Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Early Access

Identification of promising mutants for enhanced yield and component traits in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.) through multi-trait selection index for improved genetic gain

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.13026
Submitted
2 December 2025
Published
29-04-2026

Abstract

Brassica juncea is a major oilseed crop of substantial economic and nutritional significance, extensively utilised in food systems, edible oil extraction and diversified agricultural production. Improving its productivity remains a primary breeding objective, particularly through the development of an ideotype that integrates high yield potential with resilience and broad adaptability. The present investigation combined agronomic evaluation with genetic analysis to promote sustainable mustard improvement. Conventional multi-trait selection procedures, such as the Smith-Hazel selection index, are often constrained by multicollinearity among traits and reliance on subjective economic weights. Therefore, the multi-trait genotype-ideotype distance index (MGIDI) was adopted as a more flexible and statistically robust alternative. The experiment was conducted at the Agricultural Research Farm, BHU, Varanasi, during the rabi seasons of 2019–20 and 2020–21 using a randomised block design with three replications, where sixteen agronomic and yield-related traits were recorded. Combined analysis of variance revealed significant genetic variability among the mutants, while genotype × environment interaction was largely non-significant except for seeds per siliqua. Principal component analysis was performed to reduce the data complexity, classifying traits into five principal factors explaining 79.6 % of total variation. Application of MGIDI resulted in a cumulative genetic gain of 85.3 %, with notable improvement in secondary branches and siliqua per plant. Four mutants, TM-130, TPM-1, TM-53 and Kranti were identified as superior genotypes for future breeding, underscoring MGIDI’s effectiveness in multi-trait mustard improvement programmes.

