Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp1 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Residual effects of integrated nutrient management on the performance of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) in maize-barley-cowpea rotation in northwestern India

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.12848
Submitted
21 November 2025
Published
14-04-2026

Abstract

Efficient nitrogen management is vital for realising potential crop productivity. Hence, a two-year field experiment (2023–24 and 2024–25) was conducted at the Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, to evaluate the residual effects of sustainable integrated nitrogen management (INM) practices applied to preceding maize and barley on growth, yield and profitability of the succeeding cowpea. Fourteen INM treatments [T1 [100 % nitrogen (N) from farmyard manure (FYM)], T2 (100 % N from FYM + residue), T3 [75 % N from FYM + 25 % from chemical fertilizer (CF)], T4 (75 % N from FYM + 25 % from CF + residue), T5 (50 % N from FYM + 50 % from CF), T6 (50 % N from FYM + 50 % from CF + residue), T7 (25 % N from FYM + 75 % from CF), T8 (25 % N from FYM + 75 % from CF + residue), T9 (100 % from CF + 25 % N extra from FYM), T10 (100 % from CF + 25 % N extra from FYM + residue), T11 (100 % from CF), T12 (100 % from CF + residue), T13 (Cowpea intercropping in maize without fertilizer + residue retention in barley) and T14 (Control)] were applied to previous crops (maize and barley). The results showed that being statistically at par with the treatments (T1, T2, T3, T4 and T5), the treatment T6 recorded significantly higher growth parameters [plant height (95.1 and 95.8 cm), LAI (3.51 and 3.52) and dry matter accumulation (38.2 and 39.0 g/plant)] and yield attributes [pods/plant (21.3 and 22.4), pod length (20.1 and 20.7 cm) and seeds/pod (11.8 and 12.0)] of cowpea over other treatments, consequently resulting in higher productivity (54.56 and 55.76 % more green pod yield over control) and economic benefits.

References

  1. 1. Bhagat R, Walia SS, Dheri GS, Singh G, Sharma K. Balanced fertilization through integrated nutrient management improves soil health, productivity and profitability in potato–maize (fodder)–maize system under Inceptisols of Indian subtropics. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2025;25:3881–900 https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-025-02372-5
  2. 2. Walia SS, Rani N, Ravisankar N, Bhagat R, Kaur T, Kaur K. Legume-based crop rotation sustains the soil biodiversity, fertility levels, productivity and profitability: evidence from a long-term study under Indian subtropical conditions. Front Agron. 2025;7:1681733 https://doi.org/10.3389/fagro.2025.1681733
  3. 3. Akshit, Kumar S, Sheoran N, Devi P, Sharma K, Kamboj E, et al. Legumes in cropping systems: a way toward agricultural sustainability and diversification. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 2024;55:596–608 https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2023.2274035
  4. 4. Shukla M, Sadhu AC, Patel P, Mevada KD. Effect of inclusion of legumes in cropping system and their residue incorporation on the yield of maize. Legume Res. 2025;48:292–8.
  5. 5. Kumar A, Saini KS, Rolaniya LK, Singh LK, Kaushik P. Root system architecture and symbiotic parameters of summer mung bean (Vigna radiata) under different conservation agriculture practices. Sustainability. 2022;14:3901 https://doi.org/10.3390/su14073901
  6. 6. Sharma K, Walia SS, Dhaliwal SS, Saini KS, Bhagat R. Residual effect of nitrogen management on succeeding summer moong (Vigna radiata) under maize–wheat–moong rotation. Indian J Agric Sci. 2023;93:762–7 https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v93i7.134678
  7. 7. Manhas SS, Kaur J, Kang JS. Residual effect of rice residue, FYM and fertilizers on growth, yield and quality of summer moong (Vigna radiata L.) in rice–potato–summer moong cropping system. Legume Res. 2025;48:1–7 https://doi.org/10.18805/LR-5484
  8. 8. Ratanoo R, Walia SS, Saini KS, Dheri GS. Residual effects of chemical fertilizers, organic manure and biofertilizers applied to preceding gobhi sarson crop on summer mung bean (Vigna radiata L.). Legume Res. 2022;45:860–5 https://doi.org/10.18805/LR-4767
  9. 9. Piper CS. Soil and plant analysis. Asian ed. Bombay (India): Hans Publishers; 1966.
  10. 10. Jackson ML. Soil chemical analysis. New Delhi (India): Prentice Hall of India Pvt Ltd; 1973. p. 498–9.
  11. 11. Walkley AJ, Black IA. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determination of soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 1934;37:29–38 https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003
  12. 12. Subbiah BV, Asija GL. A rapid procedure for estimation of available nitrogen in soil. Curr Sci. 1956;25:259–60.
  13. 13. Olsen SR, Cole CV, Watanabe FS, Dean LA. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. USDA Circ. 1954;939:1–19.
  14. 14. Krishnasree RK, Sheeja RK, Shalini PP, Kavitha GV, Jacob D, Prathapan K, et al. Nodule parameters, quality and nutrient uptake of vegetable cowpea (Vigna unguiculata subsp. unguiculata (L.) Verdc.) as influenced by foliar application of macro and micro-nutrients. Agric Sci Dig. 2022;42:604–9 https://doi.org/10.18805/ag.D-5532
  15. 15. Cochran WG, Cox GM. Experimental designs. New Delhi (India): Asia Publication House; 1967.
  16. 16. Meena RS, Yadav RS, Meena H, Kumar S, Meena YK, Singh A. Towards the current need to enhance legume productivity and soil sustainability worldwide: a book review. J Clean Prod. 2015;104:513–5 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.002
  17. 17. Dhakal Y, Meena RS, Kumar S. Effect of INM on nodulation, yield, quality and available nutrient status in soil after harvest of green gram. Legume Res. 2016;39:590–4 https://doi.org/10.18805/lr.v0iOF.9435
  18. 18. Devi U, Singh K, Kumar S, Kumar P. Residual effect of nitrogen levels, organic manures and Azotobacter inoculation in multi-cut oats on succeeding sorghum crop. Forage Res. 2015;40:254–6.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.