Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp1 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Influence of saline-tolerant arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on rice growth under varying salinity levels

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.12921
Submitted
25 November 2025
Published
26-02-2026

Abstract

An investigation was conducted from 2022 to 2024 examined native arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi in the saline wetland rice ecosystems of the Aghanashini and Kagal regions in the Uttara Kannada district, Karnataka, India. Between the two sites, Aghanashini recorded higher AM fungal diversity across all diversity indices, including the Shannon-Wiener diversity index, Margalef’s species richness index and Simpson’s dominance index. Three efficient AM fungal isolates–UASDAMFAG8 (Acaulospora mellea), UASDAMFAG10 (Glomus macrocarpum) and UASDAMFAG28 (Glomus aggregatum)–were selected based on their superior performance in phosphorus uptake, total dry biomass production and peroxidase activity in rice grown under salinity levels of 6 and 8 dS m-1 respectively. These isolates were evaluated individually and in combination under controlled microcosm conditions. The AM fungal consortium (G. macrocarpum + A. mellea + G. aggregatum) significantly enhanced plant growth parameters, mycorrhizal root colonization, total glomalin content, relative chlorophyll content, proline accumulation, phosphorus uptake and soil enzyme activities compared to the uninoculated control (UICNotably, the consortium increased proline content in rice to 13.47 and 14.06 μmol g-¹ fresh weight (FW) under 6 and 8 dS m-¹ salinity respectively. Among individual inoculants, G. macrocarpum showed the most pronounced effects across all measured parameters. The statistical interaction between AM fungi and salinity stress revealed that the AM fungal consortium effectively mitigated the adverse effects of salinity at both levels. These findings suggest that native AM fungal isolates, particularly in consortium form, can be exploited for enhancing salt tolerance and promoting sustainable rice cultivation in saline wetland ecosystems.