References

  1. 1. Sehwag S, Das M. A brief overview: present status on utilization of mustard oil and cake. Indian J Tradit Knowl. 2015;14(2):244–50.
  2. 2. Sharma A, Garg M, Sharma HK, Rai PK. Mustard and its products. In: Ravindran PN, Sivaraman K, Devasahayam S, Babu KN, editors. Handbook of spices in India: 75 years of research and development. Singapore: Springer; 2024. p. 845–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3728-6_33
  3. 3. Bindumadhavi G, Gopi R. Exploitation of biofumigation and biocontrol agents for the management of soil-borne diseases. In: Singh RK, Gopala, editors. Innovative approaches in diagnosis and management of crop diseases. Volume 2: Field and horticultural crops. Palm Bay (FL): Apple Academic Press; 2021. p. 409–35. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003187837-15
  4. 4. Sur B, Rout S, Singla S, Mandal R, Nath S, Maying B, et al. Evaluation of mustard genotypes [Brassica juncea (L.) Czern and Coss] for quantitative traits and character association of seed yield and yield components at sub Himalayan region of West Bengal (India). Plant Sci Today. 2023;10(1):166–78. https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.1948
  5. 5. Rathore SS, Shekhawat K, Dass A, Kandpal BK, Singh VK. Phytoremediation mechanism in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) and its enhancement through agronomic interventions. Proc Natl Acad Sci India B Biol Sci. 2019;89(2):419–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-017-0885-5
  6. 6. Singhal T, Satyavathi CT, Kumar A, Sankar SM, Singh SP, Bharadwaj C, et al. Genotype x environment interaction and genetic association of grain iron and zinc content with other agronomic traits in RIL population of pearl millet. Crop Pasture Sci. 2018;69(11):1092–102. https://doi.org/10.1071/CP18306
  7. 7. Donald CM. The breeding of crop ideotypes. Euphytica. 1968;17(3):385–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00056241
  8. 8. Olivoto T, de Souza VQ, Nardino M, Carvalho IR, Ferrari M, de Pelegrin AJ, et al. Multicollinearity in path analysis: a simple method to reduce its effects. Agron J. 2017;109(1):131–42. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2016.04.0196
  9. 9. Olivoto T, Nardino M. MGIDI: a novel multi-trait index for genotype selection in plant breeding. BioRxiv. 2020.
  10. 10. Olivoto T, Lúcio AD. metan: an R package for multi-environment trial analysis. Methods Ecol Evol. 2020;11(6):783–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13384
  11. 11. Aruna K, Sridhara S, KL NK, Moussa IM, Elansary HO, Olivoto T. Multi-trait stability index for identification of stable green gram (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek) genotypes with MYMV resistance. Heliyon. 2024;10(12). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32763
  12. 12. Pallavi M, Prasad BM, Shanthi P, Reddy VL, Kumar AN. Multi trait genotype-ideotype distance index (MGIDI) for early seedling vigour and yield related traits to identify elite lines in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Electron J Plant Breed. 2024;15(1):120–31. https://doi.org/10.37992/2024.1501.020
  13. 13. Mawlong I, Singh VV, Ram B, Garg P, Rani R, Kumar MS, et al. Exploring biochemical traits for heat stress tolerance in Indian mustard germplasm. Vegetos. 2025;38(4):1559–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42535-024-00927-y
  14. 14. Singh AP, Majhi T, Das D, Dewanjee S. Phenotypic characterization of Indian mustard using agronomic and quality traits under semi-arid climate. Ann Appl Biol. 2024;184(3):365–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/aab.12883
  15. 15. Raj DS, Patil RS, Patil BR, Nayak SN, Pawar KN. Characterization of early maturing elite genotypes based on MTSI and MGIDI indexes: an illustration in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). J Cotton Res. 2024;7(1):25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42397-024-00187-w
  16. 16. Naveen A, Singh SP, Singhal T, Reddy S, Bhargavi HA, Yadav S, et al. Delineation of selection efficiency and coincidence of multi-trait-based models in a global germplasm collection of pearl millet for a comprehensive assessment of stability and high performing genotypes. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2025;72(4):4843–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-024-02245-3
  17. 17. Palaniyappan S, Ganesan KN, Manivannan N, Ravichandran V, Senthil N. Multi trait genotype-ideotype distance index-A tool for identification of elite parental inbreds for developing heterotic hybrids of fodder maize (Zea mays L.). Electron J Plant Breed. 2023;14(3):841–9. https://doi.org/10.37992/2023.1403.098
  18. 18. Meier C, Marchioro VS, Meira D, Olivoto T, Klein LA. Genetic parameters and multiple-trait selection in wheat genotypes. Pesq Agropec Trop. 2021;51:e67996. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-40632021v5167996
  19. 19. Uddin MS, Billah M, Afroz R, Rahman S, Jahan N, Hossain MG, et al. Evaluation of 130 eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) genotypes for future breeding program based on qualitative and quantitative traits and various genetic parameters. Horticulturae. 2021;7(10):376. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7100376
  20. 20. Benakanahalli NK, Sridhara S, Ramesh N, Olivoto T, Sreekantappa G, Tamam N, et al. A framework for identification of stable genotypes based on MTSI and MGIDI indexes: an example in guar (Cymopsis tetragonoloba L.). Agronomy. 2021;11(6):1221. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11061221
  21. 21. Woyann LG, Meira D, Matei G, Zdziarski AD, Dallacorte LV, Madella LA, et al. Selection indexes based on linear-bilinear models applied to soybean breeding. Agron J. 2020;112(1):175–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20044
  22. 22. Volpato L, Rocha JR, Alves RS, Ludke WH, Borém A, Silva FL. Inference of population effect and progeny selection via a multi-trait index in soybean breeding. Acta Sci Agron. 2020;43:e44623. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v43i1.44623
  23. 23. Karthik R, Hanamaratti NG. Multivariate analysis and multitrait genotype-ideotype distance index (MGIDI) for selection of promising genotypes under drought stress in post rainy sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench). Electron J Plant Breed. 2025;16(1):57–69. https://doi.org/10.37992/2025.1601.007
  24. 24. Mamun AA, Islam MM, Adhikary SK, Sultana MS. Resolution of genetic variability and selection of novel genotypes in EMS induced rice mutants based on quantitative traits through MGIDI. Int J Agric Biol. 2022;28:100–12. https://doi.org/10.17957/IJAB/15.1957
  25. 25. alalifar R, Sabouri A, Mousanejad S, Dadras AR. Estimation of genetic parameters and identification of leaf blast-resistant rice RILs using cluster analysis and MGIDI. Agronomy. 2023;13(11):2730. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13112730

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.