matrix evaluation, were performed to explore trait relationships and identify key traits associated with drought stress. These analyses effectively differentiated greenness-related and stress-responsive traits. In addition, the MGIDI analysis integrated all indices and identified ‘Queen Elizabeth’, ‘Jwala’, Rosa chinensis, ‘Sylvia’ and ‘Rose Sherbet’ as the top-performing drought-tolerant genotypes. Integration of leaf wilting scores validated the reliability of these indices as accurate indicators of drought response, with tolerant genotypes exhibiting lower LWS and higher greenness indices. Overall, the study demonstrates that RGB-based high-throughput phenotyping provides a rapid, efficient and scalable method for drought tolerance assessment in roses, offering a valuable tool for accelerating selection in ornamental breeding programs.

References

  1. 1. International Trade Centre (ITC). Trade Map: Trade statistics for international business development [Internet]. 2025 [cited 2025 Jun 10]. https://www.trademap.org
  2. 2. Leus L, Van Laere K, De Riek J, Van Huylenbroeck J, editors. Rose. In: Van Huylenbroeck J, editor. Ornamental crops. Cham: Springer; 2018. p. 719–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90698-0_27
  3. 3. Datta SK. Rose. In: Rajasekaran T, editor. Floriculture and ornamental plants. Singapore: Springer Nature; 2022. p. 153–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3518-5_8
  4. 4. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Climate change 2021: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2021.
  5. 5. Chaves MM, Maroco JP, Pereira JS. Understanding plant responses to drought—from genes to the whole plant. Funct Plant Biol. 2003;30:239–64. https://doi.org/10.1071/FP02076
  6. 6. Liao WB, Yu JH, Zhang ML. Drought resistance of nine ground cover rose cultivars. Acta Hortic. 2014;1035:125–34. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2014.1035.14
  7. 7. Al-Yasi H, Attia H, Alamer K, Hassan F, Ali E, Elshazly S, et al. Impact of drought on growth, photosynthesis, osmotic adjustment and cell wall elasticity in Damask rose. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2020;150:133–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.02.038
  8. 8. Bheemanahalli R, Gajanayake B, Lokhande S, Singh K, Seepaul R, Collins P, et al. Physiological and pollen-based screening of shrub roses for hot and drought environments. Sci Hortic. 2021;282:110062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110062
  9. 9. Li L, Zhang Q, Huang D. A review of imaging techniques for plant phenotyping. Sensors. 2014;14:20078–111. https://doi.org/10.3390/s141120078
  10. 10. Singh A, Ganapathysubramanian B, Singh AK, Sarkar S. Machine learning for high-throughput stress phenotyping in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2016;21:110–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2015.10.015
  11. 11. Al-Tamimi N, Langan P, Bernád V, Walsh J, Mangina E, Negrão S. Capturing crop adaptation to abiotic stress using image-based technologies. Open Biol. 2022;12:210353. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsob.210353
  12. 12. Guo Y, Chen S, Wu Z, Wang S, Bryant CR, Senthilnath J, et al. Integrating spectral and textural information for monitoring growth of pear trees using optical images from the UAV platform. Remote Sens. 2021;13:1795. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13091795
  13. 13. ElMasry G, Wang N, Vigneault C. Detecting chilling injury in Red Delicious apple using hyperspectral imaging and neural networks. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2009;52:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2008.11.008
  14. 14. Selvaraj GM, Vergara A, Montenegro F, Ruiz HA, Safari N, Raymaekers D, et al. Detection of banana plants and their major diseases through aerial images and machine learning methods. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 2020;169:110–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.08.025
  15. 15. Briglia N, Montanaro G, Petrozza A, Summerer S, Cellini F, Nuzzo V. Drought phenotyping in Vitis vinifera using RGB and NIR imaging. Sci Hortic. 2019;256:108555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2019.108555
  16. 16. Johansen K, Morton MJL, Malbeteau YM, Aragon B, Al-Mashharawi SK, Ziliani MG, et al. UAV-based phenotyping using morphometric and spectral analysis to quantify responses of wild tomato plants to salinity stress. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10:370. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00370
  17. 17. Gao G, Tester MA, Julkowska MM. The use of high-throughput phenotyping for assessment of heat stress-induced changes in Arabidopsis. Plant Phenomics. 2020;2020:1804651. https://doi.org/10.34133/2020/3723916
  18. 18. Enders TA, St Dennis S, Oakland J, Callen ST, Gehan MA, Miller ND, et al. Classifying cold-stress responses of inbred maize seedlings using RGB imaging. Plant Direct. 2019;3:e00104. https://doi.org/10.1002/pld3.104
  19. 19. Sarkar S, Ramsey AF, Cazenave AB, Balota M. Peanut leaf wilting estimation from RGB color indices and logistic models. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:658621. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.658621
  20. 20. Gamon JA, Surfus JS. Assessing leaf pigment content and activity with a reflectometer. New Phytol. 1999;143:105–17. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.1999.00424.x
  21. 21. Elshikha DEM, Hunsaker D, Bronson K, Sanchez P. Using RGB-based vegetation indices for monitoring guayule biomass, moisture content and rubber. In: Proceedings of the 2016 ASABE Annual International Meeting; 2016; Orlando (FL): American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers; 2016. p. 1–12.
  22. 22. Sellaro R, Crepy MA, Trupkin SA, Karayekov E, Buchovsky AS, Rossi C, et al. Cryptochrome as a sensor of the blue/green ratio of natural radiation in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2010;154:401–09. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.110.160820