References

  1. 1. Bandumula N. Rice production in Asia: key to global food security. Proc Natl Acad Sci India Sect B Biol Sci. 2018; 88:1323–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-017-0867-7
  2. 2. Ahmed MF, Haider MZ. Impact of salinity on rice production in the south-west region of Bangladesh. Environ Sci: An Indian J. 2014;9(4):135–41.
  3. 3. Radanielson AM, Gaydon DS, Li T, Angeles O, Roth CH. Modeling salinity effect on rice growth and grain yield with ORYZA v3 and APSIM-Oryza. Eur J Agron. 2018; 100:44–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2018.01.015
  4. 4. Hashem A, Salwa AA, Alqarawi AA, Abd Allah EF, Egamberdieva D. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi enhance basil tolerance to salt stress through improved physiological and nutritional status. Pak J Bot. 2016; 48:37–45.
  5. 5. Hussain S, Zhang JH, Zhong C, Zhu LF, Cao XC, Yu SM, et al. Effects of salt stress on rice growth, development characteristics, and the regulating ways: a review. J Integr Agric. 2017;16(11):2357–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(16)61608-8
  6. 6. Le Tacon F, Zeller B, Plain C, Hossann C, Brechet C, Robin C. Carbon transfer from the host to Tuber melanosporum mycorrhizas and ascocarps followed using a 13C pulse-labeling technique. PLoS One. 2013;8(5): e64626. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064626
  7. 7. Zhang B, Shi F, Zheng X, Pan H, Wen Y, Song F. Effects of AMF compound inoculants on growth, ion homeostasis and salt tolerance-related gene expression in Oryza sativa L. under salt treatments. Rice. 2023; 16:18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12284-023-00635-2
  8. 8. Gaonkar S, Rodrigues BF. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal status in mangroves of Pichavaram Forest, Tamil Nadu, India. Trop Ecol. 2021; 62:538–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42965-021-00167-0
  9. 9. Zhang Q, Sun Q, Koide RT, Peng Z, Zhou J, Gu X, et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal mediation of plant–plant interactions in a marshland plant community. Sci World J. 2014; 2014:923610. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/923610
  10. 10. Sparks DL, Page AL, Helmke PA, Loeppert RH, Soltanpour PN, Tabatabai MA, et al., editors. Methods of soil analysis. Part 3: Chemical methods. Madison (WI): Soil Science Society of America & American Society of Agronomy; 1996. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.3
  11. 11. Carter MR. The influence of tillage on the proportion of organic carbon and nitrogen in the microbial biomass of medium-textured soils in a humid climate. Biol Fertil Soils. 1991; 11:135–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00336378
  12. 12. Wright SF, Upadhyaya A, Buyer JS. Comparison of N-linked oligosaccharides of glomalin from arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and soils by capillary electrophoresis. Soil Biol Biochem. 1998;30(13):1853–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(98)00047-9
  13. 13. Phillips JM, Hayman DS. Improved procedures for clearing roots and staining parasitic and vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Trans Br Mycol Soc. 1970;55(1):158–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1536(70)80110-3
  14. 14. Gerdemann JW, Nicholson TH. Spores of mycorrhizal Endogone species extracted from soil by wet sieving and decanting. Trans Br Mycol Soc. 1963;46(2):235–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1536(63)80079-0
  15. 15. Shannon CE, Weaver W. The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana (IL): University of Illinois Press; 1949.
  16. 16. Margalef R. Temporal succession and spatial heterogeneity in phytoplankton. In: Buzzati-Traverso AA, editor. Perspectives in Marine Biology. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press; 1958:323:349. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520350281-024
  17. 17. Simpson EH. Measurement of diversity. Nature. 1949; 163:688. https://doi.org/10.1038/163688a0
  18. 18. Jackson ML. Soil chemical analysis. New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India; 1973.
  19. 19. Maehly AC, Chance B. Catalases and peroxidases. Methods Biochem Anal. 1954; 1:357-424. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470110171.ch14
  20. 20. Bates LS, Waldren RP, Teare ID. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil. 1973;39:205–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00018060
  21. 21. Casida LE Jr, Klein DA, Santoro T. Soil dehydrogenase activity. Soil Sci. 1964;98(6):371–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-196412000-00004
  22. 22. Eivazi F, Tabatabai MA. Phosphatases in soils. Soil Biol Biochem. 1977;9(3):167–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(77)90070-0
  23. 23. Manoharachary C, Sridhar K, Singh R, Adholeya A, Suryanarayanan TS, Rawat S, et al. Fungal biodiversity: distribution, conservation and prospecting of fungi from India. Curr Sci. 2005;89(1):58–71.
  24. 24. Singh AK, Jamaluddin J. Status and diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and its role in natural regeneration on limestone mined spoils. Biodiversitas. 2011; 12:107–11. https://doi.org/10.13057/BIODIV/D120208
  25. 25. Krishnamoorthy R, Kim K, Kim C, Sa T. Changes of arbuscular mycorrhizal traits and community structure with respect to soil salinity in a coastal reclamation land. Soil Biol Biochem. 2014; 72:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.01.017
  26. 26. Parvin S, Van Geel M, Yeasmin T, Verbruggen E, Honnay O. Effects of single and multiple species inocula of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on the salinity tolerance of a Bangladeshi rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivar. Mycorrhiza. 2020; 30:431–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-020-00957-9
  27. 27. Abdel Latef AAH, Chaoxing H. Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on growth, mineral nutrition, antioxidant enzymes activity and fruit yield of tomato grown under salinity stress. Sci Hortic. 2011;127(3):228–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2010.09.020
  28. 28. Ahmad P, Jaleel CA, Sharma S. Antioxidant defense system, lipid peroxidation, proline-metabolizing enzymes and biochemical activities in two Morus alba genotypes subjected to NaCl stress. Russ J Plant Physiol. 2010; 57:509–17. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1021443710040084
  29. 29. Etesami H, Jeong BR, Glick BR. Contribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, phosphate-solubilizing bacteria and silicon to P uptake by plants. Front Plant Sci. 2021; 12:699618. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.699618

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.