Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp1 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Bioprospecting endophytic Bacillus spp. from tomato for antagonistic potential against tomato leaf curl virus (ToLCV)

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.12827
Submitted
19 November 2025
Published
04-02-2026

Abstract

Tomato leaf curl virus (ToLCV) is one of the most destructive viral pathogens of tomato, causing severe yield losses and posing significant management challenges because of its persistent transmission by Bemisia tabaci and the rapid emergence of viral variants. In search of sustainable alternatives to chemical control, the present study investigated the antiviral potential of endophytic Bacillus spp. isolated from wild and cultivated tomato germplasm. A total of twenty-four bacterial endophytes were isolated from surface-sterilized root, stem and leaf tissues, of which six representative isolates were identified as Bacillus subtilis, B. safensis, B. pumilus and B. cereus through morphological traits and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Greenhouse-based evaluation of antiviral activity was conducted using seed priming and foliar application of bacterial culture filtrates. Seed priming with Bacillus isolates showed limited protection, with high percent disease incidence (PDI) values (90-100 %), indicating poor suppression of ToLCV. In contrast, culture filtrates demonstrated strong isolate-specific antiviral effects. Notably, B. subtilis isolates GSB1 and HLB1 recorded the lowest PDI (46.67 %), significantly delaying symptom onset and reducing disease severity, followed by moderate activity from B. safensis (HSB2). The remaining isolates showed minimal efficacy. The superior performance of culture filtrates suggests that bioactive metabolites produced by certain Bacillus strains may induce systemic resistance and/or interfere with viral infection processes. Overall, the study highlights the potential of tomato-associated endophytic Bacillus spp. particularly B. subtilis as promising candidates for developing environmentally safe biocontrol strategies against ToLCV.