  23. 23. Baresel JP, Rischbeck P, Hu Y, Kipp S, Barmeier G, Mistele B, et al. Use of a digital camera for nondestructive detection of leaf chlorophyll and nitrogen status in wheat. Comput Electron Agric. 2017;140:25–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2017.05.032
  24. 24. Vincent L. Morphological grayscale reconstruction in image analysis: applications and efficient algorithms. IEEE Trans Image Process. 1993;2:176–201. https://doi.org/10.1109/83.217222
  25. 25. Kawashima S, Nakatani M. An algorithm for estimating chlorophyll content in leaves using a video camera. Ann Bot. 1998;81:49–54. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1997.0544
  26. 26. Meyer GE, Hindman TW, Lakshmi K. Machine vision detection parameters for plant species identification. Proc SPIE. 1999;3543:327–35. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.336896
  27. 27. Meyer GE. Machine vision identification of plants. In: Ng TB, editor. Recent trends for enhancing the diversity and quality of soybean products. Rijeka: IntechOpen; 2011.
  28. 28. Woebbecke DM, Meyer GE, Von Bargen K, Mortensen DA. Color indices for weed identification under various soil, residue and lighting conditions. Trans ASAE. 1995;38:259–69. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.27838
  29. 29. Sánchez-Sastre LF, Alte da Veiga NM, Ruiz-Potosme NM, Carrión-Prieto P, Marcos-Robles JL, Navas-Gracia LM, et al. Assessment of RGB vegetation indices to estimate chlorophyll content in sugar beet leaves. AgriEngineering. 2020;2:128–49. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering2010009
  30. 30. Saberioon MM, Amin MSM, Anuar AR, Gholizadeh A, Wayayok A, Khairunniza-Bejo S. Assessment of rice leaf chlorophyll content using visible bands at different growth stages. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf. 2014;32:35–45.
  31. 31. Bendig J, Yu K, Aasen H, Bolten A, Bennertz S, Broscheit J, et al. Combining UAV-based plant height from crop surface models, visible and near infrared vegetation indices for biomass monitoring in barley. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf. 2015;39:79–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2015.02.012
  32. 32. Gitelson AA, Kaufman YJ, Stark R, Rundquist D. Novel algorithms for remote estimation of vegetation fraction. Remote Sens Environ. 2002;80:76–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00289-9
  33. 33. Kazmi W, Garcia-Ruiz FJ, Nielsen J, Rasmussen J, Andersen HJ. Detecting creeping thistle in sugar beet fields using vegetation indices. Comput Electron Agric. 2015;112:10–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2015.01.008
  34. 34. Zhang L, Niu Y, Zhang H, Han W, Li G, Tang J, et al. Maize canopy temperature extracted from UAV thermal and RGB imagery and its application in water stress monitoring. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10:1270. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01270
  35. 35. De Swaef T, Maes WH, Aper J, Baert J, Cougnon M, et al. Applying RGB- and thermal-based vegetation indices from UAVs for high-throughput phenotyping of drought tolerance in forage grasses. Remote Sens. 2021;13:147. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13010147
  36. 36. Zolin Y, Popova A, Yudina L, Grebneva K, Abasheva K, et al. RGB indices can be used to estimate NDVI, PRI and Fv/Fm in wheat and pea plants under drought and salinization. Plants. 2025;14:1284. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14091284
  37. 37. Humplík JF, Lazár D, Husičková A, Spíchal L. Automated phenotyping of plant shoots using imaging methods for analysis of plant stress responses: a review. Plant Methods. 2015;11:29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-015-0072-8
  38. 38. Briglia N, Williams K, Wu D, Li Y, Tao S, Corke F, et al. Image-based assessment of drought response in grapevines. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:595. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00595
  39. 39. Wang S, Yang Y, Zeng J, Zhao L, Wang H, Chen S, et al. RGB imaging-based evaluation of waterlogging tolerance in cultivated and wild chrysanthemums. Plant Phenomics. 2025;7:100019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphe.2025.100019
  40. 40. Lussem U, Bolten A, Gnyp ML, Jasper J, Bareth G. Evaluation of RGB-based vegetation indices from UAV imagery to estimate forage yield in grassland. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spatial Inf Sci. 2018;42:1215–19. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-1215-2018
  41. 41. Nehe AS, Foulkes MJ, Ozturk I, Rasheed A, York L, Kefauver SC, et al. Root and canopy traits and adaptability genes explain drought tolerance mechanisms in winter wheat. PLoS One. 2021;16:e0242472. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242472
  42. 42. Kazemi F, Parmehr EG. Evaluation of RGB vegetation indices derived from UAV images for rice crop growth monitoring. ISPRS Ann Photogramm Remote Sens Spatial Inf Sci. 2023;10:385–92. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-X-4-W1-2022-385-2023
  43. 43. Wang Y, Yang Z, Kootstra G, Khan HA. Impact of variable illumination on vegetation indices and evaluation of illumination correction methods using UAV imagery. Plant Methods. 2023;19:51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-023-01028-8
  44. 44. El-Hendawy S, Tahir MU, Al-Suhaibani N, Elsayed S, Elsherbiny O, Elsharawy H. Potential of thermal and RGB imaging combined with neural networks for assessing salt tolerance of wheat genotypes in field conditions. Agronomy. 2024;14:1390. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14071390
  45. 45. Olivoto T, Nardino M. MGIDI: A novel multi-trait index for genotype selection in plant breeding. bioRxiv. 2020:2020.07.23.217778.
  46. 46. Al Mamun SA, Ivy NA, Khan MAI, Rehana S, Sultana MS, Adhikary SK, et al. Genotype selection from azide-induced rice mutants using multitrait genotype-ideotype distance index (MGIDI): Unveiling promising variants for yield improvement. Adv Agric. 2024;2024:5719580. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/5719580

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.