Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp1 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Interactive effects of soil moisture, organic amendment and herbicide application on fipronil degradation and structure functional potential of soil microbial community in tropical paddy soil

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.12860
Submitted
22 November 2025
Published
18-01-2026

Abstract

Fipronil degradation followed first-order kinetics. In sterile soil, residues declined slowly from 2.43–1.05 µg g-1 over 30 days, with 30 % dissipation and a half-life of 54.15 days. In non-sterile soil, degradation was faster, decreasing from 1.11–0.02 µg g-1, corresponding to 79.28 % dissipation and a half-life of 11.53 days. Microbial activity accelerated degradation nearly fivefold, contributing 49 % to total dissipation. Fipronil application initially suppressed bacterial and fungal populations, which recovered within 10–30 days, while actinomycetes were largely unaffected. Organic matter (OM) under flooded conditions enhanced bacterial populations (6.61 × 10⁶ CFU g-1 soil), whereas fungal populations were higher under OM at field-capacity moisture (4.04 × 10⁴ CFU g-1 soil) at 30 days after application (DAA). Enzymatic activities showed transient inhibition followed by recovery, with higher dehydrogenase activity in flooded + OM soils (105 µg triphenyl formazan (TPF)  g-1 soil 24 hr-1) and increased urease (39 mg NH₄-N g-1 soil hr-1) and phosphatase activities (61 µg PNP g-1 soil hr-1) under field capacity + OM. Herbicide application consistently suppressed microbial and enzymatic activities across all moisture regimes. Recovery of non-target microbial populations beyond control levels suggests that fipronil and its metabolites may serve as nutrient or energy sources for specific soil microorganisms.

References

  1. 1. Sarkar S, Mukherjee I. Effect of organic amendment on mobility behaviour of flupyradifurone in two different Indian soils. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2021;107:160–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-021-03209-4
  2. 2. Claire E, Wang X, Zhang Y, Li H, Chen J. Pesticide residues in agricultural soils: occurrence, distribution and ecological risk assessment. Sci Total Environ. 2023;889:164209.
  3. 3. Mukherjee A, Mondal R, Biswas S, Saha S, Ghosh S, Kole RK. Dissipation behaviour and risk assessment of fipronil and its metabolites in paddy ecosystem using GC-ECD and confirmation by GC-MS/MS. Heliyon. 2021;7(5):e06889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06889
  4. 4. Bonmatin JM, Giorio C, Girolami V, Goulson D, Kreutzweiser DP, Krupke C, et al. Environmental fate and exposure: neonicotinoids and fipronil. Environ Sci Pollut Control Ser. 2015;22(1):35–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3332-7
  5. 5. Ahmad S, Ahmad HW, Bhatt P. Microbial adaptation and impact into the pesticides degradation. Arch Microbiol. 2022;204:288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-022-02899-6
  6. 6. Yumnam D, Dutta BK, Paul SB, Sudip C. The effect of paraquat and fipronil on the soil and rhizosphere microflora of tea (Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze). Int J Innovat Appl Stud. 2014;7:1534–43.
  7. 7. Wu XU, Xu J, Dong FS, Liu XG, Zheng YQ. Responses of soil microbial community to different concentrations of fomesafen. J Hazard Mater. 2014;273:155–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.03.041
  8. 8. Wollum AG. Cultural methods for soil microorganisms. Methods Soil Analysis Part 2 Chem Microbiol Properties. 1982;9:781–814. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.2ed.c37
  9. 9. Casida LE, Klein DA, Satoro T. Soil dehydrogenase activity. Soil Sci. 1964;98:371–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-196412000-00004
  10. 10. Tabatabai MA, Bremner JM. Use of p-nitrophenyl phosphatase for assay of soil phosphatase activity. Soil Biol Biochem. 1969;1(4):301–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(69)90012-1
  11. 11. Tabatabai MA, Bremner JM. Assay of urease activity in soils. Soil Biol Biochem. 1972;4:479–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(72)90064-8
  12. 12. Anastassiades M, Lehotay SJ, Štajnbaher D, Schenck FJ. Fast and easy multiresidue method employing acetonitrile extraction/partitioning and dispersive solid-phase extraction for the determination of pesticide residues in produce. J AOAC Int. 2003;86(2):412–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoac/86.2.412
  13. 13. DG-SANTE. Guidance document on analytical quality control and method validation procedures for pesticide residues and analysis in food and feed. European Commission Document No. SANTE/11813/2017. 2017.
  14. 14. Singh NS, Sharma R, Singh SK, Singh DK. A comprehensive review of environmental fate and degradation of fipronil and its toxic metabolites. Environ Res. 2021;199:111316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.111316
  15. 15. Kumar R, Singh B. Persistence and metabolism of fipronil in rice (Oryza sativa Linnaeus) field. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2013;90(4):482–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-012-0926-y
  16. 16. Mandal K, Singh B. Persistence of fipronil and its metabolites in sandy loam and clay loam soils under laboratory conditions. Chemosphere. 2013;91(11):1596–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.12.054
  17. 17. Abraham J, Gajendiran A. Biodegradation of fipronil and its metabolite fipronil sulfone by Streptomyces rochei strain AJAG7 and its use in bioremediation of contaminated soil. Pestic Biochem Physiol. 2019;155:90–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2019.01.011
  18. 18. Rasool S, Rasool T, Gani KM. A review of interactions of pesticides within various interfaces of intrinsic and organic residue amended soil environment. Chem Eng J Adv. 2022;11:100301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceja.2022.100301
  19. 19. Gairhe B, Liu W, Batuman O, Dittmar P, Kadyampakeni D, Kanissery R. Environmental fate and behavior of the herbicide glyphosate in sandy soils of Florida under citrus production. Front Environ Chem. 2021;2:737391. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvc.2021.737391
  20. 20. Jowenna XF, Drigo B, Karpouzas DG, Doolette CL, Lombi E. Repeated applications of fipronil, propyzamide and flutriafol affect soil microbial functions and community composition: a laboratory-to-field assessment. Chemosphere. 2023;331:138850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.138850
  21. 21. Seth A, Pradhan S, Purkait S, Sinha S, Chowdhury A. Effect of fipronil, a pyrazole insecticide, on microbial biomass carbon, soil respiration, FDA and dehydrogenase activity of soil. Int J Adv Biol Res. 2016;6(3):352–6.
  22. 22. Singh S, Gupta R, Kumari M, Sharma S. Nontarget effects of chemical pesticides and biological pesticide on rhizospheric microbial community structure and function in Vigna radiata. Environ Sci Pollut Control Ser. 2015;22:11290–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4341-x
  23. 23. Sahu M, Adak T, Patil NB, Gowda GB, Yadav MK, Annamalai M, et al. Dissipation of chlorantraniliprole in contrasting soils and its effect on soil microbes and enzymes. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2019;180:288–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.05.024

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.