References

  1. 1. Muniyappa V, Jalikop SH, Saikia AK, Chennarayappa, Shivashankar G, Bhat AI, et al. Reaction of Lycopersicon cultivars and wild accessions to tomato leaf curl virus. Euphytica. 1991;56(1):37-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00041741
  2. 2. Chowda Reddy RV, Colvin J, Muniyappa V, Seal S. Diversity and distribution of begomoviruses infecting tomato in India. Arch Virol. 2005;150(5):845-67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-004-0486-5
  3. 3. Prasad A, Sharma N, Hari-Gowthem G, Muthamilarasan M, Prasad M. Tomato yellow leaf curl virus: impact, challenges and management. Trends Plant Sci. 2020;25(9):897-911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2020.03.015
  4. 4. Chowdhury S, Mukherjee A, Basak S, Das R, Mandal A, Kundu P. Disruption of tomato TGS machinery by ToLCNDV causes reprogramming of vascular tissue-specific TORNADO1 gene expression. Planta. 2022;256(4):78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-022-03985-1
  5. 5. Ponselvakumari MK, Murugan M, Chinniah C, Karthikeyan G, Ramalingam J, Beaulah A. Assessment of tomato genotypes against the whitefly Bemisia tabaci Gennadius and tomato leaf curl virus under controlled condition. Int J Trop Insect Sci. 2024;44(2):581-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42690-024-01167-y
  6. 6. Nateshan HM, Muniyappa SH, Jalikop SH, Ramappa HK. Resistance of Lycopersicon species and hybrids to tomato leaf curl geminivirus. In: Bemisia: taxonomy, biology, damage, control and management. 1996:369-77.
  7. 7. Shankarappa KS, Sriharsha, Rangaswamy KT, Aswathanarayana DS, Prameela HA, Kulkarni RS, et al. Development of tomato hybrids resistant to tomato leaf curl virus disease in South India. Euphytica. 2008;164(2):531-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-008-9750-1
  8. 8. Prasad B, Sharma D, Kumar P, Dubey RC. Biocontrol potential of Bacillus spp. for resilient and sustainable agricultural systems. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 2023;128:102173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmpp.2023.102173
  9. 9. Gulzar AB, Hazarika KJ, Khataniar GK, Yasmin F, Mazumder PB. Exploiting the biocontrol potential of plant growth promoting Bacillus species to control plant pathogenic fungi. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 2025;102859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmpp.2025.102859
  10. 10. Kumar A, Rabha J, Jha DK. Antagonistic activity of lipopeptide-biosurfactant producing Bacillus subtilis AKP against Colletotrichum capsici. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol. 2021;36:102133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2021.102133
  11. 11. Morales-Cedeño LR, Orozco-Mosqueda MC, Loeza-Lara PD, Parra-Cota FI, Santos-Villalobos SL, Santoyo G. Plant growth-promoting bacterial endophytes as biocontrol agents of pre- and post-harvest diseases. Microbiol Res. 2021;242:126612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2020.126612
  12. 12. Sreedharan SM, Rishi N, Singh R. Microbial lipopeptides: properties, mechanics and engineering for novel lipopeptides. Microbiol Res. 2023;271:127363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2023.127363
  13. 13. Isaia HA, Clerici NJ, Brandelli A. Bacillus lipopeptides as versatile antimicrobial weapons: looking toward antiviral activity. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2025;14:1-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2025.2499152
  14. 14. Lee GH, Ryu CM. Spraying of leaf-colonizing Bacillus amyloliquefaciens protects pepper from cucumber mosaic virus. Plant Dis. 2016;100(10):2099-105. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-03-16-0314-RE
  15. 15. Sofy AR, Sofy MR, Hmed AA, El-Dougdoug NK. Potential effect of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on enhancing protection against viral diseases. In: Field crops: sustainable management by PGPR. Cham: Springer; 2019:411-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30926-8_15
  16. 16. Manjunatha L, Rajashekara H, Uppala LS, Ambika DS, Patil B, Shankarappa KS, et al. Mechanisms of microbial plant protection and control of plant viruses. Plants. 2022;11(24):3449. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11243449
  17. 17. Rojas MR, Gilbertson RL, Russell DR, Maxwell DP. Use of degenerate primers in PCR to detect whitefly-transmitted geminiviruses. Plant Dis. 1993:340-7. https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-77-0340
  18. 18. Deng D, McGrath PF, Robinson DJ, Harrison BD. Detection and differentiation of whitefly-transmitted geminiviruses by PCR. Ann Appl Biol. 1994;125(2):327-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1994.tb04973.x
  19. 19. Kaushal A, Sadashiva AT, Krishna Reddy M, Srinivasa Rao E, Singh TH, Sriram S, et al. Assessment of Ty genes against tomato leaf curl Bangalore virus. Plant Pathol. 2020;69(9):1777-86. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.13260
  20. 20. Muniyappa V, Padmaja AS, Venkatesh HM, Sharma A, Chandrashekar S, Kulkarni RS, et al. Tomato leaf curl virus resistant tomato lines TLB111, TLB130 and TLB182. HortScience. 2002;37(4):603-6.
  21. 21. Arnold AE, Maynard Z, Gilbert GS. Fungal endophytes in dicotyledonous neotropical trees. Mycol Res. 2001;105(12):1502-7. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953756201004956
  22. 22. Sahu PK, Tilgam J, Mishra S, Hamid S, Gupta A, Verma SK, et al. Surface sterilization for isolation of endophytes. J Basic Microbiol. 2022;62(6):647-68. https://doi.org/10.1002/jobm.202100462
  23. 23. Rashid S, Charles TC, Glick BR. Isolation and characterization of new plant growth-promoting bacterial endophytes. Appl Soil Ecol. 2012;61:217-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2011.09.011
  24. 24. William S, Feil H, Copeland A. Bacterial genomic DNA isolation using CTAB. Sigma. 2012;50:6876.
  25. 25. Patel R, Vinchurkar M, Patkar R, Ramesh R, Baghini MS. Identification and characterization of Ralstonia solanacearum. Proc Natl Acad Sci India B. 2023;93(3):595-601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-023-01464-5
  26. 26. Zaoti ZF, Hasan SM, Hossain M, Hasan MF, Islam MA, Khalekuzzaman M, et al. Biochemical and molecular characterization of bacterial wilt of banana. Microbiol Res J Int. 2018;22(6):1-10. https://doi.org/10.9734/MRJI/2017/38206
  27. 27. Hall TA. BioEdit: biological sequence alignment editor. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser. 1999;41:95-8.
  28. 28. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis. Mol Biol Evol. 2018;35(6):1547-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy096
  29. 29. Luo S, Wan Y, Xiao X, Guo H, Chen L, Xi Q, et al. Endophytic bacterium from Solanum nigrum and remediation potential. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;89(5):1637-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-010-2927-2
  30. 30. Varshitha K, Marappa N, Shilpa N, Reddy CL, Savithramma D. Evaluation of tomato germplasm for tomato leaf curl disease resistance. Mysore J Agric Sci. 2024;58(3):377-81.
  31. 31. Lapidot M, Friedmann M. Breeding for resistance to whitefly-transmitted geminiviruses. Ann Appl Biol. 2002;140(2):109-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2002.tb00163.x
  32. 32. Vetrivelkalai P, Sivakumar M, Jonathan EI. Biocontrol potential of endophytic bacteria on Meloidogyne incognita. J Biopestic. 2010;3(2):452. https://doi.org/10.57182/jbiopestic.3.2.452-457
  33. 33. Zaidi SS, Martin DP, Amin I, Farooq M, Mansoor S. Tomato leaf curl New Delhi virus. Mol Plant Pathol. 2017;18(7):901-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.12481
  34. 34. Sheoran OP, Tonk DS, Kaushik LS, Hasija RC, Pannu RS. Statistical software package for agricultural research workers. Am J Plant Sci. 1998;8(12):139-43.
  35. 35. Ramappa HK, Muniyappa V, Colvin J. Contribution of host plants to tomato leaf curl virus inoculum pressure. Ann Appl Biol. 1998;133(2):187-98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1998.tb05819.x
  36. 36. Khandare PM, Dhutraj DN, Ambadkar CV. Epidemiological studies of tomato leaf curl virus. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2019;8(11):688-97. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2019.811.083
  37. 37. Kefi A, Slimene IB, Karkouch I, Rihouey C, Azaeiz S, Bejaoui M, et al. Endophytic Bacillus strains from tomato with antifungal activity. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015;31(12):1967-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-015-1943-x
  38. 38. Di YN, Kui L, Singh P, Liu LF, Xie LY, He LL, et al. Characterization of Bacillus subtilis B9 from sugarcane root. J Plant Growth Regul. 2023;42(3):1720-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-022-10653-x
  39. 39. Cochard B, Giroud B, Crovadore J, Chablais R, Arminjon L, Lefort F. Endophytic PGPR from tomato roots. Microorganisms. 2022;10(4):765. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10040765
  40. 40. Kalam S, Basu A, Podile AR. Characterization of plant growth-promoting Bacillus from tomato rhizosphere. Heliyon. 2020;6(8):e04734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04734
  41. 41. Raimi A, Adeleke R. 16S rRNA gene-based identification of endophytic bacteria. Agron J. 2023;115(3):1447-62. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.21241
  42. 42. Compant S, Clément C, Sessitsch A. Plant growth-promoting bacteria in rhizo- and endosphere. Soil Biol Biochem. 2010;42(5):669-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.11.024
  43. 43. Jisha KC, Vijayakumari K, Puthur JT. Seed priming for abiotic stress tolerance. Acta Physiol Plant. 2013;35(5):1381-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-012-1186-5
  44. 44. Carr J, Loebenstein G. Natural and engineered resistance to plant viruses. Academic Press; 2010.
  45. 45. El-Gendi H, Al-Askar AA, Király L, Samy MA, Moawad H, Abdelkhalek A. Foliar application of Bacillus subtilis induces resistance against tobacco mosaic virus. Horticulturae. 2022;8(4):301. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8040301
  46. 46. Amin HA, El Kammar HF, Saied SM, Soliman AM. Effect of Bacillus subtilis on potato virus Y resistance. Eur J Plant Pathol. 2023;167(4):743-58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-023-02774-0
  47. 47. Gayathri M, Sharanya R, Renukadevi P, Nakkeeran S, Saranya N, Varanavasiappan S, et al. Antiviral nature of endophytic Bacillus spp. Front Microbiol. 2024;15:1410677. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2024.1410677
  48. 48. Hashem A, Tabassum B, Abd_Allah EF. Bacillus subtilis as plant-growth promoting rhizobacterium. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2019;26(6):1291-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2019.05.004
  49. 49. Blake C, Christensen MN, Kovács ÁT. Molecular aspects of plant growth promotion by Bacillus subtilis. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2021;34(1):15-25. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-08-20-0225-CR
  50. 50. Etesami H, Jeong BR, Glick BR. Potential use of Bacillus spp. as biostimulants. Curr Res Biotechnol. 2023;5:100128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crbiot.2023.100128

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